logo
Controversy over the censor of a University of Colorado regent escalates

Controversy over the censor of a University of Colorado regent escalates

CBS News3 days ago
Black leaders are calling for the firing of University of Colorado President Todd Saliman after a Black CU Regent was censured and sanctioned.
CU's Board of Regents found Regent Wanda James violated her "duty of loyalty" and "duty of care" to the university when she denounced -- and tried to defund -- a public health campaign by CU. They say she was censored for putting her interests above the university's.
James's supporters say she was punished for calling out racist images of Black babies and teens in the campaign, which warned about risks associated with high potency pot.
"You cannot censure and sanction the whistleblower without consequences," said Pastor Terrance Hughes with New Covenant Christian Church.
Hughs and other members of the Metro Denver Ministerial Alliance says Regent James was simply exercising her right to free speech when she spoke out about "Tea on THC" -- an education campaign promoting research by CU's School of Public Health. The research found high potency pot poses a danger to developing brains. The campaign included a social media post focused on Black and Brown babies and teenagers.
James notified CU President Todd Saliman about the images that he agreed were racially insensitive. He pulled the images and issued a public apology.
But James -- who owns a dispensary -- wanted more. She wanted the program defunded, calling it racist propaganda.
Regent Ilana Spiegel insists James wasn't censored for calling out racism but for calling into question the scientific validity of CU's research.
"I can't support actions that put political gain and theater before public health and safety and attempt to defund a scientifically backed initiative that protects the health of teenagers and expectant moms," Spiegel said.
Regents voted 7-1 to censure James, saying she violated policies that require her to always act in the best interest of the university.
Attorney Terrance Carroll, a former Speaker of the House, says telling a regent she can't criticize the university is like telling state lawmakers they can't criticize the state.
"The regents are calling for some new legal standard for elected officials that you have an absolute duty of loyalty to that entity and that's never been heard of before," Carroll said.
Saliman issued a statement saying "As the Greater Metro Denver Ministerial Alliance knows, because I have met with them, I will enthusiastically engage with those who are serious about doing the concrete work that we must all do to make the University of Colorado a place where everyone can see themselves, whether that's as a member of our student body, our faculty or our staff."
CU Regent and Board Chair Callie Rennison also issued a statement saying, "Todd Saliman has the full support of the board, a board that very recently and unanimously found his work to be excellent during his annual review."
While Saliman didn't vote on the censure, James's supporters say, as the head of CU, he should be fired. They also want the board to lift James's censure and sanctions, which include an indefinite ban from serving on committees and attending university events.
Hashim Coats, head of the Colorado Black Democrats, said they won't back down.
"We will not be silenced, we will not be dismissed, and will not let this moment pass without action."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs executive order to 'protect' college sports
Trump signs executive order to 'protect' college sports

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Trump signs executive order to 'protect' college sports

The Departments of Justice, Education, Health and Human Services, as well as the Federal Trade Commission will have to develop a plan to effectuate Trump's policy within 30 days. It is not immediately clear how the White House intends to enforce such a directive, but the Trump administration has been aggressive in pushing its agenda on universities before, such as its efforts to bring colleges to heel for their handling of campus antisemitism. The NCAA and universities have lobbied Congress to pass legislation that would cement their authority over the college athletics system. Two House committees on Wednesday advanced a bill that would bar student-athletes from being considered employees and, similarly to the executive order, shield intercollegiate sports officials from federal antitrust law. Three of the committee chairs leading that effort praised Trump and said the legislation, known as the SCORE Act, 'will complement the President's executive order, and we look forward to working with all of our colleagues in Congress to build a stronger and more durable college sports environment.' Trump's executive order comes hours after Charlie Baker, the head of the NCAA, said such action would be largely insufficient to address the structural issues with the collegiate sports industry. 'Our focus for now really needs to be on trying to get this stuff dealt with through the legislative process because that, at the end of the day, is really the only vehicle we feel can deal with those issues,' he said at the National Press Club in D.C. After Trump's order was issued, Baker issued a statement saying that the NCAA 'appreciates the Trump Administration's focus on the life-changing opportunities college sports provides millions of young people and we look forward to working with student-athletes, a bipartisan coalition in Congress and the Trump Administration to enhance college sports for years to come.'

Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans
Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans

Fast Company

time7 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans

Singapore-based solar panel manufacturer Bila Solar is suspending plans to double capacity at its new factory in Indianapolis. Canadian rival Heliene's plans for a solar cell facility in Minnesota are under review. Norwegian solar wafer maker NorSun is evaluating whether to move forward with a planned factory in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And two fully permitted offshore wind farms in the U.S. Northeast may never get built. These are among the major clean energy investments now in question after Republicans agreed earlier this month to quickly end U.S. subsidies for solar and wind power as part of their budget megabill, and as the White House directed agencies to tighten the rules on who can claim the incentives that remain. This marks a policy U-turn since President Donald Trump's return to office that project developers, manufacturers and analysts say will slash installations of renewable energy over the coming decade, kill investment and jobs in the clean energy manufacturing sector supporting them, and worsen a looming U.S. power supply crunch as energy-hungry AI infrastructure expands. Solar and wind installations could be 17% and 20% lower than previously forecast over the next decade because of the moves, according to research firm Wood Mackenzie, which warned that a dearth of new supplies could slow the expansion of data centers needed to support AI technology. Energy researcher Rhodium, meanwhile, said the law puts at risk $263 billion of wind, solar, and storage facilities and $110 billion of announced manufacturing investment supporting them. It will also increase industrial energy costs by up to $11 billion in 2035, it said. 'One of the administration's stated goals was to bring costs down, and as we demonstrated, this bill doesn't do that,' said Ben King, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice. He added the policy 'is not a recipe for continued dominance of the U.S. AI industry.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The Trump administration has defended its moves to end support for clean energy by arguing the rapid adoption of solar and wind power has created instability in the grid and raised consumer prices – assertions that are contested by the industry and which do not bear out in renewables-heavy power grids, like Texas' ERCOT. Power industry representatives, however, have said all new generation projects need to be encouraged to meet rising U.S. demand, including both those driven by renewables and fossil fuels. Consulting firm ICF projects that U.S. electricity demand will grow by 25% by 2030, driven by increased AI and cloud computing – a major challenge for the power industry after decades of stagnation. The REPEAT Project, a collaboration between Princeton University and Evolved Energy Research, projects a 2% annual increase in electricity demand. With a restricted pipeline of renewables, tighter electricity supplies stemming from the policy shift could increase household electricity costs by $280 a year in 2035, according to the REPEAT Project. The key provision in the new law is the accelerated phase-out of 30% tax credits for wind and solar projects: it requires projects to begin construction within a year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for the credits. Previously the credits were available through 2032. Now some project developers are scrambling to get projects done while the U.S. incentives are still accessible. But even that strategy has become risky, developers said. Days after signing the law, Trump directed the Treasury Department to review the definition of 'beginning of construction.' A revision to those rules could overturn a long-standing practice giving developers four years to claim tax credits after spending just 5% of project costs. Treasury was given 45 days to draft new rules. 'With so many moving parts, financing of projects, financing of manufacturing is difficult, if not impossible,' said Martin Pochtaruk, CEO of Heliene. 'You are looking to see what is the next baseball bat that's going to hit you on the head.' About face Heliene's planned cell factory, which could cost as much as $350 million, depending on the capacity, and employ more than 600 workers, is also in limbo, Pochtaruk said in an interview earlier this month. The company needs more clarity on both what the new law will mean for U.S. demand, and how Trump's trade policy will impact the solar industry. 'We have a building that is anxiously waiting for us to make a decision,' Pochtaruk said. Similarly, Mick McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar, said 'a troubling level of uncertainty' has put on hold its $20 million expansion at an Indianapolis factory it opened this year that would create an additional 75 jobs. 'NorSun is still digesting the new legislation and recent executive order to determine the impact to the overall domestic solar manufacturing landscape,' said Todd Templeton, director of the company's U.S. division that is reviewing plans for its $620 million solar wafer facility in Tulsa. Five solar manufacturing companies – T1 Energy, Imperial Star Solar, SEG Solar, Solx and ES Foundry – said they are also concerned about the new law's impact on future demand, but that they have not changed their investment plans. The policy changes have also injected fresh doubt about the fate of the nation's pipeline of offshore wind projects, which depend heavily on tax credits to bring down costs. According to Wood Mackenzie, projects that have yet to start construction or make final investment decisions are unlikely to proceed. Two such projects, which are fully permitted, include a 300-megawatt project by developer US Wind off the coast of Maryland and Iberdrola's 791 MW New England Wind off the coast of Massachusetts. Neither company responded to requests for comment. 'They are effectively ready to begin construction and are now trapped in a timeline that will make it that much harder to be able to take advantage of the remaining days of the tax credits,' said Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward.

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says he won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin
Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says he won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin

Washington Post

time7 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says he won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin

MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin's Democratic governor, Tony Evers, announced Thursday that he will not seek a third term in 2026, creating the first open race for governor in the battleground state in 16 years. It will be Wisconsin's highest profile race next year, as Democrats also angle to take control of the Legislature thanks to redrawn election maps that are friendlier to the party. They are also targeting two congressional districts as Democrats nationwide try to retake the House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store