Got Lightning still? This case adds USB-C to older iPhones
Apple's gone all-in on USB-C ever since the iPhone 15, but those still with an older iPhone with a Lightning port are probably finding themselves in a pinch when it comes to charging and accessories. I know this because many of the best portable chargers and best iPhone accessories are ditching Lightning support in favor of USB-C.
If you do own one of these older iPhones with Lightning, there's one solution that cropped up on my feed that could keep your device future-proof for a bit longer. It's this case that turns your Lightning port iPhone to one with USB-C — but it looks like it's selling out quickly.
Add USB-C to your older iPhone with a Lightning port with the iPh0n3 USB-C Protection Case from OBSOLESS. This ultra thin case offers some protection, while fashioning a USB-C port to let you use your iPhone with newer accessories.View Deal
Dubbed as the iPh0n3 USB-C Protection Case, it's a slim case that has an integrated USB-C port for power and connectivity. What I do like about this case is how it's designed to accommodate the USB-C port, mainly because it doesn't make the bottom end of the phone longer like some other battery charging cases I've seen.
Instead, the USB-C port is fashioned into the bottom right corner of the case — all without adding any additional thickness. This new case from OBSOLESS sells for CHF (Swiss Franc) 49.90, which at checkout with shipping cost comes out to about $70.99. The only cases available now are for the iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max. Unfortunately all the other models have sold out.
While it's a good option to consider, chances are you might already have a case that you like. I think the iPh0n3 USB-C Protection Case is pricey at this point, so I'd suggest looking into a Lightning to USB-C adapter instead — like the one below, just because you're saving a lot more. Plus, I do like how it attaches to a keychain so that it's always on you all the time.
Even with the last models using Lightning, the iPhone 14 series, they're going to be three generations old by the time Apple introduces its iPhone 17 models presumably this fall. Even though that's more than enough to justify upgrading, those who intend to hold onto their older iPhones longer could justify getting themselves this USB-C iPhone case.
Quickly add a USB-C port to your existing iPhone with a Lightning port with this travel-friendly adapter. One end goes into your Lightning port, while the other is a standard USB-C port. It also comes with a lanyard to attach it to you keychain so you'll always have it on you.View Deal
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
More from Tom's Guide
I've been using the iOS 26 beta for more than a month and it made me rediscover these helpful gestures
Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold: Here's how Google can beat Samsung
Google Pixel leaks won't stop as new Pixel 10 Pro Fold images appear — here's what it looks like
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jinko Tiger solar panel review: best for high output in low light conditions
In this Jinko Tiger review, we take a closer look at one of the best-performing solar panels for UK homes, particularly when it comes to output in low-light conditions. The Jinko Tiger solar panel is a strong contender for anyone looking to cut their energy bills and boost their home's energy independence, especially in the UK's notoriously unpredictable weather. As solar power becomes more popular across the UK, homeowners are increasingly searching for the best solar panels that balance efficiency, cost, and durability. With so many unfamiliar brands and similar specs across the market, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. That's why this review helps you decide if the Jinko Tiger solar panel is right for your home and whether solar panels are truly worth the investment. Many panels now offer similar specifications on paper — comparable power output, 25- to 30-year lifespans, and sleek all-black designs. But with installation often representing the largest part of the overall cost of solar panels, and British weather posing its own set of challenges, the stakes for getting the right system are high. The boom in commercial solar farms has helped push the technology forward. Installation is still the biggest cost, so it pays to invest in long-lasting panels. Fortunately, costs have fallen dramatically over the past two decades, especially as China has scaled up manufacturing and innovation. But fitting panels still involves scaffolding, labor, and additional equipment to connect to your home mains, so it's wise to factor in total system cost, not just the panel price, when choosing the best solar panel installers. Why choose the Jinko Tiger? Price, installed: £1250 per kW Efficiency: 22 per cent Wattage per panel: 440W Type: N-Type Made in: China and Malaysia, US and Vietnam Degradation: 87.40 per cent after 30 years Warranty: 25 years for the product itself, 30 years for the degradation figure Founded in 2006, Jinko Solar has grown into one of the world's largest solar panel manufacturers. It's a Tier-1 producer, meaning it's been established for more than five years, is financially stable, and uses advanced, automated manufacturing techniques. The company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, offering greater transparency than many of its competitors. It's also invested in solar infrastructure, including a 20% stake in one of the world's largest solar farms in the UAE. Jinko is a member of the Solar Module Super League, a group of seven firms responsible for around half of the world's panel production. This is a useful guide on a company's financial strength, but as a consumer rather than an investor, you may have other priorities. That's why our Jinko Tiger review highlights a few of the panel's standout features: Strong power output Long warranty Slow degradation rate For the Jinko Tiger solar panels themselves, the stats are fairly middle of the road compared to others we have reviewed, but all our featured solar panels have good warranties, power output, efficiency and useable lifespan. But while the Jinko Tiger solar panel doesn't offer the very highest wattage on the market, its balance of efficiency, degradation rate, and price make it a solid choice for UK homes. You can also take confidence in Jinko's scale and track record. If your preferred installer works exclusively with Jinko Tiger solar panels, rest assured you're still getting a dependable, cost-effective product. A bit like flat-screen TVs, intense competition in the solar panel market means prices have dropped while quality has risen. Jinko benefits from this trend, offering panels with great low-light performance, ideal for the UK's overcast climate as well as early morning and evening sunlight. The panels use N-type cells, which degrade more slowly than standard P-type cells, so they maintain output better over time. They're also resistant to salt mist, making them a good choice for coastal homes that need extra protection. The panels weigh in at 22kg, a shade lighter than most, and measure 1.76m by 1.13m. They are 3cm thick. Pros: Strong low-light performance Reliable, well-established manufacturer Solid all-round efficiency and warranty Cons: Other panels offer even higher output Degradation rate is good, but not market-leading Jinko Tiger panels deliver reliability and performance with robustness and high energy output in weak light conditions. They're a great choice for customers who want quality, affordability, and performance from one of the best solar manufacturers in the world Edward McKay at fitter Solar4Good How we compiled our guide To compile our list, we spoke to experts on the ground and have broken down the top-performing brands based on real-world value, not just technical specs. We've prioritised long-term performance, value for money, and the reputation of the best solar panel installers in the UK. And if you're wondering if solar panels are worth it for your home, this guide is designed to help you make a smart, informed decision that pays off over time, whether you're upgrading an old array or fitting solar panels for the first time. Most panels are guaranteed for 25 years and offer similar power output, size, efficiency and looks. So we've weighted our judgement towards cost and degradation, which describes how much power the cells will provide after a number of years. The higher the percentage, the better. Much of your decision will also depend on which installer you go with, as many have preferred brands they work with due to bulk purchasing. You'll also see a lot of unfamiliar Chinese names as you do your research, but many of these are Tier-1 manufacturers in clean energy with strong track records in quality and durability. Why trust us The Independent has been reporting on green energy and climate matters since it was founded in 1986. Since then, we have written hundreds of reviews and news stories on energy.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple Third Quarter 2025 Earnings: Beats Expectations
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) Third Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$94.0b (up 9.6% from 3Q 2024). Net income: US$23.4b (up 9.3% from 3Q 2024). Profit margin: 25% (in line with 3Q 2024). EPS: US$1.57 (up from US$1.40 in 3Q 2024). This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Apple Revenues and Earnings Beat Expectations Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 5.5%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 10%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 5.5% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 6.0% growth forecast for the Tech industry in the US. Performance of the American Tech industry. The company's shares are down 5.4% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should learn about the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Apple. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
I want Gemini to be my DJ in YouTube Music
Stephen Headrick / Android Authority Imagine having your very own DJ in your pocket, ready to mix your favorite songs at a moment's notice. No, not your dad's 3-5 second crossfade, but instead a completely customized mix that makes the two songs you're transitioning between meld together like they were designed that way by the artists themselves. That's the idea behind Apple Music's upcoming AI-powered AutoMix feature, which is coming with this fall's iOS 26 release. As a former Spotify user and now years-long YouTube Music user, this is the first time I've even batted an eye at one of Apple's few Android apps. I'm not really a big fan of the old-school cross-fade functionality, but this is different. Google is consistently adding Gemini-powered features across all of its verticals — including in the main YouTube app — but so far, we haven't seen much of this AI prowess in YouTube Music. AutoMix is a seemingly small Apple Music feature with big implications, and I have some ideas on how Google can bring its super-powered Gemini experience into its music app. What music streaming service do you use? 1 votes Spotify 0 % Apple Music 0 % YouTube Music 100 % Other (let me know in the comments) 0 % I don't use a music streaming service 0 % DJ Apple, spin that track! Apple first announced AutoMix back in June at this year's WWDC, its annual developer's conference. In its own words, this feature uses 'time stretching and beat matching to deliver continuous playback and an even more seamless listening experience.' Marketing jargon aside, there is a clear difference that you can hear with AutoMix enabled when compared to the standard cross-fade. Details on how the feature works are sparse, but shortly after the iOS 26 developer beta was released, videos of AutoMix in action quickly began circulating on all the major social media platforms. For me at least, I was intrigued the moment I heard it in action. Because AutoMix is not a database of pre-mixed songs and is instead powered by AI, the mixing experience can vary from user to user. Occasionally, the mixes are pretty underwhelming — remember, this is still just a beta software — but more often than not, it doesn't just work, it sounds magical. It adds an entirely new dimension to your music listening experience. I would note here that right now, AutoMix seems to work best when the two songs are from a similar genre or have a similar number of beats per minute. That said, I'd imagine this will only improve in the future. AutoMix isn't an entirely new concept. In fact, Spotify released their own take on this feature years ago under the exact same name. It, too, appears to use beat matching to determine the best way to transition between songs, but from examples I've seen and user commentary I've read, Apple's take appears to be a more advanced version. Perhaps advancements in AI also allow for an overall better mixing experience. YouTube Music needs to join the party I've been a YouTube Music convert for years now, and all in all, I've been very happy with the service. First and foremost, it's included with YouTube Premium, which is one reason I believe Google's subscription is one of the most high-value subscriptions out there. And to Google's credit, YouTube Music has frequently improved its service, adding new features and making the user interface more appealing and user-friendly. Google has added Gemini-powered capabilities to just about every corner of its software universe. From YouTube to Google Workspace to Android devices and most everything between, you will likely find some sort of Gemini-enabled feature. And it's not like we haven't seen Google dabble in the world of music, either. Stephen Headrick / Android Authority Google is adding Gemini everywhere. Is YouTube Music next? Google needs to join the personal DJ party, and this is just the beginning of what they could do with the power of Gemini. AutoMix honestly seems like a small addition as I write about it, but I can't emphasize enough how different it feels to listen to music with this mixing enabled. It makes for such a satisfying listening experience, and I am more than confident in some form of Gemini powering Google's version of this. Let's take this a little further than this relatively small AutoMix feature. How else could Gemini enhance my music streaming experience? Look no further than Spotify DJ, a feature that's already been around for a few years in Spotify land. Essentially, Spotify is using AI to generate playlists according to what you already listen to, and it has helped my colleague discover a lot more new music than he used to. Imagine Google's take on this: a Gemini Live-like DJ that you can talk back and forth with and really fine-tune your taste to find the most relevant music possible. Stephen Headrick / Android Authority YouTube Music already has playlists created by AI, based on your text input. Time to take it to the next level with a Gemini Live-like experience. Here's the thing: Google is already doing most of the heavy lifting that this type of feature would require. It already has a feature in the Google Discover feed called Daily Listen, where two AI-powered 'podcast hosts' serve up a daily short-form podcast with news and information relevant to your interests. And it works incredibly well. Creepy well, if you ask me. And Google already generates playlists based on text input. Gemini could just connect these dots together more efficiently. Since this is a Gemini Live-like experience, why not just hum something into your mic and have DJ Gemini generate a playlist of songs solely based on the vibes of whatever you're humming. That sounds both incredible and incredibly doable with the power of Gemini. I feel like we're only scratching the surface here, and yet, as I already stated, much of this is already being done by Google elsewhere in its services. Now, the YouTube Music team just needs to package this all up for its platform. Is Apple's DJ good enough to make me ditch YouTube Music? Switching music services isn't exactly fun. The app's algorithms take time to learn your preferences, and YouTube Music has years of my listening data now, so it has gotten pretty good at suggesting the right music (and podcasts…yes, I use this app for podcasts, too) at the right time. Is Apple's AutoMix feature enough to convince me to switch? Only time will tell, especially because we don't yet have clarity on whether or not this will be an iPhone-only feature, or if it will eventually make its way over to our green bubble world. Since it's an AI-powered feature, Apple may decide AutoMix can only work on Apple devices and Apple's chips; I'm not saying it's not possible for them to bring it to Android, I just wonder whether Apple will use on-device AI as a reason to keep AutoMix exclusive to its devices. That said, I tested the feature out on an iPhone 14 Pro, which doesn't have access to Apple Intelligence, so I would guess that they'll bring it to their Android app at some point, and maybe even as soon as this fall when AutoMix officially launches. Apple Music on iOS 26 beta, with AutoMix enabled Apple Music on Android 16 beta, with no AutoMix option in sight For now, I'm sticking with YouTube Music. I'm really confident in Gemini at this point, and it's only getting better. Bringing more AI into YouTube Music is the logical next step for the evolution of the platform. I remember when Google first launched Gemini — remember Bard? — I was really unsure what to make of Google's AI. The transition from Google Assistant was really rocky at first, too. But Gemini has gotten really good, and more importantly, the way it has been integrated into Google's services has become extremely powerful. I use it a lot throughout my day. I think it's only a matter of time before we see an AutoMix-like feature introduced in YouTube Music, most likely alongside other more advanced Gemini-based features. Follow
