Northern Policy Institute surveying northern Ontarians about immigration, personal wellbeing
People in Sudbury, Timmins, North Bay, Sault Ste. Marie and Thunder Bay might also receive phone calls from pollster Environics this spring asking them more about immigration.
It's part of the policy institute's annual Measurement Month, which tracks attitudes and experiences of people in the region so that the institute can use the data to evaluate programs, said Charles Cirtwill, the institute's CEO.
"For example, when [Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada] launched … the Rural and Northern Immigration Pilot, one of the things they wanted to do was see a positive uptick in the attitudes toward immigrants," Cirtwill explained.
"And so by having these surveys going on at the same time, we're able to kind of say whether or not that attitude tracked with the increased investment and the increased awareness of immigration."
The institute launched Measurement Month in 2021 because the north is so large, and its population is so dispersed that data gathered by Statistics Canada frequently has too many gaps in it to be useful, Cirtwill explained.
While measurement month typically occurs in February, this year's got off to a late start – the surveys were posted Feb. 21 – and will extend into March.
The telephone poll will occur in May.
The annual initiative includes a survey of employers' feelings about the economy and their plans to hire new staff.
It includes surveys for the general public about personal wellbeing and attitudes toward immigration.
It also includes surveys about the experiences of newcomers and the experiences of racial minorities when it comes to racism.
This will be the third time Environics has polled people in the north about their attitudes toward immigration since Measurement Month began in 2021, Cirtwill said.
The previous two surveys carried out in 2021 and 2023 show a slight decrease in positive regard for immigration.
In 2021, 82 per cent of northern Ontarians said immigration had a positive effect on their community.
That had dropped to 77 per cent in 2023.
The number of people who believed that there was too much immigration to Canada rose from 26 to 30 per cent during the same time frame.
The number of people who believed that immigrants take jobs from other Canadians dropped from 22 to 19 per cent.
Some of the most significant drops in positive regard for immigration happened in Sudbury, where the number of people who felt that immigration was good for Canada fell from 87 to 77 per cent.
On the other hand, Thunder Bay bucked the regional trend by posting increased positive regard for immigration across nearly every metric.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
'Great relief': After uncertainty, Canadian Harvard students anticipating return this fall
Thomas Mete says he is feeling "great relief" now that he knows he'll be returning to Harvard University to finish the last year of his degree, after a tumultuous summer of limbo. "I can't wait to be back in Cambridge," the fourth-year economics student said in an interview from Montreal this week. Mete is among hundreds of Canadians who expect to be back at the Massachusetts-based Ivy League school in the fall after United States President Donald Trump's administration wreaked uncertainty earlier this year. Harvard enrolled nearly 6,800 international students from more than 100 countries in the fall of 2024. According to the university's fact book, 751 of those new students were Canadian. The only country from which more students joined Harvard was China. Mete told The Canadian Press that he was picking up his brother from school in Ridgeway, Ont., when he learned in May that Trump's government was moving to block international students from studying at Harvard. At the time, it was "a complete shock," he said. "There was just a sense of fear of not being able to go back, and I think that was overwhelming for me and a lot of my other Canadian friends and international students," he recalled. "There was this idea we weren't going to be able to go back and my senior year wasn't going to start. ... I had a whole life in Cambridge that was sort of put on pause." Mete said the questions over his own future were a "heavy burden" to carry as the political battle over international students seized the American news cycle. "It was just a shame that politics had to get involved with higher education and Harvard specifically. It was never something I thought of when I applied to college," he said. "I hope (this is) going to be a great year and that there aren't any more bumps in the road." Since the spring, Harvard has been locked in a battle with the Trump administration after rejecting a list of federal demands calling for sweeping changes to campus governance, hiring and admissions with a view to limiting activism on campus. The feud has included an investigation into alleged campus antisemitism, the slashing of more than $2.6 billion in research funding and the end of several federal contracts. In late May, the situation escalated further as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a letter saying it would not allow international students to study at Harvard. The letter accused the university of creating an unsafe campus environment by allowing "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators" to assault Jewish students. The next day, Harvard filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Boston that challenged the Trump administration's decision, calling it an unconstitutional retaliation for defying the White House's political demands and saying the move violated the First Amendment that protects fundamental rights. In June, a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction stopping the policy from taking effect, and Harvard announced it would continue enrolling international students as the case moved forward. The administration signalled last week in court documents associated with the lawsuit that it does not intend to enforce its May letter. The documents dated Aug. 6 say the department agrees the letter will not be used to revoke Harvard's status as an entity that can enrol international or exchange students. Meanwhile, The Associated Press and New York Times reported Wednesday that Harvard and the Trump administration were getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations. Jared Gaffe, who is also gearing up to return to Harvard in a few weeks for his final year of law school, said there was a great deal of confusion amid initial reports that international students could be blocked from attending Harvard. He said he planned to "follow the guidance of the university" as much as possible. For now, he added, the school is telling students like him that they "should be fine" to return to the U.S. "I sort of feel resigned to the fact that there's pretty much nothing I can do to change the situation," Gaffe said. Harvard University pointed The Canadian Press to its prior statements about the situation facing international students. In several communications to its community this year, the school has stated that it intends to comply with U.S. laws while upholding university policies. "We will continue to do all that we can to ensure that our international community can continue to research, study, work and thrive at Harvard," it said in an update to students last month. During this summer's uncertainty, Harvard announced several contingency plans should international students be unable to get back into the country. One was an agreement between Havard and the University of Toronto, which agreed in June to host graduate students enrolled at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government at its Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy. U of T declined to answer questions about whether any of Harvard's foreign students enrolled at the Munk School.
Toronto Star
5 hours ago
- Toronto Star
U.S. aims to rewrite history and the CUSMA , which doesn't bode well for Canada
What on earth has gotten into those Canadians? The United States, specifically Donald Trump, has 'done nothing but treat them with the utmost respect.' The Trump administration has 'protected the integrity' of its trade deal with Canada, but the Canadians have tossed that aside and decided that 'the guardrails are off.' Frankly, it's hurtful. The U.S. sees Canada as a partner and ally but Canadians, for reasons that are really hard to understand, are angry. In fact, they've become 'vindictive' towards their neighbour to the south. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
Vancouver Sun
5 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
The dangers of Canada leaving its digital sovereignty in American hands
Canadians are waking up to just how much power American tech companies have over their digital life. In April, Microsoft confirmed that U.S. law can override foreign privacy protections, even for data stored on servers outside the United States. That means if Canadian data is hosted by Microsoft, Amazon or Google, it can be accessed by U.S. authorities. For Guillaume Beaumier, an assistant professor of political science and international studies at École nationale d'administration publique (ENAP) in Quebec City, it's a clear sign Canada needs to take digital sovereignty seriously. In a recent Policy Options article, he argues that Canada has grown too dependent on U.S. cloud providers and tech infrastructure, and risks losing control over its economy, governance and security in the digital era. National Post spoke to Beaumier about what digital sovereignty means and what steps Canada should be taking now. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. I think you can define digital sovereignty in multiple ways, and that's the issue with the concept. It can relate to the ability of the Canadian government to control its own digital ecosystem through regulation, and having the availability to force or influence companies to act in certain ways. It's also, to some extent, the ability to have the economic independence to be able to produce digital services for Canadian citizens, in ways that are not dependent on having access to services coming from other places in the world. It can also relate more broadly to the security of the nation. If you're depending on other countries for accessing specific digital services, in times of crisis, you can end up in a position where you don't have access to the services, and so the broader security of the country also depends on having the ability to produce the services on your own. For a very long time the United States has been using its control over the digital infrastructure around the world, so a lot of the digital services that we rely on are American companies and they also rely on physical infrastructures that are located in the United States. You can think of data centres in that regard. And so, for a very long time, we were fine with it, we forgot that other countries like Russia or China, might have used this control over this digital ecosystem to its advantage, to survey the world, to sometimes even impede other countries. You can see again what happened after the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, where Microsoft stopped offering some of its services in Russia. And so, like I said, for a while most countries around the world would have been fine with that, especially western countries because we were allied countries with the United States, even sometimes collaborating with them. But as the (Donald) Trump administration came in and took a more coercive approach towards its traditional allies, it's also making these countries more insecure about their dependence on the United States. I think that we do lack, to a large extent, sufficient capacity to operate on our own, to have a digital ecosystem that can function without American companies. And so, if you think about our digital ecosystem, most social media platforms, if not all, are American companies. If you think about data centres, the main ones that are operating right now and that we rely on, are either in the United States or are owned by American companies on Canadian soil. On the regulatory side, we have also seen the government struggling over the years, to enforce its own regulations, or to even want to regulate these platforms. So we threaten these companies, Google and Meta, to basically leave the country. More recently, the government decided to move back on this decision to impose digital services taxes, and it's an example of where the Canadian government seems to be struggling, because it relies primarily on American companies. So to summarize what I just said, I think just this lack of the ability to offer basic digital services by Canadian companies is one of the big gaps right now. In times of crisis, they can be used as leverage against the Canadian government, so like during this trade negotiation, they can threaten to stop offering some services to Canada. There's also the risk that when the government tries to regulate these companies, they can just threaten to exit the country. You can see in the example of Meta blocking news because of being asked to share the revenue with news organizations. This has left our media ecosystem in a worse-off position. And in times where there are forest fires or other emergencies, information can be more difficult to access by citizens. I think there should be a strategy to invest and develop more national digital ecosystems, to reduce the reliance on American companies. It also should not shy away from regulating these big tech companies and level the playing field for Canadian companies. Basically, making sure they are being taxed, and that they contribute to the national economy. Also, promoting the use of more open source software, in public administration and the digital ecosystem, could help reduce reliance on big tech companies, and prioritize the development of more digital expertise in Canada. When you're thinking of all the big projects the government wants to launch, like big national infrastructure projects, I think it would be a good moment to invest in having more data centres owned by Canadian companies, funded by the government. With the new investments coming in the defence sector, some money could go towards the development of artificial intelligence (AI). I think this broad national plan to invest in Canadian digital capacities would be an essential thing to do in the years to come. I think we just need to find a balance between still being open, we still want to rely on the valuable services that come from the United States, and elsewhere in the world, but to ensure our resilience in times of crisis, and have some basic capacities to function without the use of these services coming from the rest of the world. This is the latest in a National Post series on How Canada Wins. Read earlier instalments here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
