Opinion - Sean Duffy is doing his a great job at NASA, but it might not be enough
So, how is Duffy doing, trying to bring the space agency out from its summer of discontent?
Duffy has been spending a lot of his time boosting the Artemis program, designed to return astronauts to the moon and, eventually, to Mars.
He recently posted that he 'spoke with the smart leaders of our mission directorates' and the consensus was 'America MUST dominate space and our critical moon mission, #ARTEMIS, must be as known and supported by America just as Apollo was!'
He finished saying he was 'fired up and ready to launch.'
Duffy repeated his advocacy of the Artemis program on the Fox News show 'Hannity.' He noted that Artemis would proceed in three phases: a return to the moon, establishing a lunar base or outpost and crewed expeditions to Mars.
Considering how well the Artemis program polls, Duffy is pursuing a sound political strategy. The trick is that the steps he laid out have to happen on a sensible schedule. Fortunately, Artemis II, the crewed trip around the moon, is slated to occur early in 2026.
On the other hand, science journalist Robert Zimmerman gave Duffy the back of his hand for stating on Hannity that Artemis III, the next moon landing, is still a go for 2027. Considering the problems the SpaceX Starship has been having, few people believe that date is valid. However, SpaceX's Gwynne Shotwell has assured Duffy that it is. We shall see.
According to Politico, Duffy has called for a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor to be deployed on the moon by 2030, to provide power for a lunar base.
He has also called for the acceleration of commercial space stations that would replace the International Space Station when it ends its operational life. The new plan promises to be very disruptive.
Duffy also had a meeting at the Kennedy Space Center with his Russian counterpart. Joey Roulette of Reuters reported that the meeting discussed ''cooperation on lunar programs' and 'joint exploration of deep space' as well as ISS cooperation,' according to Roscosmos.
International Space Station cooperation is a natural topic of conversation between the head of NASA and the head of Roscosmos.
The U.S. and Russia have been partners on the space station since early in the Clinton administration. The partnership exists in its own little universe, separate from the tensions between the two countries brought about by Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Ars Technica reports that Bakanov brought up the possibility of using Russian hardware to deorbit the ISS in 2030. Clearly, he was attempting to take advantage of the feud between Trump and Elon Musk, whose SpaceX currently has the contract. Roscosmos would get a much-needed infusion of cash if it replaced SpaceX.
However, the mention of cooperation on lunar programs and the joint exploration of deep space catches the eye. Russia has turned down participation in the Artemis program, preferring to be a partner on China's planned International Lunar Research Station.
Russian participation in Artemis was likely dangled as an enticement for Putin to make peace in Ukraine on terms short of conquering the entire country. It would also serve as a way to separate Russia from China, something that has been a center of American foreign policy since the Nixon administration.
Finally, Duffy has to deal with the NASA spending war that has developed between the Congress and the White House.
A group of Democratic senators sent him a letter expressing their concerns not only about the planned cuts for the next fiscal year but plans to rescind some allocated money for the current fiscal year. They are also concerned about a planned buyout program that would cut 4,000 NASA civil servants.
The Senate and House are concerned about NASA's plans to implement the spending plans in the 'big, beautiful bill.' They are demanding answers by Sept. 1.
Duffy will need the diplomatic skills of a Henry Kissinger to reconcile the positions of the two branches over NASA funding. As able as he is, the situation cries out for a permanent NASA administrator, someone with the respect of both President Trump and the Congress.
Otherwise, the chaos will just continue, hampering the space agency's ability to fulfill its mandate to explore space, for the betterment of the United States and all humankind.
Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond' and, most recently, 'is America Going Back to the Moon' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could Ami Bera run against Kevin Kiley for CA House seat next year?
Rep. Ami Bera is exploring how to most effectively run for re-election, including a possible challenge to Rep. Kevin Kiley if Gov. Gavin Newsom's new maps are approved, a congressional source said Friday. The redistricting plan unveiled Friday is aimed at reducing the nine-member California Republican House delegation by adding Democrats to five GOP-held districts. Kiley, a Republican, won his 2024 race by 11 percentage points. His current district includes the east Sacramento metro area, bumping up against Democrat Bera's Sacramento County district. Under the new map, parts of Bera's current district would wind up on Kiley's turf, and would also include include Folsom, which Bera represented before lines were redrawn after the 2020 census. Bera, who is also considering running in his current Sixth District, would not comment on where he would run. 'I intend to continue representing the Sacramento region in the next Congress,' he said. 'Right now, we must stop Donald Trump and the Texas Republicans from gerrymandering their way to a House majority.' Kiley sent a statement prior to the release of the map Friday, saying 'Make no mistake, I will win reelection to the House regardless of the proposed changes to my district.' He added that ' I fully expect that the beautiful Third District will remain exactly as it is. We will defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters.' A Bera-Kiley race would pit two of northern California's up-and-coming congressional stars in a match that would command national attention. Bera, 60, former Sacramento County chief medical officer, was first elected to Congress in 2012. A physician, he's been steadily gaining clout among House Democrats, and was involved in the strategy that led to the redistricting plan announced Friday. He's the top Democrat on the House East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee. Kiley, 40, was first elected in 2022. He chairs the House Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education Subcommittee. The new maps are aimed at giving Democrats more winnable seats in next year's mid-term elections. Democrats need a net gain of three seats next year to win control of the House, but Texas and some other Republican-led states are trying to redraw district lines to make GOP wins easier. The next step for California is for the state legislature to approve a special election in November to approve the lines, which would be in effect until redrawn maps are implemented after the 2030 census.
Washington Post
8 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
WASHINGTON — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined. Under the name of his Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force, Trump put some 800 National Guard troops on Washington streets this past week, declaring at the outset, 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Grunge was also on his mind. 'If our capital is dirty, our whole country is dirty, and they don't respect us.' He then upped the stakes by declaring federal control of the district's police department and naming an emergency chief. That set off alarms and prompted local officials to sue to stop the effort. 'I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Police Chief Pamela Smith said. On Friday, the Trump administration partially retreated from its effort to seize control of the Metropolitan Police Department when a judge, skeptical that the president had the authority to do what he tried to do, urged both sides to reach a compromise, which they did — at least for now. Trump's Justice Department agreed to leave Smith in control, while still intending to instruct her department on law enforcement practices. In a new memo, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the force to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. In this heavily Democratic city, local officials and many citizens did not like the National Guard deployment. At the same time, they acknowledged the Republican president had the right to order it because of the federal government's unique powers in the district. But Trump's attempt to seize formal control of the police department, for the first time since D.C. gained a partial measure of autonomy in the Home Rule Act of 1973, was their red line. For sure, there have been times when the U.S. military has been deployed to American streets, but almost always in the face of a riot or a calamitous event like the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Trump's use of force was born of an emergency that he saw and city officials — and many others — did not. A stranger to nuance, Trump has used the language of emergency to justify much of what he's done: his deportations of foreigners, his tariffs, his short-term deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, and now his aggressive intervention into Washington policing. Washington does have crime and endemic homelessness, like every city in the country. But there was nothing like an urban fire that the masses thought needed to be quelled. Violent crime is down , as it is in many U.S. cities. Washington is also a city about which most Americans feel ownership — or at least that they have a stake. More than 25 million of them visited in 2024, a record year, plus over 2 million people from abroad. It's where middle schoolers on field trips get to see what they learn about in class — and perhaps to dance to pop tunes with the man with the music player so often in front of the White House. Washington is part federal theme park, with its historic buildings and museums, and part downtown, where restaurants and lobbyists outnumber any corporate presence. Neighborhoods range from the places where Jeff Bezos set a record for a home purchase price to destitute streets in economically depressed areas that are also magnets for drugs and crime. In 1968, the capital was a city on fire with riots. Twenty years later, a murder spree and crack epidemic fed the sense of a place out of control. But over the last 30 years, the city's population and its collective wealth have swelled. Against that backdrop, Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner , a Democrat, assailed Trump's moves in Washington. 'You're talking about an emergency, really?' Krasner said, as if speaking with the president. 'Or is it that you're talking about an emergency because you want to pretend everything is an emergency so that you can roll tanks?' In Washington, a coalition of activists called Not Above the Law denounced what they saw as just the latest step by Trump to seize levers of power he has no business grasping. 'The onslaught of lawlessness and autocratic activities has escalated,' said Lisa Gilbert, co-chair of the group and co-president of Public Citizen. 'The last two weeks should have crystallized for all Americans that Donald Trump will not stop until democracy is replaced by vindictive authoritarian rule.' Fifty miles northeast, in the nearest major city, Baltimore's Democratic mayor criticized what he saw as Trump's effort to distract the public from economic pain and 'America's falling standing in the world.' 'Every mayor and police chief in America works with our local federal agents to do great work — to go after gun traffickers, to go after violent organizations,' Brandon Scott said. 'How is taking them off of that job, sending them out to just patrol the street, making our country safer?' But the leader of the D.C. Police Union, Gregg Pemberton, endorsed Trump's intervention — while saying it should not become permanent. 'We stand with the president in recognizing that Washington, D.C., cannot continue on this trajectory,' Pemberton said. From his vantage point, 'Crime is out of control, and our officers are stretched beyond their limits.' The Home Rule Act lets a president invoke certain emergency powers over the police department for 30 days, after which Congress must decide whether to extend the period. Trump's attempt to use that provision stirred interest among some Republicans in Congress in giving him an even freer hand. Among them, Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee drafted a resolution that would eliminate the time limit on federal control. This, he told Fox News Digital, would 'give the president all the time and authority he needs to crush lawlessness, restore order, and reclaim our capital once and for all.' Which raises a question that Trump has robustly hinted at and others are wondering, too: If there is success in the district — at least, success in the president's eyes — what might that mean for other American cities he thinks need to be fixed? Where does — where could — the federal government go next? ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, contributed to this report.
Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Bill Maher slams 'zombie lie' that Trump is Putin's ‘bi—h' hours after summit in Alaska
"Real Time" host Bill Maher pushed back against the idea that President Donald Trump is "Putin's bi--h" after Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. "Let's not have the zombie lie that [Trump] is still backing Putin," Maher told his panel. "First of all, he bombed Iran, that was a Putin ally. He didn't get out of NATO. He mended fences with NATO. And he put sanctions back on Russia." After a three-hour meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska, where the two discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, Trump called the meeting "very warm" in an exclusive interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. He also said Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy want him to attend the next meeting. Hours after that interview, Maher confessed the "one thing" he knows about Trump. If somebody is the kind of person that would "see the good in anybody," this would be "the good" in Trump, the late-night host teased. "He really does hate war," Maher insisted. "He really does not like it when people die in war." One of Maher's panelists, County Highway editor-at-large Walter Kirn, added some wit to the discussion. "You're really coming around, Bill," Kirn joked. "I'm not coming around," Maher countered, insisting he's not "on anyone's team." He went on to call his statement "true s--t." The duo had a sterner discussion when Maher first introduced the "zombie lie" about Trump's relationship with Putin. "I think it's kind of a zombie lie that Trump is Putin's, you know, bi--h," Maher began. "Because he was certainly over friendly to him for a very long time, considering who Putin is. A thug and a murderer." "In 2015, Obama met [Putin] and nobody said anything," Kirn retorted. "He met him, he didn't praise him," Maher argued. "He didn't say he's the greatest guy in the world. I could read 20 compliments that Trump has given to him." Trump has repeatedly called Putin "smart" and blamed former President Joe Biden for Russia's invasion of Ukraine, including at the 2022 Conservative Political Action Conference. "The problem is not that Putin is smart, which, of course, he's smart," Trump told the crowd. "The real problem is that our leaders are dumb. They've allowed him to get away with this travesty and this assault on humanity." The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates the total number of casualties in the war in Ukraine to be 1.4 million since February 2022.
