logo
More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight

More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight

Yahoo3 hours ago
A group of Texas Democrats are returning to the state House in Austin where they will spend the night — the latest step in a broader protest over Republican plans to redraw congressional districts in the state.
The state House Democratic caucus said in a news release that eight of its members will return to the floor Tuesday evening, 'publicly tearing up the permission slips required by Republicans for members to leave the chamber.'
The Democrats will join state Rep. Nicole Collier, their colleague who has remained locked in the state House chamber since Monday afternoon after she refused the condition of a security escort to leave the chamber.
After Democratic lawmakers fled the state for two weeks, denying the House a quorum to move forward with redistricting legislation, Republican leaders have demanded that Democrats agree to around-the-clock security escorts to ensure they would return to the chamber Wednesday for the redistricting vote.
Collier didn't agree, so she has remained on the floor, while her party has livestreamed her protest for more than a day. Tuesday night, though, she'll have company ahead of passage of the redistricting plan in the House, which could happen as soon as Wednesday. The legislation is meant to pad the GOP majority in Washington.
Collier has framed her decision to remain in the Capitol as an act of defiance, telling NBC News she wouldn't sign the de facto permission slip House GOP leaders presented to Democrats outlining the conditions that allowed them to leave the chamber.
Those conditions are in effect because the House approved civil arrest warrants for the dozens of Democrats who left Texas this month.
Rep. Mihaela Plesa, a Dallas-area Democrat, said during a press conference Tuesday that former Vice President Kamala Harris was among the "history makers" who called Collier to send their support for her protest.
Rep. Penny Morales Shaw, a Houston-area Democrat, told NBC News that she decided to return to stand with Collier because she didn't want to be seen as 'validating' the GOP's 'narrative that we were derelict.'
'Nicole was right. We should not have submitted to this,' she added. 'I cannot support this very low and bad precedent for all future legislators.'
Rep. Rhetta Andrews Bowers told reporters that she also believed the decision to have law enforcement follow Democrats was a waste of taxpayer dollars, evoking last month's floods in the Hill Country that killed more than 100 people.
"Families in the Hill Country who lost everything to the devastating floods need our help. Yet instead of providing relief, those dollars are being spent on constant [Department of Public Safety] patrol," she said.
Now that dozens of Democrats have returned to the state, there's little else they can do to prevent the GOP-controlled Legislature from passing their maps, which could help Republicans flip up to five U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warren County Republicans vie for Ohio Senate seat
Warren County Republicans vie for Ohio Senate seat

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Warren County Republicans vie for Ohio Senate seat

The race to represent a Warren County seat in the Ohio Senate is heating up, as two Republican candidates have already announced their campaigns for a May 2026 primary. Sen. Steve Wilson currently represents District 7 but term limits prevent him from running again. The district includes Warren County and northern parts of Hamilton County. It has a 60% Republican lean and a population of about 366,000, according to analysis by Dave's Redistricting, which uses recent election results data to predict partisan split of electoral districts. It's not clear who else, Republican or Democrat, may run for the seat as it's too early to see who has pulled petitions for 2026 local elections. Who is Zac Haines? Symmes Township resident Zac Haines has announced his campaign to represent the 7th District. Haines is a Miami University trustee and CEO of DPA Buying Group, a marketing agency in Blue Ash. He was nominated by President Trump to be a trustee for the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation. He's been endorsed for the seat by U.S. Rep. Warren Davidson, a Republican from Troy, along with Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague, according a campaign news release. 'My goal is to make Ohio the best and most competitive state in the country,' Haines said in the release. Who is Scott Lipps? Scott Lipps, who previously represented Warren County in the Ohio House, has also pulled petitions to run for the Senate seat. Lipps last won reelection for the eastern Warren County House seat in 2022 with 75% of the vote. Term limits prevented him from running for the Ohio House again. Lipps has also served as Franklin mayor and city council member. He owns Sleep Tite Mattress Factory and Showroom in Franklin. Lipps said in a news release that he spent his time at the statehouse advocating for Second Amendment rights and for the rights of the elderly and those with disabilities. "It was an honor to represent Warren County and southwestern Ohio at the Statehouse. I am proud of my conservative record," Lipps said in the release. Regional politics reporter Erin Glynn can be reached at eglynn@ @ee_glynn on X or @eringlynn on Bluesky. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Warren County primary: meet the Republican candidates Solve the daily Crossword

9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program
9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program

San Francisco Chronicle​

time11 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — An attorney who helped design and implement the 9/11 victims' compensation fund says New Hampshire lawmakers have eroded the fairness of a settlement program for those who were abused at the state's youth detention center. Deborah Greenspan, who served as deputy special master of the fund created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, recently submitted an affidavit in a class-action lawsuit seeking to block changes to New Hampshire's out-of-court settlement fund for abuse victims. She's among those expected to testify Wednesday at a hearing on the state's request to dismiss the case and other matters. More than 1,300 people have sued the state since 2020 alleging that they were physically or sexually abused as children while in state custody, mostly at the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. Most of them put their lawsuits on hold after lawmakers created a settlement fund in 2022 that was pitched as a 'victim-centered' and 'trauma-informed' alternative to litigation run by a neutral administrator appointed by the state Supreme Court. But the Republican-led Legislature changed that process through last-minute additions to the state budget Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed in June. The amended law gives the governor authority to hire and fire the fund's administrator and gives the attorney general — also a political appointee — veto power over settlement awards. That stands in stark contrast to other victim compensation funds, said Greenspan, who currently serves as a court-appointed special master for lawsuits related to lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan. She said it 'strains credulity' to believe that anyone would file a claim knowing that 'the persons ultimately deciding the claim were those responsible for the claimant's injuries.' 'Such a construct would go beyond the appearance of impropriety and create a clear conflict of interest, undermining the fairness and legitimacy of the settlement process," she wrote. Ayotte and Attorney General John Formella responded by asking a judge to bar Greenspan's testimony, saying she offered 'policy preferences masquerading as expert opinions' without explaining the principles beyond her conclusions. 'Her affidavit is instead a series of non sequiturs that move from her experience to her conclusions without any of the necessary connective tissue,' they wrote. The defendants argue that the law still requires the administrator to be 'an independent, neutral attorney' and point out that the same appointment process is used for the state's judges. They said giving the attorney general the authority to accept or reject settlements is necessary to give the public a voice and ensure that the responsibility for spending millions of dollars in public funds rests with the executive branch. As of June 30, nearly 2,000 people had filed claims with the settlement fund, which caps payouts at $2.5 million. A total of 386 had been settled, with an average award of $545,000. One of the claimants says he was awarded $1.5 million award in late July, but the state hasn't finalized it yet, leaving him worried that Formella will veto it. 'I feel like the state has tricked us,' he said in an interview this week. 'We've had the rug pulled right out from underneath us.' The Associated Press does not name those who say they were sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly. The claimant, now 39, said the two years he spent at the facility as a teenager were the hardest times of his life. 'I lost my childhood. I lost things that I can't get back,' he said. 'I was broken.' Though the settlement process was overwhelming and scary at times, the assistant administrator who heard his case was kind and understanding, he said. That meeting alone was enough to lift a huge burden, he said. 'I was treated with a lot of love,' he said. 'I felt really appreciated as a victim and like I was speaking to somebody who would listen and believe my story.' Separate from the fund, the state has settled two lawsuits by agreeing to pay victims $10 million and $4.5 million. Only one lawsuit has gone to trial, resulting in a $38 million verdict, though the state is trying to slash it to $475,000. The state has also brought criminal charges against former workers, with two convictions and two mistrials so far. The 39-year-old claimant who fears his award offer will be retracted said he doesn't know if he could face testifying at a public trial. 'It's basically allowing the same people who hurt us to hurt us all over again,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store