Women's ODI WC squad: Renuka picked, Shafali dropped
The squad will be led by Harmanpreet Kaur with Smriti Mandhana, who was also present at the selection meeting here at the BCCI headquarters, as her deputy in the ICC event which begins on September 30.
The selectors also announced the squad for the three ODIs against Australia which precedes the World Cup with only one change in both the sides. The series begins on September 14.
Rawal, who has done exceptionally well in 14 ODIs, was chosen ahead of hard-hitting opener Shafali as the latter was excluded from both, with chairperson of selectors Neetu David saying the right-hander remains in their focus.
'Shafali played the Australia A series. She's in the system, it is not like that she's not. We've got our eyes on her. Hope she plays a lot more and garners experience, it'll help serve India in the 50-overs format in the future. We want a long career from Shafali,' Neetu said.
All-rounder Amanjot Kaur has been given additional time to recover from her unspecified injury as she remains at the Centre of Excellence ahead of the World Cup, and in her place Sayali Satghare was named in the squad to face Australia as the solitary change in the two squads.
'She's one of the important players, she's at (the) COE, working on a few small niggles. We've rested her for the Australia series so that she can fully be available for the World Cup,' skipper Harmanpreet said.
Renuka has been out of action since March and missed the ODI tri-series in Sri Lanka followed by the tour of England, but the right-arm pacer is back in the side to lead the attack.
'Renuka has been a precious player for us. She had (some) niggles and been out of the game, but is now available. She is (one of) our main players. This is a main event and it is great that she is a part of the team,' Neetu said.
Besides Renuka, India have the young seamer Kranti Goud and Arundhati Reddy in the pace attack, which could also feature Amanjot.
India Women's squads:
For World Cup: Harmanpreet Kaur (c), Smriti Mandhana (vc), Pratika Rawal, Harleen Deol, Deepti Sharma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Renuka Singh Thakur, Arundhati Reddy, Richa Ghosh (wk), Kranti Goud, Amanjot Kaur, Radha Yadav, Shree Charani, Yastika Bhatia (wk), Sneh Rana.
For ODIs against Australia: Harmanpreet Kaur (c), Smriti Mandhana (vc), Pratika Rawal, Harleen Deol, Deepti Sharma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Renuka Singh Thakur, Arundhati Reddy, Richa Ghosh (wk), Kranti Goud, Sayali Satghare, Radha Yadav, Shree Charani, Yastika Bhatia (wk), Sneh Rana.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
38 minutes ago
- First Post
Dravid salutes Rohit's captaincy amid questions over the Hitman's future as leader: 'He deeply cared about the team'
Rohit Sharma had formed a successful captain-coach combination with Rahul Dravid from late 2021 to the summer of 2024, the pair mastermind India's triumph at last year's T20 World Cup as well as their runner-up finish at the 2023 ICC World Cup during this period. Indian batting legend Rahul Dravid heaped praise on Rohit Sharma for his leadership, describing the 'Hitman' as someone who 'deeply cared about the team'. Rohit and Dravid had formed a successful captain-coach combination after Virat Kohli and Ravi Shastri from late 2021 to the summer of 2024. The pair had masterminded India's triumph at last year's T20 World Cup along with their runner-up finish in the 2023 ICC World Cup on home soil, with the Men in Blue also winning the 2023 Asia Cup during this period. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It was really good. Firstly, the thing with Rohit that I always felt was that he deeply cared about the team, and he was very clear about it,' Dravid told spin legend Ravichandran Ashwin on his YouTube show 'Kutti Stories with Ash'. 'Right from the first day, he was very clear about how he wanted to run the team and what was important to him. And that's really important in any relationship between a captain and a coach, especially the way I coach. 'I always like to believe that it should be the captain's team. I've been a player, and I've been a captain as well, but a captain has to lead in terms of the direction he wants to go in, and you have to support him and help him in that,' added Dravid, who captained India on a full-time basis from 2005 to 2007. Rohit's clarity and understanding made my job easier, says Dravid Dravid, who joined Rajasthan Royals as their head coach after his stint with the Indian team concluded with the T20 World Cup in the US and the Caribbean last June, added the Rohit's clarity regarding his role made his job as head coach much easier. 'Of course, you sometimes need to help a captain in terms of getting that clarity and understanding what is required. But with Rohit, I thought he was very clear about what he wanted from the team—how he wanted the environment to be, how he wanted the atmosphere to be, and how he wanted things to run.' 'He had so much experience over the years, and that really helped. He was very clear on those things,' Dravid added. Rohit, who has retired from Twenty20 Internationals and Test cricket, would go on to lead the Men in Blue to victory in the Champions Trophy in March, helping India win back-to-back ICC events after reaching a third consecutive final. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 38-year-old has expressed his desire to lead India in the 2027 ICC World Cup, although his age along with young batting star Shubman Gill's rise as captain has put a question mark on that for now.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
India Women's A slip to 93/5 against Australia on rain-truncated Day 1 in unofficial Test
Excluded from India's World Cup squad, Shafali Verma produced a 38-ball 35 before India Women's A slipped to 93 for five against Australia on the rain-truncated first day of their unofficial Test despite, here on Thursday (August 21, 2025). Shafali provided a brisk start to the side hitting eight fours. Her knock was critical since India had lost a couple of early wickets after being asked to bat first. Nandini Kashyap (0) and Dhara Gujjar (0) departed without bothering the scorer to leave India reeling at 6/2 in the first two overs with Georgia Prestwidge (3/25) accounting for both batters. Tejal Hasabnis dropped anchor for a while with Shafali taking the attack to the opposition, but India were once again pegged back with a couple of wickets. Hasabnis (9 off 20) fell to Sianna Ginger and soon after Prestwidge cleaned up Shafali in the 11th over. Raghvi Bist (26 not out) and Tanushree Sarkar (13) steadied the ship for a while but could not push on as the latter fell to Maitlan Brown at the score of 72. Only 23.2 overs were bowled here at the Allan Border Field as rains intervened to keep the players off the field. Bist, who was on 26 not out with five fours off 44 balls, was accompanied by Radha Yadav (8 not out). Brief Scores: India Women's A: 93/5 in 23.2 overs (Shafali Verma 35, Raghvi Bist 26 not out; Georgia Prestwidge 3/25).
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?
A proposal to restructure the World Test Championship (WTC) into a two-tiered system, potentially dividing the 12 Test-playing nations into two groups of six teams, or into two groups of seven and five teams, is gaining traction. While some argue that this system could improve the quality of matches and increase competitiveness by having top teams play each other more often, others worry that lower-ranked teams will get fewer opportunities to play. Will a two-tiered WTC do more harm than good? Deep Dasgupta and Jatin Paranjape discuss the question in a conversation moderated by Amol Karhadkar. Edited excerpts: Is this proposal actually expected to benefit Test cricket? Deep Dasgupta: I wrote for Sportstar in 2017 in favour of the proposal, so I am an advocate. The quality of the India-England Test series may not have been great, but because it was competitive, it had everyone's attention. Test cricket will be watched by people as long as it is competitive. Obviously, we can't expect people to watch it on all five days, for seven hours each day. But if it is competitive, people will follow it more often. With a two-tiered WTC, you will have a more competitive series and more people following Test matches again. Jatin Paranjape: Today, more people consume the T20 (Twenty-20) format of cricket. But having said that, consumer behaviour has evolved rapidly: there is a niche group of people supporting Test cricket as well. They follow and appreciate the intricacies of Test cricket. So, the time has come for the ICC (International Cricket Council) to launch Test cricket as a product. They need to be mindful of the fact that while all the media attention is around the T20 game, the ratings during the India-England Test series went through the roof. And that launch has to be a happy marriage of keeping the philosophical priority of Test cricket alive with the commercial angle. I am not against the two-tier format, but it should not be skewed towards redistribution of commerce; it should be skewed towards redistribution of opportunity for all the teams, so that they have a reasonable stab at Test cricket. It should incentivise teams in the second tier to improve their game. At the moment, the WTC involves only nine of the 12 Test-playing nations. Each team plays six series, primarily to avoid pitting India and Pakistan against each other. How can you re-jig the format or make the existing format more fan-friendly? Deep Dasgupta: The major issue with a two-tier system with six teams in each tier is that a lot of the teams might say, 'I am not going to play second tier'. It becomes a bit of an issue. So let's say they are divided as seven (in top tier) and five (in the bottom) and we stick with the current format, which is six series in a cycle. If you have seven teams in Tier 1, automatically you play six other teams (in a cycle). Whether it's India-Pakistan, I think that's a different issue. That's above my pay grade, so I'm not going to get into that bit. That can happen whenever it happens and whatever the powers are, they will decide. Once Test cricket is sold as quality product — the India-England series was a great advocate for that — then you will also get revenue from it. And then you can create a Test fund. A major chunk of it would go into organising Test series for teams in the second tier. One of the major reasons why many Test-playing nations don't play many Test matches is the commercial aspect. A series with five T20s is more commercially viable than one with three Test matches. If the ICC comes up with a Test fund, that could help. Jatin Paranjape: Your calendar dictates what you can and cannot do. There is a finite number of days within which you need to drive this game forward. It's funny that today, when you think about the calendar, you think about the IPL (Indian Premier League) first and then look at what is left after that. The ICC will have to identify what the two most important formats are, out of the three formats. ODI (One Day International) cricket needs to be looked at. The amount of inane ODI cricket being played today at a bilateral level is not good for the game or the broadcaster. I don't think it represents any value for the consumer either. So if they look at how many days they have available as part of the calendar, then let them prioritise T20 cricket and Test cricket as the two main focus areas. The ICC has to have a tricky conversation with multiple stakeholders ahead of the 2027 cycle. The people at the top of the ICC are canny commercial operators. Jay Shah (ICC Chairman) will want to prioritise Test cricket and will have to find the right way to do it. Perhaps with an eye on the next ICC broadcasting rights cycle (2027-2031), the ICC in July formed a working group headed by former New Zealand batter, Roger Twose, to look into all aspects of the next WTC. If Twose calls either of you, what would you suggest? Deep Dasgupta: First, figure out a window for Test cricket. For that to happen, control the spread of franchise cricket. You see 29-year-old quality cricketers retiring from international cricket; these are all obviously interconnected issues. Look at windows where more and more Test cricket can be played. The two-tier system makes a lot of sense in such windows. Jatin Paranjape: The ICC is the custodian of the game and custodians always have a long-term view on things. So nothing needs to be fixed in the next year or two. The path needs to be clear: over the next five-seven years, how are we going to have 12 really strong Test-playing nations? One way is to look at the tier two teams right now and create a league for them. Create a league whereby after a certain level, two or three teams out of those five or six are switched against tier one teams. That gives the spectators in these other countries something to look forward to. Deep Dasgupta: That is a great idea. Five teams in tier two can play each other over a period of a month and a half or two months. Can you suggest the ideal approach for the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India), the ECB (England and Wales Cricket Board), and Cricket Australia — the three top boards that control the Test calendar and revenue — to make the two-tier Test system work? Jatin Paranjape: There isn't a more opportune time than this: the head of the ICC is the former head of the BCCI. A lot of changes can be made because there is the muscle to do it. When I say muscle, I mean it in a good way, in a way that where you want to promote the game, where you want to add commercial longevity to the game. Let us not underestimate the power of the consumer. The consumer must feel enthused that Test cricket is well looked after; that there is the dopamine fix with the T20 format, but there is also a fantastic Test cricket calendar year on year, which is going to evolve into strengthening the tier two teams. I also feel the ICC will miss an opportunity if they don't form an advisory committee of some of the top players who have been big proponents of Test cricket or champions in Test cricket. No disrespect to Roger Twose, but players such as Sachin Tendulkar, Alastair Cook, and Ricky Ponting need to be part of the decision-making process. Deep Dasgupta: I am glad that we are talking and everyone is talking about this. We have seen the time when nobody was really bothered about Test cricket. Once we accept the fact that there are challenges, and we need to do something, I am sure there will be solutions. Jatin Paranjape: Let me talk about the consumer again. Let us not forget that the consumer is also often an aspiring cricketer. If teenagers don't want to play red-ball cricket, they want to play white-ball cricket. You need to be able to touch them in some way, you need to be able to inspire them with the fact that Test cricket is being given priority that is similar to what is given to T20 cricket. If you fix cricket from an organisational perspective, but if your new players don't want to play Test cricket, then you have a problem again. You need to launch Test cricket as a product. The objective could be that by 2036, we have we have 14 really strong Test nations. Any parting thoughts? Deep Dasgupta: For us, Test cricket is the most favoured format. Since everyone is talking about improving it, things will fall into place. Jatin Paranjape: There needs to be a long-term view. The BCCI needs to shepherd this entire conversation. It does not need to be a dictator, but it needs to shepherd this entire conversation. Without a definitive point of view from the BCCI, we'll be having the same chat two years down the road. Listen to the conversation
