logo
Column: Advocates warn proposed Trump budget cuts and agency changes put senior services at risk

Column: Advocates warn proposed Trump budget cuts and agency changes put senior services at risk

Chicago Tribune28-04-2025
Diane Slezak, president and CEO of AgeOptions, has worked in the aging services sector helping to meet the needs of seniors for nearly 50 years.
'I have never encountered a moment as challenging and concerning as the one we face now,' she said.
Slezak and other advocates are worried about the risks facing seniors posed by the Trump administration proposed $880 billion cuts to Medicaid and other U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funding, massive job cuts and other changes affecting programs that have long served the elderly.
AgeOptions is the Area Agency on Aging for suburban Cook County. That includes the south suburbs where more than 188,000 adults ages 60 and older reside. The nonprofit partners with agencies to connect older adults and caregivers with resources and services and funds senior services programs.
In recent weeks, the Trump administration announced the Health and Human Services Department was slashing 10,000 jobs. That included cutting half of the staff at the Administration for Community Living, responsible for implementing the Older Americans Act.
The act supports a range of health and health-related social services programs for adults ages 60 and older and individuals with disabilities to help them live independently. That includes home-delivered and congregate meals programs, transportation to medical appointments, personal care assistance, respite care for caregivers, health and wellness programs, falls prevention and elder abuse prevention programs and other health and wellness programs.
The agency is also responsible for supporting the funding for more than 600 area agencies on aging nationwide, Slezak noted.
In Fiscal Year 2024, Illinois agencies funded under the Older Americans Act assisted 478,113 older adults and caregivers, including 32,551 in Chicago's south suburbs served by AgeOptions, according to Slezak.
As part of the Trump administration's planned restructuring of the Health and Human Services, Older Americans Act programs will be moved to other agencies, and the proposed department budget calls for eliminating funding for some programs including senior health promotion and disease prevention programs, the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Adult Protective Services support, and other elder abuse, neglect and exploitation efforts, notes the National Council on Aging.
It would also no longer fund the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which helps seniors and others with their heating and electricity bills, Aging and Disability Resource Centers and the State Health Insurance Assistance Program, which provides counseling to help seniors enrolling in Medicare.
Older Americans Act-funded programs play a vital role and help seniors avoid more costly nursing home care, advocates note. For example, according to Meals on Wheels America, the cost of home-delivered meals for one senior for the entire year is $2,602 while the cost of one day of hospital care is $2,754 and for 10 days in a long-term care facility, the cost is $2,070.
The proposed changes are occurring at a time when the need for senior services is growing and when programs have long been underfunded, said Slezak. The population of seniors is set to reach 91 million nationally by 2030, according to Meals on Wheels America, which also notes one in two older adults living alone lack the income to pay for basic needs and 12 million older adults face financial challenges that impact their ability to age at home.
From 2010 to 2013, the number of adults ages 60 and older in the southern townships increased by more than 42,000 while the number younger than that dropped by more than 64,000, she said.
'Older Americans are one of the most rapidly growing populations,' said Slezak. 'We have in Illinois 25% of the population now over age of 60. Funding needs to be increased and not paused or terminated.'
The restructuring at Health and Human Services included laying off 10 Administration for Community Living regional administrators and veteran career staff in key roles along with experts in budgeting, grants, policy, evaluation and communications, and is disrupting the agency's functions, Slezak said. The changes, including fragmenting services into different departments, will make them less efficient and effective, she stressed. She worries seniors will fall through the cracks.
She's also concerned about any potential slowdown in funding for agencies that provide services to seniors. She cited a recent USAging survey that noted 38% of agencies would have to reduce services within two weeks of a funding disruption.
According to AgeOptions, statewide, without Older Americans Act funding, some of the monthly losses would include:
183,209 fewer home-delivered meals
154,971 fewer congregate meals served
30,264 fewer contacts providing information, assistance and outreach
14,933 fewer rides provided to older adults
'That is just unimaginable,' Slezak said. 'It's just unfathomable. I can't even think about it.'
The state would never be able to make up for that funding, she said. Medicaid provides health care coverage for 654,000 people ages 50 and over in Illinois, according to AARP.
Elaine Grande, executive director of Palos Heights-based eldercare services provider Pathlights, said the organization is closely monitoring the proposed cuts and changes and said it's essential to raise awareness on the proposed cuts 'and just how detrimental they could be for older adults in our communities.
'At Pathlights, we remain committed to advocating for older adults, providing accurate information, and emphasizing the critical importance of programs like Medicaid, SHIP and those under the Older Americans Act.'
The statewide aging network is working together to build awareness, advocate for services and ensure the needs of older adults are recognized and met, she said.
'I'm very concerned about all the cuts and all the changes,' said U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, a Democrat from Matteson. 'That puts services and care for older Americans and people with disabilities at risk.'
Earlier this month, Kelly unsuccessfully sought to meet with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for an explanation on recent layoffs and the restructuring.
She and other senior advocates note cuts in staffing at the Social Security Administration are also negatively affecting seniors with reports of people calling the agency and having to wait four and five hours to reach anyone to get help with services.
Constituents have voiced their concerns, said Kelly, who noted two town halls she held recently attracted 11,000 and 13,000 people.
'Seniors, their children and grandchildren, everybody is concerned,' she said. 'They're worried about what's going to happen to services.'
While Democrats are limited in what they can do legislatively to block the proposed changes given Republican majorities in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, Kelly praised lawsuits filed by advocates and intervention by the courts.
Those being negatively affected and or opposed to the cuts and changes must speak up, said Kelly.
'This is not the time to stay on the sidelines,' she said. She encouraged people to contact their senators and representatives.
The area agencies on aging in Illinois are organizing a statewide advocacy day on May 28 to elevate the importance of senior services and the critical role they play in the lives of older adults across the state, said Grande. For more advocacy information visit AgeOptions www.ageoptions.org and click on the advocacy tab.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declares 'loyalty' to Trump, rules out a 2028 presidential bid
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declares 'loyalty' to Trump, rules out a 2028 presidential bid

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declares 'loyalty' to Trump, rules out a 2028 presidential bid

WASHINGTON — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he's not running for president in 2028 and intends to remain in his position until President Donald Trump leaves office. The leader of the "Make America Healthy Again" movement said in an X post that his "loyalty" lies with Trump, and he dismissed speculation about his political future as part of a "smear campaign" from disgruntled Washington insiders who oppose the MAHA agenda. "They're pushing the flat-out lie that I'm running for president in 2028. Let me be clear: I am not running for president in 2028," Kennedy said. Kennedy competed for the presidency in 2024, first as a Democrat and later as an independent, before suspending his candidacy last August and throwing his support behind Trump. After the election, Trump made him HHS secretary. His comments ruling out a 2028 bid came far-right activist Laura Loomer accused Kennedy aide Stefanie Spear of using her position at HHS to lay the groundwork for Kennedy to run again. Loomer's comment came in a Politico interview and followed an Axios report in July that said Kennedy super PAC head Tony Lyons and Spear convened MAHA supporters on a call that left some attendees with the impression he was mulling another campaign. But in his social media post, Kennedy said, "The president has made himself the answer to my 20-year prayer that God would put me in a position to end the chronic disease epidemic — and that's exactly what my team and I will do until the day he leaves office."

US aid cuts condemn hungry children abroad
US aid cuts condemn hungry children abroad

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

US aid cuts condemn hungry children abroad

Starvation in the Gaza Strip has brought intense international attention to the horrors of famine, but less attention has been paid to a wider issue: The dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development has worsened the problem of severe hunger and malnutrition throughout the world. Advertisement Saving children with severe acute malnutrition is simple and inexpensive. Each packet costs less than 30 cents but contains a high-calorie mix of peanuts, sugar, milk powder and oil -- flavors appealing to children -- and a blend of vitamins and minerals. A complete six-week treatment for a severely malnourished child runs less than $45. Advertisement USAID funded roughly half the world's supply of ready-to-use therapeutic food, or RUTF, purchasing some directly from U.S. manufacturers and funding the United Nations Children Fund, or UNICEF, to manage its distribution. All those grants were abruptly halted when the Trump administration froze foreign aid earlier this year. USAID eventually reimbursed grantees for costs already incurred. The State Department recently authorized a $93 million new grant to UNICEF, but it is less than half what the government had typically spent. In 2024, the agency spent about $200 million on this work, not including aid for countries and direct grants to organizations that implement programs. Funds for 2025 have yet to be released to manufacturers; the World Food Programme, which distributes a similar product for moderate acute malnutrition; those who transport the products; or the many organizations, like the International Rescue Committee or Helen Keller International, that run the malnutrition programs. In response to questions from the Times, the State Department emailed a statement asserting that lifesaving malnutrition programs 'remain a priority.' 'Malnutrition treatment is among the first new obligations of foreign assistance funding,' the statement said. But it also said that 'other actors -- including national governments and international humanitarian organizations -- must step up.' President Trump has made the same argument for many aid programs, saying the United States should not have to carry the bulk of the burden of caring for the world. Although other countries do already contribute, and some organizations are scrambling to fill the gap, it is unlikely that they can do so quickly enough to help the children who are now in need. Increasingly, some governments such as Nigeria, Kenya and Burkina Faso have been contributing by hosting factories that manufacture the packets. The Child Nutrition Fund, started by UNICEF, the British government and others, encourages governments to finance supply by offering a 1:1 match for every dollar. Advertisement Before the sudden withdrawal of aid, 'things were absolutely moving in the right direction,' said James Sussman, a spokesperson for the International Rescue Committee. Now boxes containing millions of dollars' worth of the lifesaving packets are stuck at every link in the supply chain: in manufacturers' warehouses, at shipping companies, in cities that received the shipments and in treatment centers that have shut down all over the world. In nearly a dozen countries, the supply chain for the packets has become so unstable that thousands of children are at high risk of dying, according to organizations that help distribute the treatments. Tens of thousands more could be in danger in the coming weeks and months if funds for this year do not move quickly. 'We have seen the mortality rates in the hospitals increasing by the day,' said Aliyu Mohammed Jabo, Helen Keller International's director for Nigeria. 'This is the ugly situation that we are facing because of this funding cut.' In Nigeria, 150 clinics operated by the World Food Programme in Borno and Yobe states, which provided treatment for more than 300,000 children under the age of 2, shut down at the end of July. In Bauchi state, Helen Keller International has had to stop treating malnutrition in 16 of its 17 centers, leaving more than 17,000 children without treatment. In eastern Chad, Mali and Niger, malnutrition treatments are unavailable or in dangerously short supply. Clinics in northeast Syria, Burkina Faso and Kenya have closed down. In South Sudan, the International Rescue Committee estimates that it will have to close 62 static treatment sites and nine mobile clinics if funding is not restored by September. Advertisement In Afghanistan, IRC warehouses are bare, despite 900,000 children who are in desperate need of treatment for severe acute malnutrition. Nepal has no supply in about half of its provinces and is facing a nationwide shortage starting this month, endangering about 200,000 malnourished children, including about 25,000 who are at risk of death. Several other countries, including Congo, Ethiopia and Madagascar, similarly have only enough products to treat children for a few more weeks or months. This month, after long delays, the State Department authorized $93 million for UNICEF, its first large grant for 2025, to supply RUTF to 12 African countries and Haiti. Part of the grant is for distributing 11,000 metric tons of packets, enough for about 800,000 children, to last through June 2026. Some money will also be spent to transport and distribute more than 1,200 metric tons of stalled packets -- enough for about 87,000 children. But UNICEF expects that it will be two to three months before the products are delivered, according to Helen Wylie, a spokesperson for the organization. After orders are placed and products manufactured, it can take months for treatments to reach people. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly said that no children have died as a result of the cuts to foreign aid and the dismantling of USAID, calling reports of any deaths 'false' and 'fake.' But several organizations, including Doctors Without Borders and the aid group Action Against Hunger, have reported deaths in children related to malnutrition. More timely and precise estimates of deaths are difficult, because many of the programs that track children in need have shut down, and most organizations dare not speak up against the administration, fearing retaliation. Advertisement One global study has estimated that more than 160,000 children might die each year if the funds are not restored. Acute malnutrition, also called wasting, is thought to affect about 43 million children worldwide. Even when aid flowed freely, it did not reach many of them. In 2023, RUTF was dispensed to 9.3 million children, according to UNICEF. The first 1,000 days of life in particular are critical for brain development. Severely malnourished children have impaired immune responses, may suffer permanent cognitive damage and are more vulnerable to infections, even after treatment. They are up to 11 times as likely to die as a healthy child is. Severe wasting accounts for as many as 1 in 5 deaths of children younger than 5 worldwide. By the time a child reaches a treatment center, he or she may have only hours to survive. 'It really comes down to the children who do not have time to waste,' said Navyn Salem, who runs Edesia Nutrition, one of two large U.S. manufacturers. In previous years, American farmers supplied the raw ingredients -- peanuts, milk powder and soy -- to Edesia and Mana, two large U.S. manufacturers. The finished product was transported by truck to major U.S. ports, then shipped to the ports of Africa, where it would be unloaded and stored. An intricate network of organizations then transported and distributed the boxes. The stop-start-stop of work orders and the dissolution of USAID has thrown the system into disarray. USAID's activities have in theory been transferred to the State Department, but the department has neither the personnel it needs to restart all activities -- even less so after widespread layoffs earlier this month -- nor the systems needed to release funds. Advertisement The department 'continues to strengthen internal systems and personnel capacity to ensure timely, accountable delivery of lifesaving humanitarian programs,' a representative of the State Department said in an email. In the meantime, some organizations are burning through their reserves, but many small ones have folded. Others are looking to philanthropy. Mana received a gift of $20 million from a British philanthropist and donated about 500,000 boxes to UNICEF. Edesia has raised $2 million in private funding and is shipping some boxes to the neediest sites on its own. Without more funds, the companies will have no money left to buy raw materials and are in danger of defaulting on contracts from farmers in 25 states. 'The American farmers that we work with can only hold on for so long as well,' Salem said. 'So it's been a waiting game, a very stressful waiting game.' Edesia recently shipped 122,000 boxes to Sudan and still has more than 185,000 at its warehouses. UNICEF will use the new funds to ship those products soon, according to the State Department. Mana, too, has already been paid for 400,000 boxes which have yet to ship; 100,000 are slated to move to South Sudan sometime in the coming weeks. Even if funding were to resume tomorrow, it takes weeks to ship products to their destinations. For RUTF to reach locations in South Sudan, for example, the products must first be shipped to Mombasa, Kenya -- or produced locally in Kenya -- then transported by road through Kenya and Uganda to Juba, the capital, and then to more remote parts of the country. The roads are rough, especially in the rainy season, and boxes may take two or three months to reach the sites, said Stephane Doyon, an operations manager for Doctors Without Borders. In Afghanistan, the time to delivery may stretch to eight or nine months, he said. That may be too late for some children. This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store