A handful of European nations mostly filled the gap the US left for Ukraine's aid — at least in dollar terms
With the US not announcing new aid for Ukraine, Europe has stepped up its spending for Kyiv.
A few countries, such as the UK and the Nordics, have led the new surge, per the Kiel Institute.
As a result, Europe's total military aid to Ukraine has now eclipsed America's, the institute said.
Europe has "largely" filled the gap for aid to Ukraine after the US stopped supplying new packages in January, according to a leading organization that tracks the donated assistance.
The Kiel Institute for the World Economy found that in the first four months of 2025, the monthly average amount of all aid to Ukraine increased by 2.4 billion euros, or $2.7 billion, compared to monthly averages from the rest of the war.
Since Russia invaded in February 2022, the West has provided Ukraine with $312 billion worth of aid. Most of that is split between military assistance, such as weapons and ammo, and humanitarian aid, like food and infrastructure support.
The US, by far Ukraine's largest individual donor, previously supplied about half of the West's military aid to Kyiv and about a third of the non-military aid given to Ukraine.
But it has ceased announcing new major packages since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in mid-January. He has tried to negotiate an end to the war with Moscow.
"With US contributions stalled, the key question is whether Europe can fill the gap," the Kiel Institute wrote in its analysis published on Monday. "The latest data suggest that Europe has largely done so, at least in financial terms."
A major spike came in March and April, when the continent allocated a total of 10.4 billion euros in military aid and 9.8 billion euros in humanitarian and financial aid, per the German think-tank.
Kiel analysts found that the European surge was led by the UK, France, and the Nordics, which include Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Finland.
From January to April, the UK spent 4.5 billion euros on Ukraine, partially supplemented by incomes from frozen Russian assets, while France spent 2.2 billion euros. Meanwhile, the Nordics boosted their aid allocation to a combined 5.8 billion euros over the same period.
"As a result, Europe has, for the first time since June 2022, surpassed the US in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros compared to 65 billion euros from the US," wrote Kiel analysts.
European Union institutions, which help to distribute financial aid from their members to Ukraine, also allocated about 12.2 billion euros in non-military assistance during that period.
By contrast, several of Europe's other biggest economies barely increased their contributions.
Kiel analysts wrote that Spain has allocated 10 million euros for Ukraine so far this year, while Italy has earmarked 20 million euros.
Allocations from Germany, one of Ukraine's most stalwart supporters, dropped about 70% to 650 million euros compared to the same period of 2024.
Berlin signaled in the fall of last year that it would cut its 2025 budget for Ukraine by nearly half — from 7.5 billion euros to 4 billion euros — as lawmakers sought to curb loan-taking from the government.
With Germany lacking funds to maintain its aid flow, lawmakers have debated taking from social spending and pensions to avoid accruing further government debt.
Faced with the same looming funding issues, Europe has deliberated over unlocking about $218 billion in Russian assets frozen in its banks. But it's a controversial move, with fears that seizing the funds could undermine the continent's reputation with other big players such as India, China, and Saudi Arabia.
The EU has instead pursued less aggressive initiatives, such as a $50 billion loan to Ukraine using Russian funds and paying Kyiv interest on the frozen assets.
Europe has not, however, outlined a long-term plan to continue supporting Ukraine.
"It remains to be seen whether this is a temporary spike or the beginning of a more lasting shift in Europe's role as the main supporter of Ukraine," said Christoph Trebesch, the head of Kiel's team tracking Ukraine support, in the think-tank's analysis.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
🐐 Cristiano Ronaldo's tribute to Donald Trump
The world is watching the United States these days due to the FIFA Club World Cup dispute. However, there is one figure many people miss: Cristiano Ronaldo. A forward of his caliber and goal-scoring ability would shine in a tournament like this. But he wanted to make a gesture to the country's top leader. Cristiano Ronaldo has sent a signed jersey to Donald Trump with a clear message. "To President Donald J. Trump, playing for peace". A gesture to the 45th and 47th president of the United States. Advertisement Will we see them together at any match of the upcoming FIFA World Cup? This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.


Washington Post
7 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump says he won't call Minnesota Gov. Walz after lawmaker shootings because it would 'waste time'
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he he won't call Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after the targeted shootings of two state lawmakers because it would 'waste time.' One of the lawmakers and her husband were killed. The Republican president spoke to reporters early Tuesday aboard Air Force One as he flew back to Washington after abruptly leaving an international summit in Canada because of rising tensions in the Middle East between Israel and Iran . Asked if he planned to call Walz, Trump said the Democratic governor is 'slick' and 'whacked out' and said, 'I'm not calling him.'
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Issuers must take urgent action against fraud as chargebacks escalate
Recent data shows that issuers and merchants are struggling with rising chargeback abuse. With all indicators pointing to the already considerable problem growing by a further 24% by 2028, financial institutions (FIs) must act or risk losing both customers and profits. According to the Mastercard's 2025 State of Chargebacks report, abuse of chargebacks is a rapidly growing problem, with both merchants and FIs taking a significant hit. And things are about to get worse. Worldwide, issuers and merchants have seen a 10% increase in chargeback volume in the past year. This rise has been driven by a rapid growth in digitization as consumers lean into the convenience of e-commerce. In addition, the ease of disputing transactions at the click of a button has seen FIs in both the US and UK experiencing a 30% to 40% increase in consumer dispute volumes via their digital channels. In fact, the report suggests that over the next five years, global chargebacks volume is set to grow from $261m in 2025 to reach $324m in 2028. For the US, this means chargebacks will total a staggering $20.47bn in just three years. For issuers, the picture looks even bleaker. Globally, only 28% of their chargebacks are legitimate disputes, while a whopping 72% are fraudulent (59% being third-party fraud, while 13% is first-party fraud). One of the biggest challenges facing FIs when it comes to third-party card-not-present (CNP) fraud that fuels chargebacks is aging infrastructure. Legacy systems are limited in their ability to handle this type of fraud due to outdated architectures, fragmented data, and reliance on rigid rule-based detection. Many systems are also still heavily reliant on manual investigation processes. Tracking fraud is another major headache. The same research found that not all FIs track whether the fraud is first-party or third-party. Misclassification and underreporting could lead to inadequate response strategies and higher operational costs, with FIs burdened by time-consuming and expensive investigations. In fact, some FIs report that they need one full-time employee for every $13,000 to $14,000 in incoming annual cardholder disputes. Issuers can attest: first-party fraud is especially hard to pinpoint. What's more, the cardholder's history may show no prior suspicious activity. Responding to a customer dispute by suggesting that they are lying or committing fraud will hardly help FIs maintain good relationships with their hard-won customers. In the US, for instance, FIs and merchants only win around half of their disputes and, in the absence of forensic proof, they are likely to issue the chargeback – even if the suspicions are valid. Many Fis may not be aware what a significant role an effective 3DS program could play in the fight against chargebacks. Stopping fraud at the point of authentication is the low-hanging fruit in reducing the cost of chargebacks. With the right 3DS access control server (ACS) and modern authentication methods, FIs can combat first-party fraud with forensic proof that the transaction was legitimately authenticated. Moreover, they can tackle third-party fraud by simply detecting fraud more effectively – without adding friction. To reduce the impact of first-party fraud, cryptographic device binding technology is able to link each customer's account to a specific device and app, creating a unique digital signature for every transaction. This allows FIs to prove that a transaction was performed from the legitimate user's device, enabling banks to present strong, tamper-proof evidence to refute first-party fraud claims. To battle third-party fraud, 3DS programs that harness risk-based authentication (RBA) and low- or no-friction authentication methods empower FIs to use strong security that improves the cardholder experience and increases transaction success. However, an FI's 3DS approach should be part of a broader, multi-layered fraud prevention strategy that includes context-aware authentication not only to detect fraud across banking and payment channels more effectively, but also to recognise customers across channels to deliver consistent, streamlined experiences. There has never been a more urgent time for FIs to consider how to update their chargeback reduction strategy. 3DS is an under-appreciated tactic in that regard. If issuers or merchants are concerned that fraud prevention will add friction that negatively affects transaction success, they are using the wrong fraud prevention authentication tools. Automated tools and AI learning models can help eliminate overall friction for consumers and improve the digital experience, while also providing more effective fraud detection. With robust authentication and clear transaction context, it becomes possible to dramatically reduce fraud and increase transaction success rates. While chargeback abuse and fraud are persistent challenges, new opportunities are available to issuers to combat increasingly sophisticated attempts in their earliest stages with the right combination of 3DS solutions, risk insights authentication, and modern authentication methods. FIs must act now – failure could risk further eroding already pressured margins, and customers looking to competitors that deliver more secure and user-friendly payment experiences. Frank Moreno is Chief Marketing Officer at "Issuers must take urgent action against fraud as chargebacks escalate" was originally created and published by Electronic Payments International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio