
Prince Andrew book edits out claims about Melania Trump's relationship to Jeffrey Epstein
An entire chapter is dedicated to Prince Andrew's infamous friendship with Epstein, the late convicted sex offender.
The chapter also included a claim that Donald Trump and his wife had been introduced by the disgraced financier - which has now been edited out of future editions.
The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modelling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998.
A HarperCollins UK spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that several passages from Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie have been removed in consultation with the author. Entitled is published in the UK by HarperCollins. In the US the book is self-published by Mr Lownie.'
It is understood that the changes will appear in all future print editions of the book and that the e-book and audio book have already been updated to reflect these changes.
However, it is estimated to have been printed in around 60,000 copies of the book already.
The decision comes after Mrs Trump threatened to sue Hunter Biden, the son of former US President Joe Biden, for claiming Epstein introduced her and Mr Trump in the late 1990s.
The statements are false, defamatory, and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in the letter to Biden.
The letter demanded that Biden walk back the claim and apologise or face legal action for 'over $1bn in damages'.
ADVERTISEMENT
It also accuses the former president's son of having a 'vast history of trading on the names of others' and repeating the claim 'to draw attention to yourself.'
Hunter Biden has refused to apologise after the first lady threatened legal action.
Democratic strategist James Carville was also forced to take down parts of a podcast episode that alleged a connection between her and Jeffrey Epstein, following involvement from the first lady's lawyer earlier this month.
'First Lady Melania Trump's attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods. The true account of how the First Lady met President Trump is in her best-selling book, Melania,' a spokesperson for the first lady's office previously told The Independent.
The book has included a number of accusations about Prince Andrew, including claims of affairs, fights with Prince Harry and of being 'unbelievably cruel' to royal staff.
One passage says Andrew called a staff member in the Royal Household a 'f***ing imbecile' for not referring to the Queen Mother by her full title in 2005.
According to the book, Prince Andrew's catchphrase when dealing with royal staff was 'I want this done and I want this done now. Do it!'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
33 minutes ago
- The Journal
California Governor gives 'DONALD (TINY HANDS)' a taste of his own medicine with social media trolling
DONALD TRUMP IS known for his attention-grabbing, clickbait communication style on social media – brash statements and sweeping assertions often delivered with excessive capital letters and exclamation marks. A well-known Democrat has started to parody him, and Republicans are deeply unimpressed. 'DONALD (TINY HANDS), HAS WRITTEN HIS AUTOBIOGRAPHY THIS MORNING — UNFORTUNATELY (LOW IQ) HE SPELLED IT WRONG — 'BETA'.' That was a recent post by California Governor Gavin Newsom, who's trying to push back against certain policies and practices being implemented by Trump and his party. His new tactic has been to highlight the ludicrousness of some of Trump's political messaging by adopting the style for himself via his press office's social media. Newsom and his press office have been trolling and parodying Trump, Republicans, and right-wing media over the last several days, lobbing insults in the take-down approach usually utilised by his opponents. His posts are making a splash: many of them have received tens of thousands of likes on social media. DONALD (TINY HANDS), HAS WRITTEN HIS AUTOBIOGRAPHY THIS MORNING — UNFORTUNATELY (LOW IQ) HE SPELLED IT WRONG — 'BETA.' SOON YOU WILL BE A 'FIRED' BETA BECAUSE OF MY PERFECT, 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS.' THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! — GCN — Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) August 17, 2025 The 'beautiful maps' Newsom is referring to are his plans to hold a referendum in California in November on whether to redraw district maps to win more seats for Democrats as a retaliatory measure against gerrymandering by Republicans in the state of Texas to take seats for themselves. The redrawing of district maps in Texas has caused major concerns about the state of democracy in the US. Electoral area maps are highly politicised in the US but rarely redrawn in the middle of an election cycle, which is what has made Texas Republicans' latest move so controversial; the country is staring down the barrel of mid-term elections for Congress and the Senate next year that will influence the shape of the rest of Trump's term. Advertisement Newsom – already seen by Trump as an enemy – said he would ask Californians to vote in a referendum on whether it should also redraw its district maps to counteract the effect of Texas's tweaks. During Trump's first term, Democrats tended to lean towards the 'when they go low, we go high' approach touted by former First Lady Michelle Obama. But in more recent years, the party view is starting to shift towards realising that approach has not been working on the ground as Trump has continued to amass loyal supporters despite pushing the boundaries of his presidential authorities. 'MAGA HATES ME BECAUSE THEY HATE YOU,' Newsom wrote in one of his dispatches this week. 'THEY HATE THAT CALIFORNIA IS THE 4TH BIGGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD. THEY HATE THAT CRIME IS DOWN, THAT WE'RE #1 IN FARMING (I LOVE THE FARMERS!),' he said. 'THEY HATE THAT DEMOCRATS ARE WINNING. FOX & MAGA HAVE NEWSOM DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!!! THEY SHOULD CRY HARDER! SAD!!! — GCN.' WOW! FOX NEWS CAN'T STOP TALKING ABOUT ME (GAVIN C. NEWSOM), AMERICA'S FAVORITE GOVERNOR!!! TONIGHT THEIR ENTIRE PRIMETIME LINEUP WAS ABOUT ME! JESSE WATTERS KEPT CALLING ME 'DADDY' (VERY WEIRD, NOT INTERESTED, BUT THANK YOU!). SEAN HANNITY (VERY NICE GUY) NEARLY CRIED BECAUSE I… — Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) August 21, 2025 'Trump is GUTTING classrooms, SLASHING school funding, and KILLING public education. THANK YOU to California's educators for rising up to fight fire with fire and defend our democracy!' he wrote in one post. Responding to a post by a podcaster claiming that businesses are 'fleeing' California 'in droves', Newsom wrote, 'try again troll!', going on to say it's the number one state for Fortune 500 companies. And in a hit on Trump's tariffs, Newsom shared a post about Sony raising the cost of Playstation 5s by $50 (€43) and said: 'In Trump's America, costs keep going up, up, up!' There was also this swing against Trump's immigration policies and his patchy tan: Forget the southern border, the strongest wall Trump's ever built is his bronzer line. — Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) August 19, 2025 US Vice President JD Vance took umbrage with Newsom's attempts to mimic Trump, saying: 'Don't be a crazy person, be authentic.' Related Reads Texas Republicans push through gerrymandered map to win them more seats Newsom quipped back: 'He almost got it.' He almost got it. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) August 20, 2025 In an interview with Fox published yesterday, Newsom traced his decision to take this approach back to Trump's reaction to devastating wildfires in Los Angeles earlier this year. Newsom said Trump was 'completely misrepresenting the facts' amid the wildfires and that he was spreading 'misinformation and disinformation… Elon Musk was piling on as well.' 'I've never seen anything like it – in the middle of an emergency, all the lies,' Newsom said. 'It was a big wake-up call. We got back on our feet. We got back on the offence'. Newsom also described Trump's deployment of the National Guard as a concerning test of what he can get away with. "Yes, I've changed. The facts have changed we need to change." @GavinNewsom told me he decided to change his social media strategy & take on @realDonaldTrump more directly during the L.A. fires. "I've never seen anything like it. In the middle of an emergency, so many lies.… — Elex Michaelson (@Elex_Michaelson) August 20, 2025 He said the Democratic party 'needs to change' in response to Trump's tactics. 'We need to stand up to this authoritarian. We need to stand up at this moment. It's foundational. It's not about Republican or Democrat – this guy [Trump] is an invasive species. 'He's completely different. I respect the Republican party [but] he is something altogether different. He is unmoored. There are no constraints. 'So yes, we're [California] going to punch back with the full weight of the four largest economy in the world and with the consent of the people.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Appeal court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump
An appeal court has thrown out a massive civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump in a New York state lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost the president more than 515 million dollars (£382 million) and rock his property empire, was 'excessive'. After finding that Mr Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay 355 million dollars (£263 million) in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped 515 million dollars. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organisation executives including Mr Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr — now exceeds 527 million dollars (£391 million), with interest. Judge Arthur Engoron (Shannon Stapleton/AP) 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T Renwick and Peter H Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Judge Engoron had also imposed other punishments, such as banning Mr Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during the appeal, and Mr Trump was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a 175 million dollar (£130 million) bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Judge Engoron imposed in its entirety while leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Mr Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last autumn. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York attorney general Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating and staggering fraud'. The president and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a months-long trial, Mr Trump said in January last year that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me'. He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by Ms James and Judge Engoron, who are both Democrats. The Justice Department has subpoenaed Ms James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. New York attorney general Letitia James (Yuki Iwamura/AP) Her lawyer Abbe D Lowell has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign'. Mr Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements were not deceptive because they came with disclaimers noting they had not been audited. The defence also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, low estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, the president's lawyers said many of the case's allegations were too old, a claim they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defence also says Ms James misused a consumer protection law to sue Mr Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Mr Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state says the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others boost their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rested on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comported with Mr Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favourable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was one of several legal obstacles for Mr Trump as he campaigned, won and started a second term as president.

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Russia says EU troops in Ukraine would be 'unacceptable', as Zelenskyy asks allies for security deal
RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTER Sergei Lavrov has said any presence of European troops in Ukraine would be 'absolutely unacceptable'. It comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he could only meet with Vladimir Putin once his allies agree security guarantees to deter future Russian attacks once the fighting stops. Lavrov also said Ukraine is 'not interested' in a long-term peace deal, accusing it of seeking security guarantees incompatible with Russia's demands. On the front lines, Russia said it had captured the village of Oleksandro-Shultyne in the eastern Donetsk region, the latest in a long string of territorial gains. The village lies less than eight kilometres from Kostiantynivka, a fortified town in the Donetsk region that Russia has been pressing towards on both sides. In comments to journalists Thursday, Foreign Minister Lavrov accused Ukraine of making unrealistic security demands. Any deployment of European troops to the country would be 'absolutely unacceptable', he said. Advertisement 'The Ukrainian regime and its representatives comment on the current situation in a very specific way, directly showing that they are not interested in a sustainable, fair, long-term settlement,' he said. Zelenskyy separately announced that Ukraine had tested a long-range cruise missile, known as Flamingo, that can strike targets as far as 3,000 kilometres away. 'The missile has undergone successful tests. It is currently our most successful missile,' he told reporters. Mass production could begin by February, he added. Talks towards peace Since Trump returned to the White House in January and began pushing for an end to the fighting, Russian forces have continued to slowly but steadily gain ground across the front line. Zelenskyy said Russian forces were building up troops along the front in the Zaporizhzhia region, which Moscow claims as its own along with four other Ukrainian regions. Trump met Putin in Alaska last Friday, before bringing Zelenskyy and European leaders to Washington for separate talks on Monday. Zelenskyy has said the only way to end the war is a meeting with Putin, and has said Trump should be present too. But Moscow has played down the prospect of a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy any time soon, saying it wants to be included in discussions on future security guarantees for Ukraine.