CBI files supplementary charge-sheet in SSC scam case
CBI
submitted a supplementary charge-sheet in connection with the SSC jobs-for-cash scam and the group-D recruitment corruption case at the Alipore Special CBI Court Thursday.
The agency informed the court that the number of witnesses has increased and new evidence was found leading to an increase in documents.
Sources said 36 new witnesses and 84 new documents were added in the SSC-related case and one new witness was added in the group-D recruitment probe.
You Can Also Check:
Kolkata AQI
|
Weather in Kolkata
|
Bank Holidays in Kolkata
|
Public Holidays in Kolkata
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The scammer's trail
There has been a sharp increase in 'digital arrest' scams in India. As per data from the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal, the reported digital arrest scams and related cybercrimes have more than tripled, rising from 39,925 in 2022 to 1.23 lakh in 2024, with the defrauded amount growing from Rs 91.14 crore to Rs 1,935 crore. Such scams tend to involve fraudsters impersonating law enforcement officials such as the police, the CBI and the Income Tax Department in order to dupe people. The victims, who are from a cross-section of society, including industrialists, private sector professionals, and senior citizens, are ensnared through fake interrogations on video calls. An investigation in this paper has carefully documented several instances where people have been duped of lakhs and crores of rupees. The reports in this paper show how money is transferred from the victims to mule accounts that are used by scammers, and then in some cases to other accounts across the country. In one instance, a staggering sum of nearly Rs 6 crore was transferred over many bank accounts in a matter of a few minutes. In another case, there are indications of the stolen funds being used to buy cryptocurrency. Recoveries have been few and far between. In most cases, the bulk of the amount is withdrawn in cash from the mule accounts. In one case reported in this paper, a retired IAF veteran, who was defrauded of Rs 1.59 crore, has till now got back only Rs 16.1 lakh. In another case, the victim, a former deputy nursing superintendent, who had lost Rs 83 lakh of her pension and savings, has not recovered anything. The authorities and banks have taken steps to spread awareness and monitor suspicious activities. On October 27, 2024, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his Mann Ki Baat, warned people against digital arrests. 'Beware of digital arrest frauds. There is no system like digital arrest under the law,' he said. The Reserve Bank of India has also cautioned against digital arrest scams. Banks have launched awareness campaigns to educate the public regarding the nature of the scams. These efforts need to be ramped up urgently. Governments, banks and the central bank must continue to spread awareness about such scams and educate the public about the modus operandi of the fraudsters. Banks must further tighten the KYC process — as per a report in this paper, the addresses of the mule accounts were 'fictitious' in a number of cases. Accounts with large suspicious transactions — for instance, there were 1,960 transactions in one account on one day — need to be flagged immediately and appropriate action taken. Such cases should also be investigated more swiftly.
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
'State Can't Tap Phones Just To Prevent Corruption In Violation Of Law': Madras High Court
Last Updated: The HC said phone tapping is permitted only under Section 5(2) of Telegraph Act when there is a clear public emergency or threat to public safety, backed by reasons and due process In a significant judgment that reiterates constitutional protections in the digital age, the Madras High Court has quashed a 2011 phone-tapping order issued by the union ministry of home affairs against a private company executive, holding that the interception lacked the mandatory threshold of 'public emergency" or 'public safety" as required under Section 5(2) of the Telegraph Act. The bench of Justice N Anand Venkatesh opined that the Centre's authorisation to intercept the phone conversations of P Kishore—then managing director of Everonn Education Ltd—was issued without sufficient justification and in violation of the constitutional right to privacy under Article 21. A bribery FIR was registered by the CBI in August 2011 involving an IRS officer (A1), who allegedly demanded Rs 50 lakh to shield the company from tax scrutiny. Kishore (A2) was accused of arranging the bribe, and a friend of the officer (A3) was intercepted carrying the cash. However, the CBI did not apprehend Kishore in possession of the bribe or at the scene. The Centre had authorised the interception on the grounds of 'public safety" and 'preventing incitement to the commission of an offence". However, the court noted that these terms cannot be used in a vague or routine manner. Citing the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in People's Union for Civil Liberties and KS Puttaswamy, the judge held that such surveillance must meet the constitutional tests of necessity, proportionality, and legality. 'Neither the occurrence of public emergency nor interest of public safety is a secretive condition… either would be apparent to a reasonable person," the court observed, referring to the SC precedents and added that no such justification was visible in the interception order, which appeared to be 'mechanical" and 'cyclostyled". Further, the high court held that procedural safeguards under Rule 419-A of the Telegraph Rules, which require review by a committee and periodic oversight, were also not followed, thereby rendering the order illegal. Importantly, the court rejected the authorities' argument that even assuming that the order under Section 5(2) of the Act was without jurisdiction, the evidence so collected was admissible since it is a well-settled proposition of law that even illegally collected evidence is admissible provided it is relevant. The court opined that once the surveillance order was found to be unconstitutional, any material or evidence collected as a result of it would also be tainted. The HC also pointed out that in the case at hand, the petitioner was only accused of an offence; hence, the presumption of innocence still applied in his favour. Referring to the illegality of the interception, the bench held, 'Where the tapping of phones is found to have been done in violation of Section 5(2) of the Act, the order would be clearly unconstitutional. An unconstitutional order is void under Article 13 and no rights or liabilities can flow from it." First Published:
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
CBI books city man for encashing fraudulent TDS refunds using PAN loophole
Nagpur: After a probe by the income tax department revealed that fraudulent refunds on tax deducted at source (TDS) were availed by a former bank staffer, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has booked a Nagpur resident, Rattandeep Borkar. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He allegedly misused his login credentials from the time he was working for Canara Bank, which later discontinued him, but the credentials were left active. Borkar identified cases where the TDS was deducted but the permanent account number (PAN) was not available. Taking advantage of the gap, he filed revised returns claiming refunds in such cases. However, this time he inserted PANs of persons known to him, and tweaked the system so that he got the tax refunds in their names. Borkar inserted PANs of 92 persons in entries where the PAN was not available in the bank records. Total refunds of over Rs1.26 crore were availed, and the persons whose PAN was used also got a cut, says the FIR. The CBI first information report also covers unknown officials of the PSU bank, noting that the fraud could not have happened without insider connivance. TOI had reported that tax sleuths are probing a TDS refund claim in a PSU bank in April. Based on the probe, the CBI registered an offence now. Borkar is alleged to have misused the original conso file and the unique token numbers in the systems. He then identified the cases from the financial year 2011-12 to 2018-19 and downloaded the latest TDS returns for revision. He also modified the files using the file validation utility and return preparation utility, as well as forging Canara Bank officials' signatures. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Even Form 27A was generated, finally enabling the refund amounts to go into his accomplices' accounts, according to the CBI FIR. The income tax department too has sent notices to the beneficiaries. The refunds were revised from July 2023 to September 2024. The allegedly fraudulent returns were filed in Gandhi Nagar, Sitabuldi, Ramdaspeth, and Sadar branches of the bank. Meanwhile, sources said mainly senior citizens who get interest on their accounts generally don't have PAN. Such accounts were particularly identified and exploited.
