Afghan data leak inquiry to be conducted by Parliament's security watchdog
The peer has previously voiced concern over 'serious constitutional issues' raised by the handling of the breach that saw the details of 18,714 applicants for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released in 2022.
The leak prompted an unprecedented superinjunction amid fears the Taliban could target would-be refugees for reprisals, meaning the ISC, which routinely reviews sensitive material, was not briefed.
It also saw the establishment of a secret scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), to bring some of those affected to the UK at a projected final cost of about £850 million.
In a statement on Monday, Lord Beamish said the committee 'has agreed that, once it has considered the requested material, it will conduct an inquiry into the intelligence community's role and activity in connection with the loss of data relating to Arap applicants in February 2022'.
The Ministry of Defence said it had been instructed by Defence Secretary John Healey to give 'its full support' to the committee.
The ISC, which is made up of MPs and peers, had asked for the release of defence assessments that formed the basis of the superinjunction, as well as other material relating to the Arap scheme.
It hard argued that under the Justice and Security Act 2013, classification of material is not grounds on which information can be withheld from the committee, given its purpose is to scrutinise the work of the UK intelligence community.
Thousands of Afghans included on the list of people trying to flee the Taliban are unlikely to receive compensation after their details were accidentally leaked.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the Government would 'robustly defend' any legal action or bid for compensation, adding these were 'hypothetical claims'.
It has also been reported that the MoD will not proactively offer compensation to those affected.
In total, the Government expects 6,900 people to be brought to the UK under the ARR scheme, which was introduced under the previous Tory administration after a defence official leaked the data 'in error' in February 2022.
Along with the Afghan nationals, the breach saw details of more than 100 British officials compromised, including special forces and MI6 personnel.
An MoD spokesman said: 'The Government strongly welcomes the Intelligence and Security Committee's scrutiny of the Afghan data incident.
'We recognise the urgent need to understand how these significant failures happened and ensure there's proper accountability for the previous government's handling of this matter.
'The Ministry of Defence has been instructed by the Defence Secretary to give its full support to the ISC and all parliamentary committees. If incumbent ministers and officials are asked to account and give evidence, they will.
'We have restored proper parliamentary accountability and scrutiny for the decisions that the department takes and the spending that we commit on behalf of the taxpayer.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Why is MAGA splitting over Israel?
👉Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app👈 On this week's episode, Yalda and Richard talk about the growing international condemnation of Israel's war in Gaza, including from a usually staunch ally - the evangelical right wing of America. But what has made them voice a rare criticism? The two also talk about the shaky ceasefire that is currently in place in the southern Syrian city Sweida. This is the first real test for the new Syrian leader, but can he contain the violence? And, Yalda gives an update on the situation in Afghanistan where women and girls have been arrested by the Taliban for violating their strict dress code.
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
‘No breach' by UK Government of human rights on Russia probe
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found there was no breach of measures aimed at ensuring free and fair elections after a long-running legal action backed by three former MPs. The Strasbourg court acknowledged there was evidence of a 'significant and ongoing threat' to the UK's democratic processes from Vladimir Putin's country, but said Westminster had taken action to respond to the danger. The case was lodged at the ECtHR in 2022 by three then-MPs, Labour's Ben Bradshaw, the Green Party's Caroline Lucas and the SNP's Alyn Smith (below), after applications for a judicial review of Boris Johnson's decision not to order an investigation into Russian activities were declined by domestic courts. In a judgment published yesterday, the court ruled that the UK Government's response did not violate the right to free elections. The judgment said: 'While the Court does not underestimate the threat posed by the spreading of disinformation and the running of 'influence campaigns', their nature is nevertheless such that it is difficult to assess accurately the impact that they may have on individual voters and, by extension, on the outcome of a given election.' There was also a risk to freedom of expression if there were 'knee-jerk reactions' to debate during an election contest. 'There is a very fine line between addressing the dangers of disinformation and outright censorship,' the judgment said. READ MORE: 'Wake up, America!': Alan Cumming hits out at Donald Trump over trans attacks Any actions taken by states 'to counter the risk of foreign election interference through the dissemination of disinformation and the running of influence campaigns' would have to be balanced against the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. 'Therefore, while states should not remain passive when faced with evidence that their democratic processes are under threat they must be accorded a wide margin of appreciation in the choice of means to be adopted in order to counter such threats,' the judgment said. 'In the court's view, the United Kingdom's response to the threat of Russian election interference did not fall outside the wide margin of appreciation afforded to it in this area.' The case followed reports from the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee and the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) which looked at alleged Russian disinformation campaigns, including during the 2016 Brexit referendum. The court noted that 'there were undoubtedly shortcomings in the Government's initial response' to the Russian threat but there were 'thorough and independent investigations' by the ISC and the DCMS committee. The judgment also noted that following the publication of the ISC report in 2020 there had been new laws passed to help address the risk: the Elections Act 2022, the National Security Act 2023 ('the NSA 2023') and the Online Safety Act 2023. Following the judgment, Lucas said: 'It's hugely significant that the court has found in favour of our case that foreign interference is a threat to our right to free and fair elections and that they recognise there will be cases when states do have a duty to investigate. And while it's clearly disappointing that they found that the Government had done enough, I've no doubt that this will continue to be contested. 'The bottom line is that we still cannot be assured that our democratic system is robust against foreign interference – and for as long as that is the case, we will continue to explore all possible avenues for remedy.' READ MORE: Broadcast watchdog called in over Labour's 'misleading' Scottish water claim Tessa Gregory, a partner at Leigh Day, the law firm which represented the three former MPs, said: 'In an important judgment, which will have far-reaching implications, the court has accepted, contrary to the UK's submissions, that in order to safeguard citizens' right to free and fair elections, states will in certain circumstances have to take positive action against foreign interference in electoral processes including by investigating credible allegations. 'Our clients continue to think the UK has fallen short of protecting our democracy and are considering next steps in relation to the court's conclusion that there has been no violation of their right to free and fair elections.' A UK Government spokesman said: 'We note today's judgment, which found no violation. 'We are committed to safeguarding our electoral processes, which is why we recently announced tougher new rules on political donations to protect our elections from the growing danger of foreign interference. 'These changes will boost transparency and accountability in politics by closing loopholes that would allow foreign donors to influence elections. 'More broadly, national security is our first responsibility, and we have taken action to harden and sharpen our approach to threats – whether standing with Ukraine against Russia's illegal invasion, placing Russia on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme, and working with allies to monitor and counter Russian submarines and ships in UK waters.'
Telegraph
15 hours ago
- Telegraph
Putin is cornered. Ukraine is the point of main action
The eyes of the world are looking anywhere but at the most dangerous situation on the planet right now: the war in Ukraine. After what seemed to be a war-changing intervention by President Trump a few weeks ago, virtually every Western leader and country seems to be looking elsewhere. It is blithely assumed that Putin will come to the peace negotiation table in 40 days' time with cap in hand. Many MPs' thoughts seem to be turning to their extensive summer holidays which begin this week. When they end in five weeks' time, Trump's 50-day deadline will be almost upon us. We must ensure that it is a just peace for Ukraine we are discussing then, rather than an extension of the war to include us all. The only person who is still focused is Putin. As Trump announces much needed air defence and long-range missiles for Kyiv, Putin has ramped up drone swarm and missile strikes on civilian targets to 500 per night with a promise of 2000 very soon. We know where these mass drone factories are: we should be giving Ukraine the weapons to destroy them. With some fanfare over the weekend, we were led to believe that UK defence minister John Healey was going to galvanise the 'coalition of the willing' in Europe to up weapon delivery to Ukraine. Unfortunately, this much vaunted speech has barely caused a ripple. Most government ministers are apparently more interested in the Middle East than Europe. But however dreadful the events in Gaza and Syria might be, we are unlikely to get dragged into another war in the Middle East. We might very well in Europe. We have far too many protesters on our streets shouting about the children of Gaza. Why is nobody shouting about all the children killed by Putin's drones? Why isn't anyone on the streets waving banners in support of Ukrainian families from whom Putin has stolen 20,000 children? Israel has many critics but nobody credible would accuse that nation of child-snatching at all, let alone on such an enormous scale. Let us not forget that our Security Services warned us only last week that we are being subjected to a massive and continuous cyber-attack from Russia, and we have had to sanction 20 Russian spies because they have conducted – and continue to orchestrate – espionage and sabotage in this country. Russia is waging covert warfare against us here and abroad – and all anyone cares about is Gaza and Israel. We know the Russian elite are living in fear, as Putin's purges take their toll. The wealthy and powerful of Moscow are terrified following recent arrests and mysterious deaths. Putin's grip on power may be slipping: paradoxically this may make him more dangerous to the world, not less. The Russian economy is in freefall and will fall off a cliff if Trump does impose his promised sanctions at the end of the summer, but we must not give the Russian military freedom of manoeuvre over the next five weeks to seize more territory, kill more Ukrainians and steal more children. We can prevent this by accelerating weapons to Kyiv – Mr Trump has made it plain that the US will supply weapons if we will pay for them. We should also seriously consider using Nato jets to enforce no-drone zones around protected civilian targets, hospitals and schools, in the major cities like Kyiv and Lviv. This would be a show of intent that even the Kremlin would notice and yet it could not be taken as any form of attack on Russia. The Germans have a military concept, 'schwerpunkt', the point of main focus or action on which all force must be brought to bear. It is Ukraine, not Gaza, not Iran, that is the schwerpunkt now for the Western world. However much our political leaders, on all sides of the House, seem to believe they deserve the summer off, they don't. They must stay focused on the war that actually threatens us. The stolen children of Ukraine cannot take a holiday, the cruelly hard pressed Ukrainian soldiers cannot either. If we fail to prevent the war engulfing Europe this summer, none of us will be on holiday next summer.
