‘Unprecedented assault': Former treasury official says Labor's super, unrealised gains tax will wreak widespread havoc, cause thousands to ‘go into debt'
Former Treasury assistant secretary David Pearl has blasted Labor for pursuing its policy of slapping hefty taxes on unrealised gains in super accounts, warning the move will undermine the credibility of Australia's taxation system and cause thousands to prematurely sell off their assets.
The Albanese government's contentious move to impose a 30 per cent tax rate on super funds above $3 million is likely to pass the Senate, with the Greens and Labor expected to join forces and ram through the policy in July when parliament reconvenes.
However, the plan has faced fierce criticism from numerous industry magnates, who have fumed at the government's polarising decision to not index the threshold and to target unrealised capital gains, which are often fleeting and illusory.
It was also revealed on Monday that the Prime Minister and other long-serving politicians eligible for the defined parliamentary benefit pension have the ability to defer paying the super tax, and will only be slugged with the levy once they retire.
Former Treasury assistant secretary David Pearl said he was not shocked by the move and that the government's unwavering commitment to enact the policy meant Labor had 'completely misread the election result'.
'I'm surprised that Jim Chalmers and Anthony Albanese haven't stood up and said they have an electoral mandate to impose this unprecedented assault on Australian taxpayers," he told Sky News Australia.
Mr Pearl, echoing comments made by several financial experts, said the policy undermined numerous core principles of Australia's taxation system and that the concept of taxing unrealised capital gains was a needlessly risky move.
'We tax unrealized land values through land tax and rates, but as I've already explained, those taxes typically are one to two per cent and land values don't change in a volatile way," he said.
'This is a new departure for our income tax system, I think that's the big thing about this.
'It will undoubtedly cause a lot of harm. I think the principle is the objection."
The ex-treasury official also warned superannuants could be forced to prematurely sell off their assets, such as property and shares, to fund their increased tax liability and that this would, in turn, cause some individuals' debt burdens to soar.
'A taxpayer shouldn't have to go into debt or sell assets simply to meet a tax liability and that's what this unrealised capital gains tax will do to them," Mr Pearl said.
'Somebody with a self-managed fund who has invested in an illiquid asset like a business or a farm won't be able to sell five, 10, 20 per cent of that asset in order to meet their tax liability.
'So when they get the bill from the ATO, they'll either have to sell other assets or go into debt."
Mr Pearl added the policy discouraged Australians from amassing sufficient funds in their accounts and that the move was an outward attack on self-managed superannuation.
'It's really an assault on those with self-managed super funds, which account for one trillion of our four trillion dollar stock of super with investments in unlisted or illiquid assets," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
PM won't get raucous over AUKUS, however hard he's pushed
A month or so ago, after newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney invited Anthony Albanese to attend the G7 summit in Alberta, Australian government officials made inquiries about scheduling a side trip to the White House. For various reasons – chaos among them – it never eventuated. This was not deemed to be a disaster within the government. Far from it, given leaders blowing through the Oval Office currently risk finding themselves the subject of humiliation.


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Powerball draw 1517: The winning numbers you need for $100m prize
Powerball's $100 million jackpot — the game's richest prize for 2025 — has gone on the line on Thursday night. If you chose not to buy a ticket, chances are you know someone who did because up to half of all Australian adults were tipped to try their luck. The winning numbers for Powerball draw #1517 are: 28, 10, 3, 16, 31, 14 and 21. The Powerball is 6. Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today If a single entrant claims division one honours, they will rocket to equal third in terms of most lucrative individual wins. The last time Powerball reached these $100m heights was in November. Just six Australians know exactly how it feels to win a Powerball prize of $100 million or more. 'From quiet country towns to bustling city streets, we've seen life-changing wins happen to anyone in the most unexpected places. That's the beauty of Powerball,' The Lott spokesperson Anna Hobdell said. 'The next chapter of someone's life could begin this Thursday with $100 million up for grabs. The win could happen to anyone, a teacher, a tradie, a retiree, or a parent. 'The $100 million club is growing, and maybe we'll welcome a new member this Thursday.'


The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Sun sets on another state's solar home battery rebate
The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face". As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants. The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives. Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high. The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent. "The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday. But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners. They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery. "This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said. She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates. "We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP. The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1. In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July. But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners. Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December. Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year. The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found. The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face". As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants. The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives. Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high. The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent. "The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday. But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners. They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery. "This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said. She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates. "We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP. The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1. In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July. But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners. Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December. Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year. The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found. The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face". As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants. The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives. Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high. The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent. "The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday. But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners. They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery. "This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said. She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates. "We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP. The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1. In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July. But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners. Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December. Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year. The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found. The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face". As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants. The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives. Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high. The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent. "The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday. But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners. They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery. "This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said. She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates. "We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP. The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1. In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July. But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners. Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December. Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year. The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found.