Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020
Some $10.7 million was spent on campaigning for the 2025 General Election, with about three-quarters of candidates having reported their expenses to the Elections Department (ELD).
This figure already exceeds the total spending of $9 million by all candidates at the previous polls in 2020.
As with previous elections, the bulk of the expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising, such as the printing of posters, banners and fliers.
Another $2.01 million was spent on online election advertising, which includes posts on social media and websites, and the boosting of such posts.
With the return of physical rallies for the May 2025 election - after they were paused for the previous election due to the Covid-19 pandemic - candidates spent $1.33 million on holding these events.
These amounts were calculated based on the expenses of 164 out of the 211 candidates, most of which were uploaded to ELD's website on June 13 after their submissions were announced in the Government Gazette.
They comprised election returns of candidates from the ruling People's Action Party, the National Solidarity Party (NSP), People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), People's Power Party (PPP), Progress Singapore Party, Red Dot United (RDU), the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Singapore People's Party (SPP), and the Singapore United Party (SUP) as well as two independent candidates.
The remaining 47 candidates have until June 16 to submit their expenses. None of the WP candidates' expenses is available for inspection on the ELD's website so far.
The return of physical rallies saw political parties divert some spending on print ads to rally-related expenses, while spending on online ads saw a smaller dip.
Print advertising fell from about 60 per cent of election-related spending in 2020 to 44.4 per cent in 2025.
Online advertising represented about 18.8 per cent of candidates' expenses at GE2025, compared with 22 per cent at the 2020 polls.
On average, each candidate spent $64,959, with 19 candidates reporting no expenses, and NSP president Reno Fong reporting the highest expenses at $160,000.
Based on expenses declared so far, the PAP had an average spending of $96,667 per candidate, or close to 30 per cent higher than at the last general election.
Among the opposition parties, the SDP spent $50,009 per candidate, PSP spent $33,965, NSP spent $31,320, SPP spent $23,261, RDU spent $15,703, SUP spent $6,564, PAR spent $3,614, and PPP spent $2,017. Two SDA candidates have filed their expenses, declaring no spending.
Among the PAP teams contesting group representation constituencies and which have submitted their expenses, the West Coast-Jurong West GRC team was the biggest spender.
The team, led by Minister for Education Desmond Lee, spent $602,708 in all. The largest portion, or $290,290, went towards non-online election advertising.
The PSP team it faced, led by party chairman Tan Cheng Bock, spent $180,560, with non-online election advertising accounting for the bulk of it at $98,540.
The PAP took the constituency with 59.99 per cent of the vote, against the PSP's 40.01 per cent.
The next biggest spender among the PAP's GRC teams was the Punggol GRC team, led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, which spent $541,854 in all.
However, unlike in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, more than half of the team's spending - $301,953 - went to online election advertising.
The team won in the constituency with 55.17 per cent of the vote, against the WP's 44.83 per cent.
The PAP's third-highest spending GRC team was the Aljunied GRC team, which spent $524,312. It lost in the constituency with 40.29 per cent of the vote against the WP team's 59.71 per cent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
5 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Love without a BTO flat: Tough housing choices facing mixed-nationality couples in Singapore, Money News
With Singapore being more cosmopolitan in recent decades, and how connected we are globally, it is getting more common to see Singaporeans dating foreigners. I belong to this 'minority' demographic, and dating a foreigner is possibly the least logical thing I've done in my life; because it forced me to realise one of the most painful realities of dating someone foreign for love: You're not eligible for a shared BTO flat as a married couple — foreigners can't own an HDB flat, so only one of you is the owner; and there are restrictions besides. Mixed-nationality couples are becoming more common In 2022, about 20 per cent of marriages were between a Singaporean and a foreigner; a number that has stayed broadly similar over the past few years. So I find it quite surprising that today, there are still not many options for couples in this demographic. I wouldn't really call us a minority, when we're nearly a quarter of every year's data set. A bigger piece of the pie compared to Singaporean-PR couples! Anyway, back to the topic, for Singaporeans marrying foreigners, let's take a look at the choices of property I have considered, and why my partner and I ended up not going for them. Resale HDBs (Singapore) The most common pathway for home ownership for Singaporean-Foreigner couples is resale flats. While there are still some eligibility requirements, it's not as restrictive as a BTO unit. Only Singaporeans can own the flat, and the foreign spouse will require a Long-Term Visit Pass* or a Work Visa* of at least six months; they must be listed as an Essential Occupant. Before Covid-19, this was a possible reality. We were a bit too young to get married and commit to a mortgage together, so this was actually just Plan A for us to settle down in Singapore in a few years. But after Covid-19, we saw a huge spike in resale flat prices, and we were effectively priced out of the resale market: Resale HDB prices were around $417 psf at around April 2020, the peak Covid period when Singapore had its Circuit Breaker. As of April 2025, the average resale flat price is around $649 psf. So year after year, it became clear that resale would not be an option for us; not without derailing our long-term financial plans. Plus, there was also an issue of non-equitable ownership, as my partner would not have been able to officially own the flat until he got his Permanent Resident (PR) status in Singapore. Since getting a PR is a shot in the dark with unclear requirements and timelines of acceptance, we also decided not to bet on the outcome. It would result in potential unfairness and insecurity, which might strain our relationship. *Subject to HDB's terms regarding non-resident spouses 2-Room Flexi BTO / SBF (Singapore) The next option we thought to try was to wait till I reached 35 years old, to get a 2-Room Flexi BTO. This was far from an ideal situation as we wanted to start a family, so a 2-Room Flexi wouldn't suffice. It also means waiting almost a decade to have this option available to us, and until then, we would have no other housing option available to us other than renting or living with my parents. There's also the income ceiling of $7,000; which I unfortunately exceeded by just a little bit. This option then became impossible. Incidentally, when you apply for a 2-Room Flexi BTO with a non-citizen spouse, you can only look in non-mature areas. Frankly that's not very practical, as it means a less developed location, with limited room for starting a family. So at this point Singapore started to feel too restrictive for housing, and we felt like we were bending and twisting just to meet HDB's public housing requirements. Privatised ECs (Singapore) ECs are privatised after the 10th year, and are treated as fully private properties; so technically, we could buy and co-own ECs; but only out of their privatisation period. But if resale flat prices are too high, then the same can certainly be said of ECs, which are even pricier. Fully private properties were also out of the question. Renting (Singapore) I've been renting in Singapore since I got my right to vote, and the rental market really isn't that bad if you value flexibility, and the ability to live in areas that you want (near work, near favourite hawker stalls, etc.) Given the high prices in 2025, renting might not be a bad option for couples who are still figuring out their finances. And since Singaporean-Foreigner couples don't have that much access to public housing options in Singapore, it can be good to rent and test-drive the neighbourhoods you might eventually want to live in. One downside is that Singapore repealed its rent control acts way back in 2001, so your rental rates will depend on what you can "lock-in" with landlords. I have heard horror stories of landlords increasing the rental prices of their property, forcing them to move or accept a higher monthly rate. Also, while there is some flexibility in renting, it also takes some level of commitment. Getting married and applying for a Long Term Visit Pass (LTVP) for my partner was the first step, before we could even consider renting together. It's a lot of paperwork and hassle, to end up paying potentially high rental rates. But there's an advantage to being married to a foreigner, which opens up a new avenue Being married to a foreigner usually means you have options to live overseas and have a new life, outside the tiny red dot. So if moving overseas is something that can be considered, it might not make much sense to commit to a property in Singapore, especially if your finances aren't ready for it yet. So while renting, you don't just need to be considering places in Singapore as well; you can use that time to also look at housing options in your partner's home country (or countries.) And so, we landed on our final decision. Foreign property (Overseas) When all other options in Singapore had exhausted themselves, we became the advocate for foreign property as a viable option for homeownership. Depending on where your spouse is from and what their country's laws are on property and land ownership, the restrictions on Singaporeans will look a bit different. After talking about financial goals and how to maximise the results from our options, we have decided to get property overseas first as the barrier of entry is lower (cheaper properties even in Europe), and there are far fewer restrictions on property ownership overseas. While property appreciation is not as high, we are in less debt and under less financial stress. In this uncertain economy, where we cannot be sure if our careers will last past our mid-thirties, I am very glad we don't have a 25-year Singaporean housing mortgage, but a manageable and humble European property that can serve us while we build our financial security. If you must stay and find a home in Singapore though… It would be best if both of you were already married, and that your foreign spouse has employment in Singapore. This is important because, when applying for bank loans to finance your property purchase, the bank is going to take a look at your taxable take-home incomes. If your foreign spouse is not employed in Singapore, the bank could lower the Loan-To-Value (LTV) ratio. You may be able to borrow 20 to 30 per cent less, depending on the bank in question. Also due to compliance issues, banks may not be able to use all of a foreigner's overseas income sources (e.g., even if your foreign spouse is getting dividends, rental income, or other monies from sources abroad, banks cannot always use it for loan application purposes.) The upside is that home loan rates in Singapore can be much lower than in some other countries (around 3.75 per cent per annum as of 2025). If a family is not yet in the picture, or you're lifelong singles, a 2-room flat, as mentioned above, might also be viable. But if you're a Singaporean-Foreigner couple who aren't married yet, note that you must be married within three months of key collection. Always consult relevant government bodies or a conveyancing lawyer before buying Housing in Singapore is a pretty restrictive industry where there are many rules and laws in place; moreso for HDB than for private properties. So please take our words at face value and when in doubt, go consult the relevant authorities before proceeding with your purchases. Be wary of so-called "grey area" issues to circumvent laws, such as trying to buy an HDB flat without declaring overseas property ownership. This could get your flat confiscated. Be open to your options Don't be too sold on the Singapore dream where we go to university, graduate, get a job, get a BTO, start a family, plan for retirement… not all of us fit into that cookie cutter or want to, and that's okay. Don't feel guilty over circumstances you can't control. A lot of us are currently stuck at successfully passing the BTO phase, and then what? We just don't move on with life? Nah, we just need to figure out alternatives and be open to our options. And that's my best advice on navigating life and personal finance. Don't let the system determine your future for you. [[nid:718869]] This article was first published in Stackedhomes .
AsiaOne
14 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Singapore's 15th parliament to open on Sept 5, Singapore News
Singapore's 15th Parliament will hold its first session on Sept 5 at 5pm. The sitting would commence with the election of the Speaker and the swearing-in of Members of the Parliament (MP) who were elected during General Election 2025, said Leader of the House Indranee Rajah in a media release on Friday (June 13). Seah Kian Peng has been serving as Speaker since 2023. President Tharman Shanmugaratnam will then deliver his opening address, where he will outline the priorities, policies and programmes of the Government. Debates on the President's Address will subsequently occur between Sept 22 and 26. The 14th Parliament was dissolved on April 15 ahead of the General Election on May 3. The 15th Parliament will have 99 MPs consisting of 97 elected MPs and two Non-Constituency MPs comprising Andre Low and Eileen Chong from the Workers' Party. Indranee also posted about the upcoming Parliament session on Facebook, noting: "While MPs are already on the ground doing their constituency work, the parliamentary work begins only after the Official Opening of Parliament. "As Leader of the House, one of my responsibilities is to liaise with Parliament on the arrangement of Parliamentary business." She shared further that "work is currently ongoing" about outlining the Government's agenda for the new term, which will be discussed in the President Tharman's address. "The President's Address will set out our strategies and key policies to steer Singapore through the current challenging geopolitical climate and economic uncertainties, and secure a brighter future ahead for Singaporeans and our nation," Indranee added. [[nid:718283]] drimac@
New Paper
14 hours ago
- New Paper
Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020
Some $10.7 million was spent on campaigning for the 2025 General Election, with about three-quarters of candidates having reported their expenses to the Elections Department (ELD). This figure already exceeds the total spending of $9 million by all candidates at the previous polls in 2020. As with previous elections, the bulk of the expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising, such as the printing of posters, banners and fliers. Another $2.01 million was spent on online election advertising, which includes posts on social media and websites, and the boosting of such posts. With the return of physical rallies for the May 2025 election - after they were paused for the previous election due to the Covid-19 pandemic - candidates spent $1.33 million on holding these events. These amounts were calculated based on the expenses of 164 out of the 211 candidates, most of which were uploaded to ELD's website on June 13 after their submissions were announced in the Government Gazette. They comprised election returns of candidates from the ruling People's Action Party, the National Solidarity Party (NSP), People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), People's Power Party (PPP), Progress Singapore Party, Red Dot United (RDU), the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Singapore People's Party (SPP), and the Singapore United Party (SUP) as well as two independent candidates. The remaining 47 candidates have until June 16 to submit their expenses. None of the WP candidates' expenses is available for inspection on the ELD's website so far. The return of physical rallies saw political parties divert some spending on print ads to rally-related expenses, while spending on online ads saw a smaller dip. Print advertising fell from about 60 per cent of election-related spending in 2020 to 44.4 per cent in 2025. Online advertising represented about 18.8 per cent of candidates' expenses at GE2025, compared with 22 per cent at the 2020 polls. On average, each candidate spent $64,959, with 19 candidates reporting no expenses, and NSP president Reno Fong reporting the highest expenses at $160,000. Based on expenses declared so far, the PAP had an average spending of $96,667 per candidate, or close to 30 per cent higher than at the last general election. Among the opposition parties, the SDP spent $50,009 per candidate, PSP spent $33,965, NSP spent $31,320, SPP spent $23,261, RDU spent $15,703, SUP spent $6,564, PAR spent $3,614, and PPP spent $2,017. Two SDA candidates have filed their expenses, declaring no spending. Among the PAP teams contesting group representation constituencies and which have submitted their expenses, the West Coast-Jurong West GRC team was the biggest spender. The team, led by Minister for Education Desmond Lee, spent $602,708 in all. The largest portion, or $290,290, went towards non-online election advertising. The PSP team it faced, led by party chairman Tan Cheng Bock, spent $180,560, with non-online election advertising accounting for the bulk of it at $98,540. The PAP took the constituency with 59.99 per cent of the vote, against the PSP's 40.01 per cent. The next biggest spender among the PAP's GRC teams was the Punggol GRC team, led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, which spent $541,854 in all. However, unlike in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, more than half of the team's spending - $301,953 - went to online election advertising. The team won in the constituency with 55.17 per cent of the vote, against the WP's 44.83 per cent. The PAP's third-highest spending GRC team was the Aljunied GRC team, which spent $524,312. It lost in the constituency with 40.29 per cent of the vote against the WP team's 59.71 per cent.
