
Govt considering amendments to Atomic Energy Act, nuclear liability law
NEW DELHI: Government is considering amendments to the laws governing the nuclear power domain, including the sectoral regulator, to allow participation of private sector as India eyes to produce 100 GW atomic energy by 2047.
Government sources said amendments were being considered to the Atomic Energy Act to allow private sector participation and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act to limit the liability on suppliers of equipment to build atomic energy plants.
The government is also considering regulatory reforms and is evaluating the model of Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Center (INSPACe) which acts as the promoter and regulator for the space sector that was opened up for private participation in 2020.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced opening up of the nuclear power sector which has been restricted to public sector companies.
The Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited operates atomic power plants across the country that contribute 8.7 GWe to the country's energy mix.
Sitharaman also announced the Nuclear Energy Mission for research and development of Small Modular Reactors (SMR) with an outlay of Rs 20,000 crore and to operationalise five indigenously developed SMRs by 2033.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Will Loans Below Rs 2 Lakh Be Exempt From Tighter Rules Under New Gold Loan Norms? Finance Ministry Steps In
New Delhi: The Finance Ministry said on Friday it has suggested that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) should exclude small borrowers of up to Rs 2 lakh from the provisions of its draft directions on lending against gold collateral. The Finance Ministry has also suggested that the implementation of the guidelines be postponed to next year. 'The draft directions on lending against gold collateral issued by the RBI have been examined by the Department of Financial Services (DFS) under the guidance of Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. The DFS has given suggestions to the RBI to ensure that the requirements of the small gold loan borrowers are not adversely affected,' the Finance Ministry said in a statement on X. DFS has also stated that such guidelines will need time to implement at the field level and hence may be suitable for implementation from January 1, 2026 only, the statement said. Further, DFS has suggested that borrowers below Rs 2 lakh may be excluded from the requirements of these proposed directions to ensure timely and speedy disbursement of loans for such small ticket borrowers, the statement explained. 'RBI is reviewing the feedback received on the Draft guidelines. It is expected that concerns raised by various stakeholders, as well as the feedback received from the public, will be duly considered by the RBI before finalising the directions on the same. The suggestions have been duly forwarded to the RBI," the statement added. Shares of Muthoot Finance and Manappuram rose on the FinMin's feedback, trading at Rs 2,136.10 and Rs 233.14 apiece, up 3.07 per cent and 0.57 per cent respectively. Earlier in April, the RBI issued draft guidelines, seeking to establish uniform rules and regulations for getting gold loans from banks and NBFCs. However, the draft rules imposed some restrictions regarding the type of gold that is eligible as collateral and the maximum loan amount a bank or NBFC can extend. The RBI had found some shortcomings such as weak loan appraisal mechanisms, poor monitoring of the end use of funds, and lack of transparency during gold auctions after default. The draft guidelines are now intended to harmonise norms across different types of lenders, while also reflecting their respective risk-bearing capacities.


Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
UPI transactions hit new high in May but cash still thriving
UPI transactions hit new high in May but cash still thriving MUMBAI: Even as the country hurtles toward a digital future with the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) clocking 60 crore transactions a day, a curious contradiction persists: cash is thriving. In the month of May, UPI transactions hit a a record 1868 crore transactions for Rs 25.1 lakh crore, up from 1789 crore (Rs 23.9 lakh crore) in April. However, at the end of March, currency in circulation was a record Rs 36.86 lakh crore. The Rs 500 note, in particular, has become the dominant form of cash, making up 41 per cent of all banknotes by volume and accounting for a staggering 86 per cent of total value. In contrast, smaller denominations such as Rs 20, Rs 50, Rs 100 and Rs 200 together account for less than that, both in number (35.6 per cent) and value (10.9 per cent) -despite the state's push for a more granular, digitised cash economy. Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman recently reiterated the government's commitment to smaller denominations and digital payments, noting efforts to ensure that "currency will be in the lower denominations, used much more than the higher." In April, the Reserve Bank of India mandated that by Sept 30, 2025, at least 75 per cent of ATMs must be capable of dispensing Rs 100 or Rs 200 notes, with this figure rising to 90 per cent by March 2026. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The goal is to reduce dependence on high-value notes and improve everyday transactional ease. Yet the resurgence of cash is not driven by transaction needs. Bankers say the phenomenon is better explained by precautionary hoarding, a behavioural legacy of the Covid pandemic. An RBI study supports this view, drawing links between cash usage and perceived economic insecurity. The study, intriguingly, uses satellite images of nighttime illumination as a proxy for economic activity. It finds a correlation between brighter regions-indicative of higher GDP and tax collection-and lower currency use. As formal economic activity rises, cash in circulation tends to fall. The recent spike in cash, the RBI suggests, reflects a lingering preference for liquidity in uncertain times. This is not unprecedented. From 2005 to 2014, the rapid rollout of ATMs corresponded with a drop in household cash holdings, as easier access reduced the perceived need to store wealth in physical currency, the RBI study said. But the pandemic has reversed some of that progress. For now, even in a nation where Rs 10 can be paid by QR code, cash-especially in large denominations-continues to loom large. The RBI has successfully withdrawn most of the Rs 2000 banknotes from circulation without any disruption. The recent comments by the finance minister and the RBI have led many to believe that measures to reduce Rs 500 banknotes may be in the offing. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Fleet owners jittery as FinMin favours ₹100 crore value-based criteria for infra status to ships, ET Infra
Advt Advt By , ETInfra MUMBAI: The Ministry of Finance is pushing ahead with a value-based - vessels costing ₹100 crore and above - criteria for granting infrastructure status to ships, to implement a Union Budget announcement, a move that will exclude small ship owners or as much as 80 per cent of the Indian fleet from its scope and potentially be challenged in courts, multiple sources Ministry of Ports , Shipping and Waterways had endorsed that ships of 24 metres and above by length or 500 gross tonnage (GT) and above by capacity should be accorded infrastructure status to help fleet owners access long-term, low-cost years of lobbying by the local shipping industry due to challenges associated with securing long-term, low-cost funds, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced in her Budget speech to Parliament on February 1 that 'large ships above a specified size will be included in the infrastructure harmonised master list'.The shipping industry is miffed at the Finance Ministry 's stand on setting value-based criteria for granting infrastructure status to ships.'The government is supporting micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME's) from every side and here the Finance Ministry is advocating ₹100 crore and above as the eligibility criteria because the Finance Minister used the words 'large ships' in the Budget speech. If this sails through, then 80 per cent of our industry, which is less than ₹100 crore, will be left out of the infrastructure status,' said a ship owner.'The ₹100 crore value-based threshold will exclude the whole offshore fleet, ship owners mostly bring in second hand vessels which are less than ₹100 crore and the entire coastal shipping industry where you want to connect the hinterland through inland waterways and move the cargo along the coast, every vessel is less than ₹100 crore,' the ship owner new policies like the green tug transition programme where the ministry is nudging fleet owners to move to green ships, most of the vessels are less than ₹100 crores.'So, who are you trying to deny? You are trying to deny the whole medium-scale ship owners who are mainly catering to coastal movement of cargo which is a focus area for the government,' the ship owner stated.'More importantly, there is no revenue loss to the government by setting 24 metres by length or 500 GT by capacity as eligibility criteria for infrastructure status to ships. It will allow the Reserve Bank of India to include the defined ships in its master list of infrastructure sectors to facilitate long-term, low-cost funds from banks. Then, why this value based ₹100 crore system. If you see the sectors covered under infrastructure in the harmonised master list, hardly one sector may have some value associated with it, most of the sectors in the list have some kind of objective qualifying criteria. For ships, it should be length and gross tonnage, which is internationally accepted. It's an objective criterion,' he substantiate this point, a second ship owner referred to the shipbuilding financial assistance given by the government wherein shipyards are entitled to receive funds for constructing normal ships having length of 24 metres and above for domestic use. For hybrid and green vessels, a lesser length is accepted under the shipbuilding financial assistance scheme to handhold adoption of new stipulating a length of 24 metres and above for funding the construction of normal ships for domestic use under the shipbuilding financial assistance scheme, the government seeks to ensure that such ships comply with international conventions on load lines, tonnage infrastructure status, the ministry has endorsed setting 24 metres and above by length or 500 GT and above by capacity, the latter criteria will also comply with the Safety Of Life At Sea (SOLAS) convention of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), a treaty that sets minimum safety standards for merchant ships.'Quality will be maintained with these parameters. There are different types of vessels with different shapes. GT is a function of volumes, so with a lesser length also you can have a higher GT,' the second ship owner said.'Now, if you put ₹100 crore as the criteria, there will be a difference between the vessels of ₹100 crore and the vessels of 24 metres and above or 500 GT and above in the funding mechanism. In the Indian context, if the government is only looking at bigger vessels, then what about the smaller ship owners. Are you trying to create a difference between the big and the small ships for the funding mechanism and denying the benefits associated with infrastructure status to the whole medium-scale ship owners which is the largest chunk of the domestic industry,' the second ship owner adopting the 24 metres length criteria would exclude vessels such as small boats, launches, ferries, wooden boats, passenger boats etc from the ambit of infrastructure status. 'These ships which are small will still not get infrastructure status,' he the Finance Minister mentioning the words 'large ships' for infrastructure status in the Union Budget, most likely to garner some eyeballs, the Finance Ministry is yet to come to terms with the needs of the shipping industry.'Somebody in the finance ministry wanted some colour to the Budget speech and gave infrastructure status a 'large ships' spin. Now they want to define large ships with a value of ₹100 crore. You are looking to benefit the local shipping industry and there is no revenue loss for the government if the infrastructure status is based on 24 metres and above by length or 500 GT and above by capacity. So, what is the problem?' the second ship owner asked.