Did Trump slap tariffs for not getting India-Pakistan ceasefire ‘credit', asks Opposition
The panel, headed by senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, was briefed by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri and Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal on 'U.S.-India Trade negotiations and tariffs'. The meeting went on for three hours and according to Mr. Tharoor, nearly 50 questions were asked by 22 members of the panel, which the two Secretaries responded to.
Responding to the Opposition MP's question, Mr. Misri, according to sources, said that the India-U.S. relationship was multi-faceted with trade being just one of the many aspects. The India-U.S. trade in 2024 was worth $210 billion. Mr. Misri strongly refuted recent reports that India was planning to put on hold plans to procure new U.S. weapons and aircraft.
'The India-U.S. defence cooperation continues as before,' he told the members who were also curious to know the impact of the increased tariffs on the GDP. They demanded to know the measures India was taking to negotiate the tariffs to a more acceptable level.
Before the beginning of the meeting, the Foreign Secretary read out the External Affairs Ministry's statement on Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's remarks made during his U.S. visit. Mr. Munir reportedly said that Islamabad would take down 'half the world' with it if the country faced an existential threat from India. The Ministry responded by saying that such 'nuclear sabre-rattling' was not acceptable and it was 'regrettable' that such remarks were made 'from the soil of a friendly third country.'
Later, Mr. Tharoor said the Ministry has given a 'fitting reply' to Mr. Munir's statement. 'This gentleman has a habit of saying things to the Pakistani diaspora that are apparently intended to boost his position. India knows how to handle these things in the air and on the ground. I am not too worried,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jaya Bachchan back in meme territory again, pushes selfie-seeker fan at Constitution Club in Delhi
Jaya Bachchan, never one to mince words or gestures, made yet another viral moment on Tuesday. While at the Constitution Club in Delhi, the Samajwadi Party MP was approached by a man eager to snap a selfie. What happened next? Let us just say the photo op was cancelled, quite literally. Jaya Bachchan is back again 💀The Queen of Ruseverse 🤣 Selfie with Jaya Bachchan gone wrong in the capital In the now-viral clip, Bachchan can be seen physically pushing the man away while questioning his behaviour. Witnesses say her tone was sharp and her body language was anything but amused. Standing nearby was Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, who briefly turned to see what had happened before walking off towards the Club entrance. Jaya's parliament clapbacks This was far from her first public display of irritation. Only recently, during the fiery Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament, she publicly told treasury bench members to stop interrupting her. Her frustration even extended to her own colleague Priyanka Chaturvedi, whom she reportedly told not to 'control' her mid-speech. Those who have followed her career in politics know these moments are not rare. Bachchan's assertive personality has often translated into unforgettable, headline-grabbing exchanges. Past run-ins with protocol and paparazzi Last year, she was visibly annoyed when Rajya Sabha Chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar introduced her as 'Jaya Amitabh Bachchan,' a title she clearly did not appreciate. She pointedly reminded the Chair that she is an artist and a parliamentarian, and that the tone and manner of the introduction were unacceptable. Outside Parliament, paparazzi have also been on the receiving end of her impatience. From scolding photographers to calling out inappropriate behaviour, Bachchan's boundary-setting has been as consistent as it is unapologetic. The viral reputation continues Tuesday's selfie shove has now been added to her growing highlight reel of viral moments. Whether one sees it as protecting her personal space or being too blunt in public, there is no denying that Jaya Bachchan's reactions always make for compelling headlines. With cameras rolling and social media ready to amplify every move, the veteran actor-turned-MP seems to have embraced her place as one of India's most outspoken public figures, unfiltered, unscripted, and completely herself.
Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'Kya kar rahe hai aap?' Jaya Bachchan pushes man trying to take selfie with her at Constitution club; Viral video sparks debate
Synopsis Jaya Bachchan, known for protecting her privacy, recently reacted strongly to a fan attempting a selfie. The video went viral, sparking debate. Some support her stance on personal space, while others criticize her handling of the situation. In Parliament, she questioned the naming of 'Operation Sindoor', drawing sharp responses. Her remarks and interactions continue to generate headlines. Jaya Bachchan, the veteran actress and Samajwadi Party MP, is well known for fiercely protecting her privacy. Videos of her scolding paparazzi or people clicking pictures without permission have often gone viral on the internet. Recently, another clip surfaced showing her expressing displeasure at a man trying to take a selfie with her, and this too quickly took social media by storm. ADVERTISEMENT The video, shared by ANI's official account, shows Jaya Bachchan walking towards the Constitutional Club of India when a man leans in to click a selfie. The actress, visibly annoyed, pushes him away and asks sharply, 'Kya kar rahe hai aap? What is this?' The people around appear silent and shocked at her reaction. The video sparked varied reactions online. While some applauded Jaya for standing up for her personal space and consent, others expressed disappointment at the way she handled the situation. Many viewers reminded the man about the importance of seeking consent before taking photos. Jaya Bachchan is no stranger to making headlines for her bold opinions. In the Rajya Sabha, she recently created a stir by questioning the government's choice to name their retaliatory mission after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack as 'Operation Sindoor'.Starting with condolences to the victims' families, she criticised the naming, asking, 'You come up with these grand names. But why 'Sindoor'? Sindoor toh ujad gaya (the sindoor was wiped away). What about the wives whose husbands were gunned down in front of them?' ADVERTISEMENT Her remarks drew sharp responses from BJP members, accusing her of undermining the operation's significance. When some MPs tried to interrupt, Jaya firmly responded, 'Either you speak or I will. When you speak, I don't interrupt. When a woman speaks, I never interrupt. Please mind your tongue.' Even her fellow Opposition MP Priyanka Chaturvedi of Shiv Sena (UBT), sitting beside her, attempted to calm her, but Jaya snapped, 'Priyanka, don't control me.' Chaturvedi smiled but did not insist further. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein. NEXT STORY
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
LS clears Mines Amendment Bill; House adjourned till August 18
New Delhi: The Lok Sabha on Tuesday passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025 by voice vote, even as Opposition members continued to protest over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar. The Bill, moved by Union Minister for Mines G. Kishan Reddy, seeks to overhaul India's mining framework to promote transparency, boost domestic production, and secure critical mineral supply chains. As the House reassembled at 4:30 p.m., the protests resumed with Opposition MPs shouting slogans from the Well, demanding a debate on the SIR exercise. Presiding over the session, Jagdambika Pal repeatedly urged members to return to their seats, reminding them that the Supreme Court had "upheld the Election Commission's stand" and that the matter was sub judice. "Why are you coming to the Well before the House Well?" he asked, as papers were flung toward the Chair. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju criticised the Opposition for tossing pieces of paper at the Chair and said he had never witnessed such behaviour in his life. The Chair also reprimanded Opposition members, naming Gaurav Gogoi and alleging, "You are encouraging your fellow members to toss pieces of paper." Despite the chaos, the Bill was taken up for consideration. Minister Reddy said the legislation would ensure royalty benefits for states, incentivise exploration of deep-seated minerals, and modernise the sector through technology-driven reforms. He emphasised that the Bill aligns with India's National Critical Mineral Mission and aims to reduce dependence on imports of strategic resources like lithium, cobalt, and rare earths. A key provision of the Bill is the establishment of mineral and metal trading exchanges - electronic platforms that will allow real-time trading of minerals and processed metals. These exchanges are expected to bring transparency, curb cartelisation, and attract investment in mining infrastructure. The Bill also proposes to rename and expand the scope of the National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET), now to be called the National Mineral Exploration and Development Trust (NMEDT), with powers to invest in overseas acquisitions of critical mineral blocks. During the debate, several MPs spoke in support of the Bill. Malvika Devi (BJP, Kalahandi), G. Laxminarayan (TDP, Anantapuram), Gurumoorthy Maddila (YSRCP, Tirupati), Brijmohan Agrawal (BJP, Raipur), and Sangeeta Kumari Singh Deo (BJP, Bolangir) highlighted the Bill's potential to boost employment, enhance state revenues, and strengthen India's strategic autonomy in mineral sourcing. Jagdambika Pal, responding to the disruptions, asked pointedly, "Do you oppose financial gain for the states? What are you opposing?" His appeals, however, were drowned out by continued sloganeering and paper-throwing from the Opposition benches. The Bill marks a significant update to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act of 1957, with previous amendments in 2015 and 2021. It introduces simplified licensing, expanded territorial scope for exploration, and adjudicatory mechanisms for dispute resolution. Also, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman moved for leave to introduce a Bill further to amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. She also moved that the Bill be referred to a Select Committee of the House. To which the chair told protesting members of the Opposition, "Did you hear what the finance minister said? Will you oppose the Bill to be referred to the select committee?" However, the members of the Opposition kept on shouting slogans. The Speaker will decide the members of the committee and the terms and conditions regarding the panel. The Committee shall submit its report by the first day of the next session. Following the passage of the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill, the Chair adjourned the House till Monday, August 18, as the Monsoon Session continued to be marred by repeated disruptions over electoral transparency and procedural demands.
