
India accuses US, EU of Russia trade double standards: Who is right?
New Delhi accused the US and EU of themselves importing substantial volumes of goods – including energy in the case of Europe – from Russia, while punishing India.
India's strongest pushback yet, against mounting pressure from Washington and Brussels on trade and its ties with Russia, came hours after US President Donald Trump threatened to significantly increase tariffs he had previously announced against Indian goods.
Trump had last week imposed a 25 percent tariff on imports from India, which is expected to kick in from August 7. In a Monday social media post, however, he said he 'will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA' because of India's imports of Russian crude.
In late July, the EU also slapped sanctions on Nayara, one of India's two big private oil refiners, which is Russian-majority owned. The bloc also banned the import of refined oil made from Russian crude, again hurting Indian refiners.
Until Monday night, India's response had been muted. That has now changed. Two hours after Trump's latest announcement, New Delhi issued a statement accusing the US and EU of double standards and of, in fact, quietly encouraging India to buy Russian crude earlier.
As India's relations with the West – otherwise warm and growing until recently – now fray over its purchase of Russian energy, how true are New Delhi's claims that the West is as guilty of enabling the Kremlin's war machine as those it blames?
What did India say on Monday?
After hesitating for days to publicly take on Washington and Brussels directly, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government issued a terse statement on August 4, calling the targeting of India 'unjustified and unreasonable'.
'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, in words that suggest New Delhi is in no mood to back down.
But Jaiswal also directly pushed back against suggestions from the US and EU that India – in buying large volumes of Russian crude – had acted in a way that broke with the West's own behaviour.
'In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict,' Jaiswal said, referring to Russia's full-fledged invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets' stability,' he added.
He said India's decision to import Russian oil was 'meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer'.
'However, it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' he added.
The EU, he said, had traded more with Russia in goods in 2024 than India had. 'European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5 million tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022,' Jaiswal said.
The US, meanwhile, 'continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals,' the spokesperson said.
India's response is not surprising, said Biswajit Dhar, a trade economist who has been involved with multiple Indian trade negotiations.
'The aggressiveness that the Trump administration has shown – there had to be some reaction from India,' he told Al Jazeera. 'For a sovereign country to hear this kind of a threat from another country is unacceptable.'
How significant are the US, EU sanctions and tariffs against India?
India's pushback reflects just how much is at stake for its economy.
The US is India's largest export destination: Americans bought $87bn worth of Indian goods in 2024. By contrast, India imported $41bn worth of US goods last year, leading to a large $46bn trade deficit for the US.
Trump's earlier threat of 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods was already threatening to dramatically disrupt that trade. His announcement of even higher tariffs could bleed India's export revenue further.
Brussels' decision to bar the import of refined petroleum sourced from Russian crude could also batter the profits of Indian refineries. According to market intelligence firm S&P Global, Indian exports of petroleum products to Europe have jumped from $5.9bn in 2019 to $20.5bn, largely because of India's ability to buy subsidised Russian oil, refine it, and then sell it to the West.
But stopping the purchase of Russian oil would come with its costs: After the US and Europe imposed tough sanctions on Moscow over its war on Ukraine, Russia offered discounted crude to India. The EU also introduced price caps on Russian oil shipped by European tankers. As a result, India saved billions of dollars, with Russia becoming its biggest source of imported crude.
For India, say experts, it isn't just the economic calculations that make the recent threats and sanctions problematic. The West is 'just changing goalposts', Anil Trigunayat, a retired Indian diplomat, told Al Jazeera. 'So, India is just showing them the mirror with facts and figures now.'
Did the US and EU encourage India to buy Russian oil until now?
Trump, in his latest post targeting India, claimed that 'they don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine.'
India is arguing that the same accusations levelled against it hold true against the US and EU – and that they actually acquiesced to New Delhi buying Russian oil when the West no longer wanted to.
'They (India) bought Russian oil because we wanted someone to buy Russian oil at a price cap – that was not a violation or anything, that was actually the design of the policy, because as a commodity, we did not want the price of oil to go up,' Eric Garcetti, the US ambassador to India under former President Joe Biden, said at the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations in May 2024. 'They fulfilled that.'
"India brought Russian Oil, because we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil…", says US ambassador Garcetti on India buying Russian oil ; Adds,'no Price Cap violation, we did not want oil prices to go up..' pic.twitter.com/it3zku9Hbs
— Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) May 11, 2024
The logic was simple: If no one had bought Russian oil, that would have shrunk the total available oil supply with the same global demand, driving up costs. As Garcetti pointed out, Indian purchases of Russian crude helped avoid that – while allowing the West to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
Until July, the EU, too, had not imposed any restrictions on the import of petroleum products sourced from Russian crude.
Is the West trading more with Russia than India is?
That's the other major claim from India.
And the facts suggest that New Delhi is right. According to the EU, its total trade with Russia was worth 67.5 billion euros ($77.9 bn) in 2024. India's total trade with Russia in 2024-25 was worth $68.7bn.
To be sure, Europe's trade with Russia has fallen sharply, from 257.5 billion euros in 2021, before the invasion of Ukraine, while India's trade with Russia has surged from about $10bn before the COVID-19 pandemic.
But data shows that the bloc continues to buy Russian gas. Since the start of the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the grouping has paid Moscow $105.6bn for gas imports – an amount equivalent to 75 percent of Russia's 2024 military budget – according to the Finnish think-tank, Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, which has been tracking Russian energy trade through the war.
In 2024, EU imports of Russian LNG rose 9 percent compared with the year before.
Mineral fuels make up almost two-thirds of EU imports from Russia, followed by food, raw materials, machinery and transport equipment, according to the bloc.
And the US does indeed still import a range of chemicals from Russia, as Jaiswal claimed. Total Russia-US trade in 2024 stood at $5.2bn, according to the US Trade Representative's office – though the numbers are down significantly from 2021, when their trade in goods stood at $36bn.
Given this backdrop, the Indian foreign ministry was 'absolutely right to call out the US and EU', Jayati Ghosh, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, told Al Jazeera. 'They are still importing from Russia. They're allowed to do it, we are not. That's ridiculous.'
Is this all a trade negotiating tactic?
Some Indian experts believe that the threats and tariffs from Trump are bargaining measures aimed at securing a trade deal with India that is favourable to the US.
The two countries have been locked in negotiations over a trade agreement to minimise Trump's tariffs but have yet to agree on a pact, even though India has cut tariffs on several US imports.
A key sticking point is agriculture, where India has long imposed high tariffs to protect its farm sector, which represents about half of the country's population.
'The way the Trump administration has been demanding that India open its market to US agri-business – that's a no-go for India,' Dhar said. 'Our small farmers will face a serious adverse situation; so it's economically and politically completely unacceptable to India.'
Ghosh echoed those sentiments.
'There's no question of giving in on agriculture,' she said. 'In India, you cannot give in and allow US heavily subsidised multinational conglomerates to invade our markets, when a majority of our population still depends on agriculture for a livelihood.'
But in recent weeks, Trump has also tried to ramp up pressure on Russia to agree to a ceasefire deal with Ukraine, and choking Moscow's oil exports would make it harder for Russian President Vladimir Putin to sustain his economy.
On Monday, Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller accused India of 'financing this (Russia's) war'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why Trump's secondary tariffs on Russia could bite the US, its allies too
Top United States diplomatic negotiator Steve Witkoff visited Moscow on Wednesday in a last-ditch push to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine before an August 8 deadline set by President Donald Trump. After Witkoff's meeting with Putin, the White House said that Russia had sought a meeting with Trump. The US president, the White House said, was open to meeting both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump, who during his re-election campaign had promised he would be able to end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours if he came to power, has so far failed to mediate a truce despite months of hectic diplomacy, direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv, and phone calls with Putin. Increasingly frustrated by Putin's unwillingness to agree to a pause in fighting without imposing conditions unacceptable to Ukraine or the West, Trump has threatened a new wave of economic measures punishing Russia if it does not accept a ceasefire. Since Russia's full-fledged invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US and its allies, including the United Kingdom and the European Union, have imposed more than 21,000 sanctions on Russia's economy. The new tariffs Trump has threatened are unlike any of those earlier sanctions, however. They target Russia by hitting out against its trading partners, in the hope that they will stop buying from or selling to Moscow. But these secondary tariffs also carry risks for the US and its allies. What are the secondary tariffs Trump is threatening? In mid-July, as peace talks stalled despite Trump's efforts, the US president threatened Russia with 100 percent secondary tariffs if it did not work towards a ceasefire. He gave the Kremlin a 50-day deadline to cooperate. After Moscow suggested that it wouldn't bow to US pressure, Trump moved up the deadline, which now expires on August 8. It is unclear if Trump's openness to talks with Putin and Zelenskyy following Witkoff's Moscow visit has changed that deadline. On Wednesday, Trump doubled the tariff rate on Indian imports from 25 percent – which he had announced in late July – to 50 percent, as punishment for New Delhi's refusal to stop buying Russian oil. That makes India the country facing the highest US tariffs at present – along with Brazil. If Trump's secondary tariffs go into effect, goods that the US imports from countries still trading with Russia would face duties of 100 percent on top of the tariffs Trump has already imposed on those nations. That would at least double the price of those products, making them less competitive in the US market. The idea behind these tariffs is to persuade Russia's trading partners to stop buying and selling with the country, isolating its economy and depriving it of revenue it earns from exports, especially from energy. Despite the sanctions it already faces, Russia has consistently earned more than 500 million euros ($580m) a day from energy exports since 2022. That will be disrupted if countries stop buying all oil and gas from Russia. Which countries could Trump's secondary tariffs hit? The countries most affected by such secondary tariffs would be: China: Russia's most important ally, China is by far the largest consumer of its northern neighbour's exports. In 2023, China bought almost a third of all Russian exports. It also bought almost half of Russia's oil exports. India: An old friend, India has been buying up large volumes of Russian crude since 2022, including almost 40 percent of Russia's total oil exports in 2023. That year, 17 percent of Russia's overall exports went to India. Trump had already imposed a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods. On Wednesday, he doubled that rate as punishment for India's continued oil purchases from Russia. Turkiye: The third-largest buyer of Russian energy, 8 percent of Russia's exports in 2023 went to Turkiye. It is a NATO ally of the US. Turkiye isn't the only ally that could be hit if Trump truly targets all those who trade with Russia. Could US allies be hit? Pushing back against Western threats over its ties with Russia, India has pointed to the EU's own trade with Moscow. And while that trade has plummeted since 2022, it is still substantial. According to the EU, its total trade with Russia was worth 67.5 billion euros ($77.9bn) in 2024. India's total trade with Russia in 2024-25, by contrast, was worth $68.7bn. The bloc still relies heavily on Russia for its liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies. In fact, its import of Russian LNG has been rising: In 2024, EU imports of Russian LNG were 9 percent higher than the year before. Europe has already been hit with a 15 percent tariff from Trump. Will Trump punish his closest supporters to pressure Russia to end the war? Could the US face risks, too? It is not just allies – secondary tariffs on those who trade with Russia carry risks for the US itself, too. Trump's team is currently working on a trade deal with China, and those talks have led to a pause in a tariff war between the world's two largest economies. That detente would break down if Trump imposes 100 percent tariffs on Chinese goods simply because Beijing also trades with Russia. China, Europe and India are all major suppliers of goods to the US: If the cost of those products – from clothes to lamps to iPhones – doubles, American consumers will feel the pinch. The US also buys chemicals, including uranium hexafluoride – used in uranium enrichment – from Russia. Will India and China stop buying Russian energy? That looks unlikely. China continues to buy oil from Iran, despite US sanctions – and Russia is arguably its closest strategic partner. India has also shown no sign of loosening its ties with Russia. Witkoff isn't the only foreign envoy visiting Moscow at the moment. India's national security adviser, Ajit Doval, is also in the Russian capital. India's foreign minister, S Jaishankar, is expected to visit Russia later this month, and India has announced that it intends to host Putin later this year. On Wednesday, India described Trump's 50 percent tariff as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', adding that its purchase of Russian oil was rooted in its desire for energy security for its 1.4 billion people.


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump announces 100 percent tariff on semiconductor imports
United States President Donald Trump says he will impose a 100 percent tariff on foreign-made semiconductors, although exemptions will be made for companies that have invested in the US. 'We'll be putting a tariff on of approximately 100 percent on chips and semiconductors, but if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge, even though you're building and you're not producing yet,' Trump told reporters at the Oval Office on Wednesday evening. The news came after a separate announcement that Apple would invest $600bn in the US, but it was not unexpected by US observers. Trump told CNBC on Tuesday that he planned to unveil a new tariff on semiconductors 'within the next week or so' without offering further details. Details were also scant at the Oval Office about how and when the tariffs will go into effect, but Asia's semiconductor powerhouses were quick to respond about the potential impact. Taiwan, home of the world's largest chipmaker TSMC, said that the company would be exempt from the tariff due to its existing investments in the US. 'Because Taiwan's main exporter is TSMC, which has factories in the United States, TSMC is exempt,' National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching told the Taiwanese legislature. In March, TSMC – which counts Apple and Nvidia as clients – said it would increase its US investment to $165bn to expand chip making and research centres in Arizona. South Korea was also quick to extinguish any concerns about its top chipmakers, Samsung and SK Hynix, which have also invested in facilities in Texas and Indiana. Trade envoy Yeo Han-koo said South Korean companies would be exempt from the tariff and that Seoul already faced 'favourable' tariffs after signing a trade deal with Washington earlier this year. TSMC, Samsung and SK Hynix are just some of the foreign tech companies that have invested in the US since 2022, when then-President Joe Biden signed the bipartisan CHIPS Act offering billions of dollars in subsidies and tax credits to re-shore investment and manufacturing. Less lucky is the Philippines, said Dan Lachica, president of Semiconductor and Electronics Industries in the Philippines Foundation. He said the tariffs will be 'devastating' because semiconductors make up 70 percent of the Philippines' exports. Trump's latest round of blanket tariffs on US trade partners is due to go into effect on Thursday, but the White House has also targeted specific industries like steel, aluminium, automobiles and pharmaceuticals with separate tariffs.


Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Apple to invest extra $100bn in the US as Trump announces tariffs on chips
President Donald Trump has announced a $100bn increase in the amount of money the technology company Apple plans to invest in the United States. At an Oval Office ceremony on Wednesday, Trump stood next to Apple CEO Tim Cook and credited the increased investment to his 'America First' policy agenda. He noted that the overall investment that Apple anticipates making over the next four years now amounts to $600bn. 'This is the largest investment Apple has ever made in America and anywhere else,' Trump said. ' Apple's been an investor in other countries a little bit. I won't say which ones, but a couple. And they're coming home.' Trump has pushed for greater domestic manufacturing in the tech sector and other industries, and he has threatened companies with steep tariffs if they continue to do business overseas. As part of Wednesday's announcement, Trump said he would impose a tariff of approximately 100 percent on any imported chips and semiconductors arriving in the US. 'We're going to be putting a very large tariff on chips and semiconductors,' Trump explained. 'But the good news for companies like Apple is — if you're building in the United States or have committed to build, without question, in the United States — there will be no charge.' Experts have questioned whether Trump's protectionist policies may dampen US trade and increase prices for American consumers. But at Wednesday's press event, Trump dismissed such concerns as evidence of media bias against his administration. ' I listen to these horrendous frauds on CNN and various other fake news networks, and they say costs are up. No, no. Costs are down,' Trump said. ' Everything's down. Price is down. The only thing that's up is stock prices.' For his part, Cook confirmed the increase in his company's domestic investments, saying he had signed new agreements with 10 companies in the US to kickstart more manufacturing. 'Earlier this year, we made our largest-ever spending commitment: $500bn to the US over the next four years. That's already yielding results. Earlier this year, we broke ground on a new factory in Houston to make advanced AI servers,' Cook said. 'I'm glad to be here with you today, and I'm very proud to say that today we're committing an additional 100bn to the United States, bringing our total US investment to 600bn over the next four years.' He also praised the president for his economic initiatives: ' You've been a great advocate for American innovation and manufacturing.' Building on previous investments Previously, in February, Apple had announced the initial investment of $500bn, which included plans for the factory in Texas to produce artificial intelligence servers. It also laid the groundwork for the addition of about 20,000 research and development jobs across the country. But Apple has pledged many investments in the US in the last decade, not exclusively under Trump's second term. For instance, in 2018, during Trump's first term, the company pledged $350bn. In 2021, under former President Joe Biden, Apple announced a $430bn investment. The latest investment, however, comes after Trump warned that he would hit Apple with a 25-percent tariff if it did not move its manufacturing efforts to the US. Analysts have said such a shift is not realistic. Dan Ives at Wedbush Securities said in a note that it would take at least five to 10 years to shift production to the US, and the resulting price hike could mean that consumers would pay as much as $3,500 for an iPhone. 'We believe the concept of Apple producing iPhones in the US is a fairy tale that is not feasible,' Ives had previously said. Still, Trump repeated on Wednesday that it was his goal to see iPhones made entirely in the US, and he framed Apple's newly announced investment as a sign of progress to that end. ' This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhone sold in the United States of America also are made in America, with the mass infusion of capital it's announcing today,' Trump said. Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In April, Apple had announced plans to move the assembly of the majority of the phones it sells in the US to India by the end of next year. That shift appears to be an effort to reduce the company's reliance on China as the trade war between that country and the US heats up. But Trump's ire has shifted to India. On Wednesday, he slapped the country with a 50-percent tariff over its imports of Russian oil. It's not clear if the latest developments will impact Apple's plans for manufacturing in the country. Apple's stock surged on the looming US investment announcement. The company, which is traded under the ticker symbol APPL, was up more than 3.8 percent since the market opened as of 10:15am in New York (14:15 GMT) on Wednesday. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' Assistant White House Press Secretary Taylor Rogers said in a statement.