logo
Tencent says 'no deal' to Nexon, Kakao Mobility stake rumors

Tencent says 'no deal' to Nexon, Kakao Mobility stake rumors

Korea Herald19-06-2025
In rare public denial, Chinese tech giant refutes reports of new Korean deals after years of increasing stakes in local firms
Chinese tech giant Tencent denied reports Thursday that it was considering acquiring stakes in Korean firms Nexon and Kakao Mobility, dismissing speculation surrounding its potential investment moves.
According to Reuters, Tencent said claims about its interest in purchasing shares in Korean game giant Nexon and Kakao's mobility unit were 'untrue,' following media reports that suggested the company was seeking to expand its footprint in Korea's IT and mobility sectors.
The rebuttal comes after a local news outlet reported that Tencent was in talks to acquire around 40 percent of Kakao Mobility's shares held by financial investors, including private equity firm TPG (29 percent), Carlyle Group (6.17 percent), LG (2.46 percent) and Google (1.52 percent). Kakao is the largest shareholder with a 57.2 percent stake.
Industry sources said TPG and other financial investors have been engaged in discussions with potential buyers such as the VIG consortium, which includes Mubadala and Goldman Sachs, regarding the sale of their shares. The report that Tencent had also expressed interest in Kakao Mobility added fuel to speculation over multiple suitors.
Separately, Bloomberg reported last week that Tencent was considering acquiring Nexon shares worth $15 billion from its holding company NXC and had been in contact with the family of the late Nexon founder Kim Jung-ju. The report suggested Tencent aimed to strengthen its presence in the global gaming market.
Neither Kakao Mobility nor NXC have issued official statements in response to the reports.
TPG is reportedly exploring options with various investors regarding the sale of its Kakao Mobility stake, but sources said the talks remain at a preliminary stage and do not involve any intent to secure management control.
Tencent previously showed interest in acquiring Nexon during a 2019 bidding process but did not participate in the main auction.
Some sources suggest that Tencent may continue its efforts to pursue an acquisition of the Korean firms.
Tencent has a history of investing in Kakao and its affiliates. Since making its initial investment in Kakao in 2012, the Chinese tech giant has acquired stakes in Kakao Games and Kakao Entertainment. It currently holds a 5.95 percent stake in Kakao.
Meanwhile, Tencent's music streaming arm, Tencent Music Entertainment Group, recently acquired a 9.38 percent stake in SM Entertainment from Hybe through a block deal valued at 240 billion won ($174 million).
It makes Tencent the second-largest shareholder of SM, following Kakao and Kakao Entertainment's combined 41.5 percent stake.
yeeun@heraldcorp.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

KHNP denied access to power plant projects in N. America, Europe under Westinghouse deal: sources
KHNP denied access to power plant projects in N. America, Europe under Westinghouse deal: sources

Korea Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

KHNP denied access to power plant projects in N. America, Europe under Westinghouse deal: sources

The state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) has been prohibited from bidding for new power plant projects in North America and the European Union (EU), excluding the Czech Republic, and other countries under its agreement with US energy firm Westinghouse over an intellectual property (IP) dispute, industry sources said Tuesday. Under the agreement signed in January, the KHNP is only allowed to sign fresh deals in the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and South Africa, according to the sources. But the Korean company is banned from bidding for new nuclear power plant deals in North America and Britain, Japan, Ukraine and EU nations, except for the Czech Republic. The KHNP and Westinghouse signed the settlement deal in January this year after the latter accused the Korean firm of infringing on its IP, claiming the KHNP's APR 1000 and APR1400 plant designs utilize its licensed technology. The deal removed a major hurdle for the KHNP-led Korean consortium to sign a final contract in June, with an estimated value of 26 trillion won, to build two nuclear power units in the Czech Republic. The Czech deal, which marked South Korea's first overseas nuclear power plant contract since 2009, was initially expected to open new doors for Korean firms seeking business opportunities in Europe. Earlier in the day, KHNP President Whang Joo-ho confirmed his company has closed operations in Poland amid speculations that its deal with Westinghouse influenced the decision. Poland is the fourth European country where the KHNP confirmed its business closure, following Sweden, Slovenia and the Netherlands. "After the new Polish administration took office ... the country decided to drop the state-owned enterprise projects (in the nuclear power sector) ... and that is why we withdrew our business there," Whang said during a meeting with the parliamentary industry committee. It also reportedly includes a condition requiring Korean companies to pass the latter's technology independence verification when independently developing and exporting next-generation nuclear reactors. The 50-year deal is also said to include provisions requiring the KHNP to sign a goods and services purchase contract worth about $650 million with Westinghouse per export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. Asked whether the KHNP believes the deal with Westinghouse was fair, Whang said, "As the party accepting the terms, I cannot say it was fair," but added, "I believe it is something we can endure and still make a profit from." Whang refused to confirm the details of the deal, citing a nondisclosure agreement. Earlier in the day, the presidential office said it has ordered the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy to review whether the deal was signed under due process. (Yonhap)

Seoul stocks end lower for 2nd day as cautious investors eye key global events
Seoul stocks end lower for 2nd day as cautious investors eye key global events

Korea Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Seoul stocks end lower for 2nd day as cautious investors eye key global events

South Korean stocks closed lower for the second consecutive session Tuesday as investors remained cautious ahead of key global events, including a policy outlook on the US Federal Reserve's potential rate cuts. The Korean won lost ground against the US dollar. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index lost 25.72 points, or 0.81 percent, to close at 3,151.56. Trade volume was light at 281.47 million shares worth 8.54 trillion won ($6.14 billion), with decliners sharply beating gainers 610 to 270. Foreigners sold a net 453.5 billion won worth of local shares, while individual and institutional investors purchased a net 88.7 billion won and 252.9 billion won, respectively. The index had opened in negative territory and traded within a narrow range during the morning session, but extended losses in the afternoon on heavy foreign selling. Investors remained cautious as attention turned to the Fed's annual symposium later this week, where Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to speak on the central bank's policy direction. Also in focus is the upcoming summit among US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which investors hope may lead to progress toward ending the prolonged Russia-Ukraine war. Lee Kyung-min, an analyst at Daishin Securities, noted that there is heightened global caution ahead of the Jackson Hole meeting, along with growing interest in the potential outcomes of meetings related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. "With both issues unlikely to produce meaningful results in the short term, and with the absence of other major macroeconomic developments, markets are likely to remain in a wait-and-see mode," he said. In Seoul, market heavyweights closed mixed. Among tech shares, chip giant Samsung Electronics remained unchanged at 70,000 won, while its rival SK hynix retreated 1.68 percent to 263,000 won. Leading battery maker LG Energy Solution went up 0.26 percent to close at 384,000 won. Bio shares were also mixed. Major pharmaceutical firm Samsung Biologics declined 0.39 percent to 1,024,000 won, while Celltrion remained the same at 172,900 won. Defense giant Hanwha Aerospace dropped 6.87 percent to close at 827,000 won. The local currency was quoted at 1,390.7 won against the greenback at 3:30 p.m., down 5.7 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)

Samsung, LG stand to benefit as BOE faces US OLED ban
Samsung, LG stand to benefit as BOE faces US OLED ban

Korea Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Samsung, LG stand to benefit as BOE faces US OLED ban

BOE's exit may remove Apple's key price lever, easing margin pressure on Samsung, LG panels Chinese display giant BOE Technology Group is on the verge of being pushed out of the US OLED market after a string of legal defeats to Samsung Display, a shift that could strengthen Samsung and LG's grip on the high-value organic light-emitting diode supply chain. According to industry sources on Tuesday, the US International Trade Commission issued a limited exclusion order in July, barring BOE from exporting certain OLED products to the US for 14 years and eight months. The preliminary ruling concluded that BOE misappropriated trade secrets from Samsung Display, in violation of US intellectual property law. This decision stems from a trade secret lawsuit filed by Samsung Display in October 2023. Industry insiders say the chances of the ruling being overturned in the final decision are slim. BOE had already lost a separate patent infringement case in March, also brought by Samsung. BOE had steadily expanded its presence in the North American market, supplying OLED panels for key Apple devices such as iPhones, iPads and MacBooks. The Chinese company is estimated to hold around 10 percent of the US smartphone OLED panel market. However, the ITC's ruling could disrupt BOE's participation in global supply chains. Samsung is expected to consolidate its dominance in the low-temperature polycrystalline oxide OLED segment, as BOE was found to have infringed on Samsung's LTPO driving technology patents. LG, which also supplies LTPO panels for Apple's iPhone Pro lineup, is likewise poised to benefit from BOE's likely retreat. BOE has historically supplied 20-30 percent of iPhone OLED panels, or about 20 million to 30 million units annually, according to industry estimates. With BOE sidelined, Samsung and LG stand to absorb that demand, potentially boosting their profitability. 'The ruling will concentrate benefits on domestic panel makers, who already account for the majority of LTPO OLED shipments,' said Kang Min-koo, an analyst at IBK Securities. The US is the world's largest IT consumer market and BOE's exclusion could result in a sharp deceleration of its growth trajectory. In contrast, Samsung and LG are likely to expand their share in the premium device segment led by Apple. According to Omdia, in the first quarter of 2025, Samsung held 49 percent of the market share for iPhone OLED panel shipments, while LG and BOE held around 28 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Industry experts anticipate that BOE's prolonged absence from the US will further solidify Samsung and LG's dominance within Apple's supply chain. BOE has typically supplied panels for older-generation and refurbished iPhone models sold in the US and its estimated annual volume of 20 million to 30 million OLED units could now be reassigned to its Korean rivals. For Apple, BOE's role as a price leverage tool may also vanish. BOE, though lagging in technological prowess, was able to offer panels at lower costs thanks to state subsidies, giving Apple an edge in price negotiations with Korean firms. With BOE out of the picture, Samsung and LG may avoid price wars and maintain or even raise unit prices. 'BOE may face broader restrictions in doing business with US clients going forward,' said Kwon Min-gyu, an analyst at SK Securities. 'This could lead to stronger bargaining power for Korean panel makers when dealing with Apple, HP, Dell and other major US brands.' The ITC's ruling is expected to send ripples throughout the OLED value chain, benefiting both Samsung and LG. Analysts forecast that investor sentiment and market response will become more visible following the ITC's final decision set in November. Nam Sang-uk, associate research fellow at the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade, noted that Apple's reaction will be the decisive factor. 'If Apple decides to completely halt the use of BOE panels not only in the US but globally, the implications will be sweeping,' he said. 'In particular, Samsung is likely to secure the lead supplier role in the foldable smartphone panel market, followed closely by LG. Such a scenario would be highly favorable for both firms.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store