Another Grim Report From Social Security Trustees
The trustees' report came out a couple of weeks ago and made news for a day or two. I think the ho-hum reaction from the public to this report is partly because, as has been the case for many years now, the report says the Social Security trust funds are like a ticking doomsday clock. And the trustees have always urged action by the president and Congress to do something before the clock strikes midnight. And then nothing gets done! So, the public goes 'ho hum!' I'll have some comments about how easy it would be to shore up Social Security financing at the end of this column.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for ‘illegal' activity
WASHINGTON — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
WASHINGTON (AP) — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights.
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Legislative Frontlines
Debbie Wasserman Schultz has built a reputation in Congress as a determined advocate for civil rights, healthcare reform, and public safety. Representing Florida in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2005, she has consistently championed legislation that addresses the needs of vulnerable communities while working to strengthen the nation's democratic values. Throughout her career, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been a strong defender of civil rights. She has taken bold positions on issues ranging from voting rights to LGBTQ equality. As a member of Congress, she has supported legislation aimed at expanding voter access, opposing discriminatory practices, and ensuring that every citizen has an equal voice in the democratic process. Her advocacy extends to protecting religious and ethnic minorities. Most recently, she has been at the forefront of efforts to create a national strategy to combat antisemitism, working across party lines to address the rise in hate crimes and extremist rhetoric. She views these initiatives not only as a matter of protecting one community, but as a fundamental defense of American democracy. For Debbie Wasserman Schultz, healthcare reform has always been more than a talking point. A breast cancer survivor herself, she has been a leading voice for policies that expand access to preventive care and early detection services. Her leadership on the EARLY Act has helped fund breast cancer education programs for young women, potentially saving thousands of lives through increased awareness and timely screenings. She has also recently introduced the Reducing Hereditary Cancer Act, a bipartisan bill designed to make genetic cancer testing more accessible to Americans who are at risk. By removing financial and coverage barriers, she hopes to create a healthcare system that focuses on prevention and equity, ensuring no patient is denied care because of cost or insurance limitations. In addition to her work on civil rights and healthcare, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been an advocate for public safety measures that protect communities while respecting individual rights. She has supported common-sense gun safety reforms, investments in law enforcement training, and improved coordination among public safety agencies. Her legislative work also extends to protecting children and families. She has championed laws like the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, which addresses child drownings by requiring safety standards for public pools and spas. These efforts reflect her broader commitment to legislation that has a tangible impact on everyday lives. While Congress is often marked by partisan gridlock, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown an ability to collaborate with colleagues from both sides of the aisle. Her bipartisan efforts on anti-hate initiatives, healthcare reform, and safety legislation demonstrate her belief that meaningful change requires cooperation and dialogue, even among political opponents. This approach has allowed her to move forward on initiatives that might otherwise stall in a divided political climate. By focusing on shared values such as safety, health, and equality, she has been able to advance legislation that benefits a broad range of Americans. As she continues her work in Congress, Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains committed to her core mission: defending civil rights, improving healthcare access, and safeguarding communities. She has made it clear that she sees these priorities as interconnected, with each influencing the strength and resilience of the nation as a whole. Her ongoing legislative efforts, from combating hate crimes to expanding medical testing access, are grounded in a belief that the government should be both responsive and proactive in addressing the needs of its people. This vision, combined with her experience and willingness to work across political divides, positions her as a significant force in shaping policy on some of the most pressing issues facing the country today. For constituents in Florida and for Americans across the nation, Debbie Wasserman Schultz continues to serve as a steadfast advocate, ensuring that civil rights, healthcare, and public safety remain at the top of the congressional agenda. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
