Public employees in Iraq's Kurdish region caught in the middle of Baghdad-Irbil oil dispute
Public employees in Iraq's Kurdish region caught in the middle of Baghdad-Irbil oil dispute (Image: AP)
Tensions have escalated between Iraq's central government in Baghdad and the semi-autonomous Kurdish region in the country's north in a long-running dispute over the sharing of oil revenues.
The central government has accused the Kurdish regional authorities of making illegal deals and facilitating oil smuggling. Baghdad cut off funding for public sector salaries in the Kurdish region ahead of the Eid al-Adha holiday. Kurdish authorities called the move "collective punishment" and threatened to retaliate.
A long-running dispute It's the latest flare-up in a long-running dispute between officials in Baghdad and Irbil, the seat of the Kurdish regional government, over sharing of oil revenues.
In 2014, the Kurdish region decided to unilaterally export oil through an independent pipeline to the Turkish port of Ceyhan.
The central government considers it illegal for Irbil to export oil without going through the Iraqi national oil company and filed a case against Turkey in the International Court of Arbitration, arguing that Turkey was violating the provisions of the Iraqi-Turkish pipeline agreement signed in 1973.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Iraq stopped sending oil through the pipeline in March 2023 after the arbitration court ruled in Baghdad's favour. Attempts to reach a deal to restart exports have repeatedly stalled.
Last month, Prime Minister Masrour Barzani of the Kurdistan Regional Government travelled to Washington, where he inked two major energy deals with U.S. companies. The federal government in Iraq then sued in an Iraqi court, asserting that it was illegal for the regional government to make the deals without going through Baghdad.
Iraq cuts off funds for public employees in Kurdistan The Iraqi Ministry of Finance announced a decision last month to halt funding for salaries of public sector employees in the Kurdistan Region. The move sparked widespread outrage in Irbil, triggering strong political and public reactions.
The ministry said in a statement that the decision was due to the Kurdish regional authorities' "failure to hand over oil and non-oil revenues to the federal treasury, as stipulated in the federal budget laws."
It added that any transfer of funds would be conditional on "the region's commitment to transparency and financial accountability."
The federal Ministry of Oil accused Irbil of failing to deliver crude oil produced in the region's fields to the ministry for export through the state-run SOMO company, which it said had led to massive financial losses amounting to billions of dollars.
The ministry warned that "continued non-compliance jeopardizes Iraq's international reputation and obligations, forcing the federal government to reduce oil production in other provinces to stay within Iraq's OPEC quota - which includes Kurdistan's production, regardless of its legality."
Accusations of oil smuggled out of Kurdistan Baghdad has also accused Irbil of smuggling oil out of the country. An Iraqi official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly said the government had tracked 240 cases of illegal border crossings from Iraq's Kurdistan Region into Iran between Dec. 25, 2024, and May 24, 2025, aimed at smuggling oil derivatives.
The Kurdish region's Ministry of Natural Resources in a statement called those allegations "a smokescreen to distract from widespread corruption and smuggling in other parts of Iraq.
The KRG agreed to sell its oil through SOMO, opened an escrow account, and handed over revenues - yet Baghdad failed to meet its financial obligations."
It accused the federal government of being responsible for the halt in oil exports via Turkey due to the lawsuit it filed in 2023 and said the Kurdish region had delivered over 11 million barrels of oil to the Ministry of Oil without receiving any financial compensation.
The ministry accused Baghdad of "violating the constitution and pursuing a deliberate policy of collective punishment and starvation against the people of the Kurdistan Region" through the halt in funding for salaries.
Barzani in a statement on the eve of the Eid al-Adha holiday described the withholding of salaries as an "unjust and oppressive decision" and a "policy of mass starvation" comparable to the chemical attacks and "genocide" launched by Iraq's former long time strongman ruler, Saddam Hussein, against the Kurds.
"The people of Kurdistan have resisted with steadfastness and courage in the face of all forms of pressure and tyranny" and "regret was the fate of the tyrants," he said.
In the meantime, residents of the Kurdish region feel caught in the middle of the yearslong political dispute once again.
Saman Ali Salah, a public school teacher from the city of Sulaimaniyah, said the salary cut off comes at a particularly bad time for him - his daughter was hit by a car 40 days ago and is still in the hospital.
He blamed both Baghdad and Irbil for the situation.
"All the money I had was spent on transportation from the house to the hospital and I haven't paid my rent for the past two months," Salah said. "I don't know what to do. All I can say is that God will take revenge on these so-called officials on Judgement Day."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-Russia ties: Kremlin says 'quick results' to improve relations unlikely; talks set to continue
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin (AP) The Kremlin on Wednesday said that efforts to improve Russia-US relations are unlikely to yield 'quick results', despite a series of calls between presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin . Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters, "There are many obstacles in bilateral relations, and it is unlikely that we can hope for any quick results." Apart from phone calls, Putin has met with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff several times in Moscow, and top diplomats have held talks in Saudi Arabia. Lower-level delegations have also held talks in Istanbul to discuss enhancing the operations of their respective embassies. Talks are set to continue in Moscow and Washington, said Russia's ambassador to the US, as reported by the news agency TASS. Trump has unsettled Europe by seeking closer ties with Moscow, a sharp shift from Washington's effort to isolate Putin for the past three years. Meanwhile, US secretary of defence Pete Hegseth has stated before a congressional subcommittee that the US is set to reduce its military aid to Ukraine. Trump has voiced his inclination to bring an end to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and has urged the warring countries to strike a peace deal. In the latest offensive, Russian strikes have killed three people and wounded 60 others in Ukraine's northeastern city of Kharkiv. Russia has rejected calls for an unconditional ceasefire and has insisted that Ukraine surrender large areas of territory and forego its efforts to join Nato.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why for-profit colleges are poised to flourish under Trump's education policies
How new federal rules could boost for-profit colleges despite quality concerns. (AI Image) President Donald Trump's recent proposal to redirect federal funding from elite universities like Harvard to trade schools signals a significant shift in the US higher education landscape. While Trump lacks the direct authority to reroute the $3 billion in research grants appropriated by Congress, his push aligns with a broader Republican agenda aimed at boosting for-profit colleges and career training programs. These institutions, which have faced controversy and regulatory scrutiny in the past, now appear set for a resurgence under Trump's policies and a supportive Republican Congress. Trump's administration is advancing legislation and regulatory changes that benefit for-profit colleges, particularly through new workforce Pell grants and relaxed accreditation standards. These shifts could open federal aid to a wider range of short-term training programs, many operated by for-profit entities, despite ongoing concerns about educational quality and student outcomes. Federal policies open doors for for-profit education The House-passed tax and budget bill, formally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, introduces new workforce Pell grants available to students enrolled in eight to fifteen-week workforce training programs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 BHKs starts at ₹ 72.6 Lakh | No Floor rise | Zero PLC Mahindra Happinest Tathawade Get Quote Undo While programs must be state-approved, they do not need to be accredited, a major departure from previous requirements. As reported by the Forbes, this change lowers the regulatory barrier for many for-profit institutions to access federal funds. Michelle Dimino, director of the education program at Third Way, told Forbes that the bill's quality assurance measures are weak. Eligible programs must meet a 70% completion rate and a 70% job placement rate, thresholds she describes as easily manipulated by predatory schools. "Sometimes colleges might look for students who are already employed right as a target audience because they know that they'll do good on a job placement measure," she said. Furthermore, Trump plans to overhaul the accreditation process, making it easier for for-profit schools to qualify for federal aid. Nicholas Kent, Trump's nominee for undersecretary of education and a former lobbyist for Career Education Colleges and Universities (CECU), reflects the administration's sympathetic stance toward the industry. His nomination, as reported by the Forbes, awaits a Senate floor vote after passing the committee on a party-line vote. Investors rally behind for-profit colleges The financial markets have responded positively to the Trump administration's pro-for-profit stance. According to Jeffrey Silber, a senior analyst at BMO Capital Markets Equity Research, stocks in the sector surged after Trump's election. Adtalem Global Education's shares rose 61%, while Perdoceo Education Corporation saw a 46% increase, with notable jumps occurring immediately after the election, as quoted by the Forbes. CECU praised Trump's focus on career education and his suggestion to divert Harvard's funding to trade schools. "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," the association stated, according to the Forbes. Concerns over quality and student outcomes Despite these policy shifts, experts warn about the risks of expanding federal aid to for-profit colleges without sufficient oversight. Michael Itzkowitz, founder of The HEA Group, highlighted troubling data showing 59% of certificate-granting institutions leave graduates earning less than $32,000 annually—roughly the income of a typical high school graduate—even ten years after enrollment, as reported by the Forbes. The rollback of key regulations, including the gainful employment rule and the 90/10 rule, both designed to protect students from poor-performing programs, further exacerbates these concerns. The House bill would also limit borrower defense protections that allow students defrauded by schools to cancel loans, a safeguard introduced during the Obama administration after the collapse of Corinthian Colleges. Dimino warned Forbes that expanding access without proper safeguards could invite abuses seen in the past. "Every time for-profit colleges have been given access to more federal aid, abuses have followed," she said. As the US faces economic uncertainty, Silber noted that for-profit colleges may be seen as a "defensive" investment, potentially attracting more students seeking quick retraining, even as the broader economy fluctuates. In summary, the combination of relaxed regulations, new funding streams, and a politically favorable environment positions for-profit colleges to expand rapidly under President Trump's education policies. However, this growth comes amid persistent concerns about educational quality and financial risks for students. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade truce tested: Trump raises China tariffs to 55% even as rare earth deal advances; rights group flags forced labour risks in Xinjiang mineral supply chains
US President Donald Trump said the United States will receive magnets and rare earth minerals from China under a new deal, even as tariffs on Chinese goods are set to rise to 55%. The development comes amid renewed scrutiny over supply chains tied to China's Xinjiang region, where human rights groups allege the use of forced labour. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The rare earth announcement and tariff hike followed two days of trade talks in London, where the US and China reached a tentative framework to resume stalled negotiations. The discussions reportedly focused on easing mineral and technology-related disputes that had threatened to unravel a fragile truce reached in Geneva last month, AP reported. The move comes as a new report by Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance identified 77 Chinese companies in the titanium, lithium, beryllium, and magnesium sectors operating in Xinjiang—many allegedly linked to state-run 'labour transfer programs' involving Uyghur and other Turkic minorities. According to the report, these supply chains potentially impact global brands such as Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola, and Sherwin-Williams, who may source materials like titanium from Xinjiang. These minerals are used in a range of products, from commercial paints and thermos cups to aerospace and auto components. 'Mineral mining and processing in Xinjiang rely in part on the state's forced labour programs for Uyghurs and other Turkic people in the region,' the report stated, urging companies to re-evaluate their sourcing. China's Foreign Ministry rejected the findings, calling them fabricated. 'No one has ever been forcibly transferred in Xinjiang under work programs,' said spokesperson Lin Jian. 'The so-called allegation of forced labour is nothing but a lie concocted by certain anti-China forces.' While the companies named in the report have not commented, the issue echoes long-standing concerns. A 2022 UN report said China may have committed crimes against humanity in the region, citing arbitrary detention of over 1 million Uyghurs. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Under US law signed in 2021, imports from Xinjiang are blocked unless companies can prove their goods are free of forced labour. Initially targeting solar panels, tomatoes, and textiles, enforcement has since expanded to cover aluminum and seafood. The International Energy Agency recently warned that global critical mineral supply is becoming highly concentrated, with China dominating the refining and processing of lithium, cobalt, graphite, and other key inputs—many of which originate in or pass through Xinjiang. Despite the intensifying scrutiny, Trump's announcement signals that the US continues to rely on China for essential mineral supplies, even as broader trade tensions escalate.
