2025 MG HS Super Hybrid: Long-range PHEV priced from $52,990 drive-away
MG Motor Australia has confirmed pricing for its two-variant
MG HS Super Hybrid PHEV
range, ahead of its arrival in Australian showrooms in September.
'Tuned specifically for Australia driving habits,' the plug-in hybrid (PHEV) version of the
second-generation MG HS
launched in September 2024 will compete with existing plug-in hybrid (PHEV) mid-size SUVs, as well the next-generation
Toyota RAV4
, the replacement for Australia's top-selling SUV that will arrive here next year with PHEV power for the first time. MG will also release the conventional
MG HS Hybrid+
to compete with the popular RAV4 Hybrid.
The front-wheel drive MG HS Super Hybrid will be offered in Excite and Essence trims in Australia – with prices starting from $52,990 drive-away for the former and $55,990 drive-away for the latter. That marks a $16,000 premium over the equivalent HS 1.5T FWD.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal.
Browse now
.
For reference, the
BYD Sealion 6
starts from $42,990 plus on-road costs (~$45,524 D/A), while the
Mitsubishi Outlander Plug-in Hybrid EV
currently kicks off from $57,290 plus on-roads (or $57,990 D/A as currently promoted), but will soon be updated.
While more expensive than the BYD's base pricing, the MG Super Hybrid offers a longer electric driving range from its 24.7kWh LFP battery – rated at 135km NEDC, or 120km WLTP. Combined with a full 55-litre fuel tank, MG Australia says owners can expect 1000km or more of combined driving range.
The MG HS Super Hybrid runs the same 220kW/350Nm 1.5-litre turbo-petrol PHEV system as the model offered in the UK market, though the Chinese brand's local division has tuned the drivetrain to act more like a conventional hybrid with a big battery, rather than prioritising EV driving like its overseas equivalent.
As we detailed in
our recent pre-production drive
, the MG HS Super Hybrid will default to 'HEV' mode, and when its battery is charged it will drive as an EV up to speeds of 80km/h, then as an HEV above that. It will also turn on the petrol engine when maximum acceleration is demanded via a throttle kickdown.
MG quotes a 0-100km/h acceleration time of 6.8 seconds, and combined fuel consumption of 'under 5.0L/100km in real-world driving conditions' when its useable EV range is depleted.
Full pricing and specifications for the Australian range are still to be confirmed ahead of the PHEV's September launch, though CarExpert understands it will largely be aligned with Excite and Essence versions of the HS 1.5T petrol model – you can read our full price and specs story
here
.
MG Motor Australia has also confirmed the Super Hybrid will be backed by the Chinese brand's 10-year/250,000km new vehicle warranty, and near-100-strong national dealership network. Stay tuned to CarExpert for all the latest.
MORE:
2025 MG HS Super Hybrid review – Quick drive
MORE:
Everything MG HS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
21 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese's gas project extension is a mistake - but it's not too late
The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.
The Age
43 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump rages at ‘hustler' judges with his tariff agenda at mercy of the courts
Washington: President Donald Trump's sweeping worldwide tariffs will remain in place while the government pursues an appeal that will almost certainly be decided by the Supreme Court, with the administration saying it expects America's trading partners to keep negotiating deals in the meantime. The Court of International Trade on Thursday struck down a large swath of Trump's tariffs, finding the president overstepped his legal authority by using emergency powers. Less than 24 hours later, a federal judge in Washington made the same finding in a separate case. However, on Thursday (Friday AEST) a federal appeals court agreed to temporarily preserve the tariffs – which include a 10 per cent levy on Australian goods – while the appeal is urgently held. The White House said it expected the matter to be settled by the US Supreme Court, which could receive an appeal as soon as Friday. The government will argue that Trump has the authority to enact the tariffs under his foreign affairs and national security powers. 'The courts should have no role here,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. 'There is a troubling and dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision-making process. 'America cannot function if President Trump – or any other president for that matter – has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges. These judges are threatening to undermine the credibility of the United States on the world stage.' Trump later issued his first public remarks on the initial Court of International Trade ruling – which found the US Constitution gave Congress exclusive authority to regulate commerce with other countries – calling it 'wrong' and 'political'.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Wouldn't put a number on it': Marles open to raising defence spending after Hegseth meeting
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has pushed his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, to ramp up defence spending to counter China's increasing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific, as the two men talked up the strength of the alliance under the Trump administration. Marles would not divulge what spending figure the pair had discussed, but America's demand would be likely to mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding. Marles confirmed Australia was open to further budget increases after meeting with Hegseth on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's top defence summit, as he prepared to deliver a speech on Saturday warning of the risk of an unchecked arms build-up by China and other major nuclear powers. 'I wouldn't put a number on it. The need to increase defence spending is something that he definitely raised,' Marles told ABC TV on Friday. 'We have done a lot already, but we are absolutely up for having this conversation, and we want to calibrate our defence spending to meet the strategic moment that we all face.' Marles said Hegseth's request was consistent with the broader push by the Trump administration for its allies to spend more on defence in order to benefit from the US security guarantee. Hegseth's defence expenditure drive builds on similar calls by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, who in March said Australia's military spending should rise to at least 3 per cent of gross domestic product, saying Canberra faced a 'powerful challenge in China'. It comes after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Thursday criticised a report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, which found a lack of short-term defence funding had left the Australian Defence Force unprepared for conflict, and also called for an expenditure increase to 3 per cent of GDP.
