Sky TV block as new crackdown disrupts UK homes from watching content for free
It's no secret that millions of us have switched away from paying a monthly fee for watching premium TV and moved to illegal streams instead. Devices such as so-called 'dodgy Fire TV Sticks' have boomed in popularity with many offering full access to sports and movies for a small yearly payment - some even show streams for free.
Of course, this rise in viewing without paying the correct fees hasn't gone unnoticed.
Authorities and content providers are not only warning consumers about the dangers of streaming illegally but also trying to shut down unofficial streaming services, and the latest crackdown has done exactly that.
It's been confirmed that a recent operation has fully disrupted an illegal streaming platform, with two people in their 30s also arrested.
A team from the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) searched two residential addresses in Oldbury and a data centre in Cheltenham.
A 30-year-old man, who they suspect ran the illegal streaming service, and a 32-year-old woman who is suspected of distributing material infringing copyright and receiving criminal property were both taken into custody.
An investigation by PIPCU suggests that the man and woman received significant profits derived from the service. Along with making those arrests, content servers have also been seized, which means they are no longer transmitting streams to those who may have signed up.
Speaking about the latest arrests, Detective Constable Daryl Fryatt, from the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) at City of London Police, said:
'This activity should serve as a reminder that PIPCU will pursue criminals who seek to profit from illegal streaming and disrupt their operations. This is a crime that diverts funds away from the creative and entertainment industries, money that supports thousands of technical and support staff. At the same time, it exposes end users to the risks of data theft, fraud and malware.'
And Matt Hibbert, Group Director of Anti-Piracy at Sky, added: 'We are extremely grateful to the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit for taking this action against a significant pirate operation.
"We will continue to work alongside the police and industry partners to tackle piracy and disrupt the criminal networks behind it. This action helps to keep consumers safe from the serious risks that piracy can pose to devices and personal property.'
What are the dangers of streaming content illegally?
There are plenty of concerns about homes watching content without using official channels.
Although it's highly unlikely that anyone viewing illegal streams will ever face jail time, it's worth remembering that using dodgy Fire TV Sticks or other streaming devices can expose people to malware and inappropriate content. It's also often funding criminal gangs so whilst it might seem like a good deal it does not come risk free.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
British father issues scam warning after common Google search almost costs him £30k
A father has revealed how he nearly had tens of thousands of pounds drained from his bank account after an innocent phone call to Sky ended up being a terrifying scam. Lee Beard said his 'defences were completely down' because he was the one making the call rather than being targeted by fraudsters. Issuing a warning on his TikTok account, Mr Beard revealed how his attempt to contact Sky's customer service about the speed of their broadband almost turned into a devastating scam that could have lost him as much as £30,000. Rather than going through his My Sky app, the father called what he thought was a genuine customers service number and was reassured by security checks and the professionalism of the call handler. But soon after giving over his Sky account details and bank card he was locked out and the scammers quickly started buying phones and sim cards. Now Mr Beard is warning others to be extra vigilant to avoid being out of pocket. In the video posted to TikTok the scam victim told his followers he had always considered himself 'pretty switched on when it comes to online banking and fraud', but due to the elaborate nature of the scam he got 'absolutely slapped silly'. He explained that it had taken some time for his broadband to be set up and Mr Beard felt he wasn't experiencing the speed he had signed up for. He added that his call was answered quickly and handler appeared to follow normal Sky protocol which left his defences down But instead of contacting Sky's customer services through the My Sky app, he decided to call them, searching their number online and ringing the first result. He said: 'Rather going through my My Sky app I googled Sky customer services. Number come up that started with an 0208 number so I rang it.' He added that his call was answered quickly and the handler appeared to follow normal Sky protocol which left his defences down. Mr Beard added: 'Answered fairly quickly which I supposed should have been a red flag. Normally you end up on hold for a while. 'I spoke to a lady, an Asian lady. She took me through security. 'It all felt and seemed so legit, my defences were completely down because I'd rang them and they answered. 'They said "this is Sky how can I help you?", they had all the right spiel, the script they'd take you through.' The father went on to reveal that their professional demeanor led him to reveal all his personal Sky information to the woman on the end of the phone. @leebeard73 As much as I thought it would never happen to me, I got scammed bad last week. I managed to escape it unharmed, but it happened, my details are out there, and I now need to watch my account like a hawk. Watch the video, dont be next. Huge warning, I hope it helps #fraud #scam #scammers #theft #online #security #onlinesecurity #dont #fyp #foryoupage #important #message #staysafe #safe #becareful #sobad #banking #password #gotme #fellforit #beaware #alert #emergency @vonnie b-sen mum 🩷 #sky #skybroadband @SkyUK ♬ original sound - Lee Beard 'I ended up unwinding my entire security on Sky,' he said, 'they ultimately overtook control of my account, changed my password, locked me out, ordered mobile phones, ordered sim cards.' Mr Beard also inadvertently handed over his bank information too when they asked for his card details to 'purchase a new router' which almost resulted in £30,000 being taken from his account. He said: 'In the process of that, they very convincingly told me I needed to buy a new router. 'I complained and said "I'm not buying a new router, you should've told me I needed a new one at the time". 'She said "it's Sky's fault not yours, we will give you a router for free but we have to charge you for delivery. it's a one off payment on your card". 'Then I ended up giving them my card details which in hindsight now is ridiculous. Is it ridiculous? When you ring someone and they answer you assume it's them. Luckily Mr Beard managed to freeze his Sky account and his bank card but it didn't stop the scammers from trying to steal thousands of pounds from him. He said: 'Because i gave them my card details to pay for postage for a router, I luckily managed to change my online banking details and froze the card. 'I got message yesterday from my bank saying authorise payment to which I obviously rejected. They were trying to spend £30,000 on bloody Temu. 'I don't know who they think I am. I didn't have £30,000 in that account for a tart. It just shows how quickly your life can get out of control if you're not careful.' He finished off his video by warning others to be vigilant, saying: 'My warning to everyone is be really vigilant be really careful. If you are going through Sky go through your My Sky app and double check it's sky that answers the phone and not someone else because I got absolutely pants down.' A spokesman for Sky said: 'Sky is committed to protecting our customers from fraud and takes this issue extremely seriously. 'Sadly, cases like Mr Beards' highlight how high-profile brands such as Sky are common targets for criminal activity, with scammers using calls, emails, texts, and online impersonation to deceive individuals. We urge all customers to stay vigilant and visit Sky Help via for trusted advice on how to protect themselves and report suspicious activity. 'We strongly advise against using search engines or clicking on unsolicited links, as these can sometimes lead to fraudulent websites.'
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Retired Met officer wins damages over Sky misconduct claim
A retired Metropolitan Police officer is to receive "substantial damages" from Sky to settle a High Court claim, after it falsely said he used taxpayer money to facilitate sexual encounters with female for former Ch Supt Simon Crick told a hearing on Wednesday he felt forced to retire earlier than planned in November last year because of the claims, which were published in April article claimed Mr Crick had committed professional misconduct and had been removed from active duty while misconduct proceedings were McKenzie, for Sky, said the organisation "should never have made these allegations" and "apologises for the harm caused". 'Reputational damage' Reading an agreed statement, Nikila Kaushik, for Mr Crick, said the two entities, Sky Limited and Sky UK Limited, are within the Sky Group and publish Sky News and its said they were responsible for an online article published on 3 April last year, headlined: "Police chief accused of using taxpayer money to book hotels for sex with female colleagues".Ms Kaushik said Sky had accepted "the allegations were false" and had agreed to pay Mr Crick damages and his legal McKenzie said: "The defendants through me acknowledge that the allegations were false and apologise to the claimant for the damage to his reputation, and his distress."Sky is happy to set the record straight and undertakes to this court never to repeat them."At the end of the short hearing in London, Mr Justice Linden said he was "pleased to see this matter has been resolved".An apology was also published on the Sky News website on Wednesday.
BreakingNews.ie
2 days ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Wexford man must pay €480,000 for ‘dodgy box' copyright infringement
A Co Wexford man must pay €480,000 in damages to Sky after conceding a High Court action taken by the broadcaster and telecommunications giant over his operation of a 'dodgy box' streaming service. David Dunbar consented to judgment against him after opting not to defend the civil case brought by Sky UK Limited over his infringement of the broadcaster's copyright. Advertisement Mr Dunbar faces further sanction for being in contempt of court, having breached orders aimed at preserving evidence of his copyright infringement and orders freezing his assets, among other directions. A suite of sanctions are open to the court, including imprisonment. Mr Dunbar, with an address at Manor Crescent, Roxborough Manor, Co Wexford, was previously described by Sky as a 'top-level' copyright infringer who may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating an illegal streaming service. The broadcaster alleged that Mr Dunbar provided thousands with access to its copyrighted broadcast material since 2018. On Tuesday, Mr Justice Mark Sanfey was informed that Mr Dunbar was consenting to various reliefs sought by Sky arising from his copyright infringement. Advertisement The judge said there was no doubt of Mr Dunbar's copyright infringement, and ordered that he pay €480,000 in damages to Sky. Mr Dunbar must also pay the broadcaster's legal costs, the judge ruled, about €100,000. The judge also granted various permanent injunctions against Mr Dunbar, including an order restraining him from ever operating an Internet Protocol television service (IPTV). IPTV is the technology behind 'dodgy box' services. Mr Justice Sanfey reserved his judgment on an attachment and committal motion moved by Sky over Mr Dunbar's breach of several court orders. The court heard that Mr Dunbar did not comply with various orders granted to Sky aimed at gathering evidence of his wrongdoing. This included a refusal to comply with an Anton Piller order, which allows for entry to private premises for the purposes of seizing evidence. Advertisement Theo Donnelly BL, appearing for Sky and instructed by Philip Lee LLP, submitted that Mr Dunbar engaged in clear breaches of court orders. He submitted that the court orders were explained to Mr Dunbar in layman's terms by an independent solicitor who called to his house on foot of the Anton Piller order. Despite this, he did not allow the solicitor to enter his premises, and proceeded to destroy evidence of his copyright infringement, among other breaches, Mr Donnelly submitted. Counsel said it was hard to see how Mr Dunbar could have engaged in a more 'clear and knowing' contempt of the court orders. Advertisement It is Mr Dunbar's case that when the orders were explained to him by his legal representatives, he realised the seriousness of the matter. Following this, he said he sought to comply with the court's orders, the court heard. Darren Lehane SC, for Mr Dunbar and instructed by Dodd Solicitors, said his client was acknowledging his contempt of court. In considering sanction for his contempt, Mr Lehane asked the court to take into account Mr Dunbar's speedy consent to a judgment against him in default of defence. Mr Donnelly said he believed Mr Dunbar's case has not been referred to An Garda Síochána, but said he had not taken specific instruction on the matter. The case returns next month.
