Ex-Brazil president Bolsonaro must wear monitoring device: Supreme Court
Judge Alexandre de Moraes, a Bolsonaro adversary who is overseeing the trial now in its final stages, said the far-right leader and his son Eduardo had incited "hostile acts" against Brazil.
Bolsonaro is accused of seeking to stay in power by overturning the 2022 election won by his left-wing opponent, current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
He lashed out at the monitoring device order, calling it a "supreme humiliation."
The case is an extraordinary reckoning for a country still haunted by a two-decades-long military dictatorship that ended in 1985.
It has also thrust Brazil into an escalating row with the United States, where President Donald Trump is using trade tariffs to try and pressure the court to end the trial.
Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's 2022 plot failed only because the military did not side with him.
Violent supporters then rioted, rampaging through government buildings in the capital Brasilia in scenes that echoed the assault on the US Capitol by Trump's supporters after the Republican lost to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020.
On Tuesday, the prosecution told the top court that former army officer Bolsonaro and seven others were guilty of participating in "armed criminal association" and had sought to "violently overthrow the democratic order."
A five-justice panel is now set to decide the fate of the former president. If found guilty, Bolsonaro and his co-defendants could face up to 40 years in prison.
Trump has repeatedly called on social media for Bolsonaro's "witch hunt" trial to be halted.
On Thursday, Trump published a letter addressed to Bolsonaro saying that "the trial should end immediately!" and calling the right-wing leader "highly respected."
On July 9, Trump ramped up his pressure campaign by announcing plans to tariff Brazilian imports to the United States at 50 percent.
Washington also says it is opening an investigation into "unfair trading practices" by Brazil, a move that could provide a legal basis to justify imposing tariffs on South America's largest economy.
Unlike the tariffs Trump is slapping on countries around much of the world, including top US allies, the measures against Brazil -- which are set to take effect on August 1 -- were announced in openly political terms.
Trump cited "Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections," among other issues, warning of further escalation if the country retaliated -- something Lula indicated would happen.
Lula called Trump's tariffs threat "unacceptable blackmail."
"Brazil has only one owner: the Brazilian people," the leftist president said on Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa reassures on trade ties with Russia amidst looming US tariffs
Following Trump's statement that US imports from Russia could face a staggering 100% tariff if peace talks regarding the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict do not bear fruit within 50 days, worries have mounted over what this means for countries engaging in commerce with Russia, including South Africa. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) has sought to allay concerns regarding South Africa's trading relationship with Russia in the wake of US President Donald Trump's recent tariff ultimatum. Following Trump's statement that US imports from Russia could face a staggering 100% tariff if peace talks regarding the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict do not bear fruit within 50 days, worries have mounted over what this means for countries engaging in commerce with Russia, including South Africa. Russia produces 10% of the world's crude, and it has been able to sell oil through discounted sales to China, India, Brazil and Turkey. According to the International Energy Agency Russia earned $192 billion from oil sales last year despite western sanctions. The oil price heading for its first weekly loss in three weeks last week after Trump gave Russia a 50-day ceasefire deadline, with the Brent crude falling by 0.5% to $69.21 per barrel by Sunday. South Africa, a member of the BRICS economic bloc alongside Russia, has already been grappling with the ramifications of heightened tariffs on its exports to the US. With negotiations currently underway concerning 30% tariffs affecting key sectors – from citrus and wines to minerals and automotive exports – the last thing South Africa desires is further complications on the trade front. Despite its modest reliance on Russian imports, the figures tell a nuanced story. South Africa's bilateral trade with Russia has seen only a 7% increase, climbing from $806 million in 2023 to $864m in 2024. In a wider context, Russia ranks as South Africa's 46th largest export destination and the 39th largest source of imports. This limited trade relationship implies that although Russia is an important ally in the BRICS bloc, the economic stakes remain relatively low. The geopolitical battleground may complicate future transactions; however, the South African government remains keenly aware of the need to sustain a stable trading relationship with Russia while juggling the demands of the US market. The dtic indicated that the dissimilarities in trade profile between South Africa and Russia may serve as a buffer against potential US sanctions. South African exports have notably surged by 5%, reflecting the resilience of its agricultural products in Russian markets. Items such as citrus fruits, apples, and even consumer goods like refrigerators have managed to penetrate the Russian economy. This expansion comes at a time when Western sanctions have compelled Russia to pivot towards alternative markets, with increasing reliance on discounted energy sales to nations such as China, India, and Turkey. However, the dtic reiterated that while the unilateral sanctions imposed by the US and EU on Russia did not directly bind South Africa, they carried an extraterritorial effect. This means that South African companies engaging in trade with Russia may face repercussions, including the inability to do business in the US and EU. Notably, some Russian banks have been removed from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system, presenting barriers in banking relations and payment infrastructures for South African businesses. The dtic highlighted that despite sanctions affecting various sectors, there remains a segment of legal trade that continues unhindered. This gives South Africa a unique opportunity to bolster its agricultural exports to Russia, particularly at a time when Russia has imposed bans on food imports from several Western nations. 'There are certain products, banks, individuals, and companies that are not under sanctions. The sectors not under sanctions and legal trade can take place include: food, agricultural commodities, medicines and medical supplies,' said Yandeya Mashau, director for Europe trade relations at the dtic. 'The Russian nuclear industry remained exempt from sanctions and the national nuclear company Rosatom remained the largest actor in the international market for nuclear reactor construction (also playing key roles in nuclear fuel supplies, nuclear equipment supplies, and handling nuclear waste) 'Currently, SA banks are reluctant to finance transactions with Russia, even in products and sectors not under sanctions. According to Russia, 70% of bilateral trade takes place via third countries such as Turkey, Azerbaijan, Latvia, UAE, Qatar, etc. 'Therefore, although there are sanctions, trade can still take place. Russia responded with sanctions against several countries, including a total ban on food imports from Australia, Canada, Norway, Japan, the United States, the EU and the United Kingdom. This creates an opportunity for SA to supply agricultural products to Russia.' Michael Hewson, director at specialist African transfer pricing advisory firm, Graphene Economics, said Trump's focus on introducing new tariffs and his swift changes of direction regarding implementation of these tariffs had triggered retaliatory actions from certain trade partners and injected fresh uncertainty into global markets. 'Multinational enterprises (MNEs) that are manufacturing in Africa and then distributing into the USA will need to consider their value chains,' Hewson said. 'For example, imagine a South African company that manufactures automotive components and sells them to its sister company in the United States, which then sells the completed vehicles to American customers. The price at which the South African company sells the parts to its US counterpart is the 'transfer price'. The ripple effects of tariff-driven supply chain realignments and transfer pricing adjustments can be significant for African economies.' BUSINESS REPORT
TimesLIVE
15 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump, Xi might meet ahead of or during October APEC summit in South Korea, SCMP reports
US President Donald Trump might visit China before going to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit between October 30 and November 1, or he could meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC event in South Korea, the South China Morning Post reported on Sunday citing multiple sources. The two countries have been trying to negotiate an end to an escalating tit-for-tat tariff war that has upended global trade and supply chains. Trump has sought to impose tariffs on US importers for virtually all foreign goods, which he says will stimulate domestic manufacturing and which critics say will make many consumer goods more expensive for Americans. He has called for a universal base tariff rate of 10% on goods imported from all countries, with higher rates for imports from the most "problematic" ones, including China: imports from there now have the highest tariff rate of 55%. Trump has set a deadline of August 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariffs agreement. A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to a request for comment about the reported plans for a meeting with Xi in the fall. The two countries' most recent high-level meeting was on July 11, when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had what both described as a productive and positive meeting in Malaysia about how trade negotiations should proceed. Rubio noted then that Trump had been invited to China to meet with Xi, and said that both leaders "want it to happen." On Friday, China Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said China wants to bring its trade ties with the US back to a stable footing and that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war.
Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Was Trump's Africa summit just outsourcing America's immigration problem?
The US president reportedly asked the five African nations at his summit to accept third-country asylum seekers. United States (US) President Donald Trump hosted a mini-summit with five African leaders in the White House last week. It was surprising that he met with African leaders at all, given his stance towards the continent. His choice of countries was also interesting — why Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia and Gabon? Trump told the delegates his administration was 'committed to strengthening our friendships in Africa through economic development efforts that benefit both the US and our partners. And we're shifting from aid to trade,' noting that he had just scrapped the US Agency for International Development (USAid). As to the five countries in attendance, he said they all had 'great land, great minerals, oil deposits', and that he wanted to discuss security. Trump encouraged the leaders to invest more in defence and to 'keep pursuing the fight against terrorism, which is a big problem in Africa'. 'Immigration will also be on the agenda, and I hope we can bring down the high rates of people overstaying visas, and also make progress on the Safe Third Country Agreements.' The supposed wealth of these five countries in critical minerals has been offered as the main reason for their invitation. Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani said his country had 'minerals, rare earths, rare minerals', including manganese, uranium and probably lithium, and was the second-largest African iron ore producer. Liberian President Joseph Boakai also said his country had many minerals and asked for US help in surveying them. Trump added an unintentional comic note by commending Boakai for his 'beautiful English'. He asked where Boakai had learnt to speak it — seemingly unaware that English is Liberia's official language. The country was, after all, founded in the 19th century by free slaves from the US. Critical minerals Gabon's President Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema also stressed that his country had oil and gas and critical minerals, including manganese, and invited the US to invest in processing it locally, including building the necessary electricity capacity. He said that if the US did not invest, others would. And he appealed to Trump to help Gabon stop maritime piracy in the Gulf of Guinea. Senegal's President Bassirou Diomaye Faye noted that the US was conducting a geological survey in Senegal to help assess the potential of minerals. He added that thanks to US companies, Senegal had discovered oil and about 950 billion cubic metres of gas. So critical and other minerals, and oil and gas, were clearly a factor in the choice of the five. So was security in a chronically insecure region. Some believe the US is looking for countries to host its military bases after Niger's junta forced out the US hub at Agadez. Trump also boasted about the recent US-brokered peace deal between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda. Most of the African leaders thanked him for this, urging him to fulfil his intention to likewise broker peace in Sudan and Libya. But was immigration to the US — a key domestic issue for Trump — the real heart of the matter? The Wall Street Journal reported that before the summit, the US administration sent the five countries requests to accept deportees from the US whose home countries refused them or were slow to take them back. According to an internal document seen by The Wall Street Journal, the African countries would have to agree not to return transferred asylum seekers 'to their home country or country of former habitual residence until a final decision has been made' on their claims for asylum in the US. This arrangement appears similar to that between the former Conservative United Kingdom (UK) government and Rwanda, but which was scrapped last year by the Labour government, which said the deal had not deterred migrants to the UK. Reports say America previously tried to persuade Nigeria to accept an agreement with Venezuelan deportees — but Abuja refused. This might suggest that Trump is turning to smaller, perhaps more pliable, countries to try to persuade them to accept asylum seekers or deportees. The Guardian reported on Wednesday that five men from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Cuba and Yemen — convicted of crimes ranging from child rape to murder — had arrived in Eswatini on a Safe Third Country deportation flight from the US. On 4 July, the US deported eight men convicted of violent crimes to South Sudan. It is unclear how the five African governments responded to Trump's request, and none mentioned it in the public part of the meeting. Two overlapping goals Institute for Security Studies (ISS) Research Officer Zenge Simakoloyi said Trump's summit seemed mainly to have two overlapping goals: to test the waters on processing asylum seekers offshore, and to diversify US critical mineral supply chains away from China. Nigeria's rejection of the Venezuelans suggested that externalising the US immigration problem would be difficult, he said. According to Aimée-Noël Mbiyozo, ISS Migration Senior Research Consultant: 'There are no good precedents for outsourcing asylum processes.' She noted that the Australian effort to do so had cost at least A$1-billion annually since 2012, and had 'failed to achieve all its objectives, including stopping people smuggling'. Simakoloyi noted that countering China in African trade and mineral access was a hallmark of US foreign policy in Africa, as evidenced by the Lobito Corridor carrying minerals from Zambia and the DRC to be exported from Angola. He suggested Senegal's President Faye could serve the US as a diplomatic bridge to the Sahel's juntas, as Senegal had established a rapport with Mali and Burkina Faso's military governments. Trump's shift from aid to trade and investment in Africa is in principle a good idea, though the abrupt termination of aid has caused significant distress on the continent. (Unconfirmed reports this week suggest that Pepfar – the US programme against HIV/Aids — may be reinstated.) But how the US trades and invests in Africa will be critical. As Gabon's Nguema told Trump: 'We also want our raw materials to be processed locally in our country so that we can create value and to create jobs for youth so that they stop dying. They are crossing the sea, the ocean to go to other countries.' That would be a more constructive and ethical approach to relations than outsourcing the asylum process and dumping criminals from other countries onto Africa. DM
