logo
Iowa bill ending transgender protections heads to governor's desk

Iowa bill ending transgender protections heads to governor's desk

Yahoo28-02-2025
A bill that would repeal civil rights protections for transgender Iowans has passed the state House and Senate and is on its way to be signed by Governor Kim Reynolds.
Tyler Mitchell, Director of Development at The Project of the Quad Cities spoke with Our Quad Cities News via Zoom to discuss the ramifications of HSB 242/SF 418.
'To my knowledge, it has not yet been signed,' Mitchell said. 'However, we anticipate that it will be signed at some point, probably relatively soon.'
He explained why protestors have been demonstrating against the proposed law. 'This bill is dangerous for a number of different reasons. Iowa would become the first state in the entire country to remove a protected class from its Civil Rights Code. By doing so, we are essentially taking away equal treatment and protection under the law for transgender and nonbinary Iowans. This is a huge and significant deal.'
Mitchell is concerned that the impact of the bill might not be immediately visible. 'The trans community in the state of Iowa is relatively small. Nonetheless, this impacts people's lives in a negative way. It might not be an impact that we'll see tomorrow or even the day after. Certainly, within the next year or so, I can see certain things coming to fruition.'
'It is a removal of a protected class from the Iowa Civil Rights Code. What this can impact for people are certain protections, access to housing, employment opportunities, very much sort of cutting off the core freedoms that all of us should be able to experience, and all the opportunities that every Iowan, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, whoever they might be, should experience. Every Iowan should have access to those opportunities.'
'It is really important that we as a community make our voices heard. Letting the governor know at this moment, that is really the last hoop that this bill has to go through. So, our last chance really to stop this bill is to appeal to Governor Reynolds, to say to her that Iowa should not be the state whose reputation will be known as the first to remove a protected class from its Civil Rights Code.' Iowa became one of the first states to legalize same sex marriages, after a unanimous ruling by the state Supreme Court in 2009.
'We were known for being one of the first (states) to pass marriage equality,' he said. 'We added sexual orientation and gender identity to our Iowa Civil Rights Code. These were really important steps that we took, and now we're starting to see some of that unravel.'
Mitchell says that no matter what happens to the bill, LGBTQ+ residents in the Quad Cities will still have services. 'Here at The Project of the Quad Cities, we serve people who identify as transgender and nonbinary. We provide LGBTQ+ healthcare services like behavioral health, STI and HIV screenings and primary care. There are so many things that go into healthcare and support for LGBTQ+ people. We want that community to know, in particular, here in the Quad Cities that we are still here, our doors are open, and we want people to access services with us.'
He says that despite the insecurity in society, it's more important than ever for people to stick together. 'I would just say, right now, there is so much uncertainty. I think we can take comfort in community and in being together and in supporting one another. As the LGBTQ community continues to experience attacks, in particular trans people, it is important that the entire community, all people in the LGBTQ+ community, come together to stand up for trans and nonbinary individuals who are being impacted by this legislation. We have to come together as a community, and we're calling on our allies to join us.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Iowa administrator Adam Steen announces GOP campaign for governor
Former Iowa administrator Adam Steen announces GOP campaign for governor

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Iowa administrator Adam Steen announces GOP campaign for governor

Adam Steen, former Iowa director of Administrative Services, was joined by his sons, Maverick and Ryker and his wife Kasey Steen, as announced he was running for governor Aug. 19, 2025 at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill. (Photo by Robin Opsahl/Iowa Capital Dispatch) Republican Adam Steen, former director of the Iowa Department of Administrative Services, announced his campaign for governor Tuesday, labeling himself as a 'faith guy' in the race to succeed Gov. Kim Reynolds. Steen held a campaign kickoff event Tuesday at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill, starting with a musical performance from Nathan Thomas and the A17 worship band and an introduction from Pastor Gary Pilcher. As he introduced himself, Steen said there had been some speculation online about what type of candidate he would be. 'Let me tell you, from my own lips, who I am: I am the faith guy,' Steen said. 'I'm a Jesus guy. I'm a Make America Great Again guy. I'm a common-sense policy, America first, people first guy.' In addition to being a credentialed minister, Steen said some of his highest profile commitments to faith were as DAS director. The department had canceled a Satanic Temple of Iowa holiday celebration event at the Iowa Capitol in December 2024, with Steen saying the event was denied because it included 'elements that are harmful to minors.' Steen said at the campaign event he was 'the guy that stood in front of the Satanists when they blatantly targeted our children, and I'm the guy getting sued by the Satanists for protecting our children.' He also said there was another event request at the Capitol he denied, for an all-ages, family-friendly drag show. He said this planned event was not as well known, but that he believed it was the right thing to do despite being at risk of getting sued. Steen, appointed in 2021 to serve as DAS director in Reynolds' administration, said he led some of the major policies changing state government, like the government agency restructuring signed into law in 2023. Speaking with reporters, Steen said he had discussed running for the seat with Reynolds and came to a 'mutual agreement' that he would resign from his position if he ran for the office. 'Today, at 10 a.m., I walked into the governor's office and I submitted my resignation,' Steen told the crowd. 'Today I walked away from a job that I loved. I walked away from a job that I loved, so I could join the fight and defend the state that I love.' Before leading DAS, Steen was the director of business development at Syverson Strege, a financial services firm, and had previously owned a management consulting firm called 25 Connections. He also was a minor league baseball relief pitcher in 2002, playing for the Philadelphia Phillies and Batavia Muckdogs. Steen highlighted his commitment to protecting private property rights, but did not go into detail on his views about the use of eminent domain for carbon capture pipeline projects — the subject of a contentious bill that was vetoed by Reynolds this session. 'I was working with her at this time, and I support everything that Governor Reynolds is doing,' Steen said. When asked about his views on the use of eminent domain in these projects, he said 'I'm a pro-property rights, pro-private ownership person.' Steen is the latest Republican to join the field of GOP candidates seeking to take the mantle from Reynolds after she announced she would not run for reelection in 2026. U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra and state Sen. Mike Bousselot, R-Ankeny, currently have 'exploratory' committees for governor, while Rep. Eddie Andrews, R-Johnston, and former state legislator Brad Sherman have announced campaigns. Iowa Auditor Rob Sand is considered the current frontrunner to become the Democratic gubernatorial candidate. Former political operative Julie Stauch and Democrat Paul Dahl are also running to become the party nominee.

Appeals court overturns order that stripped some protections from pregnant Texas state workers
Appeals court overturns order that stripped some protections from pregnant Texas state workers

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Appeals court overturns order that stripped some protections from pregnant Texas state workers

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld a law strengthening the rights of pregnant workers, vacating a judge's earlier order that had stripped those protections from Texas state employees. The ruling was a victory for advocates of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a law that passed with bipartisan support in 2022 but quickly became embroiled in controversy over whether it covers workers seeking abortions and fertility treatments. A federal judge last year blocked enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act for Texas state employees, ruling that its passage was unconstitutional because a majority of House members were not physically present to approve the law as part of spending package in December 2022. In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth Circuit appeals court disagreed, finding that the law was properly passed under a COVID-19 pandemic-era Congressional rule allowing members to vote by proxy to meet the quorum requirement. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act strengthens the rights of women to receive workplace accommodation for needs related to pregnancy and childbirth, such as time off for medical appointments and exemptions from heavy lifting. Its passage came after a decades long campaign by women's advocacy groups highlighting the struggles of pregnant workers, especially those in low-wage roles, who were routinely forced off the job after requesting accommodations. The Texas case differed from other lawsuits that have narrowly focused on federal regulations stating that abortion, fertility treatments and birth control are medical issues requiring protection under the new law. The lawsuit, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, instead took aim at the entirety of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, drawing opposition from Republican lawmakers including former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who defended the pandemic-era proxy voting rule. Under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice has continued to fight Paxton's lawsuit, which if successful, could help open the door to legal challenges of other pandemic-era laws passed by proxy. Paxton's office did not reply to emails seeking comment, and it was not clear whether he would appeal Friday's ruling. The Justice Department declined to comment. 'This is a big win for women's rights. We are really happy to see that the Fifth Circuit agreed with us that the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed constitutionally and will continue to fight for the PWFA to stay legal,' said Inimai Chettiar, president of a Better Balance, an advocacy group that spearheaded the campaign for passage of the law. Texas state employees are not immediately protected, however, because the appeals court ruling doesn't become final for several weeks to give time for a possible appeal, Chettiar said. Conservative officials and religious groups, meanwhile, have been largely successfully in challenging the regulations passed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which established that workers seeking abortions are entitled accommodations. In May, a federal court struck down the abortion provisions of the EEOC regulations in response to lawsuits brought by states of Louisiana and Mississippi, and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic University and two Catholic dioceses. The Trump administration is almost certain to comply with that ruling. President Donald Trump in January fired two of the EEOC's democratic commissioners, paving the way for him to quickly establish a Republican majority at the agency. EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, a Republican, has signaled her support for revising the regulations, arguing the agency exceeded its authority by including not only abortion but fertility treatments and birth control as medical needs covered by the law. Solve the daily Crossword

More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight
More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight

A group of Texas Democrats are returning to the state House in Austin where they will spend the night — the latest step in a broader protest over Republican plans to redraw congressional districts in the state. The state House Democratic caucus said in a news release that eight of its members will return to the floor Tuesday evening, 'publicly tearing up the permission slips required by Republicans for members to leave the chamber.' The Democrats will join state Rep. Nicole Collier, their colleague who has remained locked in the state House chamber since Monday afternoon after she refused the condition of a security escort to leave the chamber. After Democratic lawmakers fled the state for two weeks, denying the House a quorum to move forward with redistricting legislation, Republican leaders have demanded that Democrats agree to around-the-clock security escorts to ensure they would return to the chamber Wednesday for the redistricting vote. Collier didn't agree, so she has remained on the floor, while her party has livestreamed her protest for more than a day. Tuesday night, though, she'll have company ahead of passage of the redistricting plan in the House, which could happen as soon as Wednesday. The legislation is meant to pad the GOP majority in Washington. Collier has framed her decision to remain in the Capitol as an act of defiance, telling NBC News she wouldn't sign the de facto permission slip House GOP leaders presented to Democrats outlining the conditions that allowed them to leave the chamber. Those conditions are in effect because the House approved civil arrest warrants for the dozens of Democrats who left Texas this month. Rep. Mihaela Plesa, a Dallas-area Democrat, said during a press conference Tuesday that former Vice President Kamala Harris was among the "history makers" who called Collier to send their support for her protest. Rep. Penny Morales Shaw, a Houston-area Democrat, told NBC News that she decided to return to stand with Collier because she didn't want to be seen as 'validating' the GOP's 'narrative that we were derelict.' 'Nicole was right. We should not have submitted to this,' she added. 'I cannot support this very low and bad precedent for all future legislators.' Rep. Rhetta Andrews Bowers told reporters that she also believed the decision to have law enforcement follow Democrats was a waste of taxpayer dollars, evoking last month's floods in the Hill Country that killed more than 100 people. "Families in the Hill Country who lost everything to the devastating floods need our help. Yet instead of providing relief, those dollars are being spent on constant [Department of Public Safety] patrol," she said. Now that dozens of Democrats have returned to the state, there's little else they can do to prevent the GOP-controlled Legislature from passing their maps, which could help Republicans flip up to five U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store