Media in the middle of political skirmishes over sickness and health
Photo:
Sunday Star Times
Mediawatch
: This week the
latest Ipsos Issues Monitor survey
showed 'inflation/cost of living' was - again - the top concern of Kiwis.
No surprise there - or that 'healthcare/hospitals' was in second place.
"It continues on its upward trend, reaching its highest level of concern (43 percent) since tracking began," Ipsos said.
That - and the fact that more of those surveyed chose Labour as the party most capable of managing health - would have stood out for the government. The same is true of how the issue plays out in the media.
Under the headline
The political problem of health
Health Minister Simeon Brown told the
Sunday Star-Times
last weekend the job "matters to every New Zealander from the moment they're born to the moment they die. It's a huge responsibility, but there's also significant opportunity."
He'd just announced an opportunity for private hospitals - instructing Health NZ to make long-term deals with them for elective surgeries.
"We haven't been ideological about it, we've been focusing on pragmatic solutions to ... maximise what's delivered both in the public and private system," Brown told Newstalk ZB the same day.
The next day,
New Zealand Herald
political editor
Thomas Coughlan reported
official papers showed Treasury reckoned further cuts to health would be needed to meet the demands of the government's health delivery plan.
But that didn't come up when the prime minister appeared that day on Newstalk ZB for his regular Monday morning chat.
The host Mike Hosking said he couldn't agree more when the PM said people don't care who's doing their long awaited op when they are staring at the hospital ceiling.
But then Hosking told the prime minister about an interview last week with a Christchurch surgeon who works in both the public and the private systems.
"We need to be more flexible in public (hospitals). They even come round at one o'clock and say it looks like you'll finish after 4 or 4.30, so we won't let you do your second case," Chris Wakeman told Hosking last week.
"You wouldn't close your factory at 4 o'clock if you still had work to do," he added.
Later, Mike Hosking read out a text from an unnamed listener who claimed nurses and anaesthetic technicians insist operating stops early if it looks like it's going to go past 4pm.
The following day Mike Hosking
asked Brown
if surgeries that might overrun 4pm were routinely postponed.
"Look, there are heavily unionised contractual arrangements in the public system and so you do end up with inefficiencies throughout the system. Those issues need to be dealt with by Health New Zealand to make sure that it is more efficient," Brown replied.
"These union agreements ... drive inefficiency and a lack of productivity. These are issues that do need to be resolved as part of (Health New Zealand) negotiations with the unions."
Health Minister Simeon Brown
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
"Absolutely not. The limits are more about management decisions on staffing costs, availability of recovery beds and how to distribute operating theatres between acute and elective work," Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists told
Mediawatch
.
"The barrier to providing more elective surgeries is a refusal to pay staff required to work longer hours ... and inability to provide sufficient staff to run our operating theatres to their maximum capacity."
"We don't have anything in place that would stand in the way of doctors opting to work in a different work pattern or longer hours. And in fact, many of them frequently do.
"Typically surgeons and anaesthetists work 10 hour days. A number of hospitals sometimes run what are sometimes called twilight theatres in the early evening or on weekends.
"I don't think the way that the discussion has been presented is entirely fair - and it is somewhat misleading.
"It is concerning to us that 'private' is seen as the answer when in fact they are already near capacity for what they can do. And we also have significant doctor shortages."
Sarah Dalton
Photo:
LDR / Stuff / Kevin Stent
Hosking [https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/mike-hosking-breakfast/audio/richard-sullivan-health-nz-chief-clinical-officer-on-surgeries-not-being-performed-past-4pm/
returned to the issue] with Health NZ's Chief Clinical Officer Dr Richard Sullivan on Thursday.
He said the proportion of "early finishes" in theatres doing elective surgery is declining - and under the government's 'elective boost' programme they had been doing some surgeries on Saturdays and Sundays too.
"It's more than just the unions. You'd need a quite a big workforce to run full Saturday lists all the time. That's not to say we shouldn't look at that, but we need the most efficient way of getting people through our theatres," Dr Sullivan said.
Hosking told his listeners the bottom line in public hospitals was: "If it's 4:30, we're going home."
There's a bit more to it than that.
While there is some extra capacity in theatres, many more people would have to be paid for more hours to do more out-of-business-hours. They don't have all the staff to do a lot more of elective surgeries, in either public or private hospitals
And as
the Herald'
s Thomas Coughlan reported earlier this week, Treasury reckoned the Health Delivery Plan targets could mean increased spending cut targets in the year ahead. Health workforce pay increases would be limited to a degree described as "unprecedented," Treasury documents also stated.
In the
Herald
, Brown rejected Treasury's conclusions. He said government provided Health NZ
additional funding
in three successive Budgets and Treasury had not consulted the Ministry of Health or Health NZ before reaching its conclusions.
"Why do we still have 10 days' sick leave?" Hosking also asked the PM last Monday.
He said the question had been put to him by "my tech guy" working at his house.
The tech guy got a headline-making response on that from the nation's leader.
"So we had five sick days until Jacinda [Ardern] decided we needed ten for Covid. Can we agree that it's gone-ish - and therefore we might need to do something about sick leave?" Hosking asked.
"We might need to do things about pro rata and sick leave as well, because you know, people who are on part time contracts are getting full-time 10-day equivalency. Brook Van Velden is working through some of those issues," Luxon replied.
The possibility of that went straight into Newstalk ZB's news bulletins.
When the prime minister did his turn on RNZ's
Morning Report
soon after that, he was asked if he would support a cut in sick leave.
"Well, I think there's probably a need for us to look at it ... and just make sure that we've got that setting right," he replied.
ZB's political editor Jason Walls was puzzled.
"Sick leave is an entitlement that everybody has. So it's not just some beltway story. It is an interesting thing for the Prime Minister to bring up. It was just Mike's mate that was talking about it."
But Mike's mates behind the mic at Newstalk ZB were teed up to talk about sick leave all day.
"A very strong hint that 10 days of sick leave might be going the way of the dodo," was Kerre Woodham's take when she followed the
Mike Hosking Breakfast
.
"I get that it's a godsend if you are prone to infections during winter, but really spare a thought for the employers."
Employers such as perhaps Nick Mills, a hospo guy in the capital who's also the host of
Wellington Mornings
on Newstalk ZB.
"I go with the flow. But I'm in an industry where people take the absolute mickey," Mills told his listeners in the capital.
"They're just teasing it a bit at the moment on the fact that it's going to be for only part- time employees, but that's going to change," he said.
One hour later they were hearing more on this on ZB in Canterbury from the local host, John MacDonald.
When Matt Heath and Tyler Adams took the ZB mic for the full national ZB network at noon, they had a similar sense of what was common sense.
"10 days a year? Does the average person walking around need 10 sick days a year? I don't think so," Heath said.
The questions for the workplace relations minister Brooke van Velden followed.
On
ThreeNews
and
Checkpoint
she batted back questions about whether it was a gender issue. She was also taken aback that this was a talking point at all.
"The only reason we're talking about this is because Mike Hosking was talking about it this morning. There was nothing from the government side to say we had an announcement to make," she told
ThreeNews
.
In the end it will be months before all this is fully aired in Parliament, long after Mike Hosking's tech guy first put it on the agenda.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
26 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Invercargill mayor thought brother was 'taking the mickey' with bid for top job
Andrew Clark, who also goes by middle name Maxwell, is standing for mayor at opposite ends of the South Island. Photo: Supplied Invercargill mayoral candidates are questioning the motive behind the current mayor's brother's decision to stand for the city's top job. Not only is Andrew Clark going by two names - he is also running for mayor in two regions. Outgoing Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark's brother is known as Max Clark in Tasman, where he lives and hopes to become mayor. But other candidates seeking the Invercargill mayoral chains are familiar with an Andrew Clark, after he turned up at a code of conduct hearing to discuss Nobby's behaviour last year. During the meeting, he made his way to the council table uninvited, to introduce himself and thank them for their support. Deputy mayor Tom Campbell called the tilt for Invercargill's mayoralty a strange move and said he found Andrew "a slightly strange guy". Councillor Alex Crackett said the real test would be whether the community saw genuine commitment. "I think it's been done to elicit a bit of a response. But the real question is whether it's wanted - and that's up to the community to decide which candidates have shown commitment, and are genuinely in it for the long haul," she said. But Andrew Clark said he was brimming with ideas for Invercargill. "I'm very passionate about the people, the economics and the environment of Invercargill. And that's why I'm standing." Nobby was not convinced : "I thought he was taking the mickey, to be honest." He said he was caught unawares by the move, and he was concerned his brother might be leveraging off the family name - which would not be fair on the other candidates. Andrew Clark said that was not the case and that members of the local business community encouraged him to run - although he would not say who. He said he phoned his brother the night before announcing his bid. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Parents cautiously optimistic about waving goodbye to NCEA
Education Minister Erica Stanford and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announce changes to NCEA. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro A Dunedin mum is hopeful the changes to NCEA will benefit her Year 7 son, but another says she's a "bit scared". The government has pulled the pin on New Zealand's official secondary-school qualification after more than 20 years. The National Certificate of Educational Achievement will be gone by 2030, replaced by a basic literacy and numeracy award at Year 11, and the Certificate of Education and Advanced Certificate of Education at Years 11 and 12. 'Achieved', 'not achieved', 'merit' and 'excellence' will be replaced by marks out of 100 and letter grades A, B, C, D and E. The new certificates would be standards-based, like the NCEA is, meaning every student passes if they demonstrate the required knowledge or skills, but they would have to study at least five complete subjects and pass four of them to get their certificate. A Dunedin mum, who RNZ has agreed not to name to protect the identity of her child, was optimistic about the move . "It will be an advantage to him because it gives that nice, stringent 'I know what I need to head for, I need to study really hard for this'." She called NCEA a "step backwards", saying the change was a return of a more structured way of learning and a focus on core subjects . "As an employer of people coming out of university, I can tell you it kind of sets them up a little bit for failure in real life," she said. "I find that the English levels, the maths levels and science levels coming out for students just isn't quite as good as some of the historical stuff that I've seen coming out of the older styles." Another mum, who has a son just starting university and a daughter in Year 9, said the NCEA system was confusing. "Even I couldn't understand this credit system and achieved system. I always thought 'what is this? Credits? Credits?'. "But one thing I've noticed, if he knows he has got enough credits, then he decides he's not going to work any harder." The new grading system could push them to study harder or discourage them from learning, she said. "As a parent, I am a bit scared, to be honest." She was uncertain how students would respond to the changes, saying it would depend on how they were implemented. A grandmother who lived with her Year 8 grandson said she was on board with the changes if they helped students. "That's what I would be hoping for. Something that makes it easier for the kids to show that they've really, really tried and that they do want to be at school and they want to learn and that they want to get a job when they get away from school, and that they want a better life." But she was worried some students might choose to drop out if they had to pass four of their five subjects to get one of the new certificates. "That does sound a bit tough because if a child or a young adult can't handle exams - to pass four subjects may just be beyond their capability," she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Three staff involved in pharmacy error that led to two-month-old's death
Bellamere Duncan died at Starship Hospital on 19 July. Photo: Supplied An intern pharmacist misread the prescribed dosage of medication for a two-month-old baby who later died from an overdose, RNZ can reveal. Afterwards, a trainee technician, who was handling a phosphate product for the first time, did not notice the dosage error. Then a registered pharmacist who carried out the final check did not pick up that the prescription was for an infant and that it was new medication. The intern pharmacist has since been suspended, and the registered pharmacist has resigned. The baby's parents say they do not blame the intern pharmacist for their daughter's death, and say he should have had more support. "It just makes no sense that he was left to make up these prescriptions without having someone there with him making sure that he is filling out each one correctly." RNZ earlier revealed Bellamere Arwyn Duncan died at Starship Hospital on 19 July. A Manawatū pharmacy dispensed an adult dosage of phosphate to the two-month-old's parents. A coroner's preliminary opinion is she died from phosphate toxicity. The revelations have prompted the Ministry of Health and Health New Zealand to "urgently" undertake a joint review into the incident with Medsafe visiting the pharmacy to ensure it was safe to continue operating. The Pharmacy Council, which is also investigating, said it was "clear that an awful error has occurred". On Friday, the owner of the Manawatū Pharmacy emailed Bellamere's parents with a summary of what happened. "Once again, we recognise the immense impact of our error on you and your family," the email began. Bellamere Duncan's parents were given an adult dosage of phosphate by the pharmacy. Photo: Supplied The owner said the pharmacy's standard dispensing process involved intern pharmacists entering each prescription into the dispensary computer. The pharmacy used a dispensing system called Toniq. A technician would then use the information in Toniq and the prescription to identify the medication and put the correct amounts in containers. The labels were then printed out and placed in a basket with the original prescription and the medication. A registered pharmacist would then check the prescription, the labels and the medication itself before it was given to the patient. The owner said the pharmacy received the prescription by email on 1 July from Palmerston North Hospital. The prescription was entered into Toniq by an intern pharmacist. "This person unfortunately misread the prescribed dosage and entered the prescription dose as '1 tablet twice daily' rather than '1.2 mmol twice daily'," the owner said. The Toniq system then generated an original label for the prescription. "This includes a warning label with the patient's age, if they are under 18 years old, and if the patient has not been prescribed the medication before. "The second warning prompts the checking pharmacist to counsel (speak with) the patient or their caregiver about how to take the medication." The product was supplied in tubes of 20 tablets. The trainee technician printed out three further labels. They were to be placed on the three tubes that were being dispensed. "This was the trainee technician's first time handling a phosphate product. She was also unfamiliar with the mmol dosage. She did not notice the dosage error as a result. She put the original prescription, labels and the medication in a basket on the dispensing bench for the registered pharmacist to check. "Unfortunately, the original label and the warning label was not kept with other items." The registered pharmacist who carried out the final check did not pick up that the medication was for an infant, the owner said. "In addition, it was not identified that this was a new medication. The fact that the warning label was not retained contributed to this error." The owner said the intern pharmacist had been suspended by the Pharmacy Council. The registered pharmacist had taken leave and then resigned. "This person does not intend to return to work in the immediate future," the owner said. Bellamere Duncan's parents are calling for a law change that would make it mandatory for medication to be checked by two people before it is dispensed. Photo: 123RF The pharmacy was "urgently re-evaluating our dispensing and checking protocols and reinforcing safety checks at every stage". "We are actively recruiting additional staff to help manage our workloads. In addition, we are engaging an independent pharmacist from outside the Manawatū region to conduct a full review of our dispensing procedures and provide further guidance on system improvements." The owner said the pharmacy was "fully co-operating" with investigations being carried out by Medsafe, the Pharmacy Council and the police on behalf of the coroner. The owner signed off the email with "heartfelt apologies and regret". Speaking to RNZ on Monday, Bellamere's parents Tempest Puklowski and Tristan Duncan said after reading the email they did not blame the intern pharmacist for what happened. "My first initial reaction after reading it was I felt really bad for the intern," Puklowski said. "I don't blame him for the mistakes. I blame whoever was meant to be looking over his shoulder, whoever put him in that responsibility and just left him to it." Puklowski said it should have been picked up that the medication was for a baby. "It just seems like there's something lacking there that could have avoided it being missed or messed up," she said. Duncan said the system "needs to be better". Tempest said she remained "frustrated and angry" about her daughter's death. "It's just an endless sort of questioning of how and where it went wrong, to the point of, yeah, how could it have been avoided? "Obviously, those questions don't do much now, which then brings on the sadness of just knowing that she could still be here if these things were pulled up on initially, if maybe the intern wasn't left just to do the job by themselves. Or if you know something else is put in place, we would've never even gotten it and then we wouldn't be beating ourselves up for giving it to her." Duncan said the past two weeks since Bellamere's death had been "really hard". "Just empty is the only word that really comes to mind," he said. "It's unfair. Just stolen away by a singular document. That's what it comes down to." Puklowski said the couple "don't really know what to do with ourselves really". They were now waiting to see what happened with the multiple investigations that are under way. "I want things to change," Duncan said. In a statement to RNZ on Friday Pharmacy Council chief executive Michael Pead said whenever the Pharmacy Council received a notification of an incident, it began an "initial enquiry" to assess the situation. "At the start of any enquiry, our focus is on ensuring there is no further risk to public safety. There are many ways to achieve this, including suspension of the pharmacist or pharmacists involved or a voluntary agreement that the individual/s will stop working." In order to ensure the inquiry into Bellamere's death was "fair and thorough", and to avoid pre-empting any findings, the council could not provide any further details. "We can confirm that the Pharmacy Council is comfortable that immediate steps have been taken to prevent the risk of further harm while the enquiry is ongoing." While in hospital Puklowski gave Bellamere her drops for Vitamin D. Nurses also administered her phosphate. When they left hospital they were given some Vitamin D in a little bottle, and a prescription for iron and Vitamin D. The following day Duncan went to a Manawatū pharmacy with the prescriptions. He was given the iron, but said the pharmacy refused to give the Vitamin D as the staff thought the dosage was "too high for her age and her weight". The staff said they would call the neonatal unit and follow-up. A few days later Puklowski received a call from the unit to organise a home care visit. During the call she was asked if she had any concerns, and Puklowski asked if they had been contacted about the Vitamin D. They had not, and said they would follow up and rewrite the prescription along with a prescription for phosphate. A day after the phone call, on 2 July, Duncan went to the pharmacy to collect the medication and came home with just the phosphate. Unbeknown to the parents they had been given an adult dosage of phosphate. The label on the medication directed them to dissolve one 500mg tablet of phosphate twice daily in a glass of water. That evening they gave Bellamere her first dose of the medicine in her formula water. They would give her three bottles in 24 hours as was recommended. The couple noticed in that period that her eating was off, and thought she was "extra gassy," Puklowski said. "She was still feeding fine. She just wasn't maybe going through a whole bottle compared to what she was," she recalled. Then, the day after she got her first dosage Bellamere suddenly stopped breathing. Bellamere was taken to hospital and rushed to the emergency department. Once she was stabilised she was taken to the neonatal unit where she stayed overnight before she was flown to Starship Hospital. The couple had taken a bottle of the medicine with them to Starship Hospital. She gave it to the staff who saw that they had been given an adult dose. The staff then requested the original prescription which confirmed the script had been written with the correct dosage, but somehow the pharmacy had given the wrong dosage Puklowski said. "I keep thinking about how much she ended up having and it just makes me feel sick." Tragically, Bellamere died at Starship Hospital on 19 July. On Wednesday, a Ministry of Health spokesperson told RNZ there were a number of investigations underway. "Medsafe has completed an urgent assessment and is comfortable there is no immediate patient safety issue at the pharmacy. Medsafe will continue to work with Health New Zealand and these findings which will inform the information provided to the coroner. Medsafe is also sharing information with the Pharmacy Council. "Once these reviews are completed, we will be able to look at next steps." Health Minister Simeon Brown earlier told RNZ he raised the incident with the Director-General of Health as soon as he was made aware. "She assured me that there would be an investigation undertaken by both the Ministry of Health and Health New Zealand. That investigation is underway. "I am advised that this incident has led to Medsafe undertaking an urgent assessment of the pharmacy. A further investigation is being undertaken by the Pharmacy Council, and the death is also the subject of a Coroner's inquest." Health agencies would provide information to the coroner as needed to support the inquest. "It is important that the reviews are undertaken, and that the circumstances that led to this incident are understood. I expect that these investigations may propose recommendations, and that these will be reviewed once reports are complete." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.