Land-related cases: Wapda chief comments on AG's findings
He made these remarks during a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Water Resources, chaired by Senator Shahadat Awan.
The Wapda Chairman informed the Committee that land-related cases worth more than Rs 298 billion are currently pending. He further clarified that audit objections amounting to Rs 2.3 billion are not linked to corruption.
Audit reports for FY2024-25: Govt initiates probe into foreign-funded uplift projects
Senator Awan noted that some of Wapda's legal cases, particularly involving land acquisition for the Mangla Dam, have remained unresolved for over two decades.
Many have been ignored for the past 16 years, and in some instances, Wapda does not even possess records of when the cases were filed. 'I've only been in office for ten days,' said the Chairman, 'and many of these cases lack proper documentation. We are working to reduce the backlog.'
In response to a question from Senator Quratulain Marri about whether Wapda has digitised its records, the Chairman admitted that the organisation's records are still not digitised, though efforts are under way. He reiterated that the Rs 298 billion in pending land cases are largely connected to land awards for the Mangla Dam.
The Secretary of the Ministry of Water Resources explained that although affectees received compensation, many still filed cases in court. In some instances, land was acquired but the dam was never constructed. Senator Saadia Abbasi observed that some individuals reportedly disappear after filing land-related claims. Senator Awan expressed concern over the massive sums involved, stating, 'since 2019, there hasn't been a single hearing scheduled in the Lahore High Court for your case.'
Wapda officials briefed the Committee that six cases are under investigation by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB)—two related to the Kacchi Canal and another two involving the Nai Gaj Dam.
Expressing surprise at the briefing, Senator Awan criticized Wapda for not tracking court dates for three years despite having a large legal team. 'Instead of solutions, the Wapda is presenting complaints,' he remarked.
Responding to the concerns, the Secretary for Water Resources clarified that Wapda is not a direct party in these NAB cases, as they were initiated by the Bureau itself.
The Committee Chairman directed that a letter be sent to NAB to obtain details of all Wapda-related cases and also requested a complete record of any criminal proceedings involving the authority.
Senator Saadia Abbasi stressed that NAB's involvement does not automatically validate the allegations. Senator Awan added that a Rs30billion illegal contract case related to the Nai Gaj Dam is also pending with NAB.
The Secretary of Water Resources clarified that the case involves private contractors and not Wapda directly.
According to an official statement, the Committee expressed serious concern over long-pending legal cases, unresolved land disputes worth trillions of rupees, and the recent shutdown of the Neelum-Jhelum Hydropower Project.
Senator Awan emphasized that some of Wapda's legal issues have remained stagnant for over 21 years. He pointed out that Wapda is occupying land worth Rs 10 billion and cases worth more than Rs 298.48 billion—primarily related to Mangla Dam lands—are still pending in courts. He also raised alarm over the Rs 30 billion illegal contract case involving the Nai Gaj Dam, urging Wapda Chairman to convene an emergency meeting on all audit cases and to submit a progress report to the Committee.
Other members shared similar views. Senator Faisal Rahman remarked, 'It seems Wapda's legal team is not doing its job,' highlighting the lack of progress on longstanding disputes.
The Committee Chair called for accountability and summoned both the FIA and NAB to the next meeting. He instructed Wapda and the Ministry of Water Resources to provide comprehensive details of all related cases.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Fragmented climate funding in KP: a costly gamble
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) has now endured two climate catastrophes in just three years, and the scale is staggering. In August 2025 alone, flash floods claimed 327 lives, including 158 deaths in Buner in a single week, while more than 1,600 buildings were damaged, 428 livestock lost, and entire tourist families swept away in Swat. These tragedies echo the devastation of 2022, when over 600,000 people were displaced, 7,700 cattle killed, and 326,000 homes destroyed; it is a vivid proof that this cycle is no longer an anomaly but a deepening pattern of climate vulnerability. Pakistan has faced this magnitude before. In 2010, record monsoon rains submerged one-fifth of the country, directly affecting 20 million people, killing nearly 2,000, and inflicting over USD 40 billion in damages to infrastructure, agriculture, and industry. Yet, despite these mounting disasters, KP's climate finance remains fragmented. The province has earmarked billions: Rs 41.1 billion for mitigation and Rs 93.7 billion for adaptation in its 2023-24 budget. On paper, these are impressive figures. In practice, however, this funding risks becoming a costly gamble: poorly tracked, scattered across departments, and dangerously out of sync with escalating risks. The costs of inaction are already visible. Climate shocks are overwhelming local capacity, from catastrophic floods to urban health crises like rising dengue cases in Peshawar, driven by hotter temperatures, erratic rainfall, and higher humidity. In other words, volatility is not just destroying infrastructure, it is driving up health costs and straining already stretched public services. The question is not whether KP is spending money, but whether it is spending it wisely. While mitigation funds are spread across sectors such as forestry, transport, and waste management, there is no central 'climate budget.' This invisibility makes it nearly impossible to track where money goes or how effective it is. Projects that clearly contribute to resilience, say in irrigation or health, are not labelled as climate-related, meaning they cannot be reported domestically or to international funders. This is more than an accounting issue. Pakistan's own National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) and National Adaptation Plan (NAP) stress the need for traceable and transparent financing. By ignoring this, KP not only weakens accountability but also cuts itself off from potential external support. At the national level, reforms are moving in the opposite direction. With support from the IMF, Pakistan has rolled out Climate Budget Tagging (CBT), which integrates climate classification into the federal budget process. A new form, III-C, now tracks climate-related subsidies and programs across ministries. The results are telling. The federal government allocated Rs. 603 billion for mitigation in 2025-26, up 183 percent from the previous year, and Rs 85.4 billion for adaptation, up 83 percent. These are not just inflated figures: they are tagged, traceable, and reportable to international partners like the Green Climate Fund (GCF). This transparency has already improved Pakistan's credibility with global climate finance institutions. In contrast, KP has no such system. Without tagging or a climate-aware financial management framework, even well-intentioned projects risk disappearing into a policy blind spot. The province cannot demonstrate alignment with national priorities, nor can it credibly pitch to global funds. This blind spot is particularly dangerous in a province as climate vulnerable as KP. Floods, forest degradation, and health emergencies are escalating. Without transparent budgeting, every rupee spent on risks becoming a missed opportunity, one that could otherwise attract external finance, build resilience, and reduce losses. For KP, the path forward is clear. The province must adopt climate budget tagging across departments, taking lessons from the federal government's recent reforms, so that climate-related expenditures are visible and traceable. Allocations should be aligned with national frameworks such as the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) and National Climate Change Policy (NCCP), ensuring consistency and coherence with Pakistan's broader climate strategy. Equally important is the disclosure and centralization of climate spending to strengthen accountability and enable external financing opportunities. Departments need to be integrated so that climate action is not scattered across silos but coordinated toward shared outcomes. Climate change is not waiting, and KP cannot afford to either. In a province where over 300 lives were lost in a single season of floods and dengue cases continue to rise, fragmented financing is no longer a bureaucratic flaw. It is a gamble with people's lives. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Judges letter challenges CJP on bench formation
A letter from Supreme Court judges Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar surfaced on Wednesday, reigniting debate over the judiciary's handling of the 26th Constitutional Amendment and whether it should be taken up by a constitutional bench or the full court. In the detailed letter, the two senior judges questioned Chief Justice Yahya Afridi's decision to disregard the procedure committee's majority view in favour of constituting a full court. Justice Shah and Justice Akhtar recalled that as members of the committee formed under the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023, they had on October 31, 2024, decided to constitute a full court to hear petitions challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment. "We had decided to constitute a full court," the letter stated. However, the case was never scheduled. When the decision was not implemented, the judges followed up with a letter on November 4, but even that failed to bring compliance, it added. They emphasised that the notes later penned by the chief justice — dated October 31 and November 5 — were not shared with them. "We are forced to write now because the minutes of meetings have been uploaded after nearly ten months, and the two notes of the Chief Justice were not issued or provided to the undersigned," the judges wrote. Instead, one of those notes was read out during a meeting of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), a forum which, they argued, had no jurisdiction in the matter. "The Judicial Commission was not the forum for such a matter, nor could the Committee's decision of 31.10.2024 be forwarded to any constitutional bench or committee thereof, for the simple reason that they did not exist on that date," they stressed. The two judges took issue with the sudden disclosure of proceedings, questioning why minutes that were previously restricted had now been placed in the public domain. They recalled that in November 2024, the committee had by majority decided that minutes would have "restricted circulation" and not be uploaded online. "The obvious question that arises is as to why have the minutes now been publicly disclosed despite the interdict placed by the Committee itself? This may well become clear once the judicial year begins in September and the Constitutional Benches start functioning again," the letter said. The letter sheds light on events of October 31, when both judges met the Chief Justice in his chambers. They pressed for a full court to hear the petitions, citing a crisis of confidence. "We underlined that the very legitimacy of the Supreme Court, as well as the office of the Chief Justice, was under question, and that only a transparent and collective adjudication — by the Full Court could restore public confidence," the letter notes. The chief justice, however, resisted, maintaining that such cases could only be heard by newly-created constitutional benches under the 26th Amendment itself. The judges objected that referring the challenge to a bench constituted under the very amendment being contested would gravely undermine the court's credibility. Although the Chief Justice sought an hour to reflect, he later informed the judges in Justice Akhtar's chambers that he had instead sought views individually from other judges. The two judges objected sharply. "The Chief Justice's act of seeking opinions individually was contrary to law and judicial practice, and opinions obtained in this manner had no legal standing," they stated. According to them, consensus could only be achieved through a proper committee or full court meeting. Later the same day, a formal committee meeting was convened, the letter said. After discussion, the judges voted in favour of constituting a full court, while the chief justice dissented. The majority decision, recorded in the minutes, was that petitions against the 26th Amendment would be fixed for hearing on November 4 before the full court. But the decision was never carried out. "The decision was not implemented. The petitions were not fixed before the Full Court on 4.11.2024," the letter recorded. When the judges wrote again to the chief justice pointing out non-compliance, no response was received, it said. Instead, the chief justice issued a note and moved the matter to the Judicial Commission, which "approved" the constitution of a seven-member bench. The judges criticised this step as an attempt to circumvent the committee's binding majority decision. "Once again, a binding decision of the Committee was not given effect. The notes of the Chief Justice do not provide any reason or justification for non-compliance," they wrote. According to the judges, this failure left the court without a collective institutional response. "At a time when no question was more important for the Court, it was necessary to immediately create consensus by calling a Full Court meeting That response could only come from the Judges themselves, by convening in open Court or meeting in full conclave. The dire consequences of that not happening continue to reverberate in the Court, the judiciary, and the entire constitutional framework," the letter stated. They further asserted that "the challenges to the 26th Amendment continue to remain pending and a golden opportunity to decide them at the earliest instance before the Full Court — has been lost, perhaps irretrievably." Now that the minutes and related records have been uploaded, the judges have demanded that their explanatory letter also be placed alongside on the Supreme Court website. "If at all it is now for History to judge then, at least, let the record be complete," they concluded. The judges were categorical: "It was mandatory to constitute a full court on the 26th Amendment, and no one could override it. The Chief Justice's notes undermined the majority decision." The refusal to constitute a full court has invited speculations and misgivings as to why the beneficiary of the 26th constitutional amendment are reluctant to examine as if the amendment is undermining independence of the judiciary. Former Sindh High Court Bar Association president Salahuddin Ahmed believes that CJP Afridi's refusal to abide by the Practice & Procedure Committee's decision to list the petitions challenging the 26th Amendment was unlawful. "He may have been of the genuine view that such petitions should be heard by the Constitutional Bench (whenever it was formed) rather than the Full Court. But the majority of the Committee felt otherwise. So the lawful thing to do would be to place the matter before the Full Court & if the majority felt that his view was correct & the petitions should not be heard till the CB was formed; they would have passed a formal order saying so. Equally, if the majority of the Full Court felt the view of Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah & Justice Munib Akhtar was correct, they would have explained the reasons why in their order." Salahuddin Ahmed says that CJP Afridi's apprehension that this step would undermine judicial collegiality, with respect, does not appear logical. Firstly, collegiality cannot be prioritised over judicial responsibilities. Secondly, the now 1-year long refusal to let challenges to the 26th Amendment be heard — has clearly undermined (not enhanced) comity within the judiciary & its reputation for independence" Finally, ex-SHCBA president states that this failure has led to needless speculation and misgivings that perhaps the reluctance to list the challenges to the 26th Amendments was the fear that some of the 9 judges who reportedly agreed the petitions should not be listed might perhaps change their mind after arguments in open court or in a formal meeting, he adds. Advocate Rida Hosain says that CJP Yahya Afridi's reluctance to place the petitions challenging the 26th Amendment before a full court is inexplicable. "The CJP's assertion that he went around informally asking judges their view is frankly absurd. Questions which should have been determined in an open courtroom are being decided behind closed doors. As it remains, the CJP has violated a binding decision of the Committee and eroded public confidence in the judiciary. The CJP holds office by virtue of the 26th Amendment. As long as he delays the challenge, his appointment remains the subject of dispute", she adds. Rida Hosain further states that Justices Mansoor Ali Shah and Munib Akhtar have said that if it is for history to judge then let the record be complete. The 26th Amendment has enabled the court martial of civilians, the capture of the Islamabad High Court, and the reserved seats reversal. While these disastrous decisions were taken, the constitutional validity of the 26th Amendment remained disputed. If the 26th Amendment is ultimately struck down, the decisions taken by the Constitutional Bench will come under question. This is not a question for history to judge. The only way forward is for the petitions to be put before the Full Court (as it existed prior to the passage of the 26th Amendment)", she further states. Mirza Moiz Baig advocate said that the letter engenders serious concerns about the Chief Justice's role. While CJ Afridi has enjoyed an unimpeachable reputation, his recalcitrance to hear the petitions challenging the 26th Amendment erode the public's confidence in the Supreme Court and in the office of the Chief Justice. Moreover, with the Government subsequently amending the Practice and Procedure Act to deliver a majority to the CJ, concerns about the Apex Court's impartiality only aggravate, he adds. Atira Ikram advocate lamented that it is unfortunate that such critical constitutional issues, such as the 26th amendment have also become victim to the division and discourse that has been prevalent in our judiciary. "It would have been far more beneficial in restoring the public's confidence, if judges relegated difference of opinion to their judgments, and not play out their personal vendettas on public stages, normally reserved for politicians", she adds.
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Shehbaz assures all possible help to flood victims
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday visited the flood-affected districts of Swat, Buner, Shangla, and Swabi, where he emphasised that every available national resource will be mobilised to accelerate recovery efforts and restore normalcy in the affected areas. The prime minister was accompanied by the federal ministers and Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, a press statement issued by the PM Office said. The prime minister and COAS received a comprehensive briefing on the ongoing rescue and relief operations in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. During their interaction with flood victims, the prime minister assured them of the federal government's and Pakistan Army's unwavering commitment to extending maximum support in this critical hour. The prime minister, while appreciating the tireless dedication of the armed forces and civil administration, reaffirmed solidarity with the flood-affected population and assured them of all possible assistance. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also drew attention towards the illegal encroachments, timber mafia and mining / crushing activities, especially in waterways which contribute greatly towards loss of lives and damages. He directed that Pakistan must act as a hard state where no one is above law and necessary actions be taken against defaulters without distinction. The COAS also interacted with troops, police and civil administration personnel involved in rescue efforts, lauding their selfless commitment in assisting victims of floods and torrential rains. COAS directed ground formations to approach this responsibility with utmost devotion and to spare no effort in alleviating the hardships of flood-stricken families. He underscored that the safety and relief of fellow citizens remain the foremost priority, commending the forces and civil administration for their untiring service. Earlier, the prime minister and participants also offered Fateha for those who lost their lives in this catostrophe. Later, the prime minister disbursed relief cheques among the victims of the recent torrential rains and floods. Addressing the participants, the prime minister expressed deep sorrow over the destruction caused by recent cloudbursts and heavy rains in various parts of the country, and said that these natural calamities had resulted in loss of many lives and properties. The prime minister mentioned that incidents of cloudbursts occurred in Swat, Buner, Shangla, and Swabi. In Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP) alone, around 350 people were martyred and hundreds of others sustained injuries, he said, adding that overall more than 700 people lost their lives due to rains and floods across the country. Recalling the 2022 floods, he noted that hundreds of thousands of acres of crops were destroyed and countless homes were washed away in Sindh. At that time, the federal government announced Rs 100 billion in aid to support the victims and rebuild the affected areas. He emphasised that today, with the support of all stakeholders, the government was fully committed to facing this new challenge. He said that he had issued clear instructions that roads and infrastructure must be repaired regardless of whether they fall under provincial or federal jurisdiction. The prime minister said that the federal ministers were currently engaged in relief activities in KP. Additionally, the prime minister announced seven days of free electricity for those affected and directed immediate repairs of damaged road infrastructure. Highlighting the root causes of such destruction, the prime minister pointed out that hotels and houses were often constructed on natural waterways, which worsened the impact of floods. He stressed the urgent need to discourage such construction and called for the development of policies and laws to prevent building on illegal land, especially along water channels, to avoid future disasters. He stated that while the government was already engaged in the fight against terrorists and Khawarij in KP, this natural disaster had added another layer of challenge. However, he emphasized that all stakeholders, including the government, armed forces, and civil society were working together to aid in the relief and recovery efforts. He reiterated that Pakistan is one home with four units and there should be no politics in times of such national crisis. He appreciated the efforts of Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ali Amin, and the armed forces who were working diligently to assist in relief operations. He also acknowledged the support of Field Marshal Asim Munir, under whose cooperation the government was striving to stabilize the country's economy. The prime minister said that Pakistan was among the 10 worst-affected countries by the impacts of climate change. He pointed out that deforestation also contributes to cloudbursts and emphasized the importance of preserving forests to mitigate the impact of future natural disasters.
