Labour minister pressed on dad Neil Kinnock's benefit demand in awkward TV exchange
Neil Kinnock's minister son faced an awkward grilling over his dad's demand that the two child benefit cap is scrapped.
Care minister Stephen Kinnock was repeatedly asked about his father's comments - made in an interview with the Sunday Mirror. The former Labour leader, who was at the helm from 1983 to 1992, said at the weekend: "I would want them to do it (abolish the cap). They may not be able to do it all at once, but I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids, fewer, are in poverty."
BBC Breakfast host Jon Kay asked the junior Mr Kinnock what his views were - but he pointedly declined to say. The minister said: "Obviously decisions like that have major financial implications. They are a matter for the Chancellor. She will be bringing forward the budget in October. It comes after Gordon Brown blasts the return of 'poverty of 60 years ago' as he makes one big demand.
READ MORE: UK facing 'dire' domestic abuse crisis with thousands of victims 'trapped'
"So I'm sure you'd agree, it would be wrong for me to start speculating about the Budget at this time." Mr Kay pressed: "But if you are having a chat with your dad, would you say he's right or wrong?"
Mr Kinnock responded: "You've invited me onto this program as a government minister, and I am saying very clearly to you, that any decisions which have financial implications, major financial implications for the government, are a matter for the Chancellor and the Prime Minister and the Cabinet, and nobody else."
The Government is facing growing pressure to axe the two-child benefit limit - one of the most severe cuts to the welfare state by austerity Chancellor George Osborne. Lord Kinnock senior said doing so would be the "immediate and direct way of trying to correct the conditions the government inherited".
The policy, which restricts Universal Credit and Child Tax Credits to the first two children, has been blamed by charities for trapping kids in poverty. The former Labour leader said tackling child poverty - among other issues facing the country - could be paid for by a tax on the assets of the super-rich or a hike in levies on the top 1%.
He told The Mirror: "I think people would see the justification of increasing taxes on assets and the very, very highly paid - I'm talking about the top 1% - in order to make the transfer directly to reduce child poverty.
"I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that." Lord Kinnock has previously said a 2% levy on asset values over £10million - a "very big fortune" - could bring in around £11billion for the Treasury. He added: "The thing is we live in a fair country where the instincts are fair, so people approve of the idea of the broadest backs bearing the heaviest burden.
"Of course the very rich do make a substantial contribution. It's not enough. And it hasn't kept pace with the increase in their asset wealth. Simple and straightforward as that."
Earlier this year official figures showed a record 4.5million children living in poverty. Pressed on what this said about the state of the nation, Lord Kinnock said: "All you've got to do is reflect where we were under Gordon Brown's government when they cut child poverty gigantically by millions. In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious.
"It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help."
Keir Starmer has previously vowed to slash the number of kids living in poverty. And Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who is leading the child poverty task force alongside Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, has suggested ending the two-child benefit limit remains on the table.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Raising VAT rates would let Rachel Reeves fill budget black hole and enable growth
Tax rises appear increasingly likely. Polly Toynbee discusses some possible tax changes, including VAT (Both left and right agree taxes must rise. Time for Labour to get creative, 12 August). My view is that a 2.5 percentage point rise in the average VAT rate is the most viable option to raise sufficient revenue without reducing growth. Toynbee also discusses possible changes to inheritance tax and the introduction of a wealth tax. These policies may be redistributive but are unlikely to raise substantial revenue. As an example, Norway currently imposes a wealth tax that raises less than 3% of its non-petroleum tax revenue. Given the urgent need for revenue, a VAT raise is likely to be the UK's best option. First, VAT raises significant revenue, at about 17% of total UK tax revenue. This means that a 2.5 percentage point increase may raise as much as £21bn yearly. This is roughly five times more than what it is expected the government will raise from the stricter taxation of non-domiciles. Second, VAT poses limited harm to growth. Since it also applies to people who are outside the labour market, it dampens work incentives less than income taxes do. A VAT rise may partially replace the government's failure to reform disability benefits. In addition, increases in VAT do not reduce incentives to save, as costs go up by the same ratio today and in the future. And third, VAT can be quite progressive. While new savings are unaffected, old savings that people spend in the future are subject to VAT increases. Most importantly, while the VAT rate is flat, using the revenue to support public services disproportionally benefits the poor. This means that raising sufficient revenue may be most important for BergLecturer, Trinity College, University of Cambridge Anent Polly Toynbee's tax suggestions for Labour, if it regains its heart, may I add two. The best taxes not only raise money but also do societal good. So why not use one to address climate, inequity and safety issues, by taxing cars by their weight and annual mileage as reported at the MOT test? Both relate directly to their energy SeatonEmeritus professor of environmental medicine, University of Aberdeen
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
East Kilbride Labour leader rallies town to ‘win our future back' ahead of Holyrood election
Joe Fagan said Scottish politics was not working for the Scottish people and called for new ideas to make East Kilbride 'new' again. Labour's candidate to become East Kilbride's next MSP rallied supporters to 'win the town's future back' – ramping up the campaign for the Holyrood election next year. Addressing supporters from the local Labour Party and beyond at East Kilbride Arts Centre, Joe Fagan said Scottish politics "was not working for the Scottish people" and called for new ideas to "make East Kilbride 'new' again" and put the Scottish Parliament back to work for Scotland. Rallying supporters, Fagan said: 'East Kilbride is where I live, where I grew up, where I went to school, where I first joined a trade union. It's the place I fight for week-in, week-out as a councillor and a local leader. It would be an honour to speak for my home town in the Scottish Parliament. And I promise then I when I speak for East Kilbride, we will not be ignored.' The East Kilbride MSP seat has been held by SNP MSP Collette Stevenson since 2021. Fagan is the councillor for East Kilbride Central North and Leader of Labour in South Lanarkshire. He grew up in St Leonards and East Mains and attended St Bride's High School. Analysing the problems facing the town, he said: 'East Kilbride is Scotland's first and most successful New Town, built on the promise of good jobs and good homes, where generations of working people came to make a better life and give a better start to their families. Many still do. The town is still growing. But it's not new anymore. 'East Kilbride was disfigured by the privatisation of our most important assets – our industrial estates and our town centre – when the Development Corporation was wound up by the Major Government 30 years ago. East Kilbride lost something of its identity when the Tories abolished our district council, as many suburban towns did, but few with as strong a sense of place or civic pride as East Kilbride. 'East Kilbride lost something of its community when the real consequence of the Right to Buy set in, unprecedented growth in a transient private rented sector now larger than the social rented sector in many of our most established communities. East Kilbride lost industries we built through the New Town years as the world changed and industrial policy was neglected. 'East Kilbride lost out to austerity as years of government funding cuts to councils deprived us of the resources we need to invest in the fabric of our town and in the quality of people's lives." East Kilbride and Strathaven MP Joani Reid; candidate for the neighbouring Clydesdale constituency, Lynsey Hamilton; and summer by-election winner Davy Russell MSP all joined the event to back East Kilbride Labour's campaign. Scottish Labour aim to build on their momentum following their win in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election in constituencies across South Lanarkshire. Fagan added: 'I don't believe that the forces driving decline are unstoppable. I'm here to push back against them. I believe that the choices we make matter. The choices governments make matter. With the most consequential Scottish election in years almost here, it's time to make East Kilbride matter.' In a rallying call to supporters and undecided voters across the town, Fagan called for today's generation to 'win' the town's future back, saying: 'In 1947, East Kilbride was designated a New Town by the post-war Labour Government - a government and a generation with the vision to build the welfare state, to build industry, to build a National Health Service and to build a New Town for the future. Now it is for this generation to win our future back. 'New homes. New jobs. A new town centre. A new public transport system run for passengers, not for profit. A new deal for councils. A new deal for workers. New leadership for our NHS. New ambition for our schools. New direction for our country. Building back for East Kilbride. Fighting back for East Kilbride. Labour's leading the way - and it's the way to make this New Town new again.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Sadiq Khan continues his feud with Donald Trump by claiming US President could be 'radicalising dangerous people'
Sir has continued his bitter feud with Donald Trump by claiming the US President is 'not a force for good' and could be 'inadvertently radicalising people'. During his visit to Scotland last month, Mr Trump branded the London mayor a 'nasty person' who has 'done a terrible job' in his latest blast at the Labour politician. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Sir Sadiq dismissed the US President's jibes as 'water off a duck's back'. The London mayor added he sometimes felt like he was 'nine years old again' and 'in the school playground'. He told the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. 'Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' Sir Sadiq said records showed, since the middle of January this year - when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House - and last month, 'there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London'. 'So I think Americans have got good taste by and large,' he continued. He also said he hoped Mr Trump would come to London during his state visit to the Britain next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the 'diversity' of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness'. 'I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer,' the London mayor added. 'And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous. 'He inadvertently - I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately - he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.' Sir Sadiq voiced fears that minorities 'could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA' as he accused Mr Trump of 'using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war'. He added: 'On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good.' But the London mayor insisted that he would be 'more than happy to meet President Trump'. He said he would seek to show him that it is 'possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three-headed monsters'. He said: 'I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way. 'What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe. 'So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so.' There has been a long-running feud between Sir Sadiq and Mr Trump, who previously called the London mayor a 'stone cold loser' in 2019. This came after Sir Sadiq allowed a giant inflatable 'Trump baby' blimp to coincide with the US President's state visit that year. In 2016, Mr Trump challenged Sir Sadiq to an IQ test after Mr Khan said his views on Islam were 'ignorant'.
