logo
Vodafone Group Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations

Vodafone Group Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations

Yahoo22-05-2025

Revenue: €37.4b (up 2.0% from FY 2024).
Net loss: €4.15b (down by 444% from €1.21b profit in FY 2024).
€0.16 loss per share (down from €0.045 profit in FY 2024).
Our free stock report includes 2 warning signs investors should be aware of before investing in Vodafone Group. Read for free now.
All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period
Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates.
The primary driver behind last 12 months revenue was the Germany segment contributing a total revenue of €12.2b (33% of total revenue). Notably, cost of sales worth €24.9b amounted to 67% of total revenue thereby underscoring the impact on earnings. The most substantial expense, totaling €8.37b were related to Non-Operating costs. This indicates that a significant portion of the company's costs is related to non-core activities. Explore how VOD's revenue and expenses shape its earnings.
Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 1.0% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 3.2% growth forecast for the Wireless Telecom industry in Europe.
Performance of the market in the United Kingdom.
The company's shares are up 15% from a week ago.
It is worth noting though that we have found 2 warning signs for Vodafone Group that you need to take into consideration.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JSDA Said to Probe Brokerages on Unsuitable Japanese Bond Sales
JSDA Said to Probe Brokerages on Unsuitable Japanese Bond Sales

Bloomberg

time12 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

JSDA Said to Probe Brokerages on Unsuitable Japanese Bond Sales

The Japan Securities Dealers Association is probing brokerages on inappropriate bond selling practices such as overstating to issuers how much demand there is for their debt, according to people familiar with the matter. The securities industry group, which helps oversee the sector, sent questionnaires to nine major local and foreign brokerages that also asked whether they contacted investors about future bond offerings before official filings were submitted, said the people, who asked not to be identified because they were discussing private matters. Responses were due by the end of May.

ROSEN, HIGHLY REGARDED INVESTOR RIGHTS COUNSEL, Encourages Digimarc Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
ROSEN, HIGHLY REGARDED INVESTOR RIGHTS COUNSEL, Encourages Digimarc Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action

Associated Press

time17 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

ROSEN, HIGHLY REGARDED INVESTOR RIGHTS COUNSEL, Encourages Digimarc Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 8, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Digimarc Corporation (NASDAQ: DMRC) between May 3, 2024 and February 26, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important July 8, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Digimarc securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Digimarc class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 8, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) a large commercial partner would not renew a large contract on the same terms; (2) as a result, Digimarc would renegotiate the large commercial contract; (3) as a result of the foregoing, Digimarc's subscription revenue and annual recurring revenue would be adversely affected; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Digimarc's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Digimarc class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store