Refugee charities demand meeting with Yvette Cooper after sweeping changes to immigration rules
In the joint letter, which has been signed by organisations including Refugee Council, Care4Calais and Choose Love, charities have called on the home secretary to meet with them and with some of the migrants they support.
Senior charity leaders have sent repeated requests to meet with Ms Cooper since the election but have had their invites turned down, The Independent understands.
The call comes after Sir Keir Starmer warned that the UK risks becoming 'an island of strangers' as he laid out plans aimed at significantly reducing immigration. Among the measures announced were a ban on the recruitment of care workers from overseas, increased English language requirements for immigrants, and the tightening of access to skilled worker visas.
In the letter, organised by migrant charity Praxis, charities, legal advice providers and civil society organisations told Ms Cooper that 'the decisions made by your department have profound consequences for the people we serve'.
They added: 'The rise in racial discrimination, hate crime against migrants and British people of colour, and targeted attacks by the far right highlights the urgent need for those most affected to have a meaningful voice in shaping government policy through genuine consultation.'
They added: 'We respectfully urge you to agree to meet with us and with migrants affected by the government's policy choices. We remain ready to engage constructively, and we believe that a meaningful dialogue between the home secretary and civil society is not only necessary, but in the public interest'.
Minnie Rahman, CEO of Praxis, added: ' There have been many formal requests for meetings with Ms Cooper since the election from CEOs across the sector, including those organised by Praxis and Asylum Matters, and none have been successful.
'We're not aware of anyone who has had a positive response to requests to meet with her and we've all made requests in various forms.'
Despite comparisons of the prime minister's language to that of Enoch Powell, Ms Cooper defended his immigration speech, saying Sir Keir's words were 'completely different' to those used in the infamous 1968 rivers of blood speech.
Under the new plans, foreign workers will no longer have the right to apply for settlement in the UK after five years, instead extending their wait to 10 years. The required level of English needed for visa holders has also been increased. Charities have also raised concerns that tough requirements on English levels and financial support could be introduced for refugee family members.
Sir Keir also announced on Thursday that the UK had begun talks to send failed asylum seekers to foreign countries while they await deportation.
Speaking during a visit to Albania, Sir Keir said officials were having discussions about using 'return hubs' outside the UK. However the Albanian prime minister Edi Rama ruled his country out of the discussions, telling journalists that an Albanian migrant processing centre used by Italy was a 'one off'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes
The Chancellor has not had much luck with some of her tax rises. Rachel Reeves was expecting to raise up to £3.2bn each year, or around £12.7bn in this parliament, with the scrapping of non-dom status – a policy announced by her Conservative predecessor Jeremy Hunt and then ramped up by Labour. She is heading for disappointment. With the exodus of more than 10,000 millionaires from the UK last year and an expected 16,000 this year, Reeves has been warned that the move may in fact reduce rather than increase tax receipts. Speculation is thus rife that the measures may be further watered down; there has already been some initial tweaking and softening earlier this year. The imposition of VAT on school fees is likewise now widely expected to raise less than the predicted £1.7bn by 2030, due to more than expected numbers of children transferring to the state sector and becoming a burden on education budgets. The spate of independent school closures – not just as a result of the VAT change but also employer National Insurance rises, the loss of business rate relief for schools with charitable status and the gamut of extra regulation affecting all businesses – will inevitably make this worse. But, ironically, Reeves may have been rather more adept at boosting Treasury revenue with some of the tax measures she did not actually implement. Before last year's Halloween Budget there was much speculation that rates of capital gains tax (CGT) would be brought into line with those for income tax. This would have meant that higher-rate taxpayers earning over £50,270 would have had to pay 40pc instead of 24pc on taxable property gains and 20pc on other assets. Additional rate taxpayers, earning over £125,140, even worried they might be faced with a full 45pc levy on any uplift. The fear that these rates would be aligned was an entirely rational one. The great Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson in his 1988 Budget had done just that – although the medicine that year was very much sweetened by the scrapping of all income tax rates over 40pc at the same time. Labour's manifesto, while pledging not to raise the rates of income tax or employee National Insurance, was silent about CGT. And after winning the election, Sir Keir Starmer and Reeves never tired of talking up a £22bn 'black hole' the Tories had allegedly left them. This would soon need filling – and Reeves did nothing to dampen down speculation that CGT rises and changes to the pension regime would be how she would achieve at least part of this. In the event, the Chancellor took less drastic action. She raised the rate of CGT for non-property gains from 10pc to 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers and 20pc to 24pc for those on the higher and additional rates. In other words, she aligned the rates for different asset classes to the one already levied on property. But the speculation alone did pay dividends for Reeves. In October last year, the month running up to the Budget, CGT receipts on residential property disposals was £408m – more than double that of most other months in the last tax year. Revenue from CGT is notoriously volatile when compared to other taxes. In the 2023-24 tax year, for example, CGT liabilities were 18pc down from the previous year. But the surge in the run-up to the Budget was vast. The best explanation for the Treasury's October windfall is that residential landlords sold up in advance of a clobbering that did not materialise. As Chris Etherington, of accountants RSM, has noted: 'It is clear that anticipation of CGT changes can distort taxpayer behaviour... the Chancellor benefitted from an inadvertent windfall... Reeves does not necessarily need to increase CGT rates to raise revenues. It's potentially possible to maximise CGT receipts by simply saying very little on the subject.' The Chancellor will insist that she cannot speculate about what moves she will be making in future Budgets – due to such information having an impact on the markets. But that argument does not quite wash. She is more than happy to rule out some fiscal moves, such as raising the rate of income tax. So why not others? Is it too cynical to suggest that Reeves has found her own third way? She can benefit from increased inflows without actually raising taxes. But such tactics are far from victimless – the uncertainty and disruption caused comes at a high price. Additionally, it makes it much more difficult for people to plan for the future and may make them take unnecessary decisions that they will live to regret. In other circumstances, allowing speculation to rip may in fact hurt Treasury coffers. Not closing down current Labour Party debates about a wealth tax will surely mean more wealthy people leaving the UK in anticipation of such a move. This will not only hurt our economy but also mean lower tax yields, resulting in less money for public services.
BBC News
3 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Frustration' in Hull communities remain a year on from UK riots
A year on from the UK riots and people in Hull, where a hotel housing asylum seekers was targeted, believe frustration and tension still continue in the violence erupted on 3 August - fuelled by misinformation - following the fatal stabbing of three young girls at a dance class in Southport, fear and vexation gripped Royal Hotel on Ferensway was attacked after an anti-immigration protest in the city centre rapidly turned vicious with bins and vehicles being set on fire and high street shops looted - the worst unrest seen in than two miles away from this once grand looking building is The Malt Shovel pub on Anlaby Road, where Paul Renton is sipping his pint outside on the terrace under the midday sun."I'm scared for my grand kids," he said. "I don't blame the people for doing stuff like that. It's getting worse and worse now. It's all about the illegals." Mr Renton was on a trip to Bridlington when missiles were thrown at the hotel and the adjacent train station, which was forced to shut with workers barricading themselves in to prevent rioters surging onto the concourse and platforms."All the trains got cancelled and it cost us a lot of money to get back," said the Mr Renton does not condone the violence, he believes "British people have had enough" of those arriving on smalls boats from France and being housed in is one of the most divisive issues in the than 25,000 migrants have crossed the English Channel since the start of the year, according to the Home is the first time the 25,000 threshold has been reached since records began in 2018. Feelings of frustration and anger centred on immigration housing have remained high in parts of Hull, though some show empathy and numbers of asylum seekers in UK hotels had been increasing since 2020, and reached a peak of more than 50,000 in 2023. In March 2025, the asylum hotel population stood at 32, previously said the government wanted to end the use of hotels by 2029 and was trying to move people into cheaper types of Renton is not alone in his views, the same are echoed by other pubgoers. George Ketley watched disturbing scenes of the hostility and rage unfold in his home city via TV. Like Mr Renton he condemns the violence, but said at its core was the issue of asylum accommodation."It's just disgusting when we - working people - can't get a house and they're putting them in hotels. It's wrong."Hull City Council leader Mike Ross said he understood the "frustrations" over the Royal Hotel housing asylum seekers "for quite some time" and had recently written to the government requesting the hotel stop being used."They're in the process of closing down hotels across the country. We think this [Royal Hotel] should be one that closes now." Sitting on a nearby table outside the same pub terrace is former serviceman Jodie and his friend serving his country, Jodie "got into a bad place" and spent time in jail. A single parent, his life descended into further chaos when he became homeless with his six-year-old son in said he sympathised with the rioters, having felt let down by the government due to the lack of support for him and his son when they "struggled" with homelessness."I'm not going to lie, I might have been there if it weren't for my little boy."[I've] not had one bit of help off any kind of government."His friend Matt maintains he is "not a racist", before saying: "I think the frustration is still there."These guys are coming over here... living for free."When I work for myself, I'm paying my taxes and going out every day on the roof. That's the bit that gets me."However, he believes prison was justified for some rioters but "the actual lengths [were] absurd". According to Humberside Police, there have been 78 convictions relating to the disorder and a further nine adults who are charged but yet to be "dealt with by the courts".While that might provide some comfort to those affected by the rioting, others still feel they are looking over their Seihili is a support worker at Welcome House, which offers help and support to asylum seekers and said attitudes had changed for the better despite the air of negativity towards migrants, many of whom were fleeing warzones or "dangerous situations"."Some people are nice, they help. They give us opportunity. But some people say 'go back to your country'."I feel like they don't like me and I'm scared."They don't know that we work hard, pay council tax, we pay for everything. They think that we came here just to take the money and the benefit from the government." Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Daventry MP committed to constituency despite new shadow role
The new shadow health secretary said he is still committed to his constituency describing it as his "bread and butter".Stuart Andrew took on the role in Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch's reshuffle of her senior team last MP for Daventry was previously the shadow culture secretary and a minister in Boris Johnson's he said his work in the constituency was the "part of the job I absolutely love doing. So it's really it's about making sure you put in the hours". Andrew replaced Edward Argar, who stood down following a "health scare".He told BBC Radio Northampton's Annabel Amos that the offer of the role was "quite a surprise"."I'm under no illusions of the enormity of the task I have ahead of me, but it is one that I have quite an interest in. So I'm looking forward to it," he MP said he is "quite used to" juggling constituency work and being in the shadow cabinet."I know that my constituency is my bread and butter if you like, [constituents] are always are a priority for me."I always do what I can to help my constituents when they come and see me asking for my help and go out and about." 'Tricky position' The MP, who represented Pudsey in West Yorkshire from 2010 until the constituency was abolished before the July 2024 election, said he would "work constructively" with Health Secretary Wes Andrew was critical of his handling of the recent strike by resident doctors in England and said the health secretary should have put in guarantees over industrial action when medics were awarded a pay rise last year."The government have got themselves in a really tricky position, and what we need to do is make sure that the patients in this country are getting the care that they need," he has also written to the General Medical Council to say resident doctors should be prevented from British Medical Association (BMA), a trade union for doctors, and the health secretary agreed to resume talks earlier this warned the union it had lost the government's goodwill because of the latest strike, which finished on Wednesday. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
