logo
How much does a $400,000 annuity pay per month?

How much does a $400,000 annuity pay per month?

CBS News2 days ago

We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms.
The monthly payments on a $400,000 annuity could be substantial, providing you with a guaranteed income stream during retirement.
Getty Images
After years of diligently saving, watching markets rise and fall and checking retirement calculators with cautious optimism, many near-retirees now face the real challenge: turning savings into sustainable income. At that point, it's no longer just about growing your money, after all. It's about making it last. And, that shift in mindset has become even more critical in today's climate.
After all, inflation may be cooling, but it's still eating into fixed budgets. Market volatility continues to rattle investors. And with people living longer than ever, the fear of outlasting your savings is very real. That's why more Americans are looking to annuities — not as flashy investments, but as practical tools for income stability. These financial products, sold by insurance companies, offer guaranteed monthly income in exchange for a lump-sum payment.
Unlike the ups and downs of stocks or bonds, annuities can give retirees a level of financial consistency that's hard to come by elsewhere. But what kind of monthly income can you actually get from a larger investment, like a $400,000 annuity?
Find out how to add an annuity to your retirement plan today.
How much will a $400,000 annuity pay per month?
So, what does a $400,000 annuity really pay? The answer depends on a few key factors, including your age, gender and the type of annuity you choose. That said, it's important to understand the range of potential monthly payouts, as that information can help you decide if locking in guaranteed income is the right move for your retirement plan.
Here's a closer look at what you might earn each month from a $400,000 annuity, according to an analysis of Cannex data by Annuity.org:
Male, age 60 : About $2,362 per month
: About $2,362 per month Female, age 60 : About $2,289 per month
: About $2,289 per month Joint life, age 60: About $2,105 per month
About $2,105 per month Male, age 65 : About $2,590 per month
: About $2,590 per month Female, age 65 : About $2,482 per month
: About $2,482 per month Joint life, age 65: About $2,246 per month
About $2,246 per month Male, age 70 : About $2,923 per month
: About $2,923 per month Female, age 70 : About $2,763 per month
: About $2,763 per month Joint life, age 70: About $2,449 per month
About $2,449 per month Male, age 75 : About $3,415 per month
: About $3,415 per month Female, age 75 : About $3,173 per month
: About $3,173 per month Joint life, age 75: About $2,736 per month
About $2,736 per month Male, age 80 : About $4,192 per month
: About $4,192 per month Female, age 80 : About $3,842 per month
: About $3,842 per month Joint life, age 80: About $3,202 per month
These figures assume a single-life immediate fixed annuity, meaning the payments start right away and continue for the rest of your life. As shown, the older you are at the time of purchase, the higher the monthly income you'll receive because the insurance company expects to make payments for fewer years. The interest rate environment can also play a role in what your monthly payouts are.
It's also worth noting that men typically receive higher payments than women since women have longer life expectancies. That means the same $400,000 investment is stretched over more years for a female annuitant, leading to slightly smaller monthly checks. And, if you opt for a joint-life annuity, which continues to pay your spouse after you die, your monthly income will be lower, as evidenced above, but it can be a good trade-off for couples who want lifetime income security for both partners.
Learn more about your annuity options and get started now.
Is a $400,000 annuity worth it?
A $400,000 annuity isn't small change, and whether it's worth it depends, in large part, on your broader retirement plan. But for many retirees, it can offer some big advantages, including:
Predictable monthly income
Having a fixed amount of money arriving in your bank account every month can reduce a lot of financial stress, especially if you're nervous about withdrawing from your 401(k) or navigating stock market swings. With payments that could range from about $2,300 to $4,000 per month, a $400,000 annuity can meaningfully supplement Social Security or help cover your core expenses.
Protection against longevity risk
One of the biggest financial unknowns in retirement is how long you'll live. Annuities offer peace of mind because they continue to pay as long as you're alive, even if you live to 100 or beyond. That's something traditional investment portfolios don't guarantee.
Freedom from market volatility
Unlike individual retirement accounts (IRAs) or mutual funds, annuity payments aren't tied to how the market is performing. That makes them especially attractive when interest rates fluctuate or a market correction is looming.
That said, there are trade-offs to be aware of, like:
Limited flexibility : Once you invest, your money is locked in. If you need to tap that cash for emergencies, an annuity won't offer the same liquidity as a savings account or brokerage fund.
: Once you invest, your money is locked in. If you need to tap that cash for emergencies, an annuity won't offer the same liquidity as a savings account or brokerage fund. Tax treatment : If you purchase the annuity with pre-tax dollars (like from a traditional IRA), your monthly payments will be taxed as ordinary income. With after-tax money, only the interest portion is taxable — the rest is a return of your principal.
: If you purchase the annuity with pre-tax dollars (like from a traditional IRA), your monthly payments will be taxed as ordinary income. With after-tax money, only the interest portion is taxable — the rest is a return of your principal. Inflation risk: Most fixed annuities don't automatically adjust for inflation, meaning your buying power could shrink over time unless you specifically purchase inflation protection (which usually reduces the initial payout).
The bottom line
A $400,000 annuity can be a powerful piece of your retirement puzzle. Depending on your age and gender, it could deliver anywhere from around $2,200 to $3,400 in monthly income, enough to cover essentials or create some extra breathing room in your budget.
Still, annuities aren't the right solution for every person. Before committing such a large portion of your savings, it's important to weigh the trade-offs, like reduced liquidity, potential tax implications and inflation risks. You should also compare the options, ask questions and consider working with an expert who can help you find the right fit.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2 Recession-Proof Stocks to Buy and Hold
2 Recession-Proof Stocks to Buy and Hold

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

2 Recession-Proof Stocks to Buy and Hold

Even amid an uncertain economic environment, reliable companies can be found. Zoetis helps people care for pets, which many consider as honorary family members. HCA Healthcare offers services in high demand, regardless of economic conditions. 10 stocks we like better than Zoetis › President Trump's trade policies are sparking concerns about a potential recession. Though it's hard to predict an upcoming economic downturn, it's never a bad idea for investors to buy shares of companies that can perform relatively well even in bad times. These corporations often have robust underlying businesses built to deliver consistent results and superior returns over the long run. Here are two great examples for investors to consider: Zoetis (NYSE: ZTS) and HCA Healthcare (NYSE: HCA). Zoetis, a leading animal health company, has faced some challenges over the past year. The company's recent financial results weren't great, and it is dealing with increased competition for some of its growth drivers, including Apoquel, a medicine to treat allergic itch in dogs. However, as Zoetis points out, there is significant whitespace in this niche. It estimates that 13 million dogs are eligible for the medicine but aren't on any prescription, and another 7 million are undertreated. The company currently treats 12 million dogs with Apoquel and Cytopoint, a similar medicine. Although Zoetis markets products for livestock, poultry, and other animals, the company's work with pets, particularly cats and dogs, is one of the primary reasons it can survive a recession relatively unscathed. People view their pets as family members and are more than willing to pay a significant amount to ensure they are well cared for. The increased humanization of pets should also be a significant long-term growth driver for Zoetis, a trend that is particularly prevalent among younger generations, who are less likely to have children than older ones. It might be pushing it to say that pets are the new kids, but it's not too far from the truth for many pet owners. The rest of Zoetis' business grants it significant diversity. The animal health leader generally grows its revenue at rates faster than the industry average, something it has been able to do for a while, despite competition, through the continuous development of newer medicines. Two of its more recent important approvals, Solensia and Librela that treat osteoarthritis pain in cats and dogs, respectively, are becoming key growth drivers, too. So, despite being slightly in the red over the trailing-12-month period, Zoetis is well-equipped to handle a recession if one is coming, while delivering strong returns in the long run. Lastly, the stock is also an excellent pick for income seekers despite its unimpressive forward yield of 1.2%. Zoetis has increased its payouts by 502% in the past decade. Whether it's for dividends or growth, the healthcare specialist is a great option. HCA Healthcare's business remains in high demand even in recessions. The company is a leading hospital chain in the U.S., and even during economic downturns, people still require critical medical care. True, some procedures performed in the company's facilities are optional. Even for those that aren't, patients may sometimes postpone them when things get tough. So, there will be an impact on the company's results, but it should be fairly minimal. Over the past year, the company has faced another source of headwinds. Various natural disasters, including hurricanes, impacted its financial results in some areas, resulting in lower revenue than anticipated. Still, HCA Healthcare continues to deliver decent updates. In the first quarter, the company's revenue increased by a modest 5.7% year over year to $18.3 billion. Its earnings per share came in at $6.45, up 8.8% compared to the year-ago period. Despite this headwind, HCA Healthcare's long-term prospects are attractive. An aging population that will require more medical care should lead to increased spending on precisely the kinds of services it offers. HCA Healthcare has also deepened its relationships with physicians, patients, and third-party payers over time, partly through the adoption of more services. It would be challenging for any newcomer to seriously challenge HCA Healthcare, considering the ecosystem it has already built, which arguably grants it a network effect. Although there is competition, HCA Healthcare has generally increased its market share over the past decade. The stock should continue delivering superior returns long after the next recession hits, whenever that happens. Before you buy stock in Zoetis, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Zoetis wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Prosper Junior Bakiny has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Zoetis. The Motley Fool recommends HCA Healthcare. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Recession-Proof Stocks to Buy and Hold was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

2 Potential Stock-Split Stocks Up 185% and 255% in 3 Years to Buy Now, According to Certain Wall Street Analysts
2 Potential Stock-Split Stocks Up 185% and 255% in 3 Years to Buy Now, According to Certain Wall Street Analysts

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

2 Potential Stock-Split Stocks Up 185% and 255% in 3 Years to Buy Now, According to Certain Wall Street Analysts

Meta Platforms and CrowdStrike are stock-split candidates in 2025 after experiencing tremendous share price appreciation during the last three years. Meta Platforms is the second-largest adtech company in the world, and it's developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools to automate the ad creation process. CrowdStrike is a leader in several cybersecurity software verticals, and the company is investing in go-to market capabilities and internal automation. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Smart investors are drawn to stock splits, not only because they make a company's share price cheaper, but also because they tend to precede market-beating returns. Stocks that split have historically outperformed the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) by 13 percentage points during the year after the stock-split announcement. Over the last three years, Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) and CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) have returned 255% and 185%, respectively. Both companies are split candidates after that price appreciation, and both stocks are worth buying today, according to certain Wall Street analysts. Barton Crockett at Rosenblatt has set Meta Platforms with a target price of $918 per share. That implies 34% upside from its current share price of $684. Andrew Nowinski at Wells Fargo has set CrowdStrike with a target price of $550 per share. That implies 19% upside from its current share price of $460. Here's what investors should know about Meta Platforms and CrowdStrike. Meta Platforms owns four of the seven most popular social media platforms, a key competitive advantage that lets it source consumer data and help brands target advertising campaigns. Consequently, Meta is the second-largest adtech company in the world, behind Alphabet's Google, and eMarketer expects the company to continue gaining market share through 2026. Meta Platform reported solid first-quarter financial results, crushing estimates on the top and bottom lines. Revenue increased 16% to $42.3 billion, operating margin expanded 3 percentage points, and generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) net income increased 37% to $6.43 per diluted share. Also, CEO Mark Zuckerberg told analysts the company is making "good progress" on artificial intelligence (AI) glasses and Meta AI, a conversational assistant with more than 1 billion monthly active users. Looking ahead, Meta hopes to automate the entire ad creation process with artificial intelligence (AI) by 2026. According to a recent report from The Wall Street Journal, "Using the ad tools Meta is developing, a brand could present an image of the product it wants to promote along with a budgetary goal, and AI would create the entire ad, including imagery, video, and text." Innovation thinking should keep Meta on the leading edge of the adtech market, where spending is projected to increase at 14% annually through 2030. In turn, Wall Street expects Meta's earnings to increase at 18% annually over the next three years. That makes the current valuation of 27 times earnings look reasonable. Patient investors should feel comfortable buying a position in this stock today. CrowdStrike is a cybersecurity company best known for leadership in endpoint protection, a discipline that secures devices like servers, desktops, and laptops. But its platform comprises 30 modules that address multiple major markets, and the company is taking share in several, including cloud security, identity threat detection, attack surface management, and managed detection and response. CrowdStrike reported mixed financial results in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, which ended in April. Revenue rose 20% to $1.1 billion, supported by high retention rates despite the widespread outage last year. But non-GAAP net income fell 8% to $0.73 per diluted share as the company ramped spending on go-to-market capabilities and automation. "We expect these investments to fuel our growth in the back half of fiscal year 2026 and beyond," CFO Burt Podbere told analysts. Looking ahead, CrowdStrike has several important tailwinds at its back. As the market leader in managed detection and response, a service that lets companies outsource their cybersecurity needs to trained professionals, the company should benefit from the massive labor shortage that currently plagues the industry. Additionally, CrowdStrike's platform strategy -- its unification of multiple cybersecurity software products on a single platform -- positions the company as a long-term winner as organizations look to eliminate complexity by consolidating through a single vendor. In total, the company values its addressable market at $250 billion by 2029. Wall Street estimates CrowdStrike's adjusted earnings will grow at 13% annually through fiscal 2027, which ends in January 2027. That makes the present valuation of 124 times earnings look expensive. Admittedly, CrowdStrike beat the consensus estimate by an average of 12% in the last six quarters, but the stock would be expensive even if that trend continues. Personally, rather than chasing CrowdStrike at its current price, I think investors should keep the stock on their watch lists right now. I expect the company to be worth far more in the future, but I also suspect the expensive valuation will create dip-buying opportunities in the near term, especially due to macroeconomic uncertainty surrounding tariffs. Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in CrowdStrike. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, CrowdStrike, and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Potential Stock-Split Stocks Up 185% and 255% in 3 Years to Buy Now, According to Certain Wall Street Analysts was originally published by The Motley Fool

How Wildfires Are Torching The Home Insurance Industry
How Wildfires Are Torching The Home Insurance Industry

Forbes

time42 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How Wildfires Are Torching The Home Insurance Industry

What happens when the models tell you the world is on fire, and the market listens? In California's most extreme wildfire zones, one in five homes has lost its insurance coverage since 2019 according to a recent wildfire research report. In some ZIP codes, premiums have skyrocketed over 40%. More than 150,000 households are now uninsured—not because they want to be, but because they're uninsurable. And this isn't a future problem. Wildfire season has barely begun, and already over 200 blazes rage across Canada, many completely out of control. This isn't just a climate story. It's a markets story. A systems story. A story of how the first real stress test of climate adaptation is happening—not in the halls of Congress or Parliament, but in your homeowner's insurance renewal letter. Insurers have one job: predict risk, price it, and spread it. And they're good at it—until they're not. When Los Angeles was engulfed in flames in January, insurance companies paid out more than $44 billion in claims. State Farm alone lost $7.6 billion. California's state-subsidized FAIR plan took a $4.8 billion hit. That plan, by the way, is supposed to be the insurer of last resort. It's now the only option left for hundreds of thousands of homeowners—and it's buckling. Insurers saw it coming. Their catastrophe models—backed by more granular data and better forecasting than most public agencies can afford—warned them. They raised premiums, cut policies, and eventually fled entire markets. Since 2018, over 30,000 households in California's high-risk fire zones have had their policies simply not renewed. Many never got a replacement. This isn't a tale of irrational panic. It's a rational response to a mathematically unsustainable situation. You can't underwrite homes in areas where the probability of destruction is not only high—but increasing. You can't make the numbers work when wildfire seasons are longer, fires more intense, and the climate system more volatile. It gets worse. Homeowners who lose private insurance are turning to FAIR plans—state-backed programs originally designed as temporary backstops. In California alone, enrolment has more than doubled since 2020. FAIR plans offer less coverage, higher deductibles, and few protections for personal property. They're expensive, incomplete, and dangerously overstretched. But they're all that's left. And because FAIR plans are funded by assessments on private insurers, every loss they take feeds back into the same system that's already retreating. It's a vicious cycle: more risk, more exits, more burden on the few insurers who remain, which leads to… more exits. Add in one more ingredient: population growth. Incredibly, the number of people moving into high-risk areas is growing faster than those leaving. The share of uninsured households is rising even as more homes are being built in harm's way. The implications for housing markets are profound. Without insurance, homes can't get mortgages. Without mortgages, property values collapse. And when homes burn without coverage—as many will—someone pays. Usually, taxpayers. Governments will step in to purchase destroyed properties or prevent rebuilding in zones now understood as climate sacrifice zones. What we're witnessing is the first collapse of a financial market under the weight of climate risk. Not in theory. In real time. The story in California is now echoing across the continent. FAIR plan enrolments are up 54% in Texas and 39% in Oregon. In the U.S. Southwest, drought has pushed fire risk to ten-year highs across Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. In Mexico and Canada, spring fire risk is breaking records. Manitoba has already declared a state of emergency as two people have died, with thousands more evacuated. And it's only June. Behind it all is a term climate scientists now use with chilling precision: hydroclimate whiplash. It's a swinging pendulum weather phenomenon of too-much-then-too-little water. Years of heavy rainfall grow dense vegetation. A sudden drought turns that growth into kindling. Add record temperatures, early snowmelt, and wind—and the landscape becomes a fuse waiting for a spark. The data backs it up. Fire Weather Index anomalies across North America show levels of risk unseen in over a decade. More fires will come. More homes will burn. More markets will break. Here's the deeper problem: fires don't just destroy property, they also emit carbon into the atmosphere. In 2023, Canadian wildfires released more carbon than oil & gas, transportation, buildings, or heavy industry. That carbon accelerates climate change. Which raises temperatures. Which increases drought. Which drives more fires. Which, yes, releases more carbon. That's the feedback loop we've entered. And yet, our policies remain reactive, not preventative. Our markets—home insurance, housing, municipal bonds—are starting to price climate risk faster than our politics can respond. We used to think climate change would hit slowly. But wildfire insurance isn't disappearing slowly. It's collapsing now. And it's showing us a hard truth: markets can adapt faster than governments—but not without consequences. When markets exit, people get left behind. What the wildfire crisis reveals is not just the cost of climate change—but the cost of delay. The systems we rely on—insurance, housing, public finance—weren't built for this. And they're beginning to fail. What comes next will depend on whether we treat this collapse as a warning, or as a preview. Disclaimer: I work for Deep Sky, a carbon removals project developer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store