logo
Gov. Green heading to D.C., hopes Hawaii can avoid tariffs

Gov. Green heading to D.C., hopes Hawaii can avoid tariffs

Yahoo19-05-2025

HONOLULU (KHON2) — Hawaii Governor Josh Green is headed to Washington, D.C., on Monday, May 19, hoping to convince the President to ease tariff impacts on the islands.
'Hawaii does not want tariffs in general, and our small businesses don't need them,' Gov. Green said of his upcoming trip. 'Again, that's something I'll try to impress upon the President, and I have already spoken with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week or two weeks ago, and I think it will settle down.'
Businesses doing what they can as effects from tariffs expected to hit soon
This comes just days after the University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization released a forecast that projected a mild recession due to federal policies.
'If the tariffs do cause a slowdown, we could see two or three quarters of recession, and that would affect us because if travelers don't travel, if they don't come to Hawaii, we're seeing a kind of a little dip right now in international travel. It, of course, could hurt our bottom line,' Gov. Green said.
The Governor is also encouraging Canadians to consider policy differences between the state and federal governments.
'I wanna say to Canadians out there, I love you guys. I love Rush, and I love hockey. Please keep coming to Hawaii. We are not a part of that discussion.'
Another aspect of his trip will be speaking to lawmakers at the Homeland Security Committee's discussion about vaccinations. He also hopes to lobby for avoiding Medicare cuts, which have been a prominent part of Republican negotiations in the House of Representatives.'Right now, they're litigating whether or not the COVID response was authentic and whether it was needed,' Gov. Green said. 'I'm going to follow five individuals that have been called by the majority, and then I'm going to rebut their testimony and talk about what we saw in Hawaii, how we came together, how we were careful with mask wearing. Vaccinations were at ninety percent in Hawaii versus eighty percent, with the lowest mortality rate. We protected our kupuna. So, I'll be sharing that information, and we'll probably talk about vaccinations in general.'
More issues with the federal government were recently decided on, when the state's land board rejected the U.S. Army's extension of its lease of the Pohakuloa Training Area on the Big Island, leaving the future of the military's training in Hawaiʻi unclear.
'We have to have the right environmental assessment,' Gov. Green said. 'That's why our Department of Land and Natural Resources folks felt that it was an inadequate assessment. That sends us to the next stage, which is how can we negotiate possibly a land swap that is beneficial to Hawaii. My feeling is there should be a smaller footprint overall, which is possible now with added technology. We do care deeply about our security presence in the Pacific. We also care deeply about the Aina. And most importantly, we care about our people, which is, in this case, the Hawaiian people who will feel that we've not been thoughtful about them or their history if we don't cut the right kind of agreement. So all those things are in play. We have to be careful because now we as we go to a possible land transfer or land swap discussion, we still have to be mindful of the environment, and we also have to make sure that we don't have the federal government just completely roll over us and take the land, through eminent domain. So this is a complicated one.'
Check out more news from around Hawaii
The Army's land leases on Pohakuloa Training Area, Kahuku, Makua and Poamoho are currently set to expire in 2029.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?
Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?

The President of the United States of America and one of the world's most influential billionaires are at odds after months of collaboration. The confrontation escalated Thursday with Elon Musk saying Trump would have lost the election without him in a post on X. President Donald Trump in turn referred to his former senior advisor as "the man who lost his mind" in a Friday morning ABC News phone interview. Republican Trump allies are now also speaking out against Musk. Musk's breakup with the administration has been public and is well-documented, with Trump and the Tesla CEO trading calculated jabs like pro boxers. The underlying reason behind the sudden intense feud is a serious cause of concern for some American car buyers. "Clean Coal" has been a popular buzzword for not one but two presidential campaigns for Donald Trump. So, Elon Musk's initial choice to stand beside a global warming skeptic as the CEO of a clean energy and automotive company was puzzling to say the least. At first, Musk's involvement with the administration was seen by many as mutually beneficial, since the CEO could potentially reap the benefits of government contracts for Tesla and SpaceX. The general public quickly soured to the idea of the eccentric CEO playing a key role in the administration. By April 8, Tesla stock had nosedived 41.50% from its January 2 share price. Tesla dealers have been attacked and vandalized while other Americans have staged peaceful protests against Musk's involvement in government and role at the Department of Government Efficiency. So, why would a guy who once wore a "Trump Was Right About Everything" hat suddenly publicly oppose his new bill? The short answer is, the two don't see eye to eye on the automotive industry's most controversial powertrain option. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill could decimate Tesla. President Donald Trump's stance and actions against EV adoption in America includes: Supporting the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, which suggests phasing out a federal EV tax credit that would benefit thousands of Tesla buyers Claiming former President Joe Biden's EV mandate "would kill 40% of the auto industry's jobs", according to Ordering the shut down of many federal electric vehicle chargers and pausing massive federal EV fleet purchases, according to Elon Musk (and Tesla's) stance and actions for EV adoption in America: Elon Musk bio says "Tesla's mission has been to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy" Musk claimed "the world does need electric cars" during a 60 Minutes interview and factory tour, asserting that Tesla has a crucial role in the future of EVs Tesla has collaborated with Ford, GM, Stellantis, Rivian, Volkswagen, Honda, Acura, Hyundai, Kia, Toyota and more to provide Tesla Supercharger access to EVs, making them easier to charge for American drivers Tesla stock recently plummeted in response to the feud between Trump and Musk. The President has also threatened Musk's government contracts amidst the dispute. The bill appears to be the focal point of the rift, but the two clearly have different ideas on what America's future should be. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may have been able to join forces over their mutual stances on certain conservative points and a hatred of bureaucracy, but their White House tag team was short-lived. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill directly undermines some of the actions Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have taken since the two united. Trump is 78 years old and expresses a desire to bring America back to a golden age of manufacturing before globalism outsourced American jobs and created a reliance on foreign trade. He also speaks about returning the country to an age where mining and drilling for fossil fuel production were prioritized over environmental concerns. Musk, on the other hand, is a 53-year-old futurist who strives to make humans a multi-planetary species and has made a fortune from innovation and technological disruption. At a glance, the issue seems to be about the One, Big, Beautiful Bill attacking Tesla's bottom line but the two polarizing figures are fundamentally different in terms of future aspirations. Based on Trump's falling out with several former members of the first Trump administration and Musk's known adversarial nature in the private sector, this could be the end for, arguably, the most fascinating duo of 2025. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump vs Elon Musk: Could Tesla, EVs be at the art of the feud?

U.S. Trade Officials to Meet with China on June 9
U.S. Trade Officials to Meet with China on June 9

Business Insider

time38 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

U.S. Trade Officials to Meet with China on June 9

Yesterday, President Trump said that his phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping resulted in a ' very positive conclusion ' with plans for representatives from both sides to hold another round of trade talks. That conversation will come sooner than later. Confident Investing Starts Here: Today, Trump announced that Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet with Chinese representatives on Monday, June 9 in London. 'The meeting should go very well,' said Trump in a Truth Social post. U.S.-China Tensions Ease ahead of Talks Last month, both the U.S. and China agreed to lower their tariffs on each other by 115% in a preliminary trade deal, among other measures. A few weeks later, Trump accused China of violating the deal, with accusations such as continuing to restrict the flow of rare earth elements.

Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners
Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners

Jun. 6—For now, the Ohio Senate is going along on an Ohio House plan to make county coroners appointed by county commissioners instead of being elected by county voters. But, while the Senate didn't change the House's proposal in its initial draft of the state's two-year operating budget, Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, told reporters that there's still a chance the Senate could eliminate the House's proposal when it amends the budget next week. McColley said he put a request out for those in his caucus with strong feelings on the matter to weigh in. "If members feel strongly that it should go back to the way that it is under current law, then there's a possibility to see an amendment here in the omnibus," McColley told this news outlet. "We didn't see a lot of members — we saw some — but we didn't see a lot of members asking for it to be changed back." The Senate is expected to make those amendments on Wednesday or Thursday of next week. The change could be consequential in counties where county commissioners and the coroner are different political parties. In Montgomery County, for example, the elected coroner is a Republican while Democrats hold two of the three seats on the county commission. The House's primary advocate for the change, county commissioner-turned-lawmaker Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, has framed the change as necessary to solve a scarcity issue. "It's really hard to find folks that want to serve as a coroner at all, it's even harder to find folks who are willing to be the coroner and want to run a political campaign to do so," Stewart said in April. But the proposed change is opposed by Ohio State Coroners Association, whose Executive Director David Corey told this outlet that he's still hopeful that former coroners in the Ohio Senate, like Sen. Matt Huffman, R-Tipp City, will help the Senate reverse course. "Commissioners already have the authority to appoint a physician to be coroner if no one runs," Corey said. "So they already have this authority — so why subject this as a blanket on everyone?" Corey noted that commissioners also already have the authority to contract out with different county coroner offices if there's no elected coroner and the commission cannot find an in-county physician that wants to be appointed. "We don't really know what (problem) the House is trying and the Senate are trying to fix ... other than chipping away at other elected officials," Corey said. Corey said the idea is "wrought with potential problems," and speculated that coroners appointed by commissioners might be more beholden to those officials than they are to the public. He said appointees could also be fired at will, which would make it harder for a coroner to stand up to the commission in budget negotiations or other high-stakes situations. "We just think it's a horrible precedent," Corey said. Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, whose home county of Cuyahoga is one of two counties in the state where the position is already appointed following a local vote, told this outlet that she didn't like the sound of applying the idea to every coroner in the state. "You want the coroner to feel like they can have a lot of pressure on them," Antonio said. "If they're appointed, then it's almost like they have an affiliation to the person that appointed them." She said this could lead to undue influence. "I think we, probably in the long run, would be better off continuing to have them be elected," Antonio said. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store