logo
National Native Organizations and Tribal Leaders Respond to Ann Clouter's ‘We Didn't Kill Enough Indians' Remark

National Native Organizations and Tribal Leaders Respond to Ann Clouter's ‘We Didn't Kill Enough Indians' Remark

Yahoo12-07-2025
When conservative pundit Ann Coulter posted 'We didn't kill enough Indians' this past weekend, she wasn't just spreading hate speech—she was launching a direct attack on tribal sovereignty and the inherent right of Native nations to exist.
Since Tuesday, national Native organizations and tribal leaders have issued statements in response. While excerpts from some of these have appeared in previous coverage, we are publishing the full, unedited statements received by our newsroom here:
Statement by the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI)
The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) emphatically condemns the hateful, genocidal statement of Ann Coulter on July 6, 2025, through a post on the social platform X, declaring: 'We didn't kill enough Indians.' There is no place in society for this direct incitement of hatred and violence toward American Indian and Alaska Native people.
Never miss Indian Country's biggest stories and breaking news. Click here to sign up to get our reporting sent straight to your inbox every weekday morning.
'These words are not provocative social commentary; they are a violent attack on Native people and Tribal Nations. Celebrating genocide against Tribal Nations crosses every moral line,' said NCAI President Mark Macarro. 'Careless comments like this glorify the darkest chapters of U.S. history and actively endanger Native peoples' lives today. We will not sit silently at attempts to normalize this abhorrent behavior. We demand an immediate retraction and public apology — and we expect leaders of every political persuasion to denounce this abomination without equivocation.'
'Free speech does not confer a license to advocate for or justify mass murder — past or present,' added NCAI Executive Director Larry Wright, Jr. 'When a public figure with more than two million followers romanticizes extermination, it fuels harassment, hate crimes, and political violence. Silence from elected officials and media outlets will only normalize this genocidal history. We call on them to speak up now.'
NCAI further demands that X enforce against vitriol like this and send a message that such inciting hate speech will not be tolerated by banning this individual from their platform. Instead of amplifying divisive and inhuman perspectives, let us turn our attention to celebrating the powerful, nation-building contributions of Tribal Nations to the United States.
NCAI encourages all Americans to learn more about the many contributions that Native peoples and Tribal Nations have made and continue to make to this country. Visit a Tribal Nation near you, explore the National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C., or New York, read from abundant award-winning literature produced by American Indians and Alaska Natives. We encourage all media outlets, elected leaders, educators, and individual Americans to uplift these living stories of service, innovation, and cultural resilience. In centering these and other Native achievements, we reject hatred and misinformation, celebrate our Tribal sovereignty, and honor our shared community and history.
Statement by John E. Echohawk, Executive Director, Native American Rights Fund
Yesterday, pundit Ann Coulter stated on X (formerly Twitter) that 'we didn't kill enough Indians.' The post was shared more than a million times. As a writer and a lawyer, Coulter knows that words matter, especially for someone with her platform. Suggesting that Native Americans—whose communities and cultures persist and thrive despite the American government having systematically taken Native lands, children, religions, and lives—deserve to die or were not persecuted enough, is ignorant and immoral.Although abhorrent, this language is not new. Getting rid of Native Americans has been the stated goal of a slew of U.S. policies from the Trail of Tears to the Termination Era. One hundred years ago, policy makers engaged in cultural genocide: killing the Indian to save the man. Many advocated to just kill the Indians. Genocidal language aimed at Native Americans was supposed to be something of the past. It was something that mainstream society had rejected and moved past—until Coulter's post.We call on all those who are decent, who have moral values, to denounce this type of hate speech. We should not treat each other in this way. The dark history of the United States' policies towards Native people should not be repeated. Join us in standing up for the rights of Native people and preserving our existence for generations to come.
Statement by the National Indian Health Board
The National Indian Health Board (NIHB) condemns the genocidal and hateful statement made by Ann Coulter: 'We didn't kill enough Indians.' This is not free speech, it is hate speech. And its consequences extend far beyond the digital space.
This kind of language is not a joke. It is violence—violence that echoes through generations, reopens wounds, and contributes to the devastating rates of depression, suicide, and trauma that too many of our Native youth are forced to carry. Words like these are not abstract; they directly impact how young Native people see themselves, their safety, and their worth in a country that has already tried to erase them.
Our communities are still healing from government-sanctioned boarding schools that attempted to strip Native children of their language, culture, and identity. These systems created lasting intergenerational trauma—trauma that Native families continue to confront and work through today. Reckoning with this truth is part of the healing process.
READ Native News Online's Editor Levi Rickert's Opinion on Ann Clouter's Remark
'Our children hear these words. They internalize them. And far too often, they are left to wonder if their lives matter in the eyes of this country,' said NIHB Chairman William 'Chief Bill' Smith, Valdez Native and Alaska Area Representative. 'When prominent voices glorify genocide, it sends a dangerous message—that Native people are less than human. That message threatens the mental health, identity, and future of Native youth everywhere.'
NIHB joins with Tribal Nations and Native organizations across the country in calling for a full retraction, public apology, and immediate accountability from all levels of leadership and media. We further urge social media platforms like X to enforce community standards and ban voices that incite racial hatred and violence.
From suicide prevention to cultural revitalization, NIHB and its partners work every day to help Native youth heal from historical and contemporary trauma. But we cannot do this work alone. We need a country that respects our children enough to condemn hate without hesitation.
Native Nations contributed to the earliest forms of American democracy and continue to lead in public health, medicine, and community care. These truths must be honored.
As Americans, we must not repeat or excuse past harms—we must learn from them and walk forward together in healing and truth.
There is no health without respect. There is no healing without truth. And there is no excuse for celebrating genocide.
Statement by Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin, Jr., Cherokee Nation
Ann Coulter's post this evening on X that 'we didn't kill enough Indians,' is beyond abhorrent. It is dangerous hate speech designed to inflict damage on a marginalized community and designed to arouse support in the deepest darkest gutters of social media. Although it is tempting to decline to dignify her regressive attack on Native Americans, I cannot and will not. This is no time for timidity.
Coulter's statement, on its face, is a despicable rhetorical shot trained on the First Peoples of this continent, designed to dehumanize and diminish us and our ancestors and puts us at risk of further injury. We have faced enough of that since this country's founding. Such rhetoric has aided and abetted the destruction of tribes, their life ways, languages and cultures, the violation of treaty rights, violence, oppression, suppression and dispossession. It should not be lost on any of us that Coulter's lament that 'we didn't kill enough Indians' takes place against the backdrop of our relatively low average life expectancies, high suicide rates and the epidemic of missing and murdered indigenous people, just to name a few aspects of our continuing struggle.
The cruelty of Coulter's comments are, of course, self-evident to decent human beings from all quarters. We have made much progress in the United States as it relates to federal Indian policy. Conservatives, liberals, Republicans and Democrats have had a hand in advancing this cause, which is so special to me as Chief of the nation's largest tribe, particularly over the last half century. Coulter's statement tonight would be extreme even by 19th century standards (though I believe President Andrew Jackson would like and share her post if he lived among us today.)
Though her star power has faded over the decades, Ann Coulter remains an opinion leader in the United States and beyond. Her account on 'X,' formerly Twitter, has 2.1 million followers. Her post has been shared over 1.4 million times as of this writing. She is a published author and appears frequently in television media. Her opinion, though peppered over the years with vitriolic attacks on marginalized populations, matters.
It is not simply that Coulter chose to attack Native Americans that moves me to speak out this evening. It is my deep concern that these sorts of attacks aimed at minorities and other marginalized populations in the country is at risk of being normalized. Her attack does not take place in a vacuum and it is not an outlier. It occurs at a time attacks on marginalized populations seem to be on repeat, used to score political points, to advance policy agendas, and sometimes to scare people to advance all of that and more. The country frequently seems on the verge of political violence. Coulter's post implicitly encourages it.
We can get used to the frequent attacks and watch silently as this group and that group is dehumanized and diminished. Hatred in the public will become white noise, accepted as 'just the way it is.' Alternatively, we can speak out against it.
What Ann Coulter said is heartless, vicious and should be repudiated by people of good faith regardless of political philosophy or party. Some things are simply wrong and we cannot validate it through our silence. I will not and cannot chase every hateful social media comment aimed at Native Americans. But, at a moment when I remain optimistic that people of good will across parties, faiths, philosophies, regions, races, political status can work to unify the country, denouncing Ann Coulter's regret that we 'did not kill enough Indians' is surely the right thing to do. Please join me.
Statement by Chief Ben Barnes (Shawnee Tribe), Chairperson, United Indian Nations of Oklahoma
United Indian Nations of Oklahoma condemns Ann Coulter's comments on Native Americans
Shawnee Chief and UINO Chairperson Ben Barnes today released the following statement repudiating conservative media pundit Ann Coulter's inflammatory statement regarding Native Americans.
'Ann Coulter's vile comment that 'we didn't kill enough Indians' is not only morally repugnant—it is a stain on the conscience of this country.
As a Tribal Nation whose people endured forced removals, massacres, broken treaties, and generations of erasure, we do not need reminders of America's darkest chapters. We live with the consequences every day—yet we continue to stand, speak our language, raise our children in our traditions, and govern ourselves with dignity.
Ms. Coulter's words dishonor every value this nation claims to uphold, and they have no place in any civilized discourse.But let us be clear: we do not respond with hate. We respond with truth, resilience, and the strength of our ancestors. We are still here. We are still sovereign. And we are not going anywhere.'
About the Author: "Native News Online is one of the most-read publications covering Indian Country and the news that matters to American Indians, Alaska Natives and other Indigenous people. Reach out to us at editor@nativenewsonline.net. "
Contact: news@nativenewsonline.net
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump moves nuclear submarines after ex-Russian president's comments
Trump moves nuclear submarines after ex-Russian president's comments

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump moves nuclear submarines after ex-Russian president's comments

US President Donald Trump says he has ordered two nuclear submarines to "be positioned in the appropriate regions" in response to "highly provocative" comments by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. In a post on social media, Trump said he acted "just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances". He did not say where the two submarines were being deployed. Medvedev has posted several comments in recent days threatening the US in response to Trump's ultimatum to Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, or face tough sanctions. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the former president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions". On Monday, Medvedev accused Trump of playing "the ultimatum game with Russia". In a post on X, the former Russian president said that "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war". Earlier this month, Medvedev described Trump's ultimatum as "theatrical", saying that "Russia didn't care". And writing on Telegram on Thursday, Medvedev warned of a "dead hand" threat - which some military analysts understood as a reference to the codename of Russia's retaliatory nuclear strikes control system. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.

President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report
President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report

President Trump said in a social media post Friday afternoon that he directed members of his administration to fire Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after the BLS on Friday published the July jobs report that contained what it called "larger than normal" revisions to data from May and June. The July jobs report published Friday morning showed the US economy added 73,000 jobs last month, fewer than expected while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%. The most notable number to emerge from the report, however, was a downward revision to job gains in May and June which that saw 258,000 jobs taken away from what had been initially reported. May's job gains were revised down to 19,000 from 144,000, while June's additions were cut to just 14,000 from the 147,000 initially reported. In its release on Friday, the BLS said these revisions, "result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." Economists on Friday were near-unanimous in their view that July's jobs data and the revisions to May and June reflect a labor market that is far weaker than had been suggested by recent data and characterizations by some officials, notably Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. "The 'solid' state of the labor market described by the FOMC earlier this week looks more questionable after the July employment report," Wells Fargo senior economists Sarah House wrote in a note Friday. Job gains over the last three months have now averaged just 35,000 after Friday's revisions. This is breaking news, more to come...

Trump orders two nuclear submarines to be moved after 'highly provocative' comments from ex-Russian president
Trump orders two nuclear submarines to be moved after 'highly provocative' comments from ex-Russian president

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump orders two nuclear submarines to be moved after 'highly provocative' comments from ex-Russian president

Donald Trump says he has ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the "appropriate regions" in a row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. It comes after Mr Medvedev, who is now deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, told the US president on Thursday to remember Moscow had Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort. On Friday, Mr Trump wrote on social media: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The spat between Mr Trump and Mr Medvedev came after the US president warned Russia on Tuesday it had "10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face tariffs, along with its oil buyers. Moscow has shown no sign it will agree to Mr Trump's demands. Read more: Mr Medvedev accused Mr Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and reminded him Russia possessed a Soviet-era automated nuclear retaliatory system - or "dead hand" - after Mr Trump told him to "watch his words" and said he's "entering very dangerous territory!" Mr Medvedev, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, was referring to a secretive semi-automated Soviet command system designed to launch Russia's missiles if its leadership was taken out in a decapitating strike. He added: "If some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the United States, then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path." He also said "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war" between Russia and the US. Mr Medvedev served as Russia's president from 2008 and 2012, when Mr Putin was barred from seeking a second consecutive term, but then stepped aside to let him run again. As deputy chair of Russia's National Security Council, he has become known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since Moscow invaded Ukraine in 2022. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store