'They were Bharatiyas': Priyanka Gandhi counters MP's 'Hindus killed' remark in Pahalgam debate
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra
on Tuesday locked horns with several MPs in Lok Sabha over the identity of the
Pahalgam terror attack
victims, countering repeated interruptions during day two of the discussion on the April 22 attack.
During her speech, the Wayanad MP said she would read out the names of the 25 victims of the attack. However, as she began reading them aloud, she was repeatedly interrupted by MPs shouting 'Hindu'.
She countered each interjection with the word 'Bhartiya'.
'I wish to read out the names of those 25 Indians in this House, so that every member sitting here realises that they too were human beings like us, not mere pawns in some political game.
They too were sons of this nation. They too are martyrs of this country. We all have a responsibility towards their families; they have the right to know the truth,' she said.
Priyanka also criticised the government's response to the Pahalgam attack. 'Most of the people who are sitting in this House today have a security cover. But on that day in Pahalgam, 26 people were killed in front of their families. All those people present in Baisaran Valley had no security.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help!
Donate For Health
Donate Now
Undo
No matter how many operations you conduct, you cannot hide behind the truth.'
Attacking the Union home minister, she said, 'The home minister stated that Pakistan had no choice but to seek refuge. The question is—why did you grant them refuge? Terrorists come to our country, kill people, and you are providing them shelter. Why have you not addressed this in any of your speeches?'
She went on to accuse the government of using diversionary tactics: 'As soon as the issue of refuge was raised, the Home Minister delved into history—from Nehru ji, Indira ji, to even my mother's tears.
But he did not answer the question of why there was a ceasefire, why the war was halted.'
Gandhi also targeted the government for its lack of accountability: 'This government always tries to escape questions. They have no sense of responsibility towards the citizens of the nation. The truth is that they have no place for the public in their heart. For them, everything is politics, publicity…'
The Congress leader's remarks came amid a heated debate where Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav also criticised the government for allegedly stepping back after
Operation Sindoor
and questioned why US President Donald Trump announced the ceasefire, not the Indian government.
The debate surrounding Operation Sindoor has drawn strong reactions from the Opposition, demanding clarity from the Centre on the reasons for halting military operations after the Pahalgam attack, which killed 26.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump says he 'does not know anything about' US imports of uranium, fertilizers from Russia
Trump on Tuesday said he was unaware that the United States imports uranium and fertilisers from Russia, a point India has raised while defending its oil trade with Moscow against Western criticism. read more US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he was unaware and 'don't know anything about' United States imports uranium and fertilisers from Russia, a point India has highlighted while defending its trade ties with Moscow amid growing Western criticism. Responding to a question about US imports of Russian uranium and chemical fertilisers, even as Washington targets India's oil trade with Moscow, Trump said, 'I don't know anything about it. I have to check…' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD US imports from Russia quietly rise #WATCH | Responding to ANI's question on US imports of Russian Uranium, chemical fertilisers while criticising their (Indian) energy imports', US President Donald Trump says, "I don't know anything about it. I have to check..." (Source: US Network Pool via Reuters) — ANI (@ANI) August 5, 2025 His remarks come even as American imports from Russia continue to quietly rise. Between January and May this year, US imports jumped 23 per cent year-on-year to $2.1 billion, driven by sharp increases in palladium (up 37 per cent), uranium (28 per cent), and fertilisers (21 per cent). While this marks a partial rebound, overall US merchandise imports from Russia had fallen to $3 billion in 2024, down 90 per cent from 2021, the year before the Ukraine war began. Trump ramps up pressure on India Trump earlier ramped up pressure on India, warning of a sharp increase in tariffs within '24 hours' over its continued oil purchases from Russia. 'India hasn't been a fair trading partner. They do a lot of business with us, but we don't get the same in return,' he said in an interview with CNBC. 'We had settled on a 25 percent tariff, but I'm going to raise it significantly because they're buying Russian oil and fueling the war machine,' he added. India hits back over 'unjustified and unreasonable' tariffs India hit back strongly on Monday, calling the threat 'unjustified and unreasonable' and asserting it would take all necessary steps to safeguard its national interests and economic security. External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal pointed out that India has been repeatedly targeted by the US and EU over its energy imports from Russia, even as many Western nations continue trade with Moscow. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified. Like any major economy, India will act to protect its interests,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India.com
12 minutes ago
- India.com
‘I Never Said A Percentage': Trump Backtracks On Russian Oil Tariff Threat — What It Means For India, China And Who's Really In The Crosshairs
Washington: What began as a routine press briefing on the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics quickly turned into a window into Donald Trump's evolving global agenda. Fielding an unexpected question, the U.S. president pivoted, hinting at fresh tariffs on countries buying Russian oil. The off-the-cuff remark, though brief, sent ripples through foreign capitals, exposing a potentially dramatic shift in U.S. economic pressure tactics that could hit allies like India, even as China avoids similar scrutiny. 'I never said a percentage. But we will be doing quite a bit of that. We will see what happens over the next fairly short period of time. We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow. We are going to see what happens,' Trump clarified when asked about plans for a 100% tariff. This statement followed earlier his remarks, suggesting he could raise tariffs on Indian imports 'very substantially' within 24 hours. He explained that the reason was India's continued energy trade with Russia. 'They are fueling the war machine, and if they are going to do that, then I am not going to be happy,' Trump told CNBC in an interview, as reported by Reuters. He also flagged India's existing tariff structure as a sticking point in bilateral trade. Trump first posted the warning on his social media platform Truth Social. There, he said, 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!' Former U.S, Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, also weighed in on the matter. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), she called attention to how the Trump administration has treated China during this time. She pointed out that China, which she described as an adversary and the 'number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil', had been granted a 90-day tariff pause. 'India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India,' she posted. Haley previously competed in the Republican primaries but was the last of Trump's major rivals to exit the race. While Trump continues to signal tariff hikes, Haley's statement serves as a reminder of the broader geopolitical implications. The conversation around oil imports, strategic alliances and tariff policy now includes strong voices from within the U.S. political establishment. The days ahead may bring new policy decisions and further clarification on tariffs, as the White House prepares for its meeting with Russia.
New Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
What staying in an ashram taught me about atheism
I belong to a religious minority in India – atheists. Only 3 per cent of Indians identify as atheists. There was no 'Moolshankar' moment for me. I grew up in a strict, conservative family and studied in an ashram. I was forced to meditate for three hours and pray for a few more. After years, I just gave up. I wasn't angry at God; I just lost his number. I hate the word atheist. It's such a harsh, metallic word – like 'dentist' or 'activist'. I prefer the term 'free-range believer', or 'agnostic with trust issues', or 'spiritually single, not ready to mingle'. Over the last week, I have been living in a spiritual ashram after all these years. A place where chants blend with birds chirping. Mosquitoes are bad karma, and walking barefoot is the ultimate sadhana. I have been meeting lots of people here, a motley crew of honky-tonk spiritual freelancers you usually find in an ashram. There are the travellers – they've been to Peru, Bali, and Pushkar. Their bags carry herbal teas and trauma. They speak slowly, as if enlightenment depends on word count. Then there are the settlers. They arrived 20 years ago to stay for the weekend. They now run cafes serving appam wraps and tantra pizza. They wear loose clothes, speak Sanskrit with a German accent, and refuse to use spoons. Others who have given up on family and are seeking refuge from the law of the land. They are vague about their origins, but up-to-date with the latest cryptocurrency strategies. Life here begins early in the morning. I visit the temple and try to meditate for an hour. This is followed by Q&A sessions that are as exciting as corporate Monday morning meetings. The questions are about ending suffering; the answers say nothing is real. I then spent the next few hours trying to calm my mind or finish writing the project I came here to finish. Prayer sessions are like karaoke nights, and I stay away from the mic. Yoga is taught by a man who looks like Gandhi's friend but bends like Houdini. By the end of the day, I go to bed early, without alcohol swimming in my bloodstream. Don't get me wrong. I am not a yogi. If anything, I am a Bhogi – a reveller in worldly pleasures. But my demands are limited – Filter coffee, AC, western toilets, and 5G. Being an atheist in an ashram taught me that there's a lot to borrow from religious practices like meditation, and the joys of a community. Surprisingly, I found that we aren't very different from each other. Neither side is too sure of themselves. I spoke to people chasing enlightenment for decades, who still are unsure of what's going on in the cosmos. As an atheist, I speak on behalf of rational thinking and science. But I am unsure of most of it. Believers seek enlightenment and sacrifice everything for it. Scientists chase answers to the big questions. To a neutral alien from Neptune, science and scientists could seem like an obsessed cult that believes in their own truth. But most importantly, I found that both sides of the fence required their daily fix. Just as I cannot function without coffee in my system, a seeker feels restless till they have meditated. Like I structure my day around my gym, I found people extremely meticulous and finicky about their daily ablutions. I have shared cigarettes with babas who repaid me with blessings. Maybe we're not so different. We believe in something, are 90 per cent sure, and need coffee first thing in the morning. (The writer's views are personal)
