How green finance rules could harm NZ farming: Dr Jacqueline Rowarth
Not production. Not the number of people fed what they need. An area.
Further, to be considered green, a farm would have to be emitting less than one tonne of greenhouse gases (measured as carbon dioxide equivalents) per hectare.
Current estimates for dairy, responsible for over $26 billion in export revenue (45% of the total) from less than 7% of New Zealand's total area, are 3-19 tonnes/ha, with an average of around nine tonnes/ha.
For sheep and beef, the average is approximately 3.6 tonnes/ha.
To achieve the new 'green' threshold of below one tonne/ha would require a lot of new trees and not much animal production.
The Government's goal of doubling the value of the export economy would fail.
The economy would fail.
So would New Zealand's commitment to the Paris Agreement – that we would do everything we could to improve adaptability and resilience while reducing greenhouse gases in a manner that does not threaten food production (Article 2.1.b).
The Paris Agreement recognised that global population growth meant a rethink of food production.
What it didn't mandate was 'how'.
Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) were supposed to enable countries to choose their own reduction targets, recognising their different abilities to achieve them.
At the same time, the Paris Agreement included (Article 2.1.c) 'Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development'.
This is what the Centre for Sustainable Finance has tried to do, starting with agriculture and forestry.
The vision is admirable: 'An equitable, inclusive financial system that enables a resilient, sustainable Aotearoa New Zealand.'
The strategy of achieving it, however, is more well-meaning than practical.
Federated Farmers of New Zealand has warned that the taxonomy's 'green' finance rules are 'ideologically driven, unworkable, and risk doing real harm to rural communities'.
The problem is that various suggestions, such as low-emissions fertiliser, are either already in use (coated urea) or rather more talked about than in existence – green urea, made from green ammonia, is an example.
Investigations on green urea for Australia, led by the CSIRO, reported that it is very challenging for fertiliser production routes to use 'green' pathways to completely decarbonise agriculture and the food industry.
Listen to Jamie Mackay interview Dr Jacqueline Rowarth on The Country below:
The researchers concluded that achieving the goal would be difficult.
(The actual words were 'would require proper energy management systems to synchronise and optimise such a multi-player orientation for a common objective of maximising the penetration of renewable sources at competitive costs'.)
Without affordable new technologies, farmers can reduce greenhouse gases by reducing fertiliser and animal numbers.
Doing this on a farm that is already efficient also reduces food production, with implications for the economy and for employment.
It might also increase the greenhouse gases per unit of production.
This has been shown for organic versus conventional production.
In addition, the food produced from organic systems costs more than that from conventional systems.
Is the world, let alone New Zealand, ready for higher food prices?
The UK has decided that it is not and is halting plans for adopting a green taxonomy.
Immediately, comments were made about the Government stalling on sustainability reporting requirements for companies.
But the UK finance industry was already contending with other regulations, and the proposed taxonomy contained conditions that critics described as 'burdensome' and 'not useful in practice'.
Similar negative comments are likely to be made if the Centre for Sustainable Finance's taxonomy is not adopted by New Zealand.
But the reality is that banks are already making decisions on investments to assist farmers with implementing green technologies, and the decisions are made based on the individual farm and farmer.
The result is included in the calculations that the meat and dairy processors are doing to show farmers what they are achieving in terms of greenhouse gases per unit of production.
The data are used by the processors when negotiating with customers.
Rewards then pass to those farmers achieving top results, gauged as greenhouse gases per kilogram of product.
These products are in demand, as indicated by the prices being paid for meat and milk by overseas buyers.
The internal competition and fascination with new technologies ensure that farmers continue to make the improvements that are appropriate for their soil-plant-animal-ecosystems.
Food production is the goal, with minimum impact.
Models that processors are using are under constant adjustment to ensure that they are capturing advances.
It is difficult to imagine how a taxonomy, well-intentioned as it might be, could make a positive difference.
Independent groups do their job by stimulating thinking about different possibilities; sometimes, they confirm that what is already being done is the best for the current times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government should cut GST on food if it's worried about butter price – Fran O'Sullivan
The Finance Minister did not need to call Hurrell in to reaffirm that global dairy prices are at a high and that this would inevitably spill over to higher farmer returns and, in turn, boost regional and finally national economies. (That's the plus side you didn't hear about before the meeting). Or that any notion of Fonterra slashing its own margins was not going to happen. They are thin when compared with the margins applied by supermarkets to dairy products, and she knows it. The upshot is that Willis did seek explanations from Hurrell over the co-operative's pricing, which she of course accepted. Within days, she was talking up Fonterra and the surging global prices on the Mike Hosking show as a plus – as indeed they are when it comes to the impact on the New Zealand economy. Hurrell subsequently made it clear his company is not moving to a two-tiered pricing system: an export price geared to global prices and a subsidised price for domestic consumers. There was more besides. It was sensible for Fonterra to shut the issue down quickly. It currently has its consumer brands business on the market. Any suggestion of a move to a two-tiered system would be a complication to that sales process or indeed an IPO of that business if that ultimately turns out to be the Fonterra board's preferred option. But while there was an element of the performative to the Beehive shenanigans, it does underline how much 'cost of living' issues are a lightning rod when it comes to sparking domestic dissatisfaction with the Government. Willis later described her meeting with Hurrell as 'constructive and engaging', underlining the fact that Fonterra does not control retail prices and that the final price is set by supermarkets, whose contracts and pricing strategies vary. This was more grist to Willis' campaign against what she claims are supermarkets profiteering at the expense of consumers. Already, she has been working to reduce the barriers to entry for other competitors. Willis has been encouraged that the Commerce Commission has taken a case against grocery giant Foodstuffs North Island and Gilmours Wholesale to court over what it believes is cartel conduct. The regulator said civil proceedings would be filed against the big grocery suppliers under the Commerce Act and Grocery Industry Competition Act (GICA). Foodstuffs 'strongly denies' any unlawful conduct. The Commerce Commission has also levelled criminal charges against retailer Noel Leeming over what it claims is a misleading price-matching promotion. The company 'firmly' maintains it had not committed an offence and would vigorously defend itself against multiple charges of misleading customers under the Fair Trading Act. Put that to one side. Prices have escalated on multiple fronts: dairy products, meat and some fruits; electricity and gas, rates, insurances. But they have decreased on others: mortgage and loan interest rates, and some fuels. There is little point in trying to jawbone prices down. In many respects, the answer lies with Willis. If she is overly concerned, she could wipe the 15% GST from particular food items. This is the case in Australia, where its 10% GST does not apply to meat, fish, produce, cheese and eggs, plain milk and cream, bread, butter and other spreads, bottled water, tea and coffee, cooking ingredients and oils, or infant formula. In Britain, most foods are zero-rated. Many European countries have reduced value-added tax rates for food, typically running at 5%-7%. Basic foods are exempted in Singapore, there is an 8% rate in Japan, and in the United States some states exempt various food items from sales tax. The upshot is that New Zealand verges on being an outlier in this area. Any changes to the GST regime would, however, have an impact on how New Zealand's tax regime is perceived as being neutral. Farmers are not the enemy. There is much to celebrate from our rural sector, which will deliver nearly $60 billion in export earnings this year. The fixation on rising prices has also overly consumed the Prime Minister, who frequently talks about 'cost of living issues'. But this is not going to be solved in the medium term. The upshot is that, short of any intervention by the Government, consumers will just have to suck it up.
NZ Herald
21 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Waikato sharemilker launches AI-driven cow breeding tool
Traditionally, Zonderop said, he would take a month, post-calving/pre-mating, to develop a spreadsheet of the best bulls for his 380-cow herd at Te Poi, near Matamata. This would initially involve thumbing through dairy herd improvement companies' bull catalogues. He said farmers would sometimes select multiple sires to cover their herds, or simply the 'bull of the day' from the listings. With PCBS, he can input data on bulls and cows covering a variety of preferred traits. 'Everything is the individual farmer's preference. 'What we are all looking for, though, is peak milk production.' Zonderop narrowed the field down to eight bulls this season for his home herd, with PCBS producing a report in less than a minute. Idea hatched Perfect Cow Breeding Solutions founder Matthew Zonderop. Correcting a mistake via AI while using several workbooks for a spreadsheet led to the business idea being hatched two years ago. Zonderop initially used the system for his own herd, but decided to create a business that would help other dairy farmers achieve greater herd efficiency and milk production. He pays a monthly subscription for the AI programme and on-charges farmers for inputting data and generating a report on the top bulls for their cows. Zonderop said that apart from a quick conversion of data, his system also uses simple language: 'farmer-speak'. 'It is designed to help dairy farmers make precise breeding decisions for their herd, both now and into the future. 'The mission is simple: to maximise herd performance, improve milk production, and drive sustainable profits for dairy farmers using cutting-edge science and technology.' Listen to Jamie Mackay interview Matthew Zonderop on The Country below: Zonderop said the RAS database contained a list of about 27,000 bulls available for use by New Zealand farmers. This is narrowed down by the preferred breed of bull that farmers wish to use. Using the RAS database – and farmers' individual preferences – a bull's desired traits to be passed on are identified. Zonderop said a clear breeding strategy was vital in building a stronger herd. Leading bulls were selected in PCBS on their 'genetic merit' through established breeding indexes. These include Breeding Worth (BW), which ranks cows and bulls on their ability to meet the National Breeding Objective: to breed dairy cattle that efficiently convert feed into profit. Desired traits Desired traits for bulls to pass on in cows include milk volume, liveweight, milk protein, milk fat, gestation length, somatic cell count, udder conformation, body condition score and fertility. Zonderop said data used in PCBS also included Production Worth, which ranks a cow based on its expected lifetime performance. Added to all evaluations is genomics, the breeding of dairy cows using genotypes (DNA) to predict an animal's potential for future profitability. He said this examines how genes interact to influence the animal's development and growth. Farmers had an idea of a cow's traits from its parents, but were dependent on its production information to determine how reliable this information was, he said. Zonderop said genomic information could better predict which production qualities an animal had inherited and provide a much more reliable Breeding Worth at a younger age. The farmer sends the final list of preferred bulls to a herd improvement company, which supplies the associated semen, which is administered on-farm by an artificial insemination technician. PCBS data for each farm is reviewed annually and changes are made as required. Zonderop said it would 'take generations' for results to come through, as calves graduated into the milking herd. He now also uses artificial intelligence for all his grazing plans and feed budgeting, while soil test results are put into the system for fertiliser application recommendations on his property. In another extension, PCBS processes data on cow health in his herd, which he receives from a sensor inside the stomach of each animal. Zonderop, the Waikato and Matamata Federated Farmers' Dairy Section chairman, was on-site in the Rural Advocacy Hub at Fieldays last month and said visitors had learnt about PCBS either through word-of-mouth or online. 'They seemed to be impressed and enthused, and keen to know more.'
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Government Direction On Plan Changes
Gisborne District Council will need to pause or withdraw notifying plan changes on some planning work following a new directive from the Government. Last week, the Government announced that all resource management plan changes and district plan reviews that have not yet reached the hearing stage must stop. This forms part of the transition to a new national resource management system, expected to come into effect in 2027. The direction is intended to reduce pressure on councils and communities as the Government moves to replace the current Resource Management Act (RMA) with a new planning framework. Council's Director of Sustainable Futures Jocelyne Allen says the Council's planning team is now reviewing the implications, including what the change means for current and future planning work, community consultation and the timing of key planning processes across the region. 'We understand that while this announcement provides direction, it also brings uncertainty and raises questions for our community – especially landowners, developers, tangata whenua and others involved in planning processes currently underway. While we await the details of the legislation, we're carefully reviewing our current work programme and will provide more information once we have a clearer picture,' says Allen. As Council navigates these changes, Mrs Allen recognises the hard work that has gone into meeting national requirements while shaping a plan that reflects what matters most to our region and its people. "We thank our communities, tangata whenua partners and industry stakeholders for their contributions - the work done still matters and continues to guide our priorities. We remain committed to working alongside our communities, Treaty partners and stakeholders to shape the decisions ahead.' 'We welcome the shift toward a planning system that is simpler, more cost-effective and better equipped to support our community's aspirations.' 'In the next coming months, we will actively prepare for the transition to ensure a smooth and effective changeover to deliver positive outcomes to our people and places.' Council will continue to keep the community updated as further information is released. For more details, refer to: Government to stop Council plan changes – Speech to the 2025 LGNZ Conference – About the Tairawhiti Resource Management Plan: As a unitary authority, all of Council's management plans are combined into a single document - the Tairāwhiti Resource Management Plan. This plan guides how we manage and protect our natural and physical resources in Tairāwhiti including land use, development and environmental wellbeing. Because the plan is large and wide-ranging, Council has been working on updating it through a series of targeted plan changes.
