Political modernisation; no turning back
If there is a problem with a specific organization or political party, the solution is not to abandon the entire course, but rather to uphold one simple principle: the rule of law—applied to all without exception. This applies both to the case currently headed for the judiciary and to defining the relationship with the IAF in accordance with the Political Parties Law. It also extends to the Muslim Brotherhood organization, which no longer has legal standing or formal political representation. If it still exists on the ground, it is due to the tolerance of successive governments and Jordan's consistent preference for containment and leniency. However, it has become increasingly clear over the past few years that the official direction is shifting toward a decisive "surgical" correction of the situation. This involves applying the rule of law and enforcing the definitive judicial decisions issued in 2020, and demanding clear and unambiguous self-definition from any party, especially concerning its internal role and severance of any ambiguous external affiliations.
It is illogical for some to blame the entire political modernization process and the broader partisan experiment every time a controversy arises. The Jordanian state is strong and fully capable of addressing any issue within its legal and political frameworks. Equally important is the need for the media narrative—especially from official channels representing the state's voice—to remain disciplined and clear. We must avoid blending or confusing different files. There are well-established national constants that are evident to all, whether concerning national unity, Jordan's historic and principled stance on the Palestinian cause, or the foundational values that have distinguished Jordanian governance since the establishment of the state. These values remain rooted and enduring—they are the secret to Jordan's political stability and a hallmark of its success, especially when compared to the political turmoil experienced by many other Arab states.
Contrary to what some political circles suggest today, the current security issue underscores—not undermines—the need for developing responsible, national, programmatic political parties. It highlights the importance of strengthening society's capacities through political parties that are grounded in national constants and capable of building bridges between the state and the people. Such parties can reinforce rational and responsible discourse both in political institutions and in the streets. The solution is not to regress or abandon the field to unchecked rhetoric or groups with broad, negative perceptions of the state and its policies. Rather, this moment calls on political parties to continue building their capacities, institutions, and grassroots connections so that they may become competitive, realistic, and influential national movements in the future.
To return to the starting point: the development and modernization of the political system is a national necessity, not a fleeting choice or tactical maneuver. It is a strategic, deliberate path that represents the gateway to the future. It is essential for the youth generation who aspire to actively participate in shaping their future; it empowers society to express its interests and demands through political parties, and it enables the formation of governments based on platforms and national policies. This is the project of the state and of future generations—a project that we must all support, strengthen, and engage with.
Jordanian youth today, amid rising frustration and disappointment fueled by regional turmoil—particularly in the occupied Palestinian territories—need political parties and a media discourse that restore their confidence, guide them toward the right path, and open the doors of hope. They must be shielded from falling into apathy, nihilism, and distrust of everything. This is the primary responsibility of political parties and the country's political elite today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Roya News
40 minutes ago
- Roya News
"Israel' quit talks to prolong war, says Hamas official
Hamas senior official Khalil Al-Hayya accused the Israeli Occupation of deliberately withdrawing from ceasefire negotiations to prolong the war on Gaza and press forward with a plan to displace Palestinians forcibly. In a televised speech on Sunday, Al-Hayya said the suffering of people in Gaza had reached indescribable levels and that their sacrifices would not be in vain. He described Gaza's civilian population as enduring burdens beyond what nations or mountains could bear. Al-Hayya praised the armed resistance, particularly the Qassam Brigades, Quds Brigades, and other factions, claiming they had successfully disrupted the Israeli military's 'Gideon Chariots' operation. He emphasized that for the past 22 months, the resistance leadership had used every available tool and relationship to halt the Israeli aggression on Gaza. During that time, Hamas participated in difficult negotiations and demonstrated what he described as maximum flexibility, without compromising core Palestinian principles. According to Al-Hayya, Hamas had responded positively to all proposals put forth by mediators in the most recent round of talks and had reached broad agreement on many of the items. However, he said the group was taken by surprise when both the Israeli delegation and US envoy Steve Wietkoff abruptly withdrew from the talks, calling it a 'blatant move' intended to sabotage negotiations and continue the war. He rejected what he described as 'the occupation's negotiation games,' insisting that the Palestinian people should not be made victims of political manipulation. Al-Hayya described the Israeli withdrawal as part of a broader strategy to waste time while enabling further genocide in Gaza. He said that even as the talks collapsed, the Israeli side criticized the agreed framework on aid distribution in an effort to sideline the role of the UN and local institutions. He also warned of a wider "Israeli" plan to displace Palestinians en masse, pointing to efforts to retain control over aid mechanisms that have already resulted in deaths, and the occupation's insistence on carving out a large section of Rafah to establish a buffer zone for the displaced. Al-Hayya said this move paves the way for forced expulsion, either through Egypt or the sea, as part of what he called a clear attempt to eliminate the Palestinian cause.


Roya News
3 hours ago
- Roya News
'Israel' extends military presence in Tulkarm camps, West Bank, through Oct
The Israeli Occupation has issued a decision to extend the presence of its forces in the Tulkarm refugee camps in the West Bank until October 31, 2025, contradicting earlier reports that suggested a potential withdrawal at the start of next month. The decision includes the renewed occupation of both Nur Shams and Tulkarm camps, as well as a new ban on Palestinian presence in the Nur Shams woodlands, an area outside the camp boundaries. As a result, nearly 30,000 displaced residents of the two camps will continue to suffer from harsh and deteriorating conditions for at least three more months. The move signals the continuation of the "Israeli" military's offensive on the area, despite growing humanitarian concerns and repeated calls for de-escalation.


Roya News
5 hours ago
- Roya News
BBC questions Gaza teen about Hamas ties before interview, raising ethical concerns
A recent exchange between a BBC producer and a 17-year-old from Gaza has sparked criticism over journalistic ethics. In a WhatsApp conversation shared by the teen, the BBC reportedly asked: 'Do you or your parents have any political affiliation to Hamas?' before confirming an interview. The teen, who was set to speak about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, expressed willingness to share his experience on behalf of his community. However, the nature of the question raised concern, with observers questioning whether such vetting would be applied to 'Israeli' interviewees amid the ongoing aggression. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Abubaker Abed (@abubakerabedw) Critics argue that singling out Palestinian voices with political background checks risks reinforcing harmful double standards. The BBC has not publicly responded to the claims.