logo
The way Indonesia deals with US, EU could set bad precedent for countries looking to forge similar deals

The way Indonesia deals with US, EU could set bad precedent for countries looking to forge similar deals

CNA20 hours ago
JAKARTA: The latest trade deal between Indonesia and the United States could set a 'bad example' for countries looking to make similar arrangements with the Western superpower, according to some experts.
And as US President Donald Trump's tariff threats spread ripples of economic uncertainty, analysts also cautioned against the potential pitfalls of a recently finalised agreement between the Southeast Asian archipelago and the European Union (EU).
In Trump's plans to impose lofty 'reciprocal' tariffs on goods imported from almost every country and territory around the world, Indonesia was initially hit by a 32 per cent tariff on Apr 2, which was then abruptly postponed for three months to leave room for negotiations.
At first, talks between Jakarta and Washington appeared to have been fruitless, with Trump informing Indonesia on Jul 7 that the tariff would remain at 32 per cent.
But he has backtracked on that decision, announcing on social media on Wednesday (Jul 16) that the US tariff on Indonesian goods will be lowered to 19 per cent.
The uncertainty triggered by the tariff threats could cause some countries to look towards other trade alliances, experts told CNA.
'Suddenly, every country is looking to diversify their markets and seek more reliable trading partners,' Yusuf Rendy Manilet, an economist from the think tank Center of Reform on Economics (CORE), told CNA, adding that Trump's tariff decisions have so far been subjective and arbitrary.
'Trump's policies have been unpredictable and without solid grounds. He is even hitting his allies with lofty tariffs.'
But as countries around the world rush to find new markets, some nations might be tempted to roll back long-standing policies and water down key environmental and industrial protections in exchange for sealing the deal quickly, said analysts.
Analysts warned such rushed negotiations could lead to trade imbalance, job losses and environmental damage, as they also cautioned against countries potentially sacrificing their domestic interests.
INDONESIA-EU'S TUG OF WAR
Amid the backdrop of Trump's ever-changing policies, which have so far caused panic buying, stock market crashes and threats of retaliation - Indonesia and the EU agreed to expedite negotiations on a proposed economic agreement.
Diplomats from Jakarta and Brussels have been locked in a nine-year political tug-of-war, struggling to work out details of the potential partnership, which has been under negotiation since July 2016 and discussed in more than a dozen rounds of talks.
However, on Sunday (Jul 13), President of the EU's executive branch, the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen announced that both sides were ready to finalise the agreement.
'We're living in turbulent times, and when economic uncertainty meets geopolitical volatility, partners like us must come closer together,' von der Leyen said at a news conference in Brussels alongside Indonesian President, Prabowo Subianto.
Officials from both sides still need to iron out some details of the final document, which is expected to be signed in September.
Analysts say the Indonesia-EU treaty could be the first of many agreements forged by countries around the world as they navigate the uncertainty caused by Trump's tariffs.
Indonesia is also looking to expedite its economic partnership negotiations with the Eurasian Economic Community - a union of five former Soviet states including Russia and Kazakhstan - and the South American economic bloc, Mercosur – comprising six countries including Brazil and Argentina.
The tariff imposed on EU countries went from 20 per cent on Apr 2 to 30 per cent as of Jul 12. The EU is still negotiating the tariff before it becomes effective on Aug 1.
Meanwhile, the EU is resuming its free trade negotiations with Malaysia, whichstarted in 2010 but were halted in 2012 due to disagreements over issues such as market access and the EU's environmental regulations affecting Malaysia's palm oil industry.
The EU is also resuming talks with the Philippines, which began in 2013 but stalled in 2017 over concerns about the human rights record of the then-President of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte.
'The only good thing from Trump's tariffs is that they bring countries closer together and have them set aside their differences,' Teuku Rezasyah, an associate professor in International Relations at Padjadjaran University, told CNA.
LONG TIME COMING
The EU is Indonesia's fifth biggest trading partner, with US$31 billion worth of goods traded between the two countries in 2024 and Indonesia enjoying a trade surplus of US$9 billion. Members of the European bloc also invested US$29.1 billion in Indonesia in 2023.
"We consider Europe to be very important to us. That is why we would like to see more European presence and more European participation in our economy," Prabowo said in Brussels on Sunday.
However, Indonesia is only the EU's 33rd largest trading partner.
The bloc's largest trading partner is the US, with volume reaching US$975.9 billion worth of goods in 2024. Of the figure, the EU enjoyed a surplus of US$236 billion.
'With the US threatening a 30 per cent tariff on European goods, it is imperative that the EU finds a new market for its products and few markets are as big as Indonesia,' Achmad Nur Hidayat, an economics and public policy lecturer from the Jakarta National Development University, told CNA.
Indonesia is the world's fourth most populous country with a population of around 286 million.
The Indonesia-EU agreement aims to eliminate tariffs on 80 per cent of the goods and services traded between both sides, along with swifter customs procedures and more investment incentives.
Before Trump's tariff plans, these benefits seemed far-fetched with numerous rounds of negotiations ending in a deadlock, said experts.
The EU has been critical towards Indonesia's local content requirement policy, which European carmakers see as a barrier to selling their products more competitively in Southeast Asia's biggest economy.
The local content requirement is a set of regulations designed to protect domestic industries and manufacturing.
Meanwhile, Indonesia has been opposing Europe's anti-deforestation law which requires Indonesian exporters to prove their palm oil, timber or other agricultural products do not contribute to forest destruction.
In April, Prabowo said that Indonesia is willing to be 'flexible' and 'realistic' on its local content requirement, acknowledging that Indonesia does not yet have the infrastructure, technology or resources to produce certain products domestically.
Meanwhile, the EU is making it easier for companies to comply with its anti-deforestation law: requiring them to submit a due diligence statement annually instead of each shipment. The EU will also categorise countries based on their risk of having products linked to unsustainable practices with low-risk countries subjected to fewer compliance requirements.
These new EU requirements, which were also announced in April, will take effect in December.
Officials in Indonesia and the EU have refused to say whether their respective policy rollbacks are part of the economic agreement.
Uli Arta Siagian from the Indonesian Forum for the Environment (WALHI) criticised the EU's decision to relax its requirement.
'It will drive the expansion of palm oil plantations on a massive scale, jeopardising forests and wetlands, which are crucial to local wildlife and the indigenous population,' she told CNA.
Analysts are also criticising Indonesia for rolling back its local content requirement.
'Our manufacturing industry is already suffering and it will suffer even more if the requirement is removed,' said economics lecturer Achmad.
He argued that the local content requirement offers a big incentive for companies to set up factories in Indonesia and removing it would reduce potential investments from companies looking to enter the Indonesian market.
It will also upset companies such as Korean electronics giant Samsung or Chinese mobile phone manufacturer Oppo, which have invested billions of dollars to comply with the regulation.
A WORRYING TREND?
The US has also been critical towards Indonesia's local content requirement, describing it as a non-tariff trade barrier and one of the factors hindering American companies from entering the Indonesian market.
In a Truth Social post, Trump wrote that 'US exports to Indonesia are to be tariff and non-tariff barrier free' in exchange for lowering Indonesia's tariff from 32 per cent to 19 per cent. 'This landmark deal opens up Indonesia's entire market to the US for the first time in history,' he continued.
Trump said Indonesia had also committed to purchasing US$15 billion worth of US energy and US$4.5 billion in American agricultural products, as well as 50 Boeing jets.
'For the first time ever, our ranchers, farmers, and fishermen will have complete and total access to the Indonesian market of over 280 million,' Trump wrote.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Prabowo defended the deal calling it 'mutually beneficial.'
'I have calculated everything. What matters to me are my people. What matters is that I have to protect my workers,' he said, adding that Indonesia is only purchasing what it needs from the US.
The president highlighted that Indonesia does not produce its own wheat and soy, something which the US can supply. The Boeing jet purchase, he continued, will be used to grow its national airline, Garuda.
'I have spoken with President Donald Trump. It was tough negotiation. But in the end there was an agreement. We understood their needs and they understood our needs,' Prabowo said.
Harry Su, research director of Jakarta-based securities firm Samuel Sekuritas Indonesia, questioned if Indonesia should call this a 'win'.
'Is this a good deal for Indonesia? Trump called it a landmark deal. Simply put: US won a lot as Indonesia opens up its entire market to the US,' he said in a statement on Wednesday.
But Wijayanto Samirin, an economist from Paramadina University believed that the US deal might not be all that bad.
With a tariff lower than most countries, US demands for Indonesian products will increase, Wijayanto argued, paving the way for more investment needed to revitalise Indonesia's manufacturing industry.
The economist also highlighted that Indonesia has been importing wheat from Australia and Canada and soy from the US and Argentina.
"We need those products. It is just where we import them from that will be different. So it won't affect our trade balance as a whole," Wijayanto said as quoted by Kompas newspaper.
Indonesia can also benefit from cheaper US goods, particularly technologies and machinery needed to support the country's defence, telecommunication and manufacturing sectors.
Still, economics lecturer Achmad said Indonesia is setting a bad example with the way it handles negotiations with both the US and the EU.
'Prabowo often says: 'One enemy is too many, a thousand friends are not enough', but it should not come with sacrificing domestic interests in exchange for quick deals,' he said.
By backpedalling, Indonesia could jeopardise future negotiations with Eurasia and Mercosur blocs, which might make similar demands for Indonesia to impose zero tariffs and eliminate trade barriers for their products.
'And this is bad for other countries which are now trying to negotiate their own deals with the US or the EU, both of which are now expecting to get the same deal as they did with Indonesia,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crypto market gets major win as US Congress passes stablecoin bill
Crypto market gets major win as US Congress passes stablecoin bill

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Crypto market gets major win as US Congress passes stablecoin bill

The US Congress delivered a watershed victory for the crypto industry on July 17, clearing the way for broader use of the technology in everyday finance. Washington – The US Congress delivered a watershed victory for the crypto industry on July 17, passing the first federal legislation to regulate stablecoins and clearing the way for broader use of the technology in everyday finance. Backed by Republicans and championed by President Donald Trump, the bill imposes federal or state oversight on US dollar-linked tokens that can move around the clock and across platforms. Supporters say it could unlock faster, cheaper forms of payments – and bring legitimacy to a US$265 billion (S$340 billion) market that Citigroup analysts expect could swell to US$3.7 trillion by 2030. The measure, which passed the House 308-122 with broad bipartisan support after clearing the Senate, is now on track to become law. Mr Trump personally lobbied Republican lawmakers to support it. The legislation marks a political coming-of-age for the digital assets industry, which rebounded from the confidence-rattling collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX crypto exchange less than three years ago to pour hundreds of millions of dollars into the election last year of friendly lawmakers. The stablecoin bill is the centrepiece of a legislative push Mr Trump has dubbed 'Crypto Week.' Earlier on July 17, the House also passed a broad crypto market structure bill that still has to be considered by the Senate. Democratic critics such as Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Maxine Waters warned the new stablecoin regulatory regime won't do enough to protect consumers and could lead to pressure for government bailouts if issuers of the digital tokens fail. But the nation's most influential bankers are already grappling with the challenge the new measure is likely to accelerate. On earnings calls this week, JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon, Bank of America's Brian Moynihan and Citigroup's Jane Fraser each described the upstart 'digital dollar' as a potential threat to the banking industry's grip on payments – and signalled they're preparing to respond. The digital tokens could potentially eat at bank deposits, as some consumers move money into stablecoin accounts. It could also broaden the stablecoins' use in cross-border money transfers and in payments, and open the way for everyone from banks to card networks to technology firms issuing their own stablecoins. In recent weeks, a slew of major banks including JPMorgan said they are looking at being involved in stablecoins. US-based crypto companies that issue dollar-denominated stablecoins such as Circle Internet Group may be in the most immediate position to gain. While Circle finished on July 17 up less than 1 per cent, it has jumped 25 per cent to US$235.08 this week. Coinbase Global, which has a revenue sharing agreement with Circle, rose 3.2 per cent to US$410.75, a record high. Bitcoin was down slightly in the last 24 hours, after hitting its all-time high of about US$123,000 on July 14, partly on optimism about the stablecoin bill's prospects. Stablecoins so far have largely been used for transactions related to the cryptocurrency market rather than business payments. The legislation 'provides the stablecoin industry with the degree of legitimacy they have been craving' said Eswar Prasad, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. 'And the bonus is that it comes with what I view as relatively light-touch regulation.' The measure sets regulatory rules for dollar-backed stablecoins, including a requirement for firms to hold dollar-for-dollar reserves in short-term government debt or similar products overseen by state or federal regulators. Mr Trump and his family have ties to a series of digital-asset businesses including World Liberty Financial, a platform that has its own branded token as well as a stablecoin. Crypto ventures have added at least US$620 million to Trump's personal fortune in the span of months, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Some Democrats unsuccessfully tried to add a provision to the legislation that would bar elected officials such as Mr Trump and their families from stablecoin business ventures. BLOOMBERG

US House passes stablecoin legislation, sending bill to Trump
US House passes stablecoin legislation, sending bill to Trump

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

US House passes stablecoin legislation, sending bill to Trump

[NEW YORK] The US House of Representatives on Thursday (Jul 16) passed a bill to create a regulatory framework for US-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens known as stablecoins, sending the bill to US President Donald Trump, who is expected to sign it into law. The vote marks a watershed moment for the digital asset industry, which has been pushing for federal legislation for years and poured money into last year's elections to promote pro-crypto candidates. House lawmakers also passed two other crypto bills, sending them next to the Senate for consideration. One lays out a regulatory framework for crypto, and the other would ban the US from issuing a central bank digital currency. The stablecoin bill, known as the Genius Act, and the crypto market structure bill, known as the Clarity Act, both received notable bipartisan support. Democratic lawmakers joined with Republicans to pass the stablecoin bill 308-122. Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 US dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say that they could be used to send payments instantly. If signed into law, the stablecoin bill would require tokens to be backed by liquid assets, such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills, and for issuers to publicly disclose the composition of their reserves on a monthly basis. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Blockchain Association CEO and former Commodity Futures Trading Commission official Summer Mersinger described on Thursday's votes as a 'defining moment in the evolution of US digital asset policy.' The crypto sector has long pushed for lawmakers to pass legislation creating rules for digital assets, arguing that a clear framework could enable stablecoins and other crypto tokens to become more widely used. The sector spent more than US$119 million backing pro-crypto congressional candidates in last year's elections and has worked to paint the issue as bipartisan. The House of Representatives passed a stablecoin bill last year, but the Senate, in which Democrats held the majority at the time, did not take up that bill. Trump has sought to broadly overhaul US cryptocurrency policies after courting cash from the industry during his presidential campaign. Tensions on Capitol Hill over Trump's various crypto ventures at one point threatened to derail the digital asset sector's hope of legislation this year, as Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with Trump and his family members promoting their personal crypto projects. Trump's crypto ventures include a meme coin called $TRUMP, launched in January, and a business called World Liberty Financial, a crypto company owned partly by the president. The White House has said there are no conflicts of interest present for Trump and that his assets are in a trust managed by his children. Clarity Act sent to Senate The Clarity Act, which passed 294-134, would critically define when a cryptocurrency is a security or a commodity and clarify the Securities and Exchange Commission's jurisdiction over the sector, something crypto companies aggressively disputed during the Biden administration. Crypto companies have argued that most tokens should be classified as commodities instead of securities, which would enable platforms to more easily offer those tokens to their customers by not having to comply with a raft of securities laws. That bill would need to pass through the Senate before heading to Trump's desk for final approval. Some Democrats fiercely opposed the Clarity Act, arguing it could be a giveaway to Trump's crypto ventures by enabling softer-touch regulation. The House also passed a bill prohibiting a central bank digital currency, which Republicans say could violate Americans' privacy. The issue had been a sticking point in House discussions this week. REUTERS

US designates Pakistani group's offshoot as ‘terrorist' over Kashmir attack
US designates Pakistani group's offshoot as ‘terrorist' over Kashmir attack

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US designates Pakistani group's offshoot as ‘terrorist' over Kashmir attack

Find out what's new on ST website and app. WASHINGTON - The US government designated The Resistance Front, considered an offshoot of the Pakistani extremist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, as a "foreign terrorist organisation" over the April 22 Islamist militant attack in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on July 17. The Resistance Front, also known as Kashmir Resistance, initially took responsibility for the attack in Pahalgam before denying it days later. Lashkar-e-Taiba, listed as a "foreign terrorist organisation" by the United States, is an Islamist group accused of plotting attacks in India and in the West, including the three-day deadly assault on Mumbai in November 2008. TRF's designation by Washington as a 'foreign terrorist organisation' and 'specially designated global terrorist' enforced President Donald Trump's 'call for justice for the Pahalgam attack', Mr Rubio said. Mr Rubio called TRF a "front and proxy" for Lashkar-e-Taiba. It is considered an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal, a Delhi-based think tank. TRF emerged in 2019. The attack sparked heavy fighting between nuclear-armed Asian neighbours India and Pakistan in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry as New Delhi blamed the attack on Pakistan. Islamabad denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not directly blame Pakistan. On May 7, Indian jets bombed sites across the border that New Delhi described as 'terrorist infrastructure', setting off an exchange of attacks between the two countries by fighter jets, missiles, drones, and artillery that killed dozens until a ceasefire on May 10. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Driverless bus in Sentosa gets green light to run without safety officer in first for S'pore World US strikes destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites, says new report Business 5 things to know about Kuok Hui Kwong, tycoon Robert Kuok's daughter and Shangri-La Asia head honcho Asia Air India probe into Boeing 787 fuel control switches finds no issues Singapore Man charged over manufacturing DIY Kpods at Yishun home; first such case in Singapore Singapore Sex first, then you can sell my flat: Women property agents fend off indecent proposals and harassment Singapore Two women jailed for submitting fake university certificates to MOM for employment passes Singapore Fatal abuse of Myanmar maid in Bishan: Traffic Police officer sentenced to 10 years' jail The ceasefire was first announced by Mr Trump on social media after Washington held talks with both sides, but India has differed with Mr Trump's claims that it resulted from his intervention and threats to sever trade talks. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their problems directly and with no outside involvement. India is an increasingly important US partner in Washington's effort to counter China's rising influence in Asia, while Pakistan is a US ally. Both Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in full while ruling only parts of the Himalayan territory, over which they have also fought wars. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store