logo
Could Northland's Marsden Point be NZ's first ‘Special Economic Zone'?

Could Northland's Marsden Point be NZ's first ‘Special Economic Zone'?

Scoop3 days ago
Article – RNZ
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones and New Zealand First leader Winston Peters have visited Northland to inspect a jet fuel storage project on the site of the old oil refinery.
, Northland reporter
A 'Special Economic Zone' at Northland's Marsden Point could supercharge the region's – if not the country's – economy, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says.
Jones and New Zealand First leader Winston Peters visited Marsden Point on Tuesday to inspect a jet fuel storage project, while also promoting their vision for encouraging investment around Northland's main port.
Peters said the area could 'easily' become New Zealand's first Special Economic Zone.
It had New Zealand's best deep-water port, was closest to international shipping lanes, and had plenty of land to build on.
'These zones go a step beyond fast-track legislation. The zones will also have tax regimes that appeal to investors, local and international alike.'
Jones said Special Economic Zones already operated in Ireland, Singapore and Croatia.
He said increased depreciation, tax 'holidays' in which companies initially paid no tax, and attractive regulatory regimes could be used to attract large-scale investment in specific areas.
Jones admitted the plan was 'unorthodox' and would not say if it was supported by the party's coalition partners – but he believed bold moves were needed because current efforts to grow the economy were not working.
'The Ruth Richardson bare austerity approach … it's not delivering the economic growth we need. Unless we have these kinds of bespoke initiatives, with tax incentives and self-consenting powers, I fear we're just going to be stuck in a rut talking about the same things year after year … and that's not good enough.'
He said the party wanted to table Special Economic Zone legislation in the coming year, or take the policy to the next election.
Jones was typically provocative when describing how consenting in a Special Economic Zone might work.
'When the zone is created any conditions of an environmental resource management character should be written into the zone. And then, my view is, you just have a couple of engineers in a tin shed somewhere, they can quickly consent things. This business of constipating and protracting all these resource consent processes is making the country broke.'
The Marsden Point zone, if created, could incorporate the former oil refinery site, the proposed Northport extension, and a planned dry dock facility for servicing large vessels such as Navy ships and Cook Strait ferries.
A rail link between the port and Northland's existing railway line was also vital for the development of Marsden Point, Jones said.
Meanwhile, the aviation fuel tank the ministers came to inspect was being constructed by Channel Infrastructure on the former Marsden Point oil refinery site.
Jones said it would boost New Zealand's resilience at a time of increasing geopolitical instability.
Channel chief executive Rob Buchanan said the 30-million-litre tank had previously been used for crude oil and was being adapted for jet fuel at cost of up to $30m, in partnership with Z Energy.
It would hold enough fuel for 10,000 flights between Auckland and Wellington.
Once complete it would increase total storage of jet fuel, petrol and diesel at Marsden Point to about 300 million litres.
Buchanan said it was not the only project bringing life back to the site where oil refining ended in 2022.
'One of the projects we're working on very actively at the moment is repurposing the old refinery into a biorefinery, which could produce diesel and jet fuel. That's with some international partners because it would be a very significant amount of capital investment. It'd be really exciting to bring back manufacturing capacity,' he said.
Buchanan would not say what would be used as the raw material, citing business confidentiality.
A decision as to whether the biorefinery would go ahead was expected next year.
Both Jones and Peters expressed disappointment at the oil refinery's closure, but with the cost of reopening it estimated at $5-7 billion, Jones accepted that was not going to happen.
'We're over that chapter and we have to support new industry and new investment,' he said.
Peters said the Marsden Point rail project, which was part of the coalition agreement, was continuing to make progress.
Almost all the land required had been bought and KiwiRail had completed the design work.
The 19 kilometre rail spur between Oakleigh, south of Whangārei, and Northport had initially been estimated to cost $1 billion.
Peters said he would not accept such a high cost.
In the coming weeks KiwiRail would share its designs, on a confidential basis, with other potential builders, he said.
'We're going to get value for money. And if we don't get it from New Zealanders we'll get it from international competition. That's why I can guarantee you we're not talking about a billion dollars or anything like it.'
Construction had originally been due to begin in late 2026 or early 2027 but Jones said that had been delayed.
The other major project planned for Marsden Point was a dry dock expected to cost $400-500m.
Jones said it would be a public-private partnership part-funded by the Regional Infrastructure Fund.
Shortlisted companies had until May to submit Requests for Proposal. Jones said the government was 'getting closer' to choosing a successful bidder.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What happens if my partner dies without a will?
What happens if my partner dies without a will?

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

What happens if my partner dies without a will?

RNZ money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Got questions? RNZ is launching a new podcast, No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds, next month. We'd love to hear more of your questions about money and the economy. You can send through written questions, like these ones, but - even better - you can drop us a voice memo to our email questions@ What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies without a will? I have been living with my partner since the late 1980s. Our house, main bank accounts and one car are in both names. Our latest car - bought last year from joint bank accounts - could only be registered in his name, due to changes in NZTA rules. I have a separate bank account in my name, which has a small amount of inherited money. He also has a separate bank account with some money from his family and a few shares in his name, which were acquired through his work. Many years ago, I was told that if either of us died, then any assets in joint names would go to the surviving partner. We have not made wills, have no children, my parents have both died and his father has died, but recently, I saw that if someone has a spouse or partner, and parents, but no children, the spouse received the personal effects, $155,000 and two-thirds of what is left. The deceased person's parents get the remaining third. That means, if I die first, all I have goes to him, which is what I want, but if my partner dies before me, does his remaining parent inherit a third of our house (meaning I will need to sell it, as I do not have funds to buy her out in my 60s), plus a third of our two cars, a third of our joint bank account money, and a third of his KiwiSaver, private superannuation, bank accounts, insurance payouts and shares in his name? His mother is in residential care with dementia and already has enough funds to cover her care for decades. I am worried I may become homeless. What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies? As a starting point, it might be re-assuring to note that assets that you hold in a joint name would pass to you, so if you own your house jointly, it would be yours, if your partner died. I went to Public Trust principal trustee Michelle Pope for more detail to answer the rest of your question. She said, when someone died, their estate would be distributed according to the Administration Act. "In the writer's case, if they die first without a will, their entire estate would pass to their partner, as they have no children or surviving parents," she said. "Assets held in joint names, listed by the writer as the house, main bank accounts and a car, will automatically pass to the surviving partner. However, it's important to confirm whether the property is legally owned jointly or in equal/unequal shares. "If it's jointly owned, it will pass by survivorship. If not, the deceased's share will need to be administered as part of their estate, which can add complexity. "If the writer's partner dies first without a will and has a surviving parent, Section 77(3) of the Administration Act 1969 applies. In this scenario, the writer would receive all personal chattels (including the car solely owned by the partner), a prescribed amount of $155,000 plus interest and two-thirds of the remaining estate. "The surviving parent would receive the remaining one-third of the estate. For clarity, the assets owned solely by the partner would appear to be a bank account, some shares, KiwiSaver, private superannuation and insurance. "Given the house is owned jointly, the writer can expect that the house will pass to them by what's called 'survivorship' in legal language and will not form part of their partner's estate. "It goes without saying that I'd encourage the writer and their partner to create wills. A will that clearly outlines their wishes can help remove any uncertainty when a person dies and can make the estate administration process a lot easier for loved ones." Having separated earlier this year, I chose to move out of the family home where my ex still resides. She is paying the mortgage, refuses to pay the house insurance or rates etc. the roof is leaking and she refuses to agree to making repairs, the ceiling is now ruined and mouldy. Though she has indicated she wishes to buy me out, she has not shared any form of offer or plan. She now refuses to engage in any form of correspondence at all. My questions - how do I go about necessary repairs to the house and how do I get her to move out, so that the house can be sold? Online research seems to point to tenancy/landlord situations which don't apply in this case. Is it actually just time for a lawyer to sort this out? Yes, I think the best - and really only - way to deal with this is to go to a lawyer as soon as possible. Can you please answer some questions about the way supermarkets operate. If I deliberately deceive customers, it's called deception. If I deliberately load, unload prices to make you think you are getting a better deal when you are not, this is manipulation to enhance your profit. Surely both of the above are profiteering and fraudulent. Supermarkets - and all retailers - have rules they have to comply with, when it comes to discounting, and it is illegal for businesses to mislead shoppers about prices. You can complain to the Commerce Commission, if you think someone has got it wrong. There is a lot of focus on supermarket pricing at the moment and Consumer NZ has been vocal about the current regime not being effective enough. It is calling for tougher penalties and infringement notice powers. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

'A bit like Star Trek': Politicians take City Rail Link test run
'A bit like Star Trek': Politicians take City Rail Link test run

1News

time21 hours ago

  • 1News

'A bit like Star Trek': Politicians take City Rail Link test run

There's been another milestone in Auckland's City Rail Link with people from outside the project allowed on an underground test run for the first time. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon was aboard along with senior ministers, city leaders and other officials. The train journey started at the revamped Maungawhau Station and headed into a tunnel to arrive at Waitematā or Britomart Station. "We were just saying it's a bit like Star Trek, warp speed up there the way the tunnel is lit," Luxon said after standing with the driver. City Rail Link's first test train. (Source: ADVERTISEMENT Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown stayed seated and chatting with the Finance Minister during the trip and maybe didn't see the warp speed lighting. "We don't really see exactly what we've got here just yet, but it's good, this is a good step in the direction," he told RNZ. In a speech before getting on the train, Brown said getting to today had not been cheap or easy, with Auckland enduring a decade of construction that has been tough. He warned future projects needed to be done better and faster and could not be done on what costs were now. There have been more than 1600 test train runs in the new City Rail Link tunnels so far. Vince Ahkuoi was the driver. "I haven't driven a train that is that important, I don't think," he said. ADVERTISEMENT Today showed just how far the City Rail Link had come, another driver Grant Dowie said. He said test trains had run more than 5000km since February and 50 drivers had been trained. "And if you think that the tunnel is only 3.5km long, to get over 5000km of test running we've been running backwards and forwards multiple times," he told RNZ. He said the VIP test train on Friday showed that testing had done its job, but there was still much more to do. "We started at walking pace, and then we went to 3km [an hour] and then we went to 10km and then we went to 25 and then 40," he said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at the City Rail Link's first test train. (Source: Trains now run at 70km/h and a key test was making sure the trains actually fit. ADVERTISEMENT "I know it's a silly thing but in other parts of the world there have been situations where they've built a tunnel and then the trains didn't fit," Dowie said. "I know people are thinking 'well why aren't we opening the tunnel' but it's a journey that we have to go through to make sure it's safe before we open." City Rail Link officials are hailing Friday's VIP test run as a milestone but say there is still a long way to go before the public can have its turn. CRL chief executive Patrick Brockie said testing and commissioning was the most complex part of the $5.5 billion project. "There is still a lot of work to do before we know when exactly passengers will ride," he said. Several politicians attended City Rail Link's first test train. (Source: Another on the train, Finance Minister Nicola Willis was happy with what she saw. "The feeling I have is it looks like when you're overseas and you go in a proper underground subway and that's an experience many New Zealanders have had and now they can have it here in Auckland," she said.

Long-Term Investment Is Guaranteed Lotto ‘Win'
Long-Term Investment Is Guaranteed Lotto ‘Win'

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Long-Term Investment Is Guaranteed Lotto ‘Win'

Article – RNZ The odds of winning Lotto First Division are about one-in-3.84 million and Powerball is even less likely., Money Correspondent The money you're putting aside for your Lotto ticket could give you an almost certain $100,000 windfall. Lotto's Powerball is rolling over for a $20 million prize on Saturday, but while statistics show we spend a combined more than $700 million a year on Lotto products, investment experts say people might be missing out on a prize that they are much more likely to achieve. The odds of winning Lotto First Division are about one-in-3.84 million per line. Powerball is even less likely – at about one-in-38 million. On the other hand, if you put money away each week, fortnight or month, the power of compounding will deliver you a solid return, given time. Hamilton Hindin Greene investment advisor Grant Davies calculated the outcome for someone investing $25 a week over 45 years at just over $58,000, without any investment returns. If they received an after-tax and after-fee return of 4.5 percent, compounding weekly, they would grow their investment to $189,785. Adjusting for inflation, both in the weekly contribution and the future value of the investment, the investor would end up with about $160,000. 'The allure of Lotto is that big win and the hope that comes along with it,' Davies said. 'That's why people do it, but if you start to do the maths, it often doesn't stack up quite so well. 'The thing about compounding interest is that it does take a long time for small amounts to build up, but once they do build up, that's when you start to see the real benefit. 'Over 45 years, it's not until you get to the final 20 years that you see the real effects of compounding start to play out. 'That's part of the human condition – we're maybe more tuned to the short-term dopamine hit than the long-term one.' Over a long time horizon, he said most investments should perform, 'but when you're only dealing with small numbers at the beginning, it's hard to see that result at the end'. Hatch managing director Waimarie Marks said she knew people who spent a lot more than $25 a week on Lotto. 'I think it's because it's a habit they can't break,' she said. 'Although there is so much literature out there about the benefits of investing and compounding growth etc, the 'hit' of potentially striking big likely draws them in. 'I will say, though, an upside of Lotto is the good work this money can do in the community.' Koura KiwiSaver founder Rupert Carlyon said a big win was more alluring than a slow and steady return. 'Even though you know that it is a one-in-38 million chance of winning, you think maybe you will be that person. 'It's the same as a capital gains tax. Most people would benefit from it, yet it still polls negatively, because people think that one day they will benefit from a capital gain that they want to have tax free. 'Lotto are currently going through a process where they add an extra number. This will reduce the odds and allows them to offer bigger prizes. 'Their research is showing them that bigger prizes will mean more tickets sold. Unfortunately, it is human psychology. 'We love big numbers and love to believe we will be the lucky ones, despite what the logic says.' Fisher Funds chief executive Ana-Marie Lockyer, said it was behavioural economics. 'You only need to watch Lotto's latest TV ads to understand it isn't just about the money – it's about your dreams coming true overnight. 'The prospect of winning millions offers an immediate emotional payoff that saving or investing can't match, even though the odds of a big win are extremely low. 'Gambling a relatively small amount each week feels harmless and the occasional small win keeps people going back for more. 'Saving or investing, on the other hand, doesn't offer the same excitement, because the payoff is usually a long way off, and it's seen as complex and only for wealthy people. 'Most people don't realise investing $25 a week into a balanced KiwiSaver fund earning 3.5 percent a year for 10 years could add up to $15,500. 'We need to change those perceptions, so investing is seen as the best way of achieving those same dreams.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store