logo
Extra £15m to cover healthcare overspend approved by Tynwald

Extra £15m to cover healthcare overspend approved by Tynwald

BBC News15-07-2025
An additional £15.3m in funding to cover the cost of an overspend on healthcare last year has been approved by Tynwald.The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) asked for the sum at the final sitting of the parliament before the summer recess to cover spending by Manx Care in 2024-25.In a debate lasting one and a half hours, several members criticised the department's continuous overspending.But DHSC Minister Claire Christian said the DHSC had "identified areas of further efficiency which will be developed and implemented" this financial year.
Among members who stated they would not support the supplementary vote was Onchan MHK Rob Callister, who called for a "fundamental review" of Manx Care's structure.He said "difficult conversations" were needed after the healthcare operator had repeatedly overspent and needed extra funds each year since it was created in April 2021. Calling for "reform, change and restructuring", he said Tynwald had become "an open cheque book" and they had reached a "critical junction".His views were echoed by Arbory, Castletown and Malew MHK Tim Glover who said "enough is enough".He said: "We're just going to stand here and vote £15.3m through as if it was perfectly normal.""Get your act together," he added.Also rising to speak was Douglas North MHK John Wannenburgh, who called the situation "nothing short of ridiculous" and blamed the overspending on budget underfunding.He also argued a full breakdown of where the overspend had come from was needed, calling for a review of the "bloated management" within Manx Care and the DHSC.
Christian said Manx Care was "still going through a great deal of growing pains" and the DHSC had worked on "tightening spending controls".She said in the 2024-25 year, the healthcare provider had saved £13.4m through its cost improvement programme.This was through reducing bank and agency staff, optimising medicines, workforce management, review of high-cost contracts, reducing supply expenditure and increased commercial income, she said.However, she said despite this "spending exceeded the amount allocated for the services outlined in the mandate for the year" and further work was "still required to achieve more efficiencies".The minister said she wanted "solutions" from Tynwald members and asked them to help avoid the same situation arising the following year.The motion carried, with 18 votes for and five against in the House of Keys, and seven for and one against in Legislative Council.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Philips lowers tariff impact estimate by 100 million euros after US-EU deal
Philips lowers tariff impact estimate by 100 million euros after US-EU deal

Reuters

time41 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Philips lowers tariff impact estimate by 100 million euros after US-EU deal

July 29 (Reuters) - Dutch healthcare technology company Philips ( opens new tab on Tuesday lowered its estimated impact from import tariffs after the U.S. and the European Union agreed to the United States imposing a 15% rate on most EU goods. The group, which sells products ranging from toothbrushes to medical imaging systems, said it expected an impact of 150-200 million euros ($173-232 million) from the tariffs this year, lower than the 250-300 million euros it had estimated previously. Its Amsterdam-listed stock was expected to rise between 4% and 5% in early Tuesday trading, according to two traders. The tariff impact "has evolved and continues to be dynamic", Philips said in a statement. Its CEO Roy Jakobs told journalists that the U.S.-EU deal provided clarity, but Philips would continue to ask for an exemption from tariffs and other trade barriers for the healthcare sector, including in the U.S. and in China. China announced earlier this month it was restricting government purchases of medical devices from the EU that exceed 45 million yuan ($6.27 million) in value, in retaliation to Brussels' own curbs last month. "We have localized 90% of what we sell in China to manufacture in China, so this is not something of significance to us," Jakobs said, adding the Chinese market was slowly recovering. Philips also increased its core profit (EBITA) margin forecast to a range of 11.3% to 11.8% for the year, from the previously guided 10.8% to 11.3%. Its second-quarter adjusted EBITA margin grew to 12.4%, beating analysts' average forecast of 9.9%, while sales were in line with market expectations at 4.3 billion euros. Philips operates through its Personal Health, Diagnosis & Treatment, and Connected Care segments. Its top selling products include image-guided and diagnostic systems, consumer electronics and appliances. The company said its comparable order intake grew by 6% in the quarter, citing the impact of innovations including AI-enabled diagnostic systems. The group also said it had signed a long-term deal with the Indonesian Ministry of Health for its Azurion image-guided therapy system for cardiac, stroke and cancer care. ($1 = 0.8630 euros) ($1 = 7.1764 Chinese yuan renminbi)

The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands
The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands

There were no pickets when I set out at the weekend to talk to striking doctors. Not even at St Thomas' hospital, a prime site opposite the Houses of Parliament, or at Guy's at London Bridge. 'It's a bit sparse,' said the duty officer from the British Medical Association, the doctors' union. The British Medical Journal (owned by the BMA but with editorial freedom) ran the headline: 'Striking resident doctors face heckling and support on picket line, amid mixed public response.' Public support has fallen, with 52% of people 'somewhat' or 'strongly' opposing the strikes and only 34% backing them. Alastair McLellan, the editor of the Health Service Journal, after ringing around hospitals told me fewer doctors were striking than last time, which isn't surprising given that only 55% voted in the BMA ballot. Managers told him these strikes were less disruptive than the last ones. But even a weaker strike harms patients and pains a government relying on falling waiting lists. 'When you're operating on the margins, it takes very little disruption to send waiting lists up again,' McLellan said. Strikes are costly, since consultants have to be paid to fill shifts, which is typically more expensive. One hospital manager asked me wryly: 'Have you tried paying for an out-of-hours emergency plumber or electrician?' This time Jim Mackey, the head of NHS England, is playing it tough. He told medical directors on Monday to warn doctors that anyone striking on one of their 12 compulsory training days would forfeit their qualification – and not to let strikers take up locum shifts on non-strike days to make up for the money they've lost. No more Mr Nice Guy. Everyone employed by the NHS will get an above-inflation pay rise this year, which is less than the 5.4% (comprising a 4% rise and a consolidated £750 payment) that resident doctors will receive. Nurses and ambulance crews have just voted overwhelmingly against a pay award of 3.6%. That was only a consultative ballot, leaving plenty of time for negotiations that might avoid holding a full strike ballot. Consultants are now balloting too. These looming demands make it vanishingly unlikely that Wes Streeting will give even more money to striking resident doctors, who have already received the top NHS offer. Mackey plays the hard man, but Streeting's emollience is over. He seems indignant and offended by the BMA. His first act as health secretary was to end the resident doctors' 44 days of strikes between March 2023 and July 2024 with a generous 22% pay rise, even while the rightwing press accused him of bowing to 'union paymasters'. Making peace was his welcome political signal that the party of the NHS was setting about repairing Tory damage. There was hope for goodwill and patience from healthcare workers. So the BMA coming back for more within a year was a shock, and a slap in the face for Streeting. The BMA is kicking a government that had been well-disposed towards it. With Tory and Liberal Democrat peers attempting to block the government's radical employment rights bill, Labour's enemies will relish this timely assistance from the strike. A piece on CapX, a comment site owned and produced by the Centre for Policy Studies, called the striking doctors 'Scargills in white coats' with 'blood on their hands', which is of course the literal truth, given what they do at work (Tom Dolphin, the new BMA chair, is a consultant anaesthetist who works in trauma surgery; his job involves 'a fair amount of stabbings, occasional shootings, assaults [and] falls from height'). Keir Starmer has warned that the strikes 'play into the hands' of those who do not want the NHS to 'succeed in its current form'. Vultures are circling: Nigel Farage talks of private insurance; the International Monetary Fund, in its great unwisdom, recently suggested the better-off should pay for NHS services; while the piece on CapX echoed the right's glee at the strike: 'The problem here isn't just that the BMA is populated by socialist thugs, it's that the NHS is a socialist system.' The NHS is ever ready to rescue us all, regardless of status – that is why doctors and nurses top public respect charts, and why they have much to lose as the public turns against them. 'When the BMA asks, 'What's the difference between a Labour government and a Conservative government?', I would say a 28.9% pay rise and a willingness to work together to improve the working conditions and lives of doctors,' Streeting said in vain last week. In a timely contrast, Kemi Badenoch has declared that the Tories would ban doctors' strikes, putting them under the same restrictions that apply to police officers and soldiers. Both sides in this strike are obdurate. 'This could be a marathon. We could be doing this until Christmas or maybe beyond,' the deputy chief executive of NHS England has glumly warned. Streeting says the negotiation door is always open, but the BMA says there's no point without cash on the table. Bad blood between them springs from the negotiations: talks were going well until the BMA resident doctors' committee told its co-chairs that it could not approve the government's deal because it did not address the BMA's demand that resident doctors receive a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Yet Streeting's offer tackled serious grievances: years of bad planning left 20,000 resident doctors without specialist training places, stuck in a bottleneck that he promised to resolve. The BMA damaged people's sympathy for the doctors by absurdly comparing their pay to that of a coffee barista. Resident doctors can expect to be on a steep annual trajectory, averaging £43,400 in year one and £51,600 in year two; as new consultants they will get £105,000, while GP partners earn as much as £160,000. The word in the corridors is that the BMA is losing support across the NHS and among its own members, Nick Hulme, the CEO of the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS foundation trust, told me. He said some of his consultants had this week resigned from the BMA. So has the fertility pioneer Robert Winston. History may reassure the BMA that the public will always trust doctors over politicians. This time, the public backs those trying to cut waiting lists more than the strikers who are adding to them. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist

'Shock' at closure of eye clinic in St Austell as services move
'Shock' at closure of eye clinic in St Austell as services move

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

'Shock' at closure of eye clinic in St Austell as services move

An eye clinic at a community health centre in Cornwall is to clinic at Wheal Northey in St Austell has treated many people with serious eye conditions across mid and north Cornwall, but treatment is moving to the Royal Cornwall Hospital, Treliske, near Bristow, a regular outpatient of the clinic, said she had been "shocked that we received no notice that it was closing".A Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust spokesperson said "our priority will always be to ensure patients continue to receive safe and effective treatment within nationally approved time frames" when considering changing clinic locations. All glaucoma patients who attended Wheal Northey are being told that treatment has moved to the Royal Cornwall Hospital, with the rest of the clinic's services understood to be transferring within the next few weeks. Mrs Bristow lives near Bodmin and has been receiving injections for macular degeneration at the said: "It's a horrific thought that you've got to have injections directly into your eyes, but I actually look forward to going to Wheal Northey because they are so friendly."Her husband George said he felt the same way as "they put you at ease there". He added: "It's a horrendous process. "Jill's got used to the people there and is confident to go there because they are so friendly. "In a bigger hospital, that's not going to happen."The change means she will have to travel nearly 20 miles (32km) to attend appointments every seven weeks."They keep wanting to get services into the community, yet this is doing the opposite," Mr Bristow clinic's closure comes after the NHS said the minor injuries unit in Launceston would remain closed until staff could be have also asked holidaymakers to stay away from the Truro emergency department.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store