logo
Troubled NHS trust to quit prison health contract

Troubled NHS trust to quit prison health contract

Yahoo09-04-2025
An NHS trust has announced its plans to withdraw from a contract to provide healthcare to prison inmates.
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (NHFT) is currently responsible for looking after prisoners at seven jails across the East Midlands and an immigration centre.
In a letter to staff, seen by the BBC, the trust said it had taken the "difficult" decision so it could focus on making improvements in other areas after a damning report from the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
Last year, the watchdog published a review, known as a Section 48, criticising the trust, which had been responsible for the care of paranoid schizophrenic Valdo Calocane, who fatally stabbed three people in Nottingham in June 2023.
The CQC ordered the trust to make improvements after identifying "a series of errors, omissions and misjudgements" by mental health services over Calocane's care.
In its letter to staff, the trust said: "The board felt that we were unable to maintain the quality improvements we have made, in part due to our need to focus capacity and resources on the Trust's improvement journey following the Section 48, CQC and homicide report recommendations."
It added: "We have also had difficulty recruiting into these services on a sustainable basis, and the consensus was that a specialist provider might have more success with this.
"And when, certainly from a regulatory point of view, our focus must be on the Section 48 improvements, we felt that a specialist provider may be better placed to make the improvements needed in the offender health setting."
Under the current contract, the trust cares for inmates at HMP Nottingham, HMP Ranby and HMP Lowdham Grange in Nottinghamshire.
The contract also covers HMP Fosse Way in Leicestershire, HMP Morton Hall, Swinderby Immigration Centre, HMP Lincoln and HMP North Sea Camp in Lincolnshire.
The trust's chief operating officer Becky Sutton said: "We can confirm that we have served notice on the offender health (prison healthcare) contracts that we currently deliver on behalf of NHS England.
"Following the Section 48 recommendations, our priority is to focus our capacity and resources on achieving the objectives of our Integrated Improvement Plan.
"We will be working closely with colleagues who are affected, partners at NHS England and prison services to support a smooth transition of services when a new provider is identified, and until that time our teams will continue to provide care in these settings."
The trust said the decision did not affect Rampton Hospital, in Nottinghamshire, where it is responsible for the care of prisoners at the secure mental health unit.
Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Call for review after first inmate death at new jail
'Repeated failures' at jail where three men died
CQC 'gave legitimacy' to trust before Nottingham attacks
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bindi Irwin says she's finally healing after 13 years of feeling ‘utterly ashamed' due to endometriosis
Bindi Irwin says she's finally healing after 13 years of feeling ‘utterly ashamed' due to endometriosis

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bindi Irwin says she's finally healing after 13 years of feeling ‘utterly ashamed' due to endometriosis

Bindi Irwin said she is 'slowly gaining' her strength back after more than a decade of living with endometriosis and struggling with its debilitating effects. The TV star, 27, the daughter of late wildlife expert Steve Irwin, said in an Instagram post that after 13 years and multiple surgeries, she is 'genuinely healing' and is able to 'function in everyday life without wanting to throw up or pass out from the pain'. '13 years of fighting for answers. 51 endometriosis lesions, a chocolate cyst, and my appendix were all removed across two surgeries,' she started, adding that a hernia she got from when she gave birth to her daughter in 2021 'that was unzipping,' was also looked at. 'I can FINALLY say that I'm feeling better. Genuinely healing. I can function in everyday life without wanting to throw up or pass out from the pain. Slowly, slowly gaining my strength back. 'I cannot express the gravity of my emotions as I am beginning to recognise myself again. I felt utterly ashamed as a teenager and young adult being told that my pain was just part of being a woman. I felt lesser. I felt hurt. I felt weak. That is not ok,' she continued. 'Young girls and women shouldn't feel alone with pain in the driver's seat of their lives. We need to take away the stigma of talking about women's health. It's time to have open discussions and make change on a global scale.' Endometriosis is a chronic condition in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus grows outside it, often on the ovaries, fallopian tubes, or pelvic lining. This misplaced tissue has no way to leave the body during menstruation, leading to inflammation, scarring, and sometimes infertility. The disorder affects an estimated one in 10 women, causing symptoms such as severe pelvic pain, heavy periods, pain during sex, and fatigue, according to the Mayo Clinic. While the exact cause remains unclear, factors such as genetics, immune dysfunction, and hormonal influences are thought to play a role. Irwin first posted about her struggle with endometriosis in 2023, writing about the 'stigma around this awful disease' and that she was sharing her story for 'anyone who reads this and is quietly dealing with pain and no answers'. She has also previously spoken about how her pain had been dismissed by doctors for a very long time. 'It's so hard because you feel like it's inescapable,' she told People in August 2023. 'You don't know what's wrong with you, and then when people tell you 'It's all in your head' or 'you're hormonal' or 'just have a cup of tea, lay down,' you end up feeling so desperately alone because there's no answer.' 'I was so scared that they wouldn't find anything because we had run out of everything else to test for,' she recalled. 'After years of doctors and various people telling you there's nothing, you really start to believe it. You wind up in this strange space of self-doubt, fear and insecurity. That's hard to overcome.' In 2022 she underwent a laparoscopy procedure after experiencing pain so debilitating that it forced her into the foetal position, which confirmed her endometriosis. She shared that during the medical procedure, doctors discovered 37 lesions and a cyst on her ovary, which she had removed through surgery. In May this year, Irwin was unable to attend the annual gala honouring her father after her appendix ruptured. Her brother Robert Irwin told People at the time: 'She's going to be OK, but surgery – out of all the things we were ready for, that was not one of them. She's just come out the other side of endometriosis and now the appendix goes. Health is so important – it really is.'

Those Red Light Tanning Beds? Yeah, They're A Scam
Those Red Light Tanning Beds? Yeah, They're A Scam

Refinery29

time3 hours ago

  • Refinery29

Those Red Light Tanning Beds? Yeah, They're A Scam

Welcome to Sun Blocked, Refinery29's global call to action to wake up to the serious dangers of tanning. No lectures or shaming, we promise. Instead, our goal is to arm you with the facts you need to protect your skin to the best of your ability, because there's no such thing as safe sun. 'They are much safer as the red light has the opposite effect of [UV], it protects your skin.' I wince as I read this. I'm exchanging emails with 19-year-old Crisiant, who uses a red light tanning bed roughly every six weeks. Last year, she discovered that a tanning salon in her area had two of these beds, and she assumed they would be better for her skin. These machines‚ also known as collagen-boosting tanning beds, combine ultraviolet (UV) light — which tans the skin — with tubes that emit red light. Even if you've never stepped inside one, you've probably seen red light before. From LED face masks to full-body treatments that immerse the skin in red light, these devices have become skincare staples, promising to boost collagen, reduce acne, and heal skin. ' Collagen [tanning beds] make no logical sense at all. [Beds] that deliver UV radiation are harmful and cause skin cancers, full stop. Cloaking them as something good for your skin health is totally disingenuous. Dr. Clare Kiely, consultant dermatologist ' Later, on the phone, it sounds like Crisiant is well aware of the dangers of regular tanning beds. She first tried one aged 18, but learning more about the risks put her off: 'If you [use] one now and then, I didn't think it'd be too bad, but I didn't want to do it consistently because I knew how dangerous they were,' she tells me. To Crisiant, red light tanning beds felt different — a little safer: 'It still gives you a tan while doing your skin good,' she says. 'I went on it once and noticed [a difference] within the same day. I had a really bad breakout on my face, and it sort of soothed and cleared my skin. It was really strange as [tanning beds] have never done that for me before.' It also made her feel more confident. It's not hard to see why Crisiant thinks these machines are a safer, even beneficial alternative to regular tanning beds — and she's not the only one. But it highlights worrying misconceptions around red light tanning beds and their damage. Head to TikTok or Instagram, and you'll find countless videos posted by people who are convinced these beds can be used safely and that the risk of burning is lower. But that's not true. Combining red light with UV in a tanning bed counteracts any of the potential benefits. Consultant dermatologist Dr. Clare Kiely, cofounder of The Skin Diary, puts it plainly: 'Collagen [tanning beds] make no logical sense at all.' It is important to point out the differences between a red light-only bed and a tanning bed that emits both UV and red light. 'Red light therapy without UV is a very different proposition,' confirms consultant dermatologist Dr. Derrick Phillips. 'It is generally considered safe and may help with things like inflammation, wound healing and improving overall skin tone. However, the results do tend to be subtle, and I always remind patients that it's not a quick fix.' Dr. Beibei Du-Harpur, scientific engagement lead at The Skin Diary, agrees: 'More clinical evidence is needed to confirm the effectiveness [of red light] as a treatment for the skin, but there have been promising small studies from a skin aging perspective.' The bottom line? On its own, red light is low-risk. But its popularity in skincare has made some see red light tanning beds as a good thing. ' Not only does UV increase your risk of skin cancer, it breaks down collagen — the very thing red light is supposed to help boost — and speeds up the skin's aging process. In other words, any benefits of red light are immediately cancelled out by the UV. ' Are red light tanning beds 'safer' to use than regular tanning beds? The World Health Organisation has classed UV-emitting tanning devices as carcinogenic to humans since 2009. It doesn't matter if UV comes from a tanning bed that also emits red light; it still causes damage to our DNA. Not only does UV increase your risk of skin cancer, it breaks down collagen — the very thing red light is supposed to help boost — and speeds up the skin's aging process. In other words, any benefits of red light are immediately cancelled out by the UV. Dr. Kiely says that those who market machines combining UV with collagen-boosting red lights can't have a good understanding of how light affects our skin. Why? It just doesn't make sense: '[Tanning beds] that deliver UV radiation are harmful and cause skin cancers, full stop,' she says. 'Cloaking them as something good for your skin health is totally disingenuous.' Dr. Phillips agrees and sees no evidence that combining red light with UV neutralizes the harm. 'If anything, it gives a misleading impression of safety,' he says. 'These are still [tanning beds] emitting UV radiation, and they carry all the same risks as traditional tanning beds. From a dermatological perspective, they're just as concerning.' Why do people still use tanning beds despite the dangers? It's difficult to say how many of these red light and UV machines exist, but IBISWorld, a global industry research platform, reports that there were more than 28,000 tanning salons in the United States in 2024. A quick Google reveals that plenty offer combined UV-red light beds. The reasons why people use beds like these are complex. Bronzed skin remains a beauty ideal, and among younger people, tanning beds are still seen as trendy. Crisiant hints that this is partly why she first tried one: 'You see all the girls getting these [tanning beds] and a nice tan from it,' she says. 'I feel like they are that phase that doesn't end for a lot of people.' Some credit tanning beds for boosting their mood. Others believe they help them get enough vitamin D — a proven myth. Another misconception is that they can help improve skin conditions like acne or eczema, but prolonged use of tanning beds can actually worsen these conditions and weaken the skin over time, making it more susceptible to infection. Then there's the theory that using tanning beds occasionally or for short bursts makes it 'safer' — something I thought was true as a teenager. Because sun damage isn't always visible right away, it's easy to underestimate the harm. Even those who understand their risks struggle to stop using them, with some describing themselves as feeling 'addicted'. If tanning beds are so dangerous, why aren't they banned? While tanning beds remain so widely available, often without clearly displayed warnings, there is always a risk that people may assume that they are somewhat safe, otherwise they'd be banned. Refinery29's stance is clear: tanning beds should be banned, as they are in Iran, Brazil, and Australia. Just one session before age 35 more than doubles your lifetime risk of melanoma, a skin cancer that can spread to other parts of the body. Red light doesn't change that. That's why many experts support a tanning bed ban and agree that the growing trend for red light beds is another reason it's needed: 'The messaging of these collagen-boosting [tanning beds] confuses those who may not understand the detrimental effects that [tanning beds] have on our skin,' says Dr. Du-Harpur. She adds this is particularly dangerous given beauty standards around having a 'healthy' tan — a phrase that doesn't make any sense when a tan is our skin's damage response to UV. Marketing red light tanning beds as collagen-boosting, she adds, 'will encourage people to risk their health in the name of beauty and present an illusion that it may be safer or different to a conventional UV-focused [tanning bed].' She stresses, 'They aren't safe — with or without red light therapy.' When I ask Crisiant if anything might put her off using a red light tanning bed, she says it's like she has 'a devil and an angel on each shoulder.' She might change her mind one day, but she can't say she'll stop for now. Crisiant isn't against a tanning bed ban, though: 'Even though I use them, if they were [banned] I don't think I'd be massively annoyed because I know that the government would be doing it for our benefit,' she says. Little has changed since Refinery29 reported on what it would take for tanning beds to be banned entirely last May. Sadly, only a handful of US states have a blanket ban. But if we're serious about tackling rising skin cancer rates, intervention is needed. At the very least, more regulation around any kind of tanning bed use, or better yet, a total ban.

How you can pack a lunch that a child will actually eat
How you can pack a lunch that a child will actually eat

Los Angeles Times

time4 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

How you can pack a lunch that a child will actually eat

For Rebecca Zeitlin, packing her 5-year-old son's school lunch is always full of surprises. Offer him a peanut butter and jelly sandwich at home and he won't touch it. But pack it in his lunch with fruits, vegetables and a small treat and he'll dive in. He will 'chow down' on applesauce at preschool parties. But if she served him applesauce at home, 'he'd look at me like I was crazy,' Zeitlin said. Like many parents, Zeitlin has been thinking about school lunch ahead of her son's first day of kindergarten. Lunchtime will be different than it was at his small private preschool, where teachers could more closely monitor whether he was eating. She's already been eyeing school lunch conversations in mom groups on Facebook, and she's has new lunch boxes ready to pack. She plans to start off with some of her usual go-tos. Perhaps she'll pack him chicken nuggets or pasta alongside strawberries, oranges or watermelon. 'I think it's going to be real interesting to see what next month is going to be like,' Zeitlin said. 'I've got my plans for now, but when reality hits, his lunches might look different.' For parents of children 5 and under, navigating school lunch can be challenging. Colorful videos fill TikTok and Instagram showing off creatively shaped sandwiches and neatly cut vegetables laid in bento box-like containers. Lunch box styles can make a difference, influencers advise, as they share school-friendly recipes. It's easy for parents to worry that they got it wrong when a child returns home with uneaten food, said Anet Piridzhanyan, a clinical dietitian at Children's Hospital Los Angeles. But there are a few basic steps to make school lunches a success. What should parents put in their toddler's lunch box? It's important to remember that the start of the school year is exciting, but can also be overwhelming for a young child, said Lori Russell, a registered dietitian and nutritionist at the Mayo Clinic. It may not be that they don't like their food — they may simply be distracted. Either way, lean into familiarity to encourage them. And don't offer too many options. 'We have this tendency to overdo it,' Russell said. 'If parents want to fill that lunch box with everything that that kid might possibly consume that you have in the house, that's stressful.' Kids should have one main item in their lunch box and two or three snacks, which could include carrot sticks or an apple and perhaps a small treat such as a piece of chocolate, she said. Piridzhanyan agreed, recommending that parents rotate through the five food groups throughout the week, packing different fruits, vegetables, grains, proteins and dairy. Consistency is key. If a parent plans to offer something new in their child's lunch box, they should pair it with a food item they know their child likes, she added. 'Every day is a new day,' Piridzhanyan said. 'They've only been around for two to five years, so it's not like us where, when we see food, we're like, 'Oh yeah, I know what that is.'' That's something that Gabriella May has learned as her daughter has grown. May, of Fresno, has been making videos of her daughter's school lunches for TikTok since she started kindergarten. She's now in fifth grade. Her daughter has always been a picky eater, so introducing new foods at school without the pressure of having mom and dad nearby was helpful — and still is, she said. What's the best lunch box for toddlers? It's important for parents to make sure that the food they pack is accessible and that they have the utensils and napkins that they need, the dietitians said. Parents should practice opening containers with their child and make sure the lunch box isn't too heavy. 'We tend to focus on what's in it and what's being consumed, and not the actual container,' Russell said. 'And does the child like it? Are they enjoying opening it? Carrying it? All that really makes a difference.' That's where, for many parents, bento box-style lunch boxes come in. The compartmentalized containers have been popularized on social media. For Zeitlin, the PlanetBox lunch box has been a great go-to. 'It's just kind of convenient,' Zeitlin said. 'Everything's in one place.' Russell, who has a 4-year-old, said that when a child likes their lunch box or container it can encourage them to eat. That's why options with beloved characters can be a good choice. 'It's not just about the food, it's about the favorite cup, the plate,' Russell said. How to get your kid to eat lunch at preschool Parents should ask their children why they did or didn't eat their lunch, Russell said. Sometimes the bread might have been too soggy, the apple slices may have browned or the texture of the macaroni and cheese may have changed after spending all day in a lunch box. If the answer isn't satisfying, ask the teacher what they have observed, she said. It helps to know how the teacher or child-care provider stores the food, Piridzhanyan added. Sometimes kids will have access to a refrigerator, other times the food may be left out in the sun, so it helps to be able to plan accordingly by adding an ice pack or a thermos to help keep food safe and appetizing, she said. 'A lot of times the lunch box bags are left out in the classroom, so that part's really important,' Piridzhanyan said. Presentation does matter to a degree, but there's no need to go overboard. If parents want to do something special, Russell recommends quickly using a cookie cutter on a sandwich or adding a sticker alongside the snacks. Zeitlin can't wait until her 5-year-old son learns to read. Then, she'll start leaving notes in his lunch box expressing encouragement and telling jokes. She's held on to a book of dad jokes for 20 years just for the occasion. Sequeira reports for The Times' early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store