Sun sets on another state's solar home battery rebate
As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants.
The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives.
Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high.
The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent.
"The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday.
But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners.
They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery.
"This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said.
She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates.
"We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP.
The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1.
In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July.
But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners.
Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December.
Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year.
The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found.
The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face".
As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants.
The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives.
Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high.
The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent.
"The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday.
But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners.
They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery.
"This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said.
She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates.
"We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP.
The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1.
In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July.
But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners.
Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December.
Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year.
The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found.
The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face".
As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants.
The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives.
Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high.
The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent.
"The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday.
But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners.
They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery.
"This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said.
She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates.
"We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP.
The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1.
In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July.
But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners.
Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December.
Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year.
The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found.
The scrapping of a $2500 solar panel sweetener has been defended by a state energy minister after critics labelled the move a "slap in the face".
As a federal battery subsidy kicks in on July 1, NSW will replace its home battery installation rebate with a smaller incentive to create more virtual power plants.
The move comes as other states power down their own battery incentives.
Virtual power plants connect solar-powered batteries owned by households and small businesses to the grid, allowing owners to generate ongoing revenue by selling the excess energy stored in their battery when demand is high.
The NSW government argues households and businesses will benefit by stacking the new scheme - worth up to $1500 - on top of the federal program, which slashes up-front costs by about 30 per cent.
"The real value of virtual power plants is that we don't waste energy that's in the batteries," NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe told AAP on Thursday.
But renewable energy advocacy group Solar Citizens said ditching the state battery subsidy on June 30 was a "slap in the face" for solar panel owners.
They were promised up to $2500 in addition to the federal program if they invested in a home battery.
"This surprise decision is a blow to solar-home owners planning to buy a home battery in coming months," the group's chief executive Heidi Lee Douglas said.
She described the rebate's removal as a "betrayal" of the Labor government's election promise of the federal Cheaper Home Batteries program, which can be topped up with state rebates.
"We designed the Cheaper Home Batteries program to be stackable with state incentives, and it is," a spokesperson for Energy Minister Chris Bowen told AAP.
The $2.3 billion federal government scheme will subsidise the up-front cost of installing eligible small-scale battery by about 30 per cent from July 1.
In Western Australia, solar battery customers are still able to receive both federal and state battery subsidies starting from July.
But NSW follows other states turfing battery sweeteners.
Victoria ended an interest-free solar battery loan worth $8800 in May while Queensland closed its $4000 battery rebate in December.
Australia has the highest take-up of rooftop solar in the world, with panels on more than two million homes providing about 13 per cent of electricity needs for the national grid in the past year.
The nation could slash $4 billion a year off power bills by the end of the decade if households embrace solar batteries in larger numbers, a Climate Council report found.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Our students are our resource. They shouldn't be taxed
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number. No attachments, please include your letter in the body of the email. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. Ross Gittins (' PM cries poor as gas riches go untaxed ', 13/8) highlights the ridiculous situation in which the government takes more money from tertiary education students via HECS than we collect from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. This is an inherited situation from previous LNP governments. On the eve of the federal government's productivity roundtable, and given the government's huge parliamentary majority, now is the time to rectify these flawed policies and follow the example of Norway, which taxes its oil and gas companies and provides free higher education. What Australia needs is strong leadership and structural change to our tax system, not a tinkering around the edges to avoid upsetting parts of the electorate. David Conolly, Brighton Labor is on notice to act Another insightful piece by Ross Gittins on the failure of the government to collect the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. Critics have been talking about this inequitable failure for some time, but nothing changes. Gittins asks why the federal government is 'giving our gas away to big companies?' He answers his own question and the reason is due to powerful lobbying by those companies. This disparity in power is at the heart of our current lack of productivity and general economic progress. Everyday workers and even students (as Gittins observes) are easy targets from which to extract tax. There is growing disquiet in the community about the stated intention of the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of not tackling the big equality issues in the economic roundtable. If this forum turns out to be just a talkfest, it will demonstrate a lack of courage by Labor and a failure to listen to voters. We will all pay the price. Jan Marshall, Brighton We allow multinationals to pay a pittance The return taxpayers receive from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax is half of 1 per cent. We are virtually allowing the petroleum companies to have our oil and gas for nothing. A person renting out a property would expect to get 2.5 per cent on the capital value of the property and yet we allow these multinationals to get away with paying a pittance. The treasurer and prime minister need to toughen up for the sake of future generations and impose a flat rate of $40 billion a year for them to have access to oil and gas. Oil and gas is a finite resource – once it's gone it's gone. Paul Chivers, Box Hill North Please, impose some sort of taxation Ross Gittins' article is jaw dropping. It is quite incomprehensible how we arrived at this position, although no doubt there are complex watertight contracts in place that would cost billions to get out of. Even a modest application of taxation would pay for the NDIS, among many other social needs. Fiona White, Alfredton Arguments need to be addressed The federal government needs to address the arguments made by Ross Gittins on the lack of a fair tax on gas exporters. Gittins shows that these tax rates stand in stark contrast to HECS charges paid by students. Mike Lawson, Adelaide We should not be subsidising this situation It is outrageous that our youth pay $50,000 for an arts degree, 56 per cent of our gas exports are given gratis to LNG exporters and the tax office describes the oil and gas companies as 'systematic non-payers' of tax. To make it even worse – currently every single Australian pays $548 a year to subsidise fossil fuels. Talk about room for improvement. Lesley Walker, Northcote THE FORUM Not so lucky The supposedly socially progressive Victorian Labor government is failing badly on at least two key measures of socio-economic wellbeing and fairness. As the Australian Education Union laments (Page 13 advertisement, 13/8), Victorian public schools are the lowest funded in Australia. Victoria ranks last in Australia for availability of social housing, with growing waiting lists. The government is not being brought to account by a divided opposition though incompetence and ideological blindness. The opposition is arguably worse federally. Liberal governments were primarily responsible for overseeing one of the most inequitable and segregated education systems in the developed world. They threaten scare campaigns against some urgent reforms to ease the housing crisis. Recent Labor governments have lacked the communication skills and courage to persevere with necessary change. Donald Horne's description of 'The Lucky Country' remains depressingly apt. Norman Huon, Port Melbourne
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Hamas claims vindication of October 7 attacks due to Albanese recognising Palestine
Sky News host Steve Price discusses reports indicating Hamas claims vindication over the shock October 7 attacks as the Albanese government recognises Palestine. 'As Prime Minister Albanese toured Brisbane today … on the other side of the world Sheikh Hassan Yousef, figuratively lobbed a hand grenade in the prime minister's very own backyard,' Mr Price said. 'The Sheikh, a 70-year-old Hamas veteran, described as an extremist, is there any other kind of Hamas leader, issued a statement that has stunned, not just critics of our pointless politically motivated recognition of Palestine, but I am sure it will unsettle many in Labor from the right rather than the Palestinian-supporting left.'
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Shameful moral fail': Australian government slammed for rewarding terrorism
Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor condemns Labor's recognition of a Palestinian state as rewarding Hamas for terrorism. 'What we've seen from this Labor government is a shameful moral fail, where they are rewarding terrorism, rewarding Hamas,' Mr Taylor said. 'We do support a two-state solution, we'd like to move toward a two-state solution, but there are very clear preconditions that have to be met before that can be achieved. 'None of those assurances can be given right now.'
