Nimisha Priya Case: This Congress MLA played a key role in halting Kerala nurse's execution in Yemen. Who is he?
Prominent Muslim cleric Kanthapuram AP Aboobacker Musliyar, originally named Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, is being hailed for initiating the mediation efforts through his long-time friend and Yemeni Sufi Islamic scholar Sheikh Habib Umar bin Hafiz.
But who prompted Abubakar to intervene?
Abubakr's office issued a formal statement on July 15 saying that the initiative began after the cleric was approached last Friday by Chandy Oommen, the Congress MLA from Puthuppally. Chandy sought the Grand Mufti's assistance due to his longstanding ties with leading Sufi scholars in Yemen, the statement said.
"With a deep sense of national responsibility and humanitarian concern, I decided to act upon this request," the Grand Mufti said.
Oommen had also approached several other influential figures, including Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar, for intervention.
"Beyond his role as a Governor, he acted as a fellow human being. His sincere efforts will never be forgotten by Kerala and its people. I thank him from the bottom of my heart," Oommen said after the execution was halted, adding that the Governor reached out to foreign governments, businessmen, and officials.
"He did whatever he could," the Congress MLA said after the execution was deferred.
Oommen, son of late Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, met Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar on Wednesday to seek urgent intervention in the case.
Oommen was accompanied by his mother, Mariyamma Oommen, during the meeting at Raj Bhavan. The family has taken up the issue as a matter of moral responsibility, recalling that the late Oommen Chandy had personally advocated for Nimisha Priya's release in his final days.
"Appa (father) gave this issue priority even amid his own health struggles. He spoke to everyone who visited him about intervening in Nimisha's case," Chandy Oommen said.
'We believe this is one of the responsibilities he entrusted to us. Now, with the date of execution approaching, we cannot remain silent,' he said in a Facebook post.
Nimisha Priya, 38, a nurse from Palakkad district in Kerala, was convicted of murdering her Yemeni business partner in 2017. She was sentenced to death in 2020, and her final appeal was rejected in 2023. She is currently imprisoned in a jail in Sana'a, the capital of Yemen.
Chandy Oommen, 39, is an Indian lawyer, lecturer, and Congress MLA who practices law at the Supreme Court of India since 2016. He is the incumbent Member of the Kerala Legislative Assembly representing the Puthuppally Assembly constituency since 2023.
Chandy was the Chairman of the National Outreach Cell of the Indian Youth Congress. On September 9, 2024, the Government of India appointed Oommen as the Empanelled Advocate to represent the National Highways Authority of India in Courts in Kerala.
Chandy Oommen was born on March 1 1986 in Puthuppally, Kottayam district of Kerala, India as the only son of former chief minister Oommen Chandy and Mariamma Oommen.
Chandy completed his schooling at St Thomas Residential School, Thiruvananthapuram, and Loyola School, Thiruvananthapuram. He then went to Mar Ivanios College, Thiruvananthapuram, for a bachelor's degree in economics. He then pursued his bachelor's ( BA Hons) and master's (MA) degrees in history at St. Stephen's College, Delhi, where he was the president of the college students' union from 2006 to 2007.
After completing his post-graduation, he went on to earn an LLB from Delhi University and an LLM in criminology from the National Law University, Delhi. Additionally, he completed a summer course at the London School of Economics. Subsequently, he obtained an additional LLM in constitutional law from Christ University, Bengaluru in 2016.
With a deep sense of national responsibility and humanitarian concern, I decided to act upon this request.
Chandy's father, Oommen Chandy, represented the Puthuppally Assembly constituency consecutively for 53 years. Puthuppally by-election was necessitated by the death of his father in July 2023.
Chandy was selected as the candidate of the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF). Chandy won the by-poll with a record margin of 37,719 votes against Jaick C Thomas of the Left Democratic Front (LDF). It was the highest margin for any candidate in the history of the Puthuppally assembly election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
How Trump's erratic behaviour strained most defining partnership of 21st century
US President Donald Trump announced on July 30, 2025, that a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods—along with additional penalties over India's continued engagement with Russia—would take effect from August 1, 2025. In a striking contradiction, he simultaneously claimed to have concluded a trade and energy deal with Pakistan—India's traditional adversary. While India has no objection to such bilateral engagements between sovereign nations, Trump went a step further by stating, 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' This wasn't merely an offhand comment—it was a calculated provocation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India and Pakistan are archrivals, and the idea of such dependence is not only unrealistic but also strategically unacceptable. By making such statements, Trump is not merely playing geopolitical games—he is striking at the heart of India's national security sensitivities and damaging a relationship that both countries have spent decades nurturing into a consequential partnership for the 21st century. Trump has consistently hyphenated India–Pakistan relations, weakening India's position on cross-border terrorism by boosting Pakistan's strategic confidence through repeated endorsements and by portraying both countries as equals. These actions have granted Pakistan undue strategic legitimacy, disregarding decades of US policy that sought to engage India as an independent and trusted strategic partner. His claim—repeated over 29 times—that he personally brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has been unequivocally denied by top Indian officials, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. By drawing false parallels and exaggerating his role, Trump has jeopardised India's core interests and eroded the trust carefully built by successive US administrations. A Diplomatic Liability Recently, India's Parliament witnessed a heated debate in which opposition leaders urged Prime Minister Modi to directly refute Donald Trump's repeated claims that he brokered the recent India–Pakistan ceasefire. But such directness is unlikely to yield results. Trump is not a leader who responds to logic or diplomacy. His erratic, impulsive, and reactive personality makes engagement unpredictable. Even if the Indian prime minister corrects him publicly, Trump may repeat the same claim in the evening—and again the next day. The problem lies in Washington, not New Delhi. This isn't a unique pattern. Trump turned against Elon Musk—a long-time supporter—after a minor disagreement, telling him to 'go back to South Africa' and threatening to revoke federal subsidies supporting Tesla and SpaceX. Notably, Musk was the largest individual donor to Trump's 2024 campaign, contributing between $250 million and $290 million to pro-Trump political action committees. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite this staggering support, Trump turned on him without hesitation—highlighting his transactional nature and readiness to discard even his most generous allies over personal slights. Similarly, Indian-American politician Vivek Ramaswamy had the foresight to distance himself from Trump early on—an act of pragmatism that likely spared him from similar treatment. Trump is not a conventional statesman. He governs through impulse-driven outbursts on Truth Social, his personal platform, bypassing standard diplomatic channels and norms. One cannot expect rational behaviour or consistency from someone so clearly erratic. Even when India's prime minister and foreign minister have privately countered his claims, Trump has continued repeating the same falsehoods, showing a complete disregard for diplomatic engagement. Undermining India's Core Sensitivities By equating India and Pakistan, Trump has granted Pakistan undeserved strategic legitimacy and confidence, despite its entrenched history of sponsoring terrorism against India. Recently, Pakistan's army chief, General Asim Munir, was hosted by Trump at a private luncheon at the White House—an extraordinary and rare gesture, especially considering that only a handful of Pakistani generals have ever received such treatment. Trump went on to lavish praise on Munir, calling him 'extremely influential in stopping the conflict from the Pakistan side' and crediting both Munir and Modi for preventing what he claimed could have escalated into a nuclear war. Adding to this, Centcom Commander General Michael Kurilla described Pakistan as 'a phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world,' blatantly ignoring its well-documented role in nurturing and exporting terrorist proxies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This repeated validation—through White House meetings, public praise, and exaggerated claims of Pakistan's counter-terrorism role—undermines India's diplomatic efforts to isolate state-sponsored terrorism. Praising a country that has itself sponsored terrorism against India is not only absurd but also adds insult to injury. Instead of backing India's fight, Trump's gestures have offered moral and strategic encouragement to Pakistan's military and political leadership—eroding the very trust that should define India–US strategic ties. Deliberate Provocation and Strategic Damage Trump's recent suggestion that India might import oil from Pakistan is not only absurd—it appears to be a deliberate attempt to provoke and humiliate. While this may be part of a broader negotiation tactic aimed at pushing India into a trade deal, the damage inflicted on bilateral relations is severe. Trump has thrown the India–US relationship into a Cold War–like deep freeze, eroding trust and mutual respect that had taken decades to build. This shift is not the result of India's foreign policy. The problem lies squarely with Trump. Unlike his predecessors—who operated with a sense of dignity, stability, and strategic foresight—Trump has pursued a chaotic, transactional approach that alienates allies and undermines shared interests. In one of his recent statements, Trump said: STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I don't care if India is buying oil from Russia. I couldn't care less. Let them do whatever they want. They can take their dead economies down together for all I care.' Such a statement is not only undiplomatic—it reflects a complete disregard for the economic realities of global partnerships and disrespects a key strategic partner in the Indo-Pacific. Instead of reinforcing mutual interests, Trump has repeatedly chosen to antagonise, offend, and weaken the very relationship considered vital for regional balance and global stability and widely regarded as the defining partnership of the twenty-first century. Moreover, Trump's ignorance of India's crucial moderating role in Brics reveals his blindness to structural realities. India's presence in Brics has ensured the group remains a non-Western coalition rather than an anti-Western alliance. Without India, BRICS could have adopted an anti-dollar currency or an explicitly adversarial posture. But explaining such nuance to an impulsive and transactional US leadership seems futile. Trump is unable—or unwilling—to grasp the strategic logic of true partnerships. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rebuilding Trust: A Long Road Ahead The trust deficit between India and the US has widened significantly. Even those in India who once firmly believed in the potential of the bilateral relationship now feel disillusioned. But India has weathered such storms before. After the 1998 nuclear tests, the United States imposed sanctions on India. Back in 1971, it had deployed the Seventh Fleet to the Bay of Bengal in an attempt to intimidate India during the Bangladesh Liberation War. India didn't bow down then—and it won't now. India will adapt and find its path, just as it has done in the past. As India's leadership has repeatedly stated, every step will be taken to secure national interest. However, the damage inflicted by Trump's erratic and impulsive leadership means that restoring faith in the relationship will take years, if not decades. Moving forward, we can expect a greater degree of scepticism and a likely recalibration of India's foreign policy posture—possibly including greater resistance to US alignment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's presidency has sown the seeds of growing anti-American sentiment in Indian strategic circles. His words and actions—especially repeated endorsements of Pakistan and disregard for India's strategic concerns—have not just weakened the India–US partnership; they have dented the very idea of trust in global diplomacy. As The Economic Times recently noted, doubts over US reliability are once again taking root in Indian foreign policy circles, and that's a serious blow to what was once considered the defining partnership of the twenty-first century. Imran Khurshid is a visiting research fellow at the International Centre for Peace Studies, New Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The Malegaon blast trial that stalled: Shared suspects, multiple probes, but no progress in 2006 case
The 2008 Malegaon blast case, in which several accused were linked to extremist groups, concluded this week following the acquittal of all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, a parallel case from 2006 involving similarly placed suspects remains stalled in court. Despite the National Investigation Agency (NIA) naming operatives of Hindu outfits in its 2013 chargesheet in the 2006 case, the trial of the four accused has made no progress since 2019. Two of the men named in the 2006 blasts, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, are also accused of having played a role in the 2008 blasts. What ATS found On September 8, 2006, four bombs exploded in Malegaon, three on the premises of Hamidia Masjid and Bada Kabrastan just after Friday prayers, and the fourth at Mushawarat Chowk, killing 31 people and injuring 312 persons. The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which initiated the investigation, claimed that 13 Muslim men, some of whom had met at a conspiracy meeting during a wedding on May 6, 2006, conspired to carry out the blasts. Nine of these men, including Shabbir Masiullah, who was already in prison, were arrested for their role in the explosions. Four accused who were never apprehended were also named for their role in the blast. The ATS accused them of making and planting the bombs. A subsequent supplementary chargesheet that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed in 2011 also named the same individuals. The case was transferred to the NIA in 2011 after RSS activist Swami Aseemanand, who was then an accused in the Ajmer Sharif and Mecca Masjid blasts, told the magistrate in his statement in 2010 that the 2006 blasts were allegedly the handiwork of 'right-wing activist' Sunil Joshi and his men. The NIA filed a supplementary chargesheet in 2013, after which the nine Muslim men were discharged from the case in 2016. Seven of these men had earlier been released on bail in 2011, and two others, who were also named in the Mumbai train blasts, were released this year after being acquitted in the case. NIA investigation The NIA's 2013 chargesheet named seven men for carrying out the 2006 blast, including Manohar Narwaria, Rajendra Chaudhari, Dhan Singh Shiv Singh, Lokesh Sharma, and Sunil Joshi, who was killed in 2007. Three of the accused, including Kalsangra, Dange, and Ramesh Mahalkar, were never apprehended. As per the NIA, a criminal conspiracy was undertaken at Bagli in Dewas District of Madhya Pradesh, where training in arms and assembling of bombs/IEDs was imparted under Joshi's supervision for committing 'terrorist acts in Muslim religious places'. Subsequently, four men carrying four bombs left from Indore and reached Malegaon on September 8, 2006. The NIA claimed that Narwaria and Chaudhari, posing as Sumer Thakur and Badal Yadav respectively, purchased two bicycles from shopkeepers in Malegaon. Singh then placed one bag with two bombs on the bicycle that Chaudhari purchased. They both then went to Mushawarat Chowk, where Chaudhari was accused of placing one bomb/IED in a metallic box and fixing that box on the carrier of the bicycle. That bicycle was then parked near an electric pole. Chaudhari then placed a bag containing the other bomb on a tree inside Hamidia Masjid and Bada Kabrastan. Kalsangra and Narwaria went to Hamidia Masjid and Bada Kabrastan with two bombs in a bag. A box containing one bomb was then fitted into their bicycle that was parked inside the mosque. Another bomb was kept in the bag and it was hung on the main gate of the Masjid. The NIA claimed that after planting the bombs in this manner, they went to Jalgaon and from there to Indore. The accused, as per the NIA, were also alleged to have called up media houses and informed them that 'Dharmasena' had taken responsibility for the bomb blast at Malegaon. They were subsequently arrested in 2013, with some men, including Singh and Sharma, also being accused in the 2008 blast by the NIA. Before the courts In 2019, the Bombay High Court granted bail to Singh, Sharma, Narwaria, and Chaudhari in the 2006 case. The High Court said the men were in jail for over six years without the trial commencing and also said the trial court, which rejected their bail pleas, should have considered the entire record, including the chargesheets that the ATS and the CBI had filed.. Following their bail pleas, the men approached the trial court seeking discharge, pointing out the difference in the findings of the ATS/CBI and the NIA probes. With no hearing having taken place on the discharge applications in the past few years, the trial court proceedings are at a standstill. The lawyers for the accused submitted that the case be heard after the High Court decides on their plea to quash the case and another one challenging the discharge of the Muslim men. The Maharashtra ATS, too, has challenged the decision to release the nine Muslim men and submitted that both sets of accused be put to trial. It had taken a stand in the Malegaon 2008 case that it would not be a party to the case as the NIA had taken over its probe, even as its investigation was called 'dubious' and its officers were accused of planting evidence. The last hearing on the appeals in the High Court took place in 2019. While Singh and Sharma were also investigated by the NIA in the 2008 case when it took over in 2011, they were dropped as accused five years later after the agency claimed there was no proof against them. When it arrested Singh, the NIA had said that Kalsangra and Dange had instructed him to transport the motorcycle fitted with the explosive from Madhya Pradesh and hand it over to Kalsangra.
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel's Ben-Gvir says he prayed at Al Aqsa mosque compound
Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir visited the flashpoint Al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem on Sunday and said he prayed there, challenging rules covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East. Under a delicate decades-old 'status quo' arrangement with Muslim authorities, the Al-Aqsa compound is administered by a Jordanian religious foundation and Jews can visit but may not pray there. Videos released by a small Jewish organisation called the Temple Mount Administration showed Ben-Gvir leading a group walking in the compound. Other videos circulating online appeared to show Ben-Gvir praying. Reuters could not immediately verify the content of the other videos. The visit to the compound known to Jews as Temple Mount, took place on Tisha B'av, the fast day mourning the destruction of two ancient Jewish temples, which stood at the site centuries ago. The Waqf, the foundation that administers the complex, said Ben-Gvir was among another 1,250 who ascended the site and who it said prayed, shouted and danced. Israel's official position accepts the rules restricting non-Muslim prayer at the compound, Islam's third holiest site and the most sacred site in Judaism. Ben-Gvir has visited the site in the past calling for Jewish prayer to be allowed there and prompting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to issue statements saying that this was not the policy of Israel. Ben-Gvir said in a statement he prayed for Israel's victory over Palestinian militant group Hamas in the war in Gaza and for the return of Israeli hostages being held by militants there. He repeated his call for Israel to conquer the entire enclave. The hillside compound, in Jerusalem's Old City, is one of the most sensitive locations in the Middle East. Suggestions that Israel would alter rules at the compound have sparked outrage in the Muslim world and ignited violence in the past. There were no immediate reports of violence on Sunday. A spokesperson for Palestinians President Mahmoud Abbas condemned Ben-Gvir's visit, which he said 'crossed all red lines.' 'The international community, specifically the US administration, is required to intervene immediately to put an end to the crimes of the settlers and the provocations of the extreme right-wing government in Al Aqsa Mosque, stop the war on the Gaza Strip and bring in humanitarian aid,' Nabil Abu Rudeineh said in a statement.
