UN report says its female staff in Afghanistan have received death threats
The UN mission to the country said female national staff were subjected to direct death threats in May, in the latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan published on Sunday.
The report says the Taliban told the UN mission that their cadres were not responsible for the threats, and an Interior Ministry investigation is under way.
The threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programmes, 'requiring the U.N. to implement interim measures to protect their safety', according to the report.
Afghan authorities, including the Taliban Interior Ministry, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on the report or the investigation, according to The Associated Press news agency.
The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign nongovernmental organisations in December 2022, extending this ban to the UN six months later. They then threatened to shut down agencies and groups still employing women. Aid agencies and NGOs say the Taliban have disrupted or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities.
The UN report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women's personal freedoms and safety, including inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Women have been arrested for only wearing the hijab.
Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces.
A UN report from August 2024 found that Afghanistan's Taliban government has 'deliberately deprived' at least 1.4 million girls of their right to an education during its three years in power.
About 300,000 more girls are missing out on school since UNESCO last carried out a count in April 2023, it said on Thursday, warning that 'the future of an entire generation is now in jeopardy.'
ICC targets Taliban for persecution of women
The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants in July for two top Taliban leaders in Afghanistan on charges of abuses against women and girls.
ICC judges said at the time there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Haibatullah Akhunzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution.
'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said in a statement in July.
The Taliban has 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy, family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said.
The Taliban has rejected the ICC warrants as 'baseless rhetoric', saying it does not recognise the ICC's authority, and underlined the court's failure to protect the 'hundreds of women and children being killed daily' in Gaza.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
President Dina Boluarte signs into law Peru's amnesty bill despite outcry
Peruvian President Dina Boluarte has signed into law a controversial piece of legislation that would shield the military, police and other government-sanctioned forces from prosecution for human rights abuses committed during the country's decades-long internal conflict. On Wednesday, Boluarte held a signing ceremony at the presidential palace in Lima, where she defended the amnesty law as a means of honouring the sacrifices made by government forces. 'This is a historic day for our country,' she said. 'It brings justice and honour to those who stood up to terrorism.' But human rights groups and international observers have condemned the bill as a violation of international law — not to mention a denial of justice for the thousands of survivors who lived through the conflict. From 1980 to 2000, Peru experienced a bloody conflict that pitted government forces against left-wing rebel groups like the Shining Path. Both sides, however, committed massacres, kidnappings and assaults on unarmed civilians, with the death toll from the conflict climbing as high as 70,000 people. Up until present, survivors and family members of the deceased have continued to fight for accountability. An estimated 600 investigations are currently under way, and 156 convictions have been achieved, according to the National Human Rights Coordinator, a coalition of Peruvian human rights organisations. Critics fear those ongoing probes could be scuttled under the wide-ranging protections offered by the new amnesty law, which stands to benefit soldiers, police officers and members of self-defence committees who face legal proceedings for which no final verdict has been rendered. The legislation also offers 'humanitarian' amnesty for those convicted over the age of 70. Peru, however, falls under the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which ordered the country's government to 'immediately suspend the processing' of the law on July 24. The court ruled against past amnesty laws in Peru. In cases of severe human rights violations, it ruled that there can be no sweeping amnesty nor age limits for prosecution. In 1995, for instance, Peru passed a separate amnesty law that would have prevented the prosecution of security forces for human rights abuses between 1980 and that year. But it was greeted with widespread condemnation, including from United Nations experts, and it was eventually repealed. In the case of the current amnesty law, nine UN experts issued a joint letter in July condemning its passage as a 'clear breach of [Peru's] obligations under international law'. But at Wednesday's signing ceremony, President Boluarte reiterated her position that such international criticism was a violation of her country's sovereignty and that she would not adhere to the Inter-American Court's decision. 'Peru is honouring its defenders and firmly rejecting any internal or external interference,' Boluarte said. 'We cannot allow history to be distorted, for perpetrators to pretend to be victims, and for the true defenders of the homeland to be branded as enemies of the nation they swore to protect.' Peru's armed forces, however, have been implicated in a wide range of human rights abuses. Just last year, 10 soldiers were convicted of carrying out the systematic rape of Indigenous and rural women and girls. Drawing from Peru's Truth and Reconciliation Commission report, the human rights group Amnesty International estimates that the country's armed forces and police were responsible for 37 percent of the deaths and disappearances that happened during the conflict. They were also credited with carrying out 75 percent of the reported instances of torture and 83 percent of sexual violence cases. Francisco Ochoa, a victims' advocate, spoke to Al Jazeera last month about his experiences surviving the 1985 Accomarca massacre as a 14-year-old teenager. He had been in the corn fields preparing to sow seeds when soldiers arrived and rounded up the residents of his small Andean village. Despite having no evidence linking the villagers to rebel groups, the soldiers locked many of them in their huts, fired into the structures and set them ablaze. As many as 62 people were killed, including Ochoa's mother, eight-year-old brother and six-year-old sister. 'The first thing I remember from that day is the smell when we arrived,' Ochoa, now 54, told journalist Claudia Rebaza. 'It smelled like smouldering flesh, and there was no one around.' When asked how he and other survivors felt about the amnesty law, Ochoa responded, 'Outraged and betrayed'.
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Human rights groups file ICC case against Israel over journalist murders
Human rights groups file ICC case against Israel over Gaza journalist murders NewsFeed The Hind Rajab Foundation and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights have filed a joint case at the International Criminal Court against Israel's military and political leadership, over the killing of Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza. Video Duration 02 minutes 16 seconds 02:16 Video Duration 02 minutes 26 seconds 02:26 Video Duration 01 minutes 17 seconds 01:17 Video Duration 02 minutes 17 seconds 02:17 Video Duration 01 minutes 37 seconds 01:37 Video Duration 00 minutes 39 seconds 00:39 Video Duration 04 minutes 23 seconds 04:23
Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Dying of thirst in Gaza
Access to clean drinking water should be a right. Yet, for Palestinians in Gaza, it's anything but. Israel has bombed what little water was keeping the taps running, and men, women and children are being killed by Israeli attacks at collection points. Aid groups say Israel is using water as a weapon of war.
