logo
The Malegaon blast trial that stalled: Shared suspects, multiple probes, but no progress in 2006 case

The Malegaon blast trial that stalled: Shared suspects, multiple probes, but no progress in 2006 case

Indian Express5 hours ago
The 2008 Malegaon blast case, in which several accused were linked to extremist groups, concluded this week following the acquittal of all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, a parallel case from 2006 involving similarly placed suspects remains stalled in court.
Despite the National Investigation Agency (NIA) naming operatives of Hindu outfits in its 2013 chargesheet in the 2006 case, the trial of the four accused has made no progress since 2019. Two of the men named in the 2006 blasts, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, are also accused of having played a role in the 2008 blasts.
What ATS found
On September 8, 2006, four bombs exploded in Malegaon, three on the premises of Hamidia Masjid and Bada Kabrastan just after Friday prayers, and the fourth at Mushawarat Chowk, killing 31 people and injuring 312 persons.
The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which initiated the investigation, claimed that 13 Muslim men, some of whom had met at a conspiracy meeting during a wedding on May 6, 2006, conspired to carry out the blasts. Nine of these men, including Shabbir Masiullah, who was already in prison, were arrested for their role in the explosions.
Four accused who were never apprehended were also named for their role in the blast. The ATS accused them of making and planting the bombs. A subsequent supplementary chargesheet that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed in 2011 also named the same individuals.
The case was transferred to the NIA in 2011 after RSS activist Swami Aseemanand, who was then an accused in the Ajmer Sharif and Mecca Masjid blasts, told the magistrate in his statement in 2010 that the 2006 blasts were allegedly the handiwork of 'right-wing activist' Sunil Joshi and his men. The NIA filed a supplementary chargesheet in 2013, after which the nine Muslim men were discharged from the case in 2016. Seven of these men had earlier been released on bail in 2011, and two others, who were also named in the Mumbai train blasts, were released this year after being acquitted in the case.
NIA investigation
The NIA's 2013 chargesheet named seven men for carrying out the 2006 blast, including Manohar Narwaria, Rajendra Chaudhari, Dhan Singh Shiv Singh, Lokesh Sharma, and Sunil Joshi, who was killed in 2007. Three of the accused, including Kalsangra, Dange, and Ramesh Mahalkar, were never apprehended.
As per the NIA, a criminal conspiracy was undertaken at Bagli in Dewas District of Madhya Pradesh, where training in arms and assembling of bombs/IEDs was imparted under Joshi's supervision for committing 'terrorist acts in Muslim religious places'. Subsequently, four men carrying four bombs left from Indore and reached Malegaon on September 8, 2006.
The NIA claimed that Narwaria and Chaudhari, posing as Sumer Thakur and Badal Yadav respectively, purchased two bicycles from shopkeepers in Malegaon. Singh then placed one bag with two bombs on the bicycle that Chaudhari purchased. They both then went to Mushawarat Chowk, where Chaudhari was accused of placing one bomb/IED in a metallic box and fixing that box on the carrier of the bicycle. That bicycle was then parked near an electric pole. Chaudhari then placed a bag containing the other bomb on a tree inside Hamidia Masjid and Bada Kabrastan.
Kalsangra and Narwaria went to Hamidia Masjid and Bada Kabrastan with two bombs in a bag. A box containing one bomb was then fitted into their bicycle that was parked inside the mosque. Another bomb was kept in the bag and it was hung on the main gate of the Masjid. The NIA claimed that after planting the bombs in this manner, they went to Jalgaon and from there to Indore.
The accused, as per the NIA, were also alleged to have called up media houses and informed them that 'Dharmasena' had taken responsibility for the bomb blast at Malegaon. They were subsequently arrested in 2013, with some men, including Singh and Sharma, also being accused in the 2008 blast by the NIA.
Before the courts
In 2019, the Bombay High Court granted bail to Singh, Sharma, Narwaria, and Chaudhari in the 2006 case. The High Court said the men were in jail for over six years without the trial commencing and also said the trial court, which rejected their bail pleas, should have considered the entire record, including the chargesheets that the ATS and the CBI had filed..
Following their bail pleas, the men approached the trial court seeking discharge, pointing out the difference in the findings of the ATS/CBI and the NIA probes. With no hearing having taken place on the discharge applications in the past few years, the trial court proceedings are at a standstill. The lawyers for the accused submitted that the case be heard after the High Court decides on their plea to quash the case and another one challenging the discharge of the Muslim men.
The Maharashtra ATS, too, has challenged the decision to release the nine Muslim men and submitted that both sets of accused be put to trial. It had taken a stand in the Malegaon 2008 case that it would not be a party to the case as the NIA had taken over its probe, even as its investigation was called 'dubious' and its officers were accused of planting evidence. The last hearing on the appeals in the High Court took place in 2019.
While Singh and Sharma were also investigated by the NIA in the 2008 case when it took over in 2011, they were dropped as accused five years later after the agency claimed there was no proof against them. When it arrested Singh, the NIA had said that Kalsangra and Dange had instructed him to transport the motorcycle fitted with the explosive from Madhya Pradesh and hand it over to Kalsangra.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Modi to inaugurate Bengaluru's yellow line metro, launch phase-3 on Aug 10
PM Modi to inaugurate Bengaluru's yellow line metro, launch phase-3 on Aug 10

Hindustan Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

PM Modi to inaugurate Bengaluru's yellow line metro, launch phase-3 on Aug 10

BJP leader Tejasvi Surya on Sunday announced that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit Bengaluru and inaugurate the Yellow Line Metro on August 10. Tejasvi Surya said this could happen because of Modi's personal insistence that this must be open to public without any further delay.(PMO) Prime Minister will also lay the foundation stone for Metro Phase-3, he said. In a post on 'X', Surya said, "Hon. PM Sri @narendramodi Ji's visit to Bengaluru on August 10 will be a landmark moment for Bengaluru South. He will not only inaugurate the long-awaited Yellow Line Metro operations but also lay the foundation stone for Metro Phase 3 - a project that received Cabinet approval within the first 100 days of his third term." He said the Yellow Line will cater to close to eight lakh riders and the 'infamous Silk Board jam' will be addressed greatly. Public transport is the only option to reduce traffic congestion. "Together, these projects will benefit nearly 25 lakh people in Bengaluru South," he said. The MP said by inaugurating it on August 10, the Yellow Line Metro project would meet the August 15 deadline. Surya said this could happen because of Modi's personal insistence that this must be open to public without any further delay. Surya, who is also the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) national president, quoted Union Urban Affairs Minister Manohar Lal Khattar, who said on 'X', "I am pleased to announce that the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India has kindly agreed to inaugurate 19.15 km Yellow Line from RV Road to Bommasandra of Bangaluru metro with 16 stations at the cost of ₹5,056.99 crore and lay the foundation stone of 44.65 km of Bangalore phase-3 at the cost of ₹15,611 Crore on 10th August 2025." Surya had staged a demonstration to open the Yellow Line of Bengaluru Metro Rail project recently.

‘Not My Father's Money': Will Maharashtra Minister's Remark After Cash Bag Row Prove Costly For Him?
‘Not My Father's Money': Will Maharashtra Minister's Remark After Cash Bag Row Prove Costly For Him?

News18

time17 minutes ago

  • News18

‘Not My Father's Money': Will Maharashtra Minister's Remark After Cash Bag Row Prove Costly For Him?

Shinde Sena leader Sanjay Shirsat's remark comes days after CM Fadnavis, in a cabinet meeting, issued a strict warning to all ministers, saying 'nonsense' won't be tolerated Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde) leader and Maharashtra's Minister for Social Justice Sanjay Shirsat is once again in the middle of a political storm. Just weeks after a video went viral showing him smoking next to a bag allegedly filled with cash, Shirsat has now stirred fresh controversy with another careless statement — this time while addressing a public function in Akola. Speaking at the inauguration of a Social Justice Bhavan, Shirsat made an off-the-cuff remark that has not gone down well with political circles. 'Ask for Rs 5, Rs 10 or Rs 15 crore — I'll approve it immediately. It's government money, not my father's," he said, triggering fresh outrage over the tone and attitude of public representatives handling public funds. This latest statement is likely to test Fadnavis' patience. While the CM has been trying to steer the government clear of needless controversies, repeated incidents like these — especially from the same minister — are causing political embarrassment. Sources suggest that Fadnavis is not pleased, and action may be on the cards if Shirsat doesn't fall in line. Interestingly, in the same speech, Shirsat also advised NCP MLA Amol Mitkari to speak cautiously. 'You give good TRP to the media, but don't talk too much. Otherwise, you'll be in the same situation as me," he said — almost joking about his own previous run-ins with the media. The comment reflects both a lack of remorse and a misplaced confidence that such controversies will blow over without consequence. What's worrying party leaders, however, is the pattern — Shirsat's previous video already put him in a tight spot, with his party leadership reportedly expressing disapproval in private. Now, with this fresh controversy, murmurs within the Mahayuti alliance have started again. Shirsat's refusal to tone down his words despite clear instructions has also reignited public debate over how ministers treat taxpayers' money. Opposition parties are already sharpening their attack, questioning whether the BJP-Sena-led alliance is serious about governance or simply brushing aside such irresponsible behaviour. As public pressure builds, all eyes are now on the Chief Minister. Will he act against Sanjay Shirsat this time, or will this too be let go as 'just another slip of tongue"? मा. शिरसाठ साहेब, पैसा तुमच्या घरचा नसला तरी निवडणुकीच्यावेळी ज्यांना तुम्ही #मायबाप म्हणता त्या 'माय' आणि 'बाप' जनतेचा तर आहे ना! या पैशाचा उपयोग करणारे तुम्ही फक्त तात्पुरते विश्वस्त आहात. त्यामुळं सरकारचा पैसा आपल्या घरचा नाही म्हणून कशीही उधळपट्टी करण्याचा किंवा 'बॅगा… — Rohit Pawar (@RRPSpeaks) August 3, 2025 Opposition reacts Shiv Sena UBT leader Aditya Thackeray on microblogging website X had posted video of Minister Sanjay Shirsat and tagged CMO Maharashtra and wished him 'happy friendship day". He further wrote, 'Due to compulsion of alliance Dharma, Minister who was caught playing cards on mobile was given Sports department. Now will this minister get Finance department?" NCP(SP) MLA Rohit Pawar also posted same video of Shirsat and slammed him for the language and tone which he had used. 'Minister Shirsath, even if the money doesn't come from your personal household, it certainly belongs to the common people of the state whom you call #MyLord during election time! You being minister in the state govt who has given responsibility utilize this money is merely temporary trustees. Therefore, no one has the right to recklessly squander government funds or 'fill their bags' just because it's not their personal money." First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Tejashwi Yadav has 2 voter IDs? Poll body issues notice after BJP's claim
Tejashwi Yadav has 2 voter IDs? Poll body issues notice after BJP's claim

India Today

time35 minutes ago

  • India Today

Tejashwi Yadav has 2 voter IDs? Poll body issues notice after BJP's claim

The Election Commission has asked Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav to prove his claim that his name was deleted from Bihar's electoral roll, seeking the EPIC card number mentioned by him in the press conference on Saturday. Right after Tejashwi made the claim on Saturday, the poll body refuted it, saying his name was there in the draft voter EPIC number is a 10-digit unique identification number that every single voter ID card poll body's notice came after the BJP slammed the former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister, alleging that he had committed a crime by keeping "two voter ID cards". In a notice served to Yadav, the Election Commission said, "It is to be informed that in the press conference held on 02.08.2025, you said that your name was not mentioned in the draft voter list. After investigation, it was found that your name is mentioned on serial number 416 of polling station number 204 (Library Building of Bihar Animal Science University), whose EPIC number is RAB0456228"."As per your quote from your press conference, your EPIC number is RAB2916120. As per preliminary investigation, EPIC number RAB2916120 does not appear to be officially issued. Therefore, you are requested to kindly provide the details of the mentioned EPIC card (along with the original copy of the card) mentioned by you in the press conference, so that it can be thoroughly investigated," the poll body came a day after the RJD leader displayed his Election Photo Identity Card (EPIC) number and entered it into the poll body's official mobile application, which showed a "no records found" error."My name is also not on the voter list. How will I contest the elections?," the RJD leader asked at the after Yadav's claim, the Election Commission released a copy of the electoral rolls showing his details, confirming that he was listed at a booth in the Veterinary College in the poll panel's rebuttal, the BJP alleged on Sunday that Tejashwi Yadav committed a crime by keeping two voter IDs, taking note that the EPIC number he cited was different from the one he officially carries."The Congress and RJD have been thoroughly exposed. Did you (Yadav) lie under oath? Did you present wrong facts to the Election Commission," BJP national spokesperson Sambit Patra said at a press the presser, the BJP Lok Sabha MP also alleged that the voter ID Yadav had mentioned in his 2020 poll affidavit was not the one he had showed on to the Election Commission notice and its rebuttal, BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya demanded that a case be registered against Tejashwi Yadav for holding two voter ID cards, calling it a "criminal offence".advertisementTejashwi's claim came against the backdrop of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, which has stirred a major row, with the Opposition vehemently objecting to it as an "exercise in exclusion" and a "conspiracy" to disenfranchise communities that form its core vote intense protests both inside and outside Parliament, the Election Commission on Friday released the revised draft rolls, eliminating 65 lakh names it identified as illegal voters. - EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Bihar

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store