Dutton lost his seat. His colleagues were talking about his leadership before a vote was counted
But by 8.30pm, the need for a new leader was clear, and Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce said his colleagues had gotten ahead of themselves.
'There's only been one one-term government in the history of Australia ... And what I never wanted to do, and what I'd say to my colleagues, is don't overbid on what you're saying when you go in,' he said.
Liberal National Party senator James McGrath said he would not examine the Coalition's loss so early, but it was clear there must be a 'serious, considered look at the party and how we need to grow'.
Loading
'It is not a good night for us. There will be a lot of soul-searching in the party as to how we take the party forward and what we need to do to make sure we are an election-winning force,' he said.
Country Liberal Party Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price downplayed her own role in the Coalition's defeat – having generated headlines with a Trump-esque pledge to 'make Australia great again' – but conceded it was a tough ask to unseat a first-term prime minister.
'There's a lot that we're going to have to consider going forward, and regrouping as the Coalition, in terms of the approach we take in three years' time. And considering where we went wrong this time around,' she said.
'Certainly we could have provided our policies sooner to the Australian people ... We could have called out [Albanese's] lies earlier on in the piece.'
Finance spokeswoman Jane Hume conceded the Coalition had campaigned in ways 'that we will never do again' but slammed Labor's negative scare campaign that claimed Dutton would cut Medicare to pay for a $600 billion nuclear power policy.
'It was so disappointing to take part in an election where there were so many lies told.'
But Hume said her first act on Sunday would be to go through the Coalition's review of its 2022 loss, which she co-authored. 'Because there are some similarities I can see,' she said.
'There is an extraordinary amount of work we need to do, there is no doubt about that. Turning a party around is not an easy thing to do. We will need to start from scratch with great candidates, great policies.'
Groups on the left and right of the party had been quietly considering leadership scenarios for weeks, according to factional sources on both sides of the party. Coalition MPs believed Dutton required a five-to-10-seat haul to remain leader.
Loading
While Dutton lost his seat, Hastie was recording a more than 7 per cent swing towards him in Canning.
Taylor, Ley and Tehan all retained their seats without losing significant ground to Labor.
Tehan, when asked on Saturday night if he would run to lead the party after successfully fighting off a well-funded challenge by independent candidate Alex Dyson, said: 'I haven't had any time to think about the future'.
Hume, seen by other moderates as a future deputy leader, began contacting colleagues in NSW, Victoria and South Australia on Friday, asking for face-to-face meetings or phone calls for Sunday morning.
Hume has a close relationship with Taylor, who has been talked about as a potential replacement for Dutton. Hume does not currently hold a leadership position in the Senate, but is a shadow cabinet member.
Taylor's path to leadership is complicated by the NSW moderate grouping, which would support Ley, Tehan or Hastie over Taylor, who is one of the leaders of the NSW right.
The moderates do not have a clear leadership option in the lower house, where party leaders must sit, making Hume an option as deputy to any future leader, although her comments this week on Chinese spies have lowered her prospects.
The NSW moderates have been loyal to Dutton and were only set to change leaders if the Coalition had a disastrous result. Taylor was contacted for comment.
Hastie and Taylor are from the right, but it is not clear if Hastie is keen to run. Ley is supported by the small centre-right faction associated with Alex Hawke, while Tehan is a Victorian who does not neatly fit with any group and is battling to keep his seat of Wannon.
Out-of-field leadership options include NSW MP Julian Leeser, who was the shadow attorney-general before quitting over the Voice to parliament and energy spokesman Ted O'Brien. Sukkar was also on track to lose his seat to Labor in Melbourne.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
33 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
US Congress and Senate ‘emphatically' support AUKUS
Former Australian ambassador to the US Joe Hockey discusses the US officials who 'emphatically' support AUKUS, including Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and the Secretary of the US Navy. 'There's no doubt the Secretary of the United States Navy, Secretary Phelan, is very supportive of AUKUS,' Mr Hockey told Sky News Australia. 'I believe Secretary Hegseth, Department of Defence Secretary, is the same – I know Donald Trump supports AUKUS, and there is no doubt Congress and the Senate … they emphatically support AUKUS.'

The Age
35 minutes ago
- The Age
Albanese must make Trump an offer he can't refuse
And it's in that second option, change, that there is an opportunity for Anthony Albanese and the Labor government to cement the deal. Put simply, Albanese needs to make AUKUS great again by super-sizing the deal and offering the Trump administration more than was agreed to under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. As a former Defence official, who asked not to be named so they could speak freely, puts it, Trump's view is that the AUKUS deal began to be negotiated during his first term before Biden took over and closed the deal. Instinctively, Trump supports AUKUS because of the advantages it offers the United States in terms of additional basing in the Indo-Pacific theatre but 'it now needs to be bigger than the Biden plan', according to the official. 'We can't just offer them more money [Australia has promised to pay the US about $4.5 billion to help ramp up production of the submarines], it has to be bigger than that,' the official said. Loading 'The way to get support for it is to make Trump feel like it is his again. Australia will need to offer something like better facilities at Henderson [the submarine base in Western Australia]; a second graving yard, though they are expensive, would be ideal as it offers maintenance on US submarines and would take the pressure off Guam and Pearl Harbour.' Top US officials, including AUKUS skeptic Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's Deputy Under Secretary of Defence, have spoken recently about the need for increased submarine availability - that is, for the US fleet submarines to be able to spend more time in the water and less time in maintenance. That's where the graving yard - a dry dock that raises submarines out of the water for more involved maintenance work - comes in. One is planned for the Henderson submarine base already but increasing the offer to two, so that US submarines can be serviced in Australia - and spend more time in the water and on duty - is the sort of offer the US would welcome. Albanese's first face-to-face meeting with Trump is expected to take place next week at the G7 summit in Canada. Between now and then, the prime minister and defence officials will be crafting an offer for the US president to consider while the review takes place. The prime minister will not be willing to cede any ground on the sovereign control of the US-made submarines and nor would he be willing to settle for a deal that sees US submarines rotate through Australian ports but for us to miss out on the submarine capability. But if Albanese comes up with an offer to make AUKUS great again, there will be little to worry about in terms of the subs deal proceeding.

Sydney Morning Herald
35 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese must make Trump an offer he can't refuse
And it's in that second option, change, that there is an opportunity for Anthony Albanese and the Labor government to cement the deal. Put simply, Albanese needs to make AUKUS great again by super-sizing the deal and offering the Trump administration more than was agreed to under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. As a former Defence official, who asked not to be named so they could speak freely, puts it, Trump's view is that the AUKUS deal began to be negotiated during his first term before Biden took over and closed the deal. Instinctively, Trump supports AUKUS because of the advantages it offers the United States in terms of additional basing in the Indo-Pacific theatre but 'it now needs to be bigger than the Biden plan', according to the official. 'We can't just offer them more money [Australia has promised to pay the US about $4.5 billion to help ramp up production of the submarines], it has to be bigger than that,' the official said. Loading 'The way to get support for it is to make Trump feel like it is his again. Australia will need to offer something like better facilities at Henderson [the submarine base in Western Australia]; a second graving yard, though they are expensive, would be ideal as it offers maintenance on US submarines and would take the pressure off Guam and Pearl Harbour.' Top US officials, including AUKUS skeptic Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's Deputy Under Secretary of Defence, have spoken recently about the need for increased submarine availability - that is, for the US fleet submarines to be able to spend more time in the water and less time in maintenance. That's where the graving yard - a dry dock that raises submarines out of the water for more involved maintenance work - comes in. One is planned for the Henderson submarine base already but increasing the offer to two, so that US submarines can be serviced in Australia - and spend more time in the water and on duty - is the sort of offer the US would welcome. Albanese's first face-to-face meeting with Trump is expected to take place next week at the G7 summit in Canada. Between now and then, the prime minister and defence officials will be crafting an offer for the US president to consider while the review takes place. The prime minister will not be willing to cede any ground on the sovereign control of the US-made submarines and nor would he be willing to settle for a deal that sees US submarines rotate through Australian ports but for us to miss out on the submarine capability. But if Albanese comes up with an offer to make AUKUS great again, there will be little to worry about in terms of the subs deal proceeding.