Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?
The head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency told senators that Chinese swimmers would have had to eat around 11 pounds (5 kilograms) of food to test for the amounts of the performance enhancer that resulted in the much-debated positive drug tests from 2021 that were later disregarded.
'It's unbelievable to think that Tinkerbell just showed up and sprinkled it all over the kitchen,' Travis Tygart said in a Senate hearing Tuesday focused on the World Anti-Doping Agency's response to the doping case.
A key part of that case was WADA's acceptance of the explanation from Chinese authorities that the swimmers had been contaminated by traces of the drug Trimetazidine (TMZ) in a hotel kitchen.
USADA scientists analyzed data from a report commissioned by WADA to come up with the amount of food (5 kilos) or liquid (4.9 liters) the athletes would have had to have consumed to test positive at the levels they did.
WADA officials declined to participate in the hearing, which spokesperson James Fitzgerald called 'another political effort led by Travis Tygart ... to leverage the Senate and the media in a desperate effort to relitigate the Chinese swimming cases and misinform athletes and other stakeholders.'
Also testiying was former U.S. drug czar, Rahul Gupta, whose decision at the start of this year to
withhold $3.6 million in funding
— the biggest single chunk that WADA receives on an annual basis — furthered a long-running feud between U.S. and WADA authorities.
The Senate subcommittee holding the hearing is considering a bill that would give the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy — the so-called drug czar — permanent authority to withhold those funds, without needing year-to-year permission from Congress.
In his prepared testimony, Gupta compared WADA's governance challenges to a used car.
'You expect that the car has been thoroughly inspected, that it's safe and roadworthy,' he said. 'But as soon as you drive it off the lot, the brakes fail and the engine sputters — and only then do you learn that the dealership has a history of skipping inspections altogether.'
Gupta and Tygart recommended a host of reforms for WADA, most of which revolve around ensuring independence, which they say cannot be accomplished under the current model that calls on the International Olympic Committee to supply half of WADA's money.
Gupta also pressed for the United States to regain a seat on WADA's executive committee that it lost in the aftermath of the dues flareup.
Also testifying was Katie McLaughlin, a member of the U.S. 4x200 freestyle team that won a silver medal at the 2021 Olympics. The Americans finished second to a Chinese team that had two swimmers whose positives were erased after WADA declined to look further into the contamination case.
'It was devastating, honestly,' McLaughlin said of hearing the news about the doping case. 'I was taken aback and heartbroken. I spent a lot of my career trusting in the powers that be, and it was really sad to find out that's someone who could not be trusted, meaning WADA.'
The investigator WADA hired to look into the Chinese doping case ruled that WADA
had acted reasonably
in not pursuing the Chinese case but still called it 'curious' that the agency did not further pursue facts that didn't line up with the normal handling of contamination cases.
Fitzgerald, the WADA spokesperson, said the agency did, in fact, address some of the concerns in the report, especially about the way contaminations cases are handled.
'As highlighted by the Chinese cases and many others, the issue of contamination is real and growing and it is crucial that WADA and its partners address it head on,' he said.
Tygart led off his testimony claiming the Chinese case had potentially impacted 96 medals from the 2021 and 2024 Olympics.
WADA argued with that, with Fitzgerald reiterating the agency's long-held legal position that, given the complexities of the evidence, had it taken appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, it would have lost all of them.
___
AP Summer Olympics:
https://apnews.com/hub/2024-paris-olympic-games
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Iran warns Trump of ‘irreparable damage' if US joins conflict
Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Wednesday said the United States will face 'irreparable damage' if President Trump joins the conflict and approves strikes against his country, rejecting the the call a day earlier for 'unconditional surrender.' 'It isn't wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender,' he said in a post on X. 'What should the Iranian nation surrender to? We will never surrender in response to the attacks of anyone. This is the logic of the Iranian nation. This is the spirit of the Iranian nation.' The words follow a day of escalating rhetoric from Trump, who appeared to be edging closer to joining the war that began six days ago with Israel's massive strikes. Trump called for Iran's unconditional surrender on Tuesday and in another post said 'we' could take out '[kill]' Khamenei himself. Trump's use of 'we' during a bombing campaign that has only involved Israel did not go unnoticed. Israel said Wednesday it continued to land 'significant blows' against Iran, hitting 40 different sites, Israel Defense Forces said. Trump faces a difficult decision if he does go forward with actions, since the MAGA world is divided on the matter. Some criticism is coming from the likes of pundit Tucker Carlson, who engaged in a beef with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) over Iran on Tuesday. On Wednesday, after a swearing-in ceremony, Trump meets with the Pakistani army's chief of staff at the White House. On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth returns to the Senate for a budget hearing, and is sure to get questions on Iran, as well as the deployment of U.S. military to quell domestic protests. And Senate Republicans are wrestling over the megabill that funds Trump's agenda. Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is receiving strong pushback from members of the his conference over the Finance Committee's piece of the legislation, which largely ignores GOP senators' concerns about Medicaid cuts and the quick phaseout of clean-energy tax credits. Catch up here: Follow along here for updates today.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fed decision, Israel-Iran tensions, GENIUS Act: 3 Things
Here are some of the stories Wall Street is watching on Wednesday, July 18. All eyes are on the Federal Reserve, which releases its decision on interest rates this afternoon. Tensions continue to flare between Israel and Iran, with Iran warning the US not to get militarily involved. The US Senate passed the GENIUS Act, giving the crypto industry a big legislative win. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: The tax changes in the U.S. Senate are a mixed bag
As is its right and duty, the U.S. Senate now has messed with the Trump administration's 'big, beautiful,' tax-and-spending bill that just squeaked through the House. Here's our hot take on some of the Senate's work in progress, as viewed not in terms of what is ideal but in the context of what the House already passed. We're all for limiting the 'no-tax-on-tips' deduction to $25,000 per person. We didn't like the campaign promise in the first place and its application to servers at fancy joints who make very good money is especially unfair on those employees who don't receive tips. Same deal with the smart idea to limit 'no tax on overtime' to $12,500 (or $25,000 per couple). That's not fair either, but it's certainly better to make sure only lesser paid folks get the benefit. It's more justifiable for servers at Denny's than Alinea. And while plenty of seniors do not need a bigger $6,000 tax break (in lieu of Trump's promises not to tax social security), that amount is pegged about right to make a difference in the lives of the people who need it without offering anything of life-changing significance to wealthier Americans. We suspect that will be expensive but can live with that. And it made sense for the Senate version to limit another wacky Trump giveaway, no tax on car loans, to vehicles. It limits the cost of the $10,000 tax break, helps workers in dealerships and factories, and gets more cars with advanced safety features and gas mileage on the road. It also will be harder to game than the House version, applicable to any car. We're all for a modest increase in both the standard deduction and the child tax allowance (the Senate would make it $2,200), being as temporary increases with expiry dates invariably represent sleight of hand to our minds. We're all for reducing the tax on university endowment income (to 8%); the House version, which went as high as 21%, was mere Trumpian punitiveness and would have harmed the sector immeasurably. Arguably, the current 1.4% rate for endowments is too low, given the legitimate concerns about the expansion of the national debt. But we'd be happier if a more comprehensive look at all non-profit tax breaks was taking place; there's no reason to single out universities beyond ideology or revenge, neither of which should be part of tax policy. The Senate should consider that. Regular readers know that we favor raising the cap imposed by Trump in the so-called SALT deduction, not least on the grounds of fairness, given that nobody should have to pay taxes twice on the same money earned. Property taxes have been rising in cities like Chicago, where many homeowners now pay more than $10,000 a year in property tax alone and some tax relief is only reasonable. In the House, the cap went to $40,000, albeit with income restrictions, but the Senate draft kills that increase. Trump's initial actions were about punishing blue cities and he caught up too many middle-class Americans in his dragnet. That needs to change and we're confident a compromise can be found. Finally, here's something else to like in the Senate version. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) has been pushing a plan to claw back revenue from the $15.2 billion litigation finance industry, wherein investors finance lawsuits in order to get a piece of any future award or settlement. This can be a really nice ca-ching for investors, even in downtimes in other markets, but it is deeply problematic for cities like Chicago as it encourages lengthy lawsuits and also drives up the cost of settlements at taxpayer expense since the actual injured party inevitably gets less of the payout. Given the whole parking meter morass, we've had more than enough of Chicagoans' hard-earned money landing in these kinds of hands. We're all for the Senate's proposed 41% levy on litigation finance profits—if only because it should curtail this practice by making it less attractive.
