Trump's tariffs: Why did US President Donald Trump extend deadline for Japan, South Korea?
The announcement has already led to volatility in stock markets across the globe, and its ripple effects are expected to affect investors in the weeks ahead.
Japan's Nikkei added 0.3% and South Korea's KOSPI climbed 0.5% today. At the same time, Australia's stock index declined 0.5%, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng lost 0.7%. Back home, the Indian stock market traded in a narrow range, gyrating between gains and losses.
With markets preparing for ongoing volatility, it's important for investors to grasp how this extension might influence their portfolios.
'The delay of the tariff deadline is more than just a temporary relief for trading partners, but it's also a signal that the trade war is far from over. Investors need to assess how global supply chains could be disrupted further and consider hedging strategies to protect their portfolios from potential market shocks,' said Fei Chen, Investment Strategist and Founder and CEO of Intellectia AI.
Anuj Gupta, Director, Ya Wealth Research & Advisory, believes that Trump's tariff postponement indicates his intention to assess the growth prospects of the U.S. economy more closely.
'It also appears he is aiming to reduce market uncertainty before moving forward,' said Gupta.
Gupta further said that following the recent conflict between Israel and Iran, Trump has slightly softened his previously aggressive stance, opting to delay the implementation of tariffs as part of a more cautious and measured approach.
According to Sugandha Sachdev, VP, Religare Broking, the extension underscores Trump's preferred tactic: threaten maximal action, then retreat tactically if counterparties engage in 'good-faith' talks.
Extending the deadline lets Washington convert this goodwill into concrete concessions rather than risk squandering it with a sudden tariff shock.
"The objective remains unchanged, narrowing the trade deficit and reshoring production, but the White House is showing investors it can calibrate pressure without destabilising the recovery. The postponement is less a climb-down than a calculated move to lock in diplomatic wins, safeguard the domestic economy and coax trading partners toward concessions that make across-the-board tariffs unnecessary," Sachdev said.
Sachdev further explained that markets should therefore view the delay as a pragmatic step that keeps the growth narrative intact while preserving Trump's leverage for the further negotiating rounds.
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Can US, EU actually reach a trade deal? Trump says there's '50/50 chance or maybe less'
Brussels and Washington are reportedly nearing a potential agreement that could involve a 15 per cent US tariff on EU goods, with possible exemptions for key sectors read more US President Donald Trump sips Diet Coke from his wine glass after a toast, during a luncheon for world leaders at the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, US, September 25, 2018. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump on Friday (July 25) stated there was roughly a '50/50 chance, maybe less' of reaching an agreement with the European Union to lower import tariffs, as he spoke to reporters before departing the White House for Scotland. Trump, aiming to reduce US trade deficits, has threatened punitive tariff increases on numerous countries unless they secure trade deals with Washington by August 1. '90 deals in 90 days' His administration launched a '90 deals in 90 days' initiative in April, postponing higher duties, but has so far announced only five agreements, including with Britain, Japan, and the Philippines. 'I would say that we have a 50/50 chance, maybe less than that, but a 50/50 chance of making a deal with the EU,' Trump remarked. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The EU's 27 member states have tasked the European Commission with negotiating to avoid steep US tariffs, with Trump warning of 30 per cent levies if no deal is reached by the end of the month. According to multiple diplomats, Brussels and Washington are nearing a potential agreement that could involve a 15 per cent US tariff on EU goods, with possible exemptions for key sectors. EU readies retaliatory sanctions package However, on Thursday, EU states approved a retaliatory package targeting $109 billion (93 billion euros) of US goods, set to take effect on August 7 if negotiations fail. Trump claimed that most of the trade deals he sought were nearly finalised, though he clarified that his focus was on sending letters to impose tariffs on trading partners, not on negotiating comprehensive free trade agreements. He noted that tariffs, paid by importers rather than the exporting country, effectively act as a sales tax passed on to US consumers. 'I don't want to hurt countries, but we're going to send a letter out some time during the week, and it's basically going to say, 'You're going to pay 10 percent, you're going to pay 15 percent, you're going to pay maybe less,' I don't know,' Trump explained. He added that his negotiators were working 'diligently' with EU counterparts but expressed frustration with Canada, threatening a 35 per cent tariff and stating, 'we haven't really had a lot of luck' in those talks. Trump also mentioned that the US and China, its third-largest goods trading partner this year, have the 'confines of a deal' in place. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
India-UK FTA: Wait for cheap Scotch whisky may not end the way you think
While the free trade agreement between India and the UK deals with a reduction in the duty on UK-made whisky and gin, the wait for cheap Scotch whisky may not end the way you think. read more While the India-UK Free Trade Agreement intends to halve tariffs on UK-made whisky and gin, the drop will not lead to major price revisions, at least in the short term, experts said. After the signing of the deal, the tariff would eventually drop to 40 per cent in over ten years. Industry executives say price revision may not be significant initially. It is pertinent to note that the agreement still awaits ratification by the parliament of the United Kingdom before the changes to the deal come into effect. Even when they come down, the reduction in prices will be in the range of only 8 to 10 per cent as the share of customs duty to the cumulative retail price of scotch is only around 15-20 per cent, industry officials told The Times of India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The reduction in the duty on Scotch had been a major ask for the British government while both nations were negotiating the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. Meanwhile, the UK parliament is likely to ratify the deal only by the middle of next year. More from World India-UK trade deal: How traditional Indian brews like Feni and toddy will soon hit UK store shelves There will still be hurdles once the agreement is ratified by the parliament. Once the deal is approved, the customs duty will come down to 75 per cent, and thereafter reduced to 40 per cent over the next decade. Industry experts remain optimistic Top international spirit makers such as Diageo welcomed the move, and even Indian makers who source Scottish spirits for blending in their local brands. 'We laud the Indian and British governments for formalising this historic treaty, which will boost bilateral trade and positively impact the accessibility of premium Scotch whisky in India, reigniting growth and increased choice for Indian consumers,' Praveen Someshwar, MD & CEO of Diageo India, told TOI. However, industry officials say that despite the halving of the import duty, the actual reduction of consumer prices will not be more than 10 per cent. 'The share of customs duty to the overall structure of MRP is hardly 15-20 per cent, depending on the category. The rest comprises state government taxes and distribution margins. So actual consumer prices will come down by only 8-10 per cent,' an official said. With state taxes, production, distribution and marketing costs remaining unchanged, tariff reduction will translate into less than 10 per cent of their cost savings, which may not be passed entirely.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
How good relations with India are a geographic necessity for Maldives
In the balmy blue expanse of the Indian Ocean, geography is destiny. Few countries exemplify this axiom better than the Maldives, a string of vulnerable islands perched just 400 kilometres south-west of India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit saw its politics swinging from nationalistic bravado to regional pragmatism. India is a lifeline for the Maldives economically, strategically, and sometimes existentially. Equally, the geographical location of the Maldives is of great strategic interest for India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Muizzu administration came to power amid campaign bluster demanding 'India Out'—a slogan aimed squarely at the presence of a minor Indian military contingent and Indian involvement in national affairs. For a time, it appeared that Chinese investment and political overtures could fill whatever void India might leave behind. Beijing, keen to expand its Belt and Road footprint, signed infrastructure deals and seemed eager to deliver. But in office, Muizzu has been forced to triangulate. The islands' routines of dependency have imposed themselves on decision-making. The core of this dependency is ignored only by the wilfully blind. Take potable water, a resource analysts regretfully call 'strategic' in a thirsty archipelago. In 2014, when a fire disabled Malé's only desalination plant, India, within hours, launched 'Operation Neer', sending drinking water by plane and ship. Other essentials function in a similarly Indian orbit. A big proportion of staples for the Maldivian table—rice, flour, sugar, and vegetables—comes from India. Around 70 per cent of the medicines on Maldivian pharmacy shelves bear Indian labels, a fact underscored by India's prompt medical assistance during the pandemic's darkest days. Construction is largely an act of import substitution: cement and steel from the Indian state of Gujarat underpin the Maldives' celebrated resorts. Even the fuel that powers government facilities and tourism's infrastructure comes, more often than not, from Indian refiners. Indian generosity is not purely altruistic; it is part of a carefully calibrated strategy for regional stability. New Delhi's extension of a $565 million (over ₹5,000 crore) line of credit during Modi's visit was complemented by the gifting of 100 military vehicles and, most notably, a 40 per cent reduction in Maldivian debt repayments. These gestures appear aimed not only at Malé but also at small Indian Ocean states teetering under China's loans. India's message, thinly veiled, is that it remains an engaged neighbour without the 'debt trap' tendencies attributed to Beijing. Underpinning this economic largesse is the delicate but vital domain of security. The Muizzu government did, rhetorically and practically, demand the withdrawal of an Indian military presence—a few helicopters, pilots, and medical teams. But few in Malé believe that strategic cooperation is obsolete. For much of the last two decades, Indian military personnel have quietly supplied a reassuring counterweight to the region's instability—responding to terror threats, evacuating citizens, and delivering supplies during storms. If trust can be rebuilt, there is little doubt India could once more be invited to base a small, stabilising detachment on Malé. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The diplomatic thaw is also boosting the engine of Maldivian prosperity: tourism. Indian visitors have long been an economic mainstay, accounting for a record 23 per cent of arrivals at the height of post-pandemic travel in 2021 and still second only to Russia in 2023 at around 11 per cent. As relations warm, Indian tourists—buoyed by rupee-rufiyaa payment schemes and new digital connectivity—are again filling the resorts. Hoteliers expect their share to rise swiftly, restoring a crucial underpinning of the islands' revenues. For India, the challenge is to translate geographical inevitability into goodwill, not resentment. Easing the debt overhang for Malé, maintaining open lines of credit, and quickening disaster response all lend durable influence. Muizzu's government is betting, sensibly, on triangulation. Engagement with China will continue and should not unduly concern New Delhi so long as core security interests are respected. But the underlying message is clear: in the Indian Ocean, the TINA factor rules—There Is No Alternative to India, certainly not for the Maldives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For all the rhetoric of 'India Out' the Maldives' best bet remains partnership, and for India, steady generosity will be the surest path to lasting influence in the archipelago's sunlit waters. The writer is a senior journalist with expertise in defence. Views expressed are personal and do not necessarily reflect those of Firstpost.
