American Pacific Mining Among 3 TSX Penny Stocks To Consider
Name
Share Price
Market Cap
Financial Health Rating
Westbridge Renewable Energy (TSXV:WEB)
CA$0.75
CA$75.86M
★★★★★★
NTG Clarity Networks (TSXV:NCI)
CA$2.74
CA$116.41M
★★★★★★
Intermap Technologies (TSX:IMP)
CA$2.30
CA$131.52M
★★★★★☆
Thor Explorations (TSXV:THX)
CA$0.68
CA$446.12M
★★★★★★
Orezone Gold (TSX:ORE)
CA$1.27
CA$669.5M
★★★★★☆
McChip Resources (TSXV:MCS)
CA$0.84
CA$4.8M
★★★★★★
Hemisphere Energy (TSXV:HME)
CA$1.74
CA$168.18M
★★★★★★
PetroTal (TSX:TAL)
CA$0.58
CA$530.69M
★★★★★☆
Pulse Seismic (TSX:PSD)
CA$2.65
CA$134.5M
★★★★★★
Findev (TSXV:FDI)
CA$0.405
CA$11.6M
★★★★★★
Click here to see the full list of 877 stocks from our TSX Penny Stocks screener.
Let's uncover some gems from our specialized screener.
Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★
Overview: American Pacific Mining Corp. focuses on the exploration and development of precious and base metals in the Western United States, with a market cap of CA$51.49 million.
Operations: Currently, there are no reported revenue segments for the company.
Market Cap: CA$51.49M
American Pacific Mining Corp., with a market cap of CA$51.49 million, is pre-revenue and focuses on exploration in the Western U.S. The company recently reported a net income of CA$3.49 million for 2024, marking a turnaround from the previous year's loss. Their ongoing 3,000-meter drill program at Madison Copper-Gold Project targets high-impact areas to explore skarn and porphyry mineralization potential, leveraging insights from the Silverstar Fault Complex. With no debt and experienced management and board members, American Pacific Mining is strategically positioned to potentially capitalize on its exploration efforts despite inherent risks in pre-revenue ventures.
Navigate through the intricacies of American Pacific Mining with our comprehensive balance sheet health report here.
Explore historical data to track American Pacific Mining's performance over time in our past results report.
Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★
Overview: C-Com Satellite Systems Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells transportable and mobile satellite-based antenna systems internationally, with a market cap of CA$45.21 million.
Operations: The company generates revenue of CA$5.96 million from the design and manufacture of auto-deploying mobile satellite antennas.
Market Cap: CA$45.21M
C-Com Satellite Systems Inc., with a market cap of CA$45.21 million, is navigating challenges as its revenues declined to CA$0.70 million in Q1 2025 from CA$2.63 million the previous year, resulting in a net loss of CA$0.50 million compared to prior net income. Despite being debt-free and having seasoned management and board members with average tenures of 17.8 and 21.3 years respectively, the company faces profitability hurdles as losses have increased annually by 15.7% over five years, highlighting volatility typical for penny stocks while maintaining stability in share dilution and liabilities coverage through its assets.
Jump into the full analysis health report here for a deeper understanding of C-Com Satellite Systems.
Gain insights into C-Com Satellite Systems' past trends and performance with our report on the company's historical track record.
Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆
Overview: Fuerte Metals Corp. focuses on identifying, exploring, and evaluating mineral properties in Chile, Mexico, and the Americas with a market cap of CA$41.60 million.
Operations: Currently, Fuerte Metals Corp. does not report any revenue segments.
Market Cap: CA$41.6M
Fuerte Metals Corp., with a market cap of CA$41.60 million, is pre-revenue and faces challenges typical for penny stocks. The company reported a net loss of CA$2.5 million in Q1 2025, an improvement from the previous year's larger loss. Recent drilling at its Cristina project in Mexico has shown promising high-grade gold zones, suggesting potential resource expansion. Despite being debt-free and covering short-term liabilities with assets, Fuerte Metals has less than a year of cash runway and faces going concern doubts from auditors due to its unprofitable status and limited financial flexibility.
Click here to discover the nuances of Fuerte Metals with our detailed analytical financial health report.
Learn about Fuerte Metals' historical performance here.
Investigate our full lineup of 877 TSX Penny Stocks right here.
Want To Explore Some Alternatives? We've found 19 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yeild of over 6% next year. See the full list for free.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include CNSX:USGD TSXV:CMI and TSXV:FMT.
This article was originally published by Simply Wall St.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
About 80% of Canadians Say Trump Won't Honor a Trade Deal, Poll Finds
(Bloomberg) -- Mark Carney's government has been trying to reach a new trade accord with the US, but most Canadians are skeptical that President Donald Trump will keep his word on any deal. Four in five Canadians say they think it's unlikely that Trump would honor a future trade agreement with their country, according to a poll by Nanos Research Group conducted for Bloomberg News. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome The survey highlights a political challenge for Carney, who became prime minister in March, then won a snap election in April by promising to strike a new trade and security relationship with the US. He hasn't been able to deliver on that yet, and the Nanos poll suggests the public harbors serious doubts that any agreement would be lasting. Trump signed off on the new US-Mexico-Canada Agreement during his first term in office, hailing it as the 'largest, fairest, most balanced and modern trade agreement ever achieved.' Since returning to power in January, he has nevertheless imposed tariffs on steel, aluminum, automobiles and other products from Mexico and Canada. On Aug. 1, the US increased its tariff to 35% on imports of Canadian products that don't comply with USMCA. The previous rate was 25%. The White House said the move was justified because Canada hasn't done enough to crack down on fentanyl trafficking. Still, Canadian exporters, on average, face a lower tariff rate because the White House has kept an exemption in place for many products from Canada and Mexico, as long as they're shipped in compliance with the rules of USMCA. The trade agreement is scheduled for a review next year. The economic stakes of a trade deal are much higher for Canada than for most other countries. Last year, three-quarters of Canada's merchandise exports went to the US, led by oil and gas. Exports represent about a third of the country's gross domestic product. At the same time, the northern nation is a large market for US exporters — about $440 billion in US goods and services last year, more than any other country, according to US Commerce Department data. Excluding energy products, the US has a trade surplus with Canada. Trump has made a series of deal announcements with other trading partners including Japan, South Korea and the UK that reduce taxes on US imports of their products. But the vague terms mean major trading partners have to been made to wait before the promised tariff relief kicks in. In May, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he'd cut a deal with Trump to see US tariffs on British steel reduced to zero. It hasn't happened yet. Nor has the promised reduction of US import taxes on vehicles from the European Union, Japan and South Korea. In a Tuesday interview with CNBC, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said written documents on some recent trade deals were 'weeks away.' In the same Nanos survey, a majority of respondents said the impact of US tariffs on the Canadian economy is about the same as they'd expected. Fifteen percent said the impact has been better than they thought it would be, 17% said it was worse and 12% of respondents were unsure. Nanos surveyed 1,034 Canadian adults online and on the phone between July 31 and Aug. 6. The results are accurate to plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. --With assistance from Laura Dhillon Kane. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
About 80% of Canadians Say Trump Won't Honor a Trade Deal, Poll Finds
(Bloomberg) -- Mark Carney's government has been trying to reach a new trade accord with the US, but most Canadians are skeptical that President Donald Trump will keep his word on any deal. Four in five Canadians say they think it's unlikely that Trump would honor a future trade agreement with their country, according to a poll by Nanos Research Group conducted for Bloomberg News. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome The survey highlights a political challenge for Carney, who became prime minister in March, then won a snap election in April by promising to strike a new trade and security relationship with the US. He hasn't been able to deliver on that yet, and the Nanos poll suggests the public harbors serious doubts that any agreement would be lasting. Trump signed off on the new US-Mexico-Canada Agreement during his first term in office, hailing it as the 'largest, fairest, most balanced and modern trade agreement ever achieved.' Since returning to power in January, he has nevertheless imposed tariffs on steel, aluminum, automobiles and other products from Mexico and Canada. On Aug. 1, the US increased its tariff to 35% on imports of Canadian products that don't comply with USMCA. The previous rate was 25%. The White House said the move was justified because Canada hasn't done enough to crack down on fentanyl trafficking. Still, Canadian exporters, on average, face a lower tariff rate because the White House has kept an exemption in place for many products from Canada and Mexico, as long as they're shipped in compliance with the rules of USMCA. The trade agreement is scheduled for a review next year. The economic stakes of a trade deal are much higher for Canada than for most other countries. Last year, three-quarters of Canada's merchandise exports went to the US, led by oil and gas. Exports represent about a third of the country's gross domestic product. At the same time, the northern nation is a large market for US exporters — about $440 billion in US goods and services last year, more than any other country, according to US Commerce Department data. Excluding energy products, the US has a trade surplus with Canada. Trump has made a series of deal announcements with other trading partners including Japan, South Korea and the UK that reduce taxes on US imports of their products. But the vague terms mean major trading partners have to been made to wait before the promised tariff relief kicks in. In May, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he'd cut a deal with Trump to see US tariffs on British steel reduced to zero. It hasn't happened yet. Nor has the promised reduction of US import taxes on vehicles from the European Union, Japan and South Korea. In a Tuesday interview with CNBC, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said written documents on some recent trade deals were 'weeks away.' In the same Nanos survey, a majority of respondents said the impact of US tariffs on the Canadian economy is about the same as they'd expected. Fifteen percent said the impact has been better than they thought it would be, 17% said it was worse and 12% of respondents were unsure. Nanos surveyed 1,034 Canadian adults online and on the phone between July 31 and Aug. 6. The results are accurate to plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. --With assistance from Laura Dhillon Kane. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Activist investor urges CSX to engage in alternative merger discussions
Ancora Holdings, a prolific activist investor in transports, has once again set its sights on an underperforming Class I railroad and its CEO. In a move that mirrored its successful intervention with Norfolk Southern, Ancora has penned a pointed letter to the board of directors at CSX Corporation, urging immediate action to explore merger options. If the Surface Transportation Board allows Union Pacific to acquire Norfolk Southern, then CSX's primary competitor will be able to offer seamless coast-to-coast service, and CSX won't. If CSX assumes that a merger with BNSF will come, and it doesn't actively pursue other options (like a Canadian rail), Ancora argued, it will be at a distinct disadvantage in merger talks and may be forced to accept a lower valuation dictated by Berkshire Hathaway / BNSF. 'BNSF is a cash buyer that would bring a highly disciplined approach to any negotiations, rendering CSX in a vulnerable position if it does not have alternative parties to speak with,' Ancora wrote. The letter, dated August 6 and addressed to CSX's independent board members, highlights Ancora's dissatisfaction with the company's current trajectory under the leadership of CEO Joe Hinrichs. Ancora emphasizes that CSX's lackluster performance, especially in light of the recent Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern merger, necessitates a swift recalibration of strategy. The letter underscores a pressing need for CSX to engage actively in merger discussions to avoid being left behind in the rapidly evolving rail sector. CSX has struggled in recent years, particularly when compared to its peers in the Class I rail sector. Ancora points out that since Hinrichs took the helm in 2022, the company's operating ratio—a critical measure of efficiency and profitability—has worsened significantly. From a relatively healthy 58% at the start of his tenure, the ratio has ballooned to approximately 67% as normal operating expenses have consumed an increasing share of CSX's revenue. This operational backslide has compounded investors' concerns about the company's direction, as well as its ability to compete effectively in a market defined by extensive consolidation and competition. Ancora Letter to CSXDownload In its correspondence, Ancora argues that Hinrichs' lack of substantive accomplishments—and his failure to seize pivotal merger opportunities—has placed CSX at a competitive disadvantage. The letter notes that while Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern were making headlines with their transcontinental merger, CSX's leadership was reportedly focused on less impactful initiatives, such as managing its social media presence. Ancora is not alone in its criticisms. Conversations with industry analysts, customers, and other stakeholders reveal a shared perception that CSX has been missing the strategic vision required to remain competitive. Many view CSX's current trajectory as a glaring example of how the right leadership, or lack thereof, can significantly influence a company's fortunes. Ancora's recent actions are reminiscent of its approach with Norfolk Southern. The investment firm began its campaign for change at Norfolk Southern in early 2024. Its aggressive push for improved operational efficiency led to notable changes, including the ousting of the CEO due to mismanagement, and ultimately laid the groundwork for the blockbuster merger with Union Pacific. The success of this intervention has likely emboldened Ancora to apply similar pressure on CSX. The letter to CSX's board highlights Ancora's keen interest in seeing CSX pursue discussions with potential partners beyond BNSF, the immediate alternative often mentioned. Ancora is concerned that CSX's leadership has not been proactive in establishing dialogue with other potential partners, such as Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CPKC). Ancora suggests that engaging with CPKC might prove beneficial, as it could catalyze a competitive bidding environment, ensuring that CSX is not cornered into a disadvantageous position. As Ancora pushes for change, the question remains whether CSX will heed the call. The challenges facing CSX are emblematic of broader trends within the railroad industry, where even savvy cyclical investors have struggled to find double-digit gains, and activist investors are increasingly in the driver's seat when it comes to capital allocation and share price performance. The coming weeks will be critical for CSX's management team. They must weigh Ancora's demands against their own vision for the future, while ensuring they do not miss the window of opportunity created by the current wave of consolidation. The post Activist investor urges CSX to engage in alternative merger discussions appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data