How illegal migrants are paying £20k to fly into the UK using fake papers before disappearing in new border threat
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
APPROACHING British passport control, a mum grips her young daughter's hand nervously.
She fidgets with the documents they hope will fool airport officials into letting them through.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
Cops arrested the crooks they believed had been trafficking untold numbers of illegal immigrants into Britain
Credit: GMP
7
Cops ready to strike on a morning raid in Bolton
Credit: GMP
7
An officer whacks the door with a battering ram
Credit: GMP
7
Two policemen lead their suspect towards a van
Credit: GMP
With her eyes darting nervously and head hung low, it doesn't take long for border control officers at Manchester airport to clock something is not quite right.
And on closer examination, it is clear the paperwork is forged.
Immediately, they are blocked from entering the UK.
But while this mum and daughter failed, there are plenty more queuing up to take their place — and the majority are Iranians, cops believe.
And far from risking death in treacherous boat journeys across the Channel, these chancers are prepared to pay £20,000 for a forged document pack enabling them to travel to the UK from airports all over Europe.
Many will get through — mysteriously disappearing once they have conned their way through customs.
Or they will dump their forged or stolen documents and immediately head to the closest immigration office to beg for asylum.
But on this occasion, Greater Manchester Police were called and an investigation — named Operation Alfriston — was quickly formed.
Its aim is to discover who these ruthless smuggling gangs are and how they operate across the UK.
This week The Sun was invited to watch as cops smashed down doors and arrested the crooks they believed had been trafficking untold numbers of illegal immigrants into Britain.
13 migrants jumped from the back of a lorry at a Sainsbury's distribution centre in South East London
At 6am yesterday, 129 GMP police officers, alongside seven immigration compliance and enforcement officers, stormed 15 different addresses.
They arrested eight men, between the ages of 18 and 52, and two women, aged 32 and 43, all involved in a conspiracy to facilitate a breach of immigration law by assisting illegal entry into the UK.
If charged and found guilty, each member could face life in prison for their role in the smuggling ring.
'I think we're just scraping the surface'
The arrests took place in Greater Manchester — Bolton, Sale, Bramhall, Salford, Leigh and Cheadle — and Cricklewood, North London.
We saw cops from the Tactical Aid Unit shatter a glass door and then break down an internal one to enter a property in Bolton.
They alerted the occupants to their arrival with shouts of 'police' as they marched inside in full protective gear.
Greater Manchester Police's Head of Intel, Detective Chief Superintendent John Griffith, told The Sun: 'Tackling immigration crime has become a priority for us. With the arrests yesterday morning, I think we're just scraping the surface.
'By focusing on gathering intelligence on the infrastructure around how people are entering the UK illegally, hopefully we can deter other people from doing it.'
7
Migrants met by officers after arriving in Kent
Credit: AFP
Often people who are smuggled into the UK will end up working for little money at businesses such as car washes, nail bars and hairdressers. DCS Griffith, who has a background in counter terrorism, added: 'These people are hugely vulnerable.
'If you can imagine some of the travelling conditions that they will have faced across Europe when coming into the UK — to put up with that, there must be a real desire to get here.
'That desire often transfers into a willingness to pay a lot of money to individuals to facilitate that entry, irrespective of the success of that entry or not.
'There are numerous individuals who have paid these facilitators and actually have never arrived in the UK, but continue to engage with them and pay them just for the attraction of coming here.'
Not long before Christmas last year, the ringleader of an organised crime gang dealing with migrants was picked up at the airport and flagged to police.
At the time, he was not arrested. Instead, cops gathered intelligence so that when they struck, they could take out all the key players.
While this is technically smuggling, it sits in a grey area that shares characteristics with modern slavery.
Justine Carter
The crook did most of his communications in the Persian language Farsi, adding a stumbling block for the team of 12 police officers.
For fake documents or stolen identities and paperwork to enter the UK via an airport, the group was charging around £20,000.
Investigation leader Detective Chief Inspector Tim Berry told The Sun: 'Our main suspect, who is actively involved in facilitating people into the UK, is generally using false documents of various nationalities.
'To do that he needs a number of people around him to facilitate and support with various elements, such as supplying false documents, booking travel, moving monies — that kind of thing.
'We know that he's offering the full package for around £20,000. It's that profit that motivates organised crime gangs to do this kind of work.'
The Manchester force has spent thousands of man hours to identify all the key players in the group, with their tentacles extending as far as Cricklewood.
Police believe most of the people who have paid the extortionate fee to travel safely through the air, rather than crammed on a small boat in the Channel, are of Iranian nationality.
7
Det Chief Supt John Griffith from Greater Manchester Police
Credit: Greater Manchester Police
7
Fake passports are being sold by callous criminals
Credit: Getty
But not all the fake documents work, meaning the holders are turned away at the border and sent back to the country they have flown in from.
The process of sorting what is sold as safe passage to the UK requires a team of people.
DCI Berry explained: 'We have evidence of travel booked by travel agents and our view is that they're doing that knowing that they're acting illegally, rather than blindly.
'We've also arrested people involved in money exchange services because you have to move money across Europe to pay for these documents.
'A lot of the people arrested fall into the logistics and facilitating category rather than being the organiser.'
'Exploitation isn't always visible or physical'
But things could be more sinister than just people smuggling — it is possible that the gang is also going on to exploit the people it has helped to enter the country illegally.
This would fall under modern slavery, where illegal immigrants are forced to work long hours for low pay or be exploited sexually to pay off their debt.
DCS Griffiths said: 'Modern slavery in organised immigration crime is interlinked significantly. For me, organised immigration crime is the primary offence.
'People are coming into the country illegally, and we need to stop that collectively through our police action and partnership action.
'But once people are here, they are tied into the country through debt bondage.
'They get pulled into the grey economy as gangs exploiting these people either utilise their labour or engage them even further in criminal enterprise.
'Ahead of the curve'
'This would be criminality such as drug supply and cannabis farms and other sorts of premises where crimes can be undertaken.'
Traditionally, immigration offences were dealt with by the National Crime Agency, Border Force and immigration enforcement officers.
But with the flood of illegal migrants by boat and other entry points, local police have been asked to step in too.
DCI Berry said: 'In recent years, there's been a real push from the Home Office and from the National Crime Agency for police forces to improve their response to organised immigration crime.
'I would like to think as a force that we're actually fairly ahead of the curve because we have a dedicated team.
'We absolutely do look to take this work on and we're still developing an understanding about our work from an intelligence point of view.
'But wherever we get opportunities to investigate this, we will do — because we recognise the risks around it and the vulnerabilities and the harm that can be caused by it.'
Justine Carter, director of strategy and business services at anti-modern slavery group Unseen, said: 'While this is technically smuggling, it sits in a grey area that shares characteristics with modern slavery.
'These cases typically involve recruitment, movement, deception, and significant financial exploitation, which can often lead to debt bondage and long-term vulnerability.
'Even without forced labour, the legal threshold for trafficking may still be met if the acts, means and purpose are present.
'In these cases, the purpose is not labour or sexual exploitation, but financial gain through the exploitation of vulnerable people.
'It's a reminder that exploitation isn't always visible or physical — it can be economic and deeply systemic.'
The ten people arrested are being interviewed under suspicion of conspiracy to facilitate a breach of immigration law, assisting illegal entry into the country by non-UK nationals in breach of immigration law, conspiracy to money launder and participating in the activities of organised crime.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
8 hours ago
- Spectator
Has deporting illegals become illegal?
The circus around Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia – whose full name the New York Times likes to trot out as if citing an old-school English aristocrat – speaks volumes about the immigration battle roiling the US. Our friend Kilmar is what we fuddy-duddies insist on calling an illegal immigrant. The Salvadoran crossed clandestinely into the US in 2012. As for what he's done since, that depends on whom you ask. According to his GoFundMe page, Kilmar is a 'husband, union worker and father of a disabled five-year-old'. Left-wing media portray 'the Maryland man' – a tag akin to Axel Rudakubana's 'a Welshman' – as an industrious metalworker devoted to his family. His wife has rowed back on the temporary protective order she once requested, claiming she'd been over-cautious. Yet according to the Trump administration, Kilmar is a member of the notoriously violent street gang MS-13 who's derived his primary source of income from smuggling hundreds of illegals over the southern border for several years. Choose A or B. In 2019, Kilmar was arrested for loitering along with three other men, one a suspected MS-13 member. He was carrying marijuana, for which (of course) he wasn't charged. From his clothing, tattoos and, more persuasively, a 'past proven and reliable' confidential source who verified he was an active gang member using the moniker 'Chele', police adjudged that Kilmar was a gangbanger, for which (of course) he wasn't charged. He was turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement – whose acronym, ICE, reinforces its rep as cold-hearted – which moved to deport him. Kilmar (of course) contested his removal. The immigration judge hearing Kilmar's case concurred that the defendant was indeed a gang member and deportable; the Salvadoran (of course) appealed the decision, which nevertheless was upheld. Kilmar (of course) then filed for asylum, as well as for a 'withholding of removal'. A subsequent immigration judge stayed his deportation to his home country, where his wellbeing might be endangered by local gangs. Now, you might suppose that putting yourself in the way of other famously rivalrous gangs would come with the territory when you join one yourself. Like, inter-gang violence seems a natural hazard of this line of work. But it's not only British immigration judges who are soft touches. Only mass round-ups and swift group trials could effectively address the millions of gate-crashers Kilmar (of course) remained in the US. In 2022, he was pulled over for speeding while driving eight other Hispanic men of uncertain immigration status in an SUV altered to add a third row of seats for extra passengers. The officers suspected human-trafficking; Kilmar's driving licence had expired; a run of his number plate through the database turned up a federal note on likely membership of MS-13. Yet when the patrolmen contacted the feds, ICE (of course) declined to pick him up. So Kilmar was (of course) released without charge. Even so, his claim that he was merely transporting construction workers between jobs did not, under investigation, hold up. Fast-forward to 2025 and why this otherwise obscure Salvadoran who is or is not a thug merits such a detailed lowdown. Meaning (of course) that this case has to do with Donald Trump – whose evil minions in March flew more than 230 purported criminals to a Salvadoran prison, including none other than Kilmar, whom ICE did finally pick up (no 'of course' there). The flights' timing was judicially dodgy. The planes did or didn't take off after a federal judge ruled that the flights could not proceed until the deportees were given the opportunity to challenge their removal. The administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which directed Trump to 'facilitate' Kilmar's return to the US. Because, remember, there was only one country to which he could not be deported because of that credulous 2019 decision: his own. Hence the Justice Department's acceptance that Kilmar's deportation was an 'administrative error'. During this proxy war with Trump, Democrats have pretended to hair-tear over poor Kilmar, mouldering away in a nasty foreign prison and deprived of due process. But the story I just laid out has due process, not to mention leniency or even dereliction on the part of the authorities, up the wazoo. Meanwhile, after slyly getting their jurisprudential ducks in a row, last week Trump and co finally got Kilmar flown back to the US, only to arrest him immediately for human-trafficking – with every intention of convicting the guy and then deporting him right back to El Salvador. What do we make of this farce? The American commentariat has focused on a potential showdown between Trump and the judiciary, claiming to fear a flat-out executive refusal to follow court orders but secretly rather hoping that Trump does defy the courts and thus reveals himself as an unconstitutional tyrant. I view this absurd tale through a different lens. All these trials and flights for a lone illegal alien are expensive. The amount of 'due process' the American justice system affords every single illegal makes deportation at any scale impossible. There isn't enough time and money and there aren't nearly enough judges to make any but a token gesture toward the mass deportation of illegals that Trump has promised. That amounts to a victory not just for Democrats but also for disorder. I'd assess the odds that Kilmar is a thug at about 90 per cent. But proving membership of unofficial allegiances in court is a bastard. If every individual deportation case must be adjudicated according to exacting evidentiary rules and appeal procedures, America's drastic, undemocratic demographic change will proceed inexorably. Only mass round-ups and swift group trials could effectively address the staggering ten million gate-crashers during the Biden administration alone. What are the chances of that? In New York at the weekend, ICE raids were impeded by LA-style crowds of righteously indignant protestors screaming: 'Let them go! Let them go!' The officers just doing their jobs looked beleaguered, tired, numb and pre-defeated. After all the ICE agents' thankless labours, what proportion of their detainees will still get to stay in the country in the end? I'll take another stab at 90 per cent.
Spectator
8 hours ago
- Spectator
My plan for Prevent
In the autumn of 1940, British cities were being bombed every night by large aeroplanes whose provenance was apparently of some considerable doubt. While the public almost unanimously believed the conflagrations to have been caused by the Luftwaffe, the authorities – right up to the government – refused to speculate. Indeed, when certain members of the public raised their voices and said 'This is all down to Hitler and Goering and the bloody Germans!', they received visits from the police who either prosecuted them for disturbing the peace or put their names on a list of possible extremists. The nights grew darker. The number of towns and cities subjected to these nightly bombardments widened. Very soon everybody in the country knew somebody whose home had been destroyed or who had themselves been killed. The government was forced to take action, and so in November 1940 it came up with what it called its 'Prevent' strategy, which aimed to protect British cities from further destruction. In the introduction to this new policy, civil servants listed possible vectors for these bombing raids and top of the list, by some margin, were the Slovaks. A senior intelligence officer told the public: 'The greatest threat to our nation today is from the Slovaks. We must train our people in how to spot Slovaks and report them to the police whenever they can.' The Germans were also mentioned, further down the list of possible perps, but the wording here was heavily caveated. Yes, some Germans may have been involved, but over all the German population was utterly devoted to peace and regretted the nightly infernos every bit as much as did the people who suffered under them. Our own air force was directed to drop its bombs on Bratislava, Kosice, Poprad and (the consequence of an understandable confusion over the names of the two countries) Maribor. And yet for some mystifying reason, the raids on Britain did not lessen. This seems to me exactly the response of our government(s) and most importantly of Prevent to the threat from Islamic terrorism. Let me be clear: I am not remotely comparing Muslims with Germans or Islam with National Socialism – I am simply saying that, in effect, this is what our government would have done in 1940 if it had been gripped by the same cringing witlessness and outright lying that possesses seemingly all of our authorities today when it comes to terrorist attacks upon the British people. You may be aware of the manifestly stupid quote from the Prevent halfwits that people who believe that 'western culture is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups' are cultural nationalists at risk of becoming the kind of extremists who end up murdering people. People who believe the above probably consist of 70 per cent of the British population and, if his latest speeches are anything to go by, include the Prime Minister. And yet this stuff pervades everything Prevent puts out, while at the same time exonerating Islam and in some cases even those Muslims who do become terrorists (because they have suffered, you see). If people who support Brexit or worry about immigration are extremists, you're going to get pretty high figures So, for example, Bolton council's useful 'Prevent' handbook singles out 'right-wing extremists' as being at the forefront of terror attacks in the UK, and these extremists include people who are cultural nationalists: 'Cultural nationalism is ideology characterised by anti-immigration, anti-Islam, anti-Muslim, anti-establishment narratives, often emphasising British/English 'victimhood' and identity under attack from a perceived 'other'.' Islamic terrorism is also mentioned – but, again, heavily caveated. Then there's Prevent's own list of people who were picked up under its guidelines: 45 per cent were related to extreme right-wing radicalisation (230); 23 per cent were linked to Islamist radicalisation (118); the rest were related to other radicalisation concerns, including incels and those at risk of carrying out school shootings. But then I suppose if people who proclaim their support for Brexit or worry a bit about immigration are extremists, you are going to get pretty high arrest figures. If you add into the mix the fact that simply to associate Islam with terrorism you are guilty of Islamophobia, then you can see why we're in the state we're in. Incidentally, when she was Prime Minister, Theresa May, to her credit, drafted a new introduction to the Prevent guidelines which made it clear that the biggest threat to British security was al Qaeda, not Tommy Robinson et al. But that message does not seem to have sunk in with those in Prevent. It seems almost pointless to run through the facts. The truth is that almost every fatal terrorist attack in Britain since 2001 has been perpetrated by Islamists. All bar three. Have these people got a twisted or perverted understanding of Islam, as Prevent insists? I haven't a clue. I am no Quranic expert. I'm just, y'know, taking their word for it. Further, 80 per cent of the Counter Terrorism Policing network's investigations are related to Islamism (2023). Some 75 per cent of MI5's surveillance cases are Islamists. There are around 40,000 potential jihadis being monitored by our security services. There is not the remotest doubt as to the provenance of the gravest terror threats to our country. It's not the shaven-headed nutters with swastika armbands. It is Islamists. Nigel Farage's answer is to sack everyone working in Prevent. That seems a perfectly reasonable suggestion. But I may have a better one. Scrap Prevent entirely and initiate a new network of monitoring and reporting which focuses solely on Islamic terrorism. Junk the sixth-form philosophising over what is meant by the term 'extremist' and locate the problem precisely where it is: somewhere within our Muslim communities, even if we accept that our Muslim communities may not want them there. In short, get real and tell the truth. This kind of approach worked pretty well 85 years ago.
Daily Record
9 hours ago
- Daily Record
'Serious disorder' in Salford sees four more arrests and girl, 16, charged
Police were alerted to reports of a gathering of around 50 to 60 people using cars and wheelie bins to block off the road. Four more people have been arrested after riot cops responded to 'serious disorder' in Salford. Police were alerted to reports of a gathering of around 50 to 60 people on Lower Broughton Road who were using cars and wheelie bins to block off the road on Wednesday afternoon. A police car's window was broken and a number of vehicles were set on fire during the disorder. As reported by the Manchester Evening News, shocking footage shows vehicles screeching down the road. Police have since carried out an investigation and have detained four men in relation to three incidents in the area. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A 16-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of theft and public order, before a man in his 30s was detained on suspicion of being drunk and disorderly and possession of Class A drugs. Two men aged 18 and 19 have been arrested on suspicion of possession of a bladed article. The 16-year-old girl – who cannot be named for legal reasons – has been charged with assaulting an emergency worker and has been bailed to appear at court at a future date after being arrested earlier on Wednesday. Superintendent Marcus Noden, of Greater Manchester Police, said: 'I wanted to provide a further update into the disorder in Salford this afternoon, I would like to stress that there have been no further incidents since our last update. 'We have robust plans in place should any further incidents arise in the area, and we will take action like we did earlier on in the day, should we need to. 'A dispersal order remains in place in Salford until 2pm tomorrow afternoon (Thursday June 12 2025) and anyone who does not abide by the law, will be dealt with.'
