Major mobile network ads BANNED for all Brits after ‘misleading' savings claim – exact SIM plans slammed by watchdog
VODAFONE has had two website adverts removed by the UK's advertising watchdog for making "misleading" claims about savings.
Customers were led to believe two SIM card packages advertised during November and December last year could save them as much as £312 annually.
1
The watchdog told Vodafone that the ads in their current form must not appear again
Credit: PA
However, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) found they did not return on the savings promised.
An advert for Vodafone's Unlimited Plus SIM plan, referred to as example A, stated: "Save £240. Monthly £23. Offer ends 19 December."
While a previous version of the ad, example C, said: "Unlimited Plus. Black Friday. Save £312. Monthly £20. Offer ends 02 December."
Similarly, an advert for Vodafone's Unlimited Max SIM package, example B, read: "Black Friday: Save £312. Monthly £23. Offer ends 2 December'."
READ MORE ON MOBILE NETWORKS
However, another version of the advertisement, example D, said: 'Unlimited Max. 6 months half price. Monthly £18. £36pm after 6 months. Offer ends 28 November'.
The savings claimed in the example A were based on a prior price of £33 per month, but the immediately preceding price had been their Black Friday deal of £20 from example C.
The listings were investigated by the regulator after it received a complaint from rival mobile network provider EE.
Following an investigation, the watchdog concluded that the savings of £240 and £312 in both package promotions "were not genuine".
Most read in Tech
Savings claims in the two packages "had not been made against the immediately preceding prices at which the products were sold at when the ads appeared," the watchdog wrote in its ruling.
Inside Vodafone's 'fastest-ever' broadband speed boost
ASA also
found that the products in both ads
"did not return to the prices against which the savings were being claimed once the promotions ended" - which meant they were misleading.
The watchdog told Vodafone that the ads in their current form must not appear again.
The network provider was also told to "ensure that future savings claims did not mislead and to ensure products returned to the price against which the saving was being claimed, once a promotion ended".
Vodafone responded to the ASA's investigation, noting that during the promotional period, the Unlimited Plus was on offer for 33 per cent of the time and the Unlimited Max was on offer for 49 per cent of the time, according to
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Guinness and Three seen as Ireland's ‘top sponsors' as number of deals rises 29%
Guinness and Three have been named as Ireland's top sponsors as the number of sponsorship deals rose 29 per cent year-on-year in the first quarter, according to data from consultancy firm Onside. The group, which announced the top sports and non-sports sponsors in its quarterly review on Tuesday, said the GAA had a 'very active first quarter', with renewals from long-standing sponsors Centra, SuperValu and Allianz. The group, which has been running the reviews since 2016, said horse racing and soccer were also 'very active categories'. Guinness secured the 'most appealing sponsor' position in sports, driven by the success of the Guinness Men's and Women's Six Nations Championships. READ MORE Vodafone, a long-standing partner of the IRFU, claimed second place, followed by Lidl for its sponsorship of the Women's Gaelic Football Association (LGFA). Telco company Three emerged as the top non-sports sponsor, recognised for its music and venue naming rights strategy with the 3Arena and the 3Olympia. Electric Ireland, for its partnership with Pieta and Darkness Into Light, secured second place, while SuperValu rounded out the top three for its Tidy Towns sponsorship. Onside said the research shows the 'enduring appeal' of rugby as a sponsorship platform in Ireland. Five of the top 10 most admired sports sponsors have prominent partnerships in the sport. 'Despite a disappointing result for Ireland in the 2025 Guinness Six Nations, the review highlights the mass appeal of rugby for consumer-facing brands,' the group said. 'Leading IRFU sponsors Guinness, Vodafone, Aviva, Bank of Ireland and Aldi all feature prominently among the top sports sponsors.' Connacht rugby star Bundee Aki was named as the 'most recognisable, admired, trustworthy, and influential' Irish rugby personality, followed by Leinster's James Lowe and Caelan Doris. Other appealing sports sponsors included Allianz as the top sponsor of Paralympics Ireland and the Olympic Federation of Ireland, and as a sponsor of the GAA Football All-Ireland Senior Championship. Elsewhere, notable sponsors named were Sky as primary partners of the women's and men's national football teams, as well as AIB which sponsors four codes in GAA. 'The sponsorship landscape is constantly evolving, and our review highlights the power of authentic partnerships that resonate with the Irish public,' says Kim Kirwan, director of intelligence and insight at Onside. 'Rugby's continued dominance demonstrates its ability to connect brands with consumers, while the success of non-sports sponsorships like Electric Ireland's Darkness into Light shows the importance of aligning with meaningful causes.'
The Journal
26-05-2025
- The Journal
Boots Ireland admits misleading Black Friday toothbrush and perfume discounts in court
BOOTS IRELAND HAS admitted breaking pricing laws during a 2023 Black Friday sale, triggering a Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) investigation. The retail giant was summoned to appear before Judge Anthony Halpin at Dublin District Court today, with the case centred on electric toothbrushes and perfume. It was prosecuted under a law that compelled traders to base any discount on the lowest price in at least the previous 30 days and to display this price clearly on any price tag or advertisement. The case centred on Oral B toothbrushes. Noting that the wrongly advertised price information stemmed from 'human error', the firm's lack of prior convictions and its guilty plea, Judge Halpin said Boots could avoid a court conviction. He adjourned the case until June 26, saying that if it paid €4,624 toward the CCPC costs and €1,000 to the Little Flower Penny Dinners charity, he would apply the Probation of Offender's Act. It was among the first batch of prosecutions under new sales pricing rules introduced in 2022. Cathal Ó Braonáin BL, for the competition regulator, said the offence arises when a retailer announces a reduced selling cost without announcing the product's prior price, which must be the lowest offered by that trader in the preceding 30 days. Boots Ireland pleaded guilty to a sample count, with two others withdrawn. Counsel explained that a proposal was accepted on the basis that the company would pay costs and the court would hear facts on all three charges. Mr Ó Braonáin said CCPC authorised officer David Mulholland was tasked with overseeing and managing traders' price reduction announcements on their websites for the November 17, 2023, Black Friday sale. Data collected from Boots revealed there had been three breaches. The first involved a black limited edition Oral-B iO 10 electric toothbrush, which was advertised for sale at €470, and the prior price indicated was €999.99. Advertisement The date of the reduction announcement was November 16, 2023, but that was not the lowest price applied to the product over the previous 30 days. Judge Halpin heard that from November 11 – 14, it was offered for sale at €470, the same price, so €999.99 was not the correct prior price. The next item was another Oral B electric toothbrush advertised on November 16 for €240, with the indicated prior sale price being €590.99. However, from November 9 – 14, it was offered at a lower cost of €228. The final charge involved the sale of Dior Eau de Toilette at €104 when the previous price indicated was €123, but it had been offered at a lower cost of €94 earlier that month. Boots' solicitor, Eoin Mac Aodha, pleaded for leniency, telling Judge Halpin that it was a human error and the firm was remorseful. He stressed that there were about 104,000 products on promotion on Black Friday, and these offences represented a tiny number of items on sale. A full review of internal processes has since taken place, and guidance, protocols, and governance have been updated. Mr MacAodha submitted that Boots was happy to make a charitable donation and to pay costs. Judge Halpin remarked that Boots was a very reputable firm in Ireland with branches and employees throughout the country, and he noted a senior compliance officer from the company had travelled over from the UK to attend the proceedings. The charge came under the European Union (Requirements to Indicate Product Prices) (Amendment) Regulations introduced in November 2022. Following the court hearing, Brian McHugh, Chairperson of the CCPC, said: 'Misleading sale discounts harm consumers and harm competition. Businesses need to be able to compete for consumers openly and honestly on price. 'Transparency around sales discounts allows consumers to make informed decisions about their purchases and to shop with confidence.' Lifestyle Sports (Ireland), DID Electrical Appliances, Rath-Wood Home and Garden World pleaded guilty to the same charges on March 10. Today, Judge Halpin noted they had each paid €1,000 to the Little Flower Penny Dinners and the costs of the CCPC; consequently, he spared them convictions and applied the Probation of Offenders Act in their cases.
Irish Independent
26-05-2025
- Irish Independent
Boots Ireland pleads guilty to breaking pricing laws during Black Friday sale
The case focused on misleading discount practices on electric toothbrushes and perfumeIt is among the first wave of prosecutions under new sales pricing rules introduced in 2022 Tom Tuite Today at 10:46 Boots Ireland has admitted breaking pricing laws during a 2023 Black Friday sale, triggering a Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) investigation. The retail giant was summonsed to appear before Judge Anthony Halpin at Dublin District Court today, with the case centred on electric toothbrushes and perfume.
