Plastic pollution a global health emergency, says Lancet report
Plastics are a grave, growing and under-recognised danger to human and
Plastics cause disease and deaths, from infancy to old age and are responsible for health-related economic losses exceeding $1.5 trillion annually. These effects fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations, particularly babies and children, said the
The Lancet
on the eve of the expected final round of talks to conclude a
The mandate for
The report says the
Given that less than 10% of plastic is recycled and waste can persist in the environment for decades, an estimated eight billion tonnes of plastic waste, or 80% of all the plastic ever made, now pollutes the planet.
'Yet, continued worsening of plastics' harms is not inevitable. Similar to air pollution and lead, plastics' harms can be mitigated cost-effectively by evidence-based, transparently tracked, effectively implemented and adequately financed laws and policies.'
In parallel with the finalisation of the global plastics treaty, the report also announced the launch of an independent, health-focused global monitoring system — the Lancet Countdown on Health and Plastics.
This will develop and track indicators across four domains: production and emissions; exposures; health and interventions and engagement.
'We know a great deal about the range and severity of the health and environmental impacts of plastic pollution across the full lifecycle of plastic,'
'These impacts fall most heavily on vulnerable populations, especially
Decision-makers will need access to the best available scientific evidence to guide the implementation and development of the important treaty in the months and years to come, said Margaret Spring, one of the report's co-authors and the co-lead of one of the working groups in the new Lancet countdown.
'The countdown reports will offer a robust, independent and accessible data source that can help to inform development of effective policies addressing plastic pollution at the international, regional, national, sub-national and local levels,' Spring said.
The report noted how plastic is the 'defining material of our age' with more than 98% of it made from fossil carbon — gas, oil and coal.
Plastics are flexible, durable, convenient and 'perceived to be cheap', it said. They are ubiquitous in modern societies and have supported advances in many fields, including medicine, engineering, electronics and aerospace.
'It is increasingly clear, however, that plastics pose grave, growing and underappreciated dangers to human and planetary health. Moreover, plastics are not as inexpensive as they appear and are responsible for massive hidden economic costs borne by governments and societies.'
These harms to human and planetary health are worsening, driven mainly by continuing annual increases in the production of new plastics.
Early-life exposure to plastics and plastic chemicals is linked to increased risk of miscarriage; prematurity; stillbirth; low birthweight and birth defects of the reproductive organs; neurodevelopmental impairment, impaired lung growth and childhood cancer.
'Early-life exposures to plastic chemicals can contribute to reduced human fertility and increased risks of non-communicable diseases, such as cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adult life.'
Plastic production is highly energy-intensive and releases more than two gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, and other climate-forcing greenhouse gases, into the atmosphere each year, harming health by accelerating climate change.
Every year, an estimated 10 to 12 million tonnes of plastic enter the ocean. 'Many plastics appear to resist breakdown in the ocean and could persist for decades.'
Microplastic and nanoplastic particles, which result from the breakdown of larger plastic materials, are an emerging threat to health. While their effects are still incompletely understood, more studies report the presence of microplastics in multiple human tissues and are 'beginning to link it to disease'.
The report said that, in 2015, the health-related costs of plastic production amounted to almost $600 billion globally — more than the GDP of New Zealand or Finland.
'Chemicals in plastics, such as PBDE (
These estimates undercount the full costs of plastic-related health damages because they examine only a few countries and only a subset of plastic chemicals. 'The costs are externalised by fossil fuel and plastic manufacturing industries and borne by governments and taxpayers.'
A key driver of the acceleration in plastic output is a pivot by fossil fuel corporations and nations that are the major producers of plastic and petrochemicals, in response to declining demand for fossil energy, the report said.
'For example, the Saudi Arabian Oil Company plans to channel about one third of its oil production to plastics and petrochemicals by 2030 and Shell has recently opened a new cracking plant in western Pennsylvania, USA, that will transform fracked gas from Appalachia into plastic pellets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
The warning labels that could be coming for your crisps
Decrypting the nutritional label on your favourite packaged food products might get easier sometime soon. But that doesn't mean you're going to like what it's going to say. (UNSPLASH) 'It's sort of hidden.' That's how 30-year-old Elvina Moodley describes the nutritional labels on the back of packaged food products stacked on grocery store shelves. 'When you're there, you're already in a rush and don't have the time to look at the small print on the back to see how much sugar or salt is in an item.' Moodley, like many South Africans, says she's never really understood how nutritional tables — the per serving amounts of calories, But big, bold triangle warning labels on the front of packages could mean making healthy choices will be a lot easier. South Africa's draft food labelling It would work, says Edzani Mphaphuli, executive director of the childhood nutrition nonprofit 'You might not know why smoking causes cancer, but when you see the label, you start to think, 'Okay, this might not be good for me,'' she says. 'But [many people] don't know that sugar causes cancer or that obesity is related to cancer. We just think about it as, 'I'm big,' and it ends there. There isn't a clear link that is made around that and hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes, and all of the other chronic diseases.' Why labels are hard to read Many familiar foods — from noodles and breakfast cereals to Currently, food labels in South Africa Even when it does appear, it's often in small writing and uses terms and measurements that an ordinary shopper would not understand, says Makoma Bopape, a nutrition researcher and lecturer at the 'It tells you how much of certain nutrients you get in, say, 100ml or in a serving size. But if you don't have a nutritional science [background] it's hard to know what that means.' That's why some countries have started to These labels help shoppers compare products, but they can also confuse them. A UK government A Chile warning Not all front-of-pack labels are equal. Research shows that clear warning signs that simply say the food is 'high in' sugar, salt or saturated fats are Chile was the first country to The result? After the regulations were enacted, Chileans bought In 2021, Chilean researchers Yet obesity rates continued to In France, manufacturers use what's called South Africa will use a similar system to Chile, but the label will come in the shape of a triangle. The warnings will cover between 10% and 25% of the front of the package, will be black on a white background and will be located in the top right corner. They will have the words 'high in' and 'warning' in bold, uppercase letters, next to an exclamation mark and an icon to represent the nutrient. This will help make the warning easier for people who can't read or don't speak English to understand. Because each nutrient will have its own warning symbol, if a product is high in more than one nutrient — or has any artificial sweeteners at all — a single package could carry up to four warning icons. 'They just want to fill their tummies' Still, what people — and their children — eat isn't always up to them, says Mphaphuli. 'Some parents can only afford cheap food that fills up the family the quickest, which limits their choice in what they consume.' In Most of these households are located outside of the metropolitan areas, where healthy, 'If in your spaza shop one apple costs the same as a bottle of highly concentrated juice that can be shared across days, you're going to go for the cheaper thing.' When people don't have enough types of food to choose from, they 'People say, 'At the beginning of the month, when I still have money, I get worried and I pay attention to what I buy. But as the month goes by, I just buy whatever I can afford,'' explains Bopape. 'They just want to fill their tummies.' Clear labelling alone won't be enough to reduce unhealthy eating, says Bopape. Warning signs need to go hand in hand with other policies such as sugar taxes, restrictions on advertising and the selling of unhealthy foods in and around schools. Moodley wishes healthy foods were more reasonably priced. But the warning labels will at least 'help us know what we're getting ourselves into'. This story was produced by the . Sign up for the .
The Herald
2 days ago
- The Herald
July quake appears to have damaged Russian nuclear sub base
A nuclear submarine base in Russia's remote far east region was damaged last week after one of the most powerful earthquakes to hit the area in decades, the New York Times reported on Monday, citing satellite images. Photos captured by Planet Labs, a commercial satellite imaging firm, show damage to a floating pier at the Rybachiy submarine base on the Kamchatka Peninsula, the newspaper reported. One section of the pier appears to have broken away from its anchor point. Aside from the damaged pier, the satellite imagery does not show any other major destruction. Reuters could not independently verify the report. There was no immediate response from Russia's defence ministry outside business hours to a Reuters request for comment. A very powerful magnitude 8.8 earthquake off Russia's far eastern Kamchatka coast last Wednesday triggered tsunami warnings as far away as French Polynesia and Chile, and was followed by an eruption of the most active volcano on the peninsula. The Rybachiy nuclear submarine base, a strategic hub for Russia's Pacific fleet, serves as a facility for the maintenance, deployment and operations of the country's nuclear-powered submarines in the Pacific region. Reuters
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Plastic pollution a global health emergency, says Lancet report
Plastics cause disease and deaths, from infancy to old age and are responsible for health-related economic losses exceeding $1.5 trillion annually. Plastics are a grave, growing and under-recognised danger to human and Plastics cause disease and deaths, from infancy to old age and are responsible for health-related economic losses exceeding $1.5 trillion annually. These effects fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations, particularly babies and children, said the The Lancet on the eve of the expected final round of talks to conclude a The mandate for The report says the Given that less than 10% of plastic is recycled and waste can persist in the environment for decades, an estimated eight billion tonnes of plastic waste, or 80% of all the plastic ever made, now pollutes the planet. 'Yet, continued worsening of plastics' harms is not inevitable. Similar to air pollution and lead, plastics' harms can be mitigated cost-effectively by evidence-based, transparently tracked, effectively implemented and adequately financed laws and policies.' In parallel with the finalisation of the global plastics treaty, the report also announced the launch of an independent, health-focused global monitoring system — the Lancet Countdown on Health and Plastics. This will develop and track indicators across four domains: production and emissions; exposures; health and interventions and engagement. 'We know a great deal about the range and severity of the health and environmental impacts of plastic pollution across the full lifecycle of plastic,' 'These impacts fall most heavily on vulnerable populations, especially Decision-makers will need access to the best available scientific evidence to guide the implementation and development of the important treaty in the months and years to come, said Margaret Spring, one of the report's co-authors and the co-lead of one of the working groups in the new Lancet countdown. 'The countdown reports will offer a robust, independent and accessible data source that can help to inform development of effective policies addressing plastic pollution at the international, regional, national, sub-national and local levels,' Spring said. The report noted how plastic is the 'defining material of our age' with more than 98% of it made from fossil carbon — gas, oil and coal. Plastics are flexible, durable, convenient and 'perceived to be cheap', it said. They are ubiquitous in modern societies and have supported advances in many fields, including medicine, engineering, electronics and aerospace. 'It is increasingly clear, however, that plastics pose grave, growing and underappreciated dangers to human and planetary health. Moreover, plastics are not as inexpensive as they appear and are responsible for massive hidden economic costs borne by governments and societies.' These harms to human and planetary health are worsening, driven mainly by continuing annual increases in the production of new plastics. Early-life exposure to plastics and plastic chemicals is linked to increased risk of miscarriage; prematurity; stillbirth; low birthweight and birth defects of the reproductive organs; neurodevelopmental impairment, impaired lung growth and childhood cancer. 'Early-life exposures to plastic chemicals can contribute to reduced human fertility and increased risks of non-communicable diseases, such as cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adult life.' Plastic production is highly energy-intensive and releases more than two gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, and other climate-forcing greenhouse gases, into the atmosphere each year, harming health by accelerating climate change. Every year, an estimated 10 to 12 million tonnes of plastic enter the ocean. 'Many plastics appear to resist breakdown in the ocean and could persist for decades.' Microplastic and nanoplastic particles, which result from the breakdown of larger plastic materials, are an emerging threat to health. While their effects are still incompletely understood, more studies report the presence of microplastics in multiple human tissues and are 'beginning to link it to disease'. The report said that, in 2015, the health-related costs of plastic production amounted to almost $600 billion globally — more than the GDP of New Zealand or Finland. 'Chemicals in plastics, such as PBDE ( These estimates undercount the full costs of plastic-related health damages because they examine only a few countries and only a subset of plastic chemicals. 'The costs are externalised by fossil fuel and plastic manufacturing industries and borne by governments and taxpayers.' A key driver of the acceleration in plastic output is a pivot by fossil fuel corporations and nations that are the major producers of plastic and petrochemicals, in response to declining demand for fossil energy, the report said. 'For example, the Saudi Arabian Oil Company plans to channel about one third of its oil production to plastics and petrochemicals by 2030 and Shell has recently opened a new cracking plant in western Pennsylvania, USA, that will transform fracked gas from Appalachia into plastic pellets.'
