German court lifts ban on far-right magazine
A German court has lifted a ban imposed by the government on a far-right magazine, ruling the case against it does not clear the high bar required to outlaw its publisher.
Germany's previous government banned Compact magazine and the company that publishes it, Compact-Magazin GmbH, in July.
Then-interior minister Nancy Faeser described Compact as "a central mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene", and said it "agitates in an unspeakable way against Jews, against people with a history of migration and against our parliamentary democracy".
Compact appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, which suspended the ban in August 2024 pending a full consideration of the case.
Following a hearing earlier in June, the court lifted the ban altogether on Tuesday.
The court said Germany's constitution guaranteed freedom of the press and opinion "even for the enemies of freedom" and that, on grounds of proportionality, a ban could only be justified if the publisher's anti-constitutional activities were proven to be "formative" for the group.
It said a review of the evidence showed that the material in question did not reach that threshold.
Compact is run by far-right figure Jurgen Elsasser and produces the monthly magazine of the same name, which has a circulation of about 40,000, as well as an online video channel, Compact TV.
It also runs an online shop selling books, CDs, DVDs and other merchandise.
Compact has been published since 2010.
In its annual report for 2023, Germany's domestic intelligence agency said that it "regularly disseminates ... anti-Semitic, anti-minority, historically revisionist and conspiracy theory content".
The strength of the far right has caused increasing concern in Germany in recent years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
ABC host fired over 'ill advised' Gaza post gets $70k
A casual ABC radio host will receive $70,000 in damages after being fired from the national broadcaster over an "inconsiderate" post about Israel's actions in Gaza. Antoinette Lattouf was hired for a week-long stint on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program before Christmas 2023. She was fired in a "state of panic" at the broadcaster hours after staff learned she had shared a Human Rights Watch post claiming Israel was using starvation as a "weapon of war" in Gaza. The 41-year-old won her unlawful termination case in the Federal Court on Wednesday, when Justice Darryl Rangiah handed down his decision in a courtroom full of her supporters. He found the ABC breached Australian employment law by dismissing the journalist for reasons that included her political opinion. At the time, the broadcaster was under pressure from an orchestrated campaign of complaints against Lattouf by a pro-Israel lobbyist group. The national broadcaster also did not give her the chance to defend the allegations against her, merely showing her the door, the judge found. The ABC was ordered to pay $70,000 in compensation to Lattouf for the emotional distress the termination had caused. In February, the ABC confirmed at a parliamentary hearing that it had spent $1.1 million on legal fees defending the case, although the judge is yet to make a decision about costs. A potential pecuniary penalty will also be determined at a later hearing. Lattouf argued at a hearing in February that then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose, former content chief Chris Oliver-Taylor and former managing director David Anderson were responsible for her termination. But Justice Rangiah found the decision was solely Mr Oliver-Taylor's as he tried to mitigate further complaints about the broadcaster employing someone with Lattouf's political opinions. "Mr Oliver-Taylor sought to appease members of the public who would attribute to Ms Lattouf the holding of anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic opinions by taking her off air," he said. Mr Anderson made a "material contribution" to the decision, however, by giving his views to Mr Oliver-Taylor that the fill-in host held anti-Semitic opinions. Justice Rangiah accepted Mr Oliver-Taylor was put in a difficult position by Lattouf's choice to share the controversial post. "Ms Lattouf's making of the HRW Post was ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer," he said. "The ABC would have to brace itself for the inevitable criticism - whether fair or unfair - for permitting one of its presenters to make a controversial post and then allowing her to remain on air." The ABC's claims the journalist was fired for breaching a direction not to post anything about Israel and Gaza during her five days on air were also rejected. "I find Ms Lattouf was merely provided with advice that it would be best not to post anything controversial about the war," he said. The judge rejected claims by Lattouf - who is of Lebanese heritage - that she was terminated due to her race or national extraction. A casual ABC radio host will receive $70,000 in damages after being fired from the national broadcaster over an "inconsiderate" post about Israel's actions in Gaza. Antoinette Lattouf was hired for a week-long stint on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program before Christmas 2023. She was fired in a "state of panic" at the broadcaster hours after staff learned she had shared a Human Rights Watch post claiming Israel was using starvation as a "weapon of war" in Gaza. The 41-year-old won her unlawful termination case in the Federal Court on Wednesday, when Justice Darryl Rangiah handed down his decision in a courtroom full of her supporters. He found the ABC breached Australian employment law by dismissing the journalist for reasons that included her political opinion. At the time, the broadcaster was under pressure from an orchestrated campaign of complaints against Lattouf by a pro-Israel lobbyist group. The national broadcaster also did not give her the chance to defend the allegations against her, merely showing her the door, the judge found. The ABC was ordered to pay $70,000 in compensation to Lattouf for the emotional distress the termination had caused. In February, the ABC confirmed at a parliamentary hearing that it had spent $1.1 million on legal fees defending the case, although the judge is yet to make a decision about costs. A potential pecuniary penalty will also be determined at a later hearing. Lattouf argued at a hearing in February that then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose, former content chief Chris Oliver-Taylor and former managing director David Anderson were responsible for her termination. But Justice Rangiah found the decision was solely Mr Oliver-Taylor's as he tried to mitigate further complaints about the broadcaster employing someone with Lattouf's political opinions. "Mr Oliver-Taylor sought to appease members of the public who would attribute to Ms Lattouf the holding of anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic opinions by taking her off air," he said. Mr Anderson made a "material contribution" to the decision, however, by giving his views to Mr Oliver-Taylor that the fill-in host held anti-Semitic opinions. Justice Rangiah accepted Mr Oliver-Taylor was put in a difficult position by Lattouf's choice to share the controversial post. "Ms Lattouf's making of the HRW Post was ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer," he said. "The ABC would have to brace itself for the inevitable criticism - whether fair or unfair - for permitting one of its presenters to make a controversial post and then allowing her to remain on air." The ABC's claims the journalist was fired for breaching a direction not to post anything about Israel and Gaza during her five days on air were also rejected. "I find Ms Lattouf was merely provided with advice that it would be best not to post anything controversial about the war," he said. The judge rejected claims by Lattouf - who is of Lebanese heritage - that she was terminated due to her race or national extraction. A casual ABC radio host will receive $70,000 in damages after being fired from the national broadcaster over an "inconsiderate" post about Israel's actions in Gaza. Antoinette Lattouf was hired for a week-long stint on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program before Christmas 2023. She was fired in a "state of panic" at the broadcaster hours after staff learned she had shared a Human Rights Watch post claiming Israel was using starvation as a "weapon of war" in Gaza. The 41-year-old won her unlawful termination case in the Federal Court on Wednesday, when Justice Darryl Rangiah handed down his decision in a courtroom full of her supporters. He found the ABC breached Australian employment law by dismissing the journalist for reasons that included her political opinion. At the time, the broadcaster was under pressure from an orchestrated campaign of complaints against Lattouf by a pro-Israel lobbyist group. The national broadcaster also did not give her the chance to defend the allegations against her, merely showing her the door, the judge found. The ABC was ordered to pay $70,000 in compensation to Lattouf for the emotional distress the termination had caused. In February, the ABC confirmed at a parliamentary hearing that it had spent $1.1 million on legal fees defending the case, although the judge is yet to make a decision about costs. A potential pecuniary penalty will also be determined at a later hearing. Lattouf argued at a hearing in February that then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose, former content chief Chris Oliver-Taylor and former managing director David Anderson were responsible for her termination. But Justice Rangiah found the decision was solely Mr Oliver-Taylor's as he tried to mitigate further complaints about the broadcaster employing someone with Lattouf's political opinions. "Mr Oliver-Taylor sought to appease members of the public who would attribute to Ms Lattouf the holding of anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic opinions by taking her off air," he said. Mr Anderson made a "material contribution" to the decision, however, by giving his views to Mr Oliver-Taylor that the fill-in host held anti-Semitic opinions. Justice Rangiah accepted Mr Oliver-Taylor was put in a difficult position by Lattouf's choice to share the controversial post. "Ms Lattouf's making of the HRW Post was ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer," he said. "The ABC would have to brace itself for the inevitable criticism - whether fair or unfair - for permitting one of its presenters to make a controversial post and then allowing her to remain on air." The ABC's claims the journalist was fired for breaching a direction not to post anything about Israel and Gaza during her five days on air were also rejected. "I find Ms Lattouf was merely provided with advice that it would be best not to post anything controversial about the war," he said. The judge rejected claims by Lattouf - who is of Lebanese heritage - that she was terminated due to her race or national extraction. A casual ABC radio host will receive $70,000 in damages after being fired from the national broadcaster over an "inconsiderate" post about Israel's actions in Gaza. Antoinette Lattouf was hired for a week-long stint on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program before Christmas 2023. She was fired in a "state of panic" at the broadcaster hours after staff learned she had shared a Human Rights Watch post claiming Israel was using starvation as a "weapon of war" in Gaza. The 41-year-old won her unlawful termination case in the Federal Court on Wednesday, when Justice Darryl Rangiah handed down his decision in a courtroom full of her supporters. He found the ABC breached Australian employment law by dismissing the journalist for reasons that included her political opinion. At the time, the broadcaster was under pressure from an orchestrated campaign of complaints against Lattouf by a pro-Israel lobbyist group. The national broadcaster also did not give her the chance to defend the allegations against her, merely showing her the door, the judge found. The ABC was ordered to pay $70,000 in compensation to Lattouf for the emotional distress the termination had caused. In February, the ABC confirmed at a parliamentary hearing that it had spent $1.1 million on legal fees defending the case, although the judge is yet to make a decision about costs. A potential pecuniary penalty will also be determined at a later hearing. Lattouf argued at a hearing in February that then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose, former content chief Chris Oliver-Taylor and former managing director David Anderson were responsible for her termination. But Justice Rangiah found the decision was solely Mr Oliver-Taylor's as he tried to mitigate further complaints about the broadcaster employing someone with Lattouf's political opinions. "Mr Oliver-Taylor sought to appease members of the public who would attribute to Ms Lattouf the holding of anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic opinions by taking her off air," he said. Mr Anderson made a "material contribution" to the decision, however, by giving his views to Mr Oliver-Taylor that the fill-in host held anti-Semitic opinions. Justice Rangiah accepted Mr Oliver-Taylor was put in a difficult position by Lattouf's choice to share the controversial post. "Ms Lattouf's making of the HRW Post was ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer," he said. "The ABC would have to brace itself for the inevitable criticism - whether fair or unfair - for permitting one of its presenters to make a controversial post and then allowing her to remain on air." The ABC's claims the journalist was fired for breaching a direction not to post anything about Israel and Gaza during her five days on air were also rejected. "I find Ms Lattouf was merely provided with advice that it would be best not to post anything controversial about the war," he said. The judge rejected claims by Lattouf - who is of Lebanese heritage - that she was terminated due to her race or national extraction.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Premier's staff do an about-face after arrest threat
The NSW premier's right-hand man will be spared arrest after he and fellow staffers gave in to demands to face up to a hate crimes inquiry centred on an explosive-laden caravan. Empty chairs at an otherwise routine inquiry into the passage of religious hate laws led upper house MPs to call for the arrest of five staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley. While the premier defended his staff's position over the weekend, chief-of-staff James Cullen and his four colleagues did an about-face on Wednesday. That followed legal advice to upper house president Ben Franklin, confirming he could seek the staffers' arrest. "I was intending to advise the house that I would be certifying to a judge of the Supreme Court ... that the witnesses have failed to appear before the committee without a just and reasonable excuse," Mr Franklin told the parliament on Wednesday morning. "I have subsequently been advised that the five witnesses have reconsidered their position and have agreed to attend a hearing to provide evidence voluntarily." Mr Franklin sought legal advice from eminent barrister Bret Walker SC, which affirmed the president was within his rights to seek arrest warrants for the staffers failing to appear. The premier and minister, as members of parliament's lower house, cannot be compelled to appear. Mr Cullen, his two deputies and two senior staff in Ms Catley's office are due to appear at a new hearing on Friday morning. The inquiry was formed to probe the passage of protest and speech laws rushed through parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside a caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest in January. Investigators later revealed the discovery was part of a "criminal con job". Committee member Sue Higginson said the inquiry expected new evidence to come to light as a result of the staffers' appearance. "People's evidence brings a different perspective which helps to ascertain a fuller picture of what did happen and who knew what at what point in time," she told AAP. Mr Minns was scathing of the committee's actions in pursuing the appearance of his staff on Wednesday morning. His office also pointed to numerous statements by the committee chair Rod Roberts, calling for stronger hate crime laws ahead of their passage in February. "We've really got to scrutinise whether this is the right chamber for this," Mr Minns said. "There's just gross hypocrisy and political bias." The NSW premier's right-hand man will be spared arrest after he and fellow staffers gave in to demands to face up to a hate crimes inquiry centred on an explosive-laden caravan. Empty chairs at an otherwise routine inquiry into the passage of religious hate laws led upper house MPs to call for the arrest of five staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley. While the premier defended his staff's position over the weekend, chief-of-staff James Cullen and his four colleagues did an about-face on Wednesday. That followed legal advice to upper house president Ben Franklin, confirming he could seek the staffers' arrest. "I was intending to advise the house that I would be certifying to a judge of the Supreme Court ... that the witnesses have failed to appear before the committee without a just and reasonable excuse," Mr Franklin told the parliament on Wednesday morning. "I have subsequently been advised that the five witnesses have reconsidered their position and have agreed to attend a hearing to provide evidence voluntarily." Mr Franklin sought legal advice from eminent barrister Bret Walker SC, which affirmed the president was within his rights to seek arrest warrants for the staffers failing to appear. The premier and minister, as members of parliament's lower house, cannot be compelled to appear. Mr Cullen, his two deputies and two senior staff in Ms Catley's office are due to appear at a new hearing on Friday morning. The inquiry was formed to probe the passage of protest and speech laws rushed through parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside a caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest in January. Investigators later revealed the discovery was part of a "criminal con job". Committee member Sue Higginson said the inquiry expected new evidence to come to light as a result of the staffers' appearance. "People's evidence brings a different perspective which helps to ascertain a fuller picture of what did happen and who knew what at what point in time," she told AAP. Mr Minns was scathing of the committee's actions in pursuing the appearance of his staff on Wednesday morning. His office also pointed to numerous statements by the committee chair Rod Roberts, calling for stronger hate crime laws ahead of their passage in February. "We've really got to scrutinise whether this is the right chamber for this," Mr Minns said. "There's just gross hypocrisy and political bias." The NSW premier's right-hand man will be spared arrest after he and fellow staffers gave in to demands to face up to a hate crimes inquiry centred on an explosive-laden caravan. Empty chairs at an otherwise routine inquiry into the passage of religious hate laws led upper house MPs to call for the arrest of five staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley. While the premier defended his staff's position over the weekend, chief-of-staff James Cullen and his four colleagues did an about-face on Wednesday. That followed legal advice to upper house president Ben Franklin, confirming he could seek the staffers' arrest. "I was intending to advise the house that I would be certifying to a judge of the Supreme Court ... that the witnesses have failed to appear before the committee without a just and reasonable excuse," Mr Franklin told the parliament on Wednesday morning. "I have subsequently been advised that the five witnesses have reconsidered their position and have agreed to attend a hearing to provide evidence voluntarily." Mr Franklin sought legal advice from eminent barrister Bret Walker SC, which affirmed the president was within his rights to seek arrest warrants for the staffers failing to appear. The premier and minister, as members of parliament's lower house, cannot be compelled to appear. Mr Cullen, his two deputies and two senior staff in Ms Catley's office are due to appear at a new hearing on Friday morning. The inquiry was formed to probe the passage of protest and speech laws rushed through parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside a caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest in January. Investigators later revealed the discovery was part of a "criminal con job". Committee member Sue Higginson said the inquiry expected new evidence to come to light as a result of the staffers' appearance. "People's evidence brings a different perspective which helps to ascertain a fuller picture of what did happen and who knew what at what point in time," she told AAP. Mr Minns was scathing of the committee's actions in pursuing the appearance of his staff on Wednesday morning. His office also pointed to numerous statements by the committee chair Rod Roberts, calling for stronger hate crime laws ahead of their passage in February. "We've really got to scrutinise whether this is the right chamber for this," Mr Minns said. "There's just gross hypocrisy and political bias." The NSW premier's right-hand man will be spared arrest after he and fellow staffers gave in to demands to face up to a hate crimes inquiry centred on an explosive-laden caravan. Empty chairs at an otherwise routine inquiry into the passage of religious hate laws led upper house MPs to call for the arrest of five staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley. While the premier defended his staff's position over the weekend, chief-of-staff James Cullen and his four colleagues did an about-face on Wednesday. That followed legal advice to upper house president Ben Franklin, confirming he could seek the staffers' arrest. "I was intending to advise the house that I would be certifying to a judge of the Supreme Court ... that the witnesses have failed to appear before the committee without a just and reasonable excuse," Mr Franklin told the parliament on Wednesday morning. "I have subsequently been advised that the five witnesses have reconsidered their position and have agreed to attend a hearing to provide evidence voluntarily." Mr Franklin sought legal advice from eminent barrister Bret Walker SC, which affirmed the president was within his rights to seek arrest warrants for the staffers failing to appear. The premier and minister, as members of parliament's lower house, cannot be compelled to appear. Mr Cullen, his two deputies and two senior staff in Ms Catley's office are due to appear at a new hearing on Friday morning. The inquiry was formed to probe the passage of protest and speech laws rushed through parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside a caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest in January. Investigators later revealed the discovery was part of a "criminal con job". Committee member Sue Higginson said the inquiry expected new evidence to come to light as a result of the staffers' appearance. "People's evidence brings a different perspective which helps to ascertain a fuller picture of what did happen and who knew what at what point in time," she told AAP. Mr Minns was scathing of the committee's actions in pursuing the appearance of his staff on Wednesday morning. His office also pointed to numerous statements by the committee chair Rod Roberts, calling for stronger hate crime laws ahead of their passage in February. "We've really got to scrutinise whether this is the right chamber for this," Mr Minns said. "There's just gross hypocrisy and political bias."
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Politician blames Anthony Albanese's ‘casual approach' and anti-Trump rhetoric for failure to secure meeting with US President
Bridget McKenzie has slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's 'casual approach' to politics, saying it was the reason Australia has failed to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the upcoming NATO summit. Senator McKenzie went on a scolding rant on Sunrise on Wednesday, saying Albanese had thrown around anti-Trump rhetoric, before saying he should have gone to Florida to sit down with Trump prior to the inauguration. Albanese's planned first face-to-face meeting with Trump was on the sidelines of the G7 summit earlier this month in Canada, but it was cancelled due to the conflict in the Middle East between Israel and Iran. Albanese had eyed-off a possible meeting with Trump at the NATO summit in The Netherlands next month. However, he pulled the pin on the trip to The Hague after other Indo-Pacific leaders opted out. Defence Minister Richard Marles, who will represent Australia at the summit, confirmed to reporters he has failed to lock in a meeting with Trump, amid pressure to increase defence spending and tariffs. Appearing on Sunrise on Wednesday, McKenzie took aim at Albanese. 'I've been saying repeatedly that the Prime Minister's casual approach has caught up with him,' McKenzie said, blasting the leader. 'We know that you don't always have allies, but you should always be respectful to them. 'In the last election, we saw anti-Trump rhetoric being used to win a domestic election and that is having repercussions. I think right now with our relationship with the US.' McKenzie explained Albanese's focus appears to be elsewhere, rather than meeting President Trump. 'It's on securing the relationship with (China's leader) Xi Jinping. 'He turned down the opportunity to meet with US Vice President JD Vance, saying 'I'm the Prime Minister, I only deal with Presidents', which is really, really poor, I think. '(He) should take the opportunity to build the personal relationship, particularly when it looks like a meeting between the President, whilst this issue the Middle East is ongoing, will be difficult to secure.' A meeting with any senior Trump administration officials would likely include talks on Washington's 30-day review of its nuclear submarine deal with Australia under the AUKUS partnership. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth previously called on Australia to massively boost its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product. A suggestion Albanese has not appeared to be keen on. Minister for Housing Clare O'Neil took aim at the criticism. 'If I can just say, if the Prime Minister goes overseas, the Coalition get upset about it. 'If he doesn't go overseas, they also get upset about it. This is really just noise. Missed opportunity 'We take this incredibly seriously. If you look at the way that our Foreign Minister Penny Wong have turned around Australia's global standing over the past three years, it is a great credit to these national leaders of ours. 'I have enormous confidence in the way that they pursue these relationships across China and our other friends and partners around the world. 'We'll continue to pursue the national interest and the domestic politics here is not relevant.' McKenzie fired back: 'I've been really clear, he should have gotten on the plane a lot earlier, like other world leaders did, before the inauguration of President Trump. 'Instead, he chose to play domestic politics and use anti-Trump rhetoric during the election. 'Other leaders went to Florida to sit down with President before he was inaugurated and develop that relationship. That's what we should have done. 'This is our key ally. Now, we're in a very dangerous and precarious time globally and we can't just simply pick up the phone or have that personal relationship, as, (UK Prime Minister) Keir Starmer can.'
